Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
1.
EuroIntervention ; 19(7): 571-579, 2023 Sep 18.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482940

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) improves clinical symptoms and quality of life. The longer-term safety of PCI compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains uncertain. AIMS: We sought to evaluate the long-term safety of PCI for CTO in a randomised trial as compared to OMT. METHODS: A total of 396 patients with a symptomatic CTO were enrolled into a randomised, multicentre clinical trial comparing PCI and OMT. Half of the patients had a single CTO; the others had multivessel disease. Non-CTO lesions were treated prior to randomisation (2:1 ratio). During follow-up, crossover from OMT to PCI occurred in 7.3% (1 year) and 17.5% (3 years) of patients. RESULTS: At 3 years, the incidence of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the groups (OMT 3.7% vs PCI 6.2%; p=0.29). By per-protocol analysis, the difference remained non-significant (OMT 5.7% vs PCI 4.7%; p=0.67). Overall, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were more frequent with OMT (OMT 21.2% vs PCI 11.2%), largely because of ischaemia-driven revascularisation. The rates of stroke or hospitalisation for bleeding were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years there was no difference in the rate of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction between PCI or OMT among patients with a remaining single coronary CTO. The MACE rate was higher in the OMT group due largely to ischaemia-driven revascularisation. CTO PCI appears to be a safe option for patients with a single remaining significant coronary CTO. CinicalTrials.gov: NCT01760083.


Sujet(s)
Occlusion coronarienne , Infarctus du myocarde , Intervention coronarienne percutanée , Humains , Occlusion coronarienne/imagerie diagnostique , Occlusion coronarienne/thérapie , Résultat thérapeutique , Intervention coronarienne percutanée/effets indésirables , Intervention coronarienne percutanée/méthodes , Qualité de vie , Infarctus du myocarde/thérapie , Maladie chronique , Facteurs de risque
2.
Eur Heart J ; 39(26): 2484-2493, 2018 07 07.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29722796

RÉSUMÉ

Aims: The clinical value of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic coronary total occlusions (CTOs) is not established by randomized trials. This study should compare the benefit of PCI vs. optimal medical therapy (OMT) on the health status in patients with at least one CTO. Method and results: Three hundred and ninety-six patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized, multicentre, open-label, and controlled clinical trial to compare the treatment by PCI with OMT with a 2:1 randomization ratio. The primary endpoint was the change in health status assessed by the Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) between baseline and 12 months follow-up. Fifty-two percent of patients have multi-vessel disease in whom all significant non-occlusive lesions were treated before randomization. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed including 13.4% failed procedures in the PCI group and 7.3% cross-overs in the OMT group. At 12 months, a greater improvement of SAQ subscales was observed with PCI as compared with OMT for angina frequency [5.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75; 8.71; P = 0.003], and quality of life (6.62, 95% CI 1.78-11.46; P = 0.007), reaching the prespecified significance level of 0.01 for the primary endpoint. Physical limitation (P = 0.02) was also improved in the PCI group. Complete freedom from angina was more frequent with PCI 71.6% than OMT 57.8% (P = 0.008). There was no periprocedural death or myocardial infarction. At 12 months, major adverse cardiac events were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention leads to a significant improvement of the health status in patients with stable angina and a CTO as compared with OMT alone. Trial registration: NCT01760083.


Sujet(s)
Antagonistes bêta-adrénergiques/usage thérapeutique , Angine de poitrine/thérapie , Inhibiteurs de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine/usage thérapeutique , Occlusion coronarienne/thérapie , Inhibiteurs de l'hydroxyméthylglutaryl-CoA réductase/usage thérapeutique , Nitrates/usage thérapeutique , Intervention coronarienne percutanée , Antiagrégants plaquettaires/usage thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , Angine de poitrine/étiologie , Maladie chronique , Occlusion coronarienne/complications , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Qualité de vie
3.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 65(22): 2388-400, 2015 Jun 09.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26046732

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: A retrograde approach improves the success rate of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs). OBJECTIVES: The authors describe the European experience with and outcomes of retrograde PCI revascularization for coronary CTOs. METHODS: Follow-up data were collected from 1,395 patients with 1,582 CTO lesions enrolled between January 2008 and December 2012 for retrograde CTO PCI at 44 European centers. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and further revascularization. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 62.0 ± 10.4 years; 88.5% were men. Procedural and clinical success rates were 75.3% and 71.2%, respectively. The mean clinical follow-up duration was 24.7 ± 15.0 months. Compared with patients with failed retrograde PCI, successfully revascularized patients showed lower rates of cardiac death (0.6% vs. 4.3%, respectively; p < 0.001), myocardial infarction (2.3% vs. 5.4%, respectively; p = 0.001), further revascularization (8.6% vs. 23.6%, respectively; p < 0.001), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (8.7% vs. 23.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). Female sex (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33 to 3.18; p = 0.001), prior PCI (HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.60; p = 0.011), low left ventricular ejection fraction (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.22 to 4.83; p = 0.011), J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score ≥3 (HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.27; p = 0.002), and procedural failure (HR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.72 to 3.57; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The number of retrograde procedures in Europe has increased, with high percents of success, low rates of major complications, and good long-term outcomes.


Sujet(s)
Occlusion coronarienne/chirurgie , Hôpitaux , Intervention coronarienne percutanée/méthodes , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Enregistrements , Maladie chronique , Coronarographie , Occlusion coronarienne/diagnostic , Occlusion coronarienne/mortalité , Électrocardiographie , Europe/épidémiologie , Femelle , Études de suivi , Mortalité hospitalière/tendances , Humains , Incidence , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études prospectives , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutique
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE