RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) in women of reproductive age has surged globally, contributing to increased rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a crucial marker for diagnosing and monitoring PGDM, with periconceptional levels influencing the risk of congenital anomalies and complications. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between periconceptional HbA1c levels and perinatal complications in pregnant women with poorly controlled PGDM. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of pregnancies between 2010 and 2019, HbA1c > 6% at 3 months prior to conception or during the first trimester. Outcomes of periconceptional HbA1c levels were compared. RESULTS: The cohort included 89 women: 49 with HbA1c 6-8%, 29 with HbA1c 8-10%, and 11 with HbA1c > 10%. Higher HbA1c levels were more prevalent in type 1 diabetics and were associated with increased end-organ damage risk. Women with elevated HbA1c levels tended toward unbalanced glucose levels during pregnancy. The cohort exhibited high rates of preterm delivery, hypertensive disorders, cesarean delivery, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Overall live birth rate was 83%. While a significant correlation was found between HbA1c levels and preterm delivery, no consistent association was observed with other adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Periconceptional glycemic control in PGDM pregnancies is important. Elevated HbA1c levels are associated with increased risks of adverse outcomes. Beyond a certain HbA1c level, risks of complications may not proportionally escalate.
Sujet(s)
Hémoglobine glyquée , Issue de la grossesse , Grossesse chez les diabétiques , Humains , Grossesse , Femelle , Hémoglobine glyquée/analyse , Issue de la grossesse/épidémiologie , Adulte , Études rétrospectives , Grossesse chez les diabétiques/épidémiologie , Grossesse chez les diabétiques/sang , Diabète de type 1/sang , Diabète de type 1/complications , Diabète de type 1/épidémiologie , Naissance prématurée/épidémiologie , Naissance prématurée/étiologie , Nouveau-né , Glycémie/analyse , Glycémie/métabolisme , Césarienne/statistiques et données numériquesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether single sonographic abdominal circumference (AC) discordancy estimation can predict small for gestational age (SGA) at birth in twin gestations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Cohort included all twin gestations delivered at one university-affiliated medical center between 2010 and 2018, with available sonographic evaluation from 22 gestational weeks to term. Pregnancies complicated by fetal chromosomal abnormalities, major anomalies or twin to twin transfusion syndrome were excluded. One sonographic evaluation per pregnancy was selected randomly. AC discordance was calculated as (large twin AC - small twin AC)/large twin AC*100. Prediction of SGA at birth for at least one newborn (<10% percentile for gestational age by gender-specific local curves for multiples) was evaluated using ROC statistics with calculation of Youden index to establish best AC discordance cutoff. AC discordance prediction performance was compared to estimated fetal weight discordance performance. Results were adjusted for confounders using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: After exclusion, 236 twin gestations entered analysis. Of them, 200/236 (84.7%) were dichorionic-diamniotic twins. Mean gestational age at ultrasound evaluation and at delivery were 30.9 ± 4.4 and 35.9 ± 2.4 weeks, respectively. In 28/236 (11.8%) pregnancies, at least one neonate was born SGA. AC discordance predicted SGA at birth as good as sonographic estimated fetal weight (sEFW) discordance: ROC-AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.85 vs. 0.77 95% CI 0.66-0.87, p < .001 for all. Best AC discordance cutoff for prediction of SGA at birth was 7.1% (57% sensitivity, 87% specificity), ROC-AUC 0.72 (95% CI 0.61-0.84, p < .001). Results remained significant after adjustment for maternal age, nulliparity, chorionicity and ultrasound to delivery interval (aOR 1.21 95% CI 1.1-1.32, p < .001). CONCLUSION: According to our results, AC discordance at single sonographic evaluation can predict SGA at birth in twin gestations as good as sEFW discordance. Best cutoff for SGA prediction was 7.1%.
Sujet(s)
Poids du foetus , Grossesse gémellaire , Poids de naissance , Femelle , Retard de croissance intra-utérin , Âge gestationnel , Humains , Nouveau-né , Grossesse , Courbe ROC , Études rétrospectives , Jumeaux dizygotes , Échographie prénatale/méthodesRÉSUMÉ
Objective To construct new reference values for biometrical measurements and sonographic estimated fetal weight (sEFW) in twin gestations and compare them to previously published normograms. Methods A retrospective analysis of sEFW evaluations of twin gestations was performed between 2011 and 2016 in a single university-affiliated medical center. sEFW was calculated using the Hadlock 1985 formula. To avoid selection bias, one evaluation per pregnancy was randomly selected. Following mathematical transformation to obtain normality of values, normograms were constructed using a best-fit regression model for estimation of mean and standard deviation at each gestational age (GA). Normograms were validated by applying all observations to ensure equal distribution at parallel percentiles. Our normograms were then compared to previously published sEFW normograms for twin gestations. Results A total of 864 sEFW evaluations were performed on 195 twin pregnancies at 22-39 gestational weeks. Of them, 390 entered the primary analysis. The rest were left for validation. Seventy percent of the cohort were dichorionic-diamniotic twins (136/195), 16% (32/195) were monochorionic-diamniotic twins and three (1.5%) were monochorionic-monoamniotic twins. Twenty-four fetuses lacked data on chorionicity. The rest were monochorionic twins or were of unknown chorionicity. Values corresponding to the 2.5th, 10th, 50th, 90th and 97.5th percentiles for sEFW are presented for every GA. Validation by applying all 864 evaluations on constructed normograms was achieved. Comparison to previously published twins' sEFW normograms demonstrated wide variation between curves. Conclusion New reference values for biometrical measurements and sEFW in twin gestations are presented for clinical and research use. Comparison to other curves demonstrates the wide variability and need for further investigation on twin's normal growth.