Immediate versus Delayed Attachment Incorporation Impact on Prosthetic Aftercare among Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture Wearers.

BACKGROUND: Substantial effort is dedicated to finding the most favorable parameters that will ensure low aftercare demands among edentulous patients wearing mandibular implant supported overdentures (MISODs). The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare prosthetic aftercare between MISOD patients with a simultaneous (group A) vs. a three-week settling in period (group B) prior to attachment incorporation. METHODS: Forty-five patients enrolled in this study. Two implants per patient were placed using a two-stage implant insertion protocol. Second-stage surgery was performed after three months. All patients received ball attachments using the direct (chairside) incorporation method. Twenty-two patients received their dentures with simultaneous attachment activation and the rest-twenty-three patients-after a three-week settling in period. Patients' files were scanned for aftercare visits. Outcome parameters included sore spot relief, attachment incorporation, and denture repair. Additionally, gingival index measurements were compared. Confounding factors included age, gender, and implant dimensions. RESULTS: The mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 84 ± 21 months, and the range 39-120 months. The mean number of visits for group A vs. B respectively: pressure sores relieve (3.63 ± 0.84 vs. 3.71 ± 0.61, p = 0.581), liner exchange due to loss of retention (2.09 ± 1.03 vs. 2.31 ± 1.04 p = 0.487), and gingival index (1.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.03 ± 0.2, p = 0.653) exhibited no statistically significant differences between the tested groups. No statistically significant differences between the groups were also noted for the denture repair aftercare treatments (p = 0.318) and the independent variables including age, gender, and implant length. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic aftercare in MISOD wearers is similar whether a simultaneous or a three-week settling in period for attachment incorporation is applied.

Primary Teeth Supported Fixed Prosthesis-A Predictable Treatment Alternative.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with tooth agenesis often present a significant clinical challenge for dental practitioners. This retrospective study evaluated clinical and radiological long-term functional and esthetic outcomes following restoration using primary teeth to support fixed all-ceramic prosthesis in patients with teeth agenesis. METHODS: Patients with teeth agenesis and at least one year follow-up were included. Examinations included panoramic X-ray, clinical examination and family history records. Only primary teeth without permanent teeth underneath were chosen. All ceramic fixed restorations were used. All data were collected from patient files. Outcome parameters included: restoration parameters (restoration survival, restoration fractures, restoration detachment, restoration replacement, and secondary caries), plaque index, and gingival index. RESULTS: The study included 58 porcelain restorations inserted in 25 individuals; mean age 12 ± 2.1 years (range 10-19 years); mean number of missing teeth 12.3 ± 9 (range 6-12). Mean follow-up 48 ± 6 months (range 12-60 months). All restorations survived up to last follow-up, rendering a survival rate of 100%. Restorations outcome-porcelain chipping (9%), detachment (2%), no restoration replacement nor secondary caries, mean gingival index-0.7 ± 0.5 and mean plaque index-0.9 ± 0.3. CONCLUSIONS: In tooth agenesis, restoration using primary teeth to support fixed all-ceramic prosthesis is a viable treatment alternative.

Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns.

Marginal fit is an important clinical factor that affects restoration longevity. The accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques was compared by marginal fit assessment using the nondestructive method. A stainless steel master cast containing three abutments with three metal crowns matching the three preparations was used to make 45 impressions: group A = single-step technique (putty and wash impression materials used simultaneously), group B = two-step technique with a 2-mm relief (putty as a preliminary impression to create a 2-mm wash space followed by the wash stage), and group C = two-step technique with a polyethylene spacer (plastic spacer used with the putty impression followed by the wash stage). Accuracy was assessed using a toolmaker microscope to measure and compare the marginal gaps between each crown and finish line on the duplicated stone casts. Each abutment was further measured at the mesial, buccal, and distal aspects. One-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. P values and Scheffe post hoc contrasts were calculated. Significance was determined at .05. One-way analysis of variance showed significant differences among the three impression techniques in all three abutments and at all three locations (P < .001). Group B yielded dies with minimal gaps compared to groups A and C. The two-step impression technique with 2-mm relief was the most accurate regarding the crucial clinical factor of marginal fit.

Post-traumatic implant-supported restoration of the anterior maxillary teeth using cancellous bone block allografts.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the outcome of dental implants placed in the post-traumatic anterior maxilla after ridge augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried block bone allografts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with a history of anterior dentoalveolar trauma with bony deficiencies in the sagittal (≥3 mm) and vertical (<3 mm) planes according to computed tomography were included. The recipient sites were reconstructed with cancellous bone block allografts. After 6 months of healing, implants were placed. The primary outcomes of interest were 1) bone measurements taken before grafting, at the time of implant placement, and at stage 2 operations; 2) implant survival; and 3) complications. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 20 consecutive patients with a mean age of 25 ± 7 years. We used 28 cancellous allogeneic bone blocks, and 31 implants were inserted. Of the 31 implants, 12 were immediately restored. The mean follow-up was 42 ± 15 months. Graft and implant survival rates were 92.8% and 96.8%, respectively. Mean bone gain in the sagittal and vertical planes was 5 ± 0.5 mm horizontally and 2 ± 0.5 mm (P < .001). Successful restoration was achieved in all patients with fixed implant-supported prostheses. Soft tissue complications occurred in 7 patients (35%). Complications after cementation of the crowns were seen in 3 implants (9.6%). All implants remained clinically osseointegrated at the end of the follow-up examination. There was no crestal bone loss around the implants beyond the first implant thread. CONCLUSION: Cancellous block allograft can be used successfully for post-traumatic implant-supported restoration in the anterior maxilla.

Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.

PURPOSE: The present study was designed to compare the long-term outcome and complications of cemented versus screw-retained implant restorations in partially edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with bilateral partial posterior edentulism comprised the study group. Implants were placed, and cemented or screw-retained restorations were randomly assigned to the patients in a split-mouth design. Follow-up (up to 15 years) examinations were performed every 6 months in the first year and every 12 months in subsequent years. The following parameters were evaluated and recorded at each recall appointment: ceramic fracture, abutment screw loosening, metal frame fracture, Gingival Index, and marginal bone loss. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were treated with 221 implants to support partial prostheses. No implants during the follow-up period (mean follow-up, 66 ± 47 months for screw-retained restorations [range, 18 to 180 months] and 61 ± 40 months for cemented restorations [range, 18 to 159 months]). Ceramic fracture occurred significantly more frequently (P < .001) in screw-retained (38% ± 0.3%) than in cemented (4% ± 0.1%) restorations. Abutment screw loosening occurred statistically significantly more often (P = .001) in screw-retained (32% ± 0.3%) than in cement-retained (9% ± 0.2%) restorations. There were no metal frame fractures in either type of restoration. The mean Gingival Index scores were statistically significantly higher (P < .001) for screw-retained (0.48 ± 0.5) than for cemented (0.09 ± 0.3) restorations. The mean marginal bone loss was statistically significantly higher (P < .001) for screw-retained (1.4 ± 0.6 mm) than for cemented (0.69 ± 0.5 mm) restorations. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcome of cemented implant-supported restorations was superior to that of screw-retained restorations, both clinically and biologically.

The effect of splinting implant-supported restorations on stress distribution of different crown-implant ratios and crown height spaces.

PURPOSE: To assess whether splinting can counterbalance the detrimental effects of varying the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio and crown height space (CHS) by decreasing nonaxial overload stresses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three implants were inserted into a photoelastic block model. Two strain gauges were cemented onto the neck of each implant on the buccal and lingual aspects and provided a simultaneous direct reading of strain. Four groups of splinted cement-retained restorations with C/I ratios of 1:1, 1:1.5, 1:1.75, and 1:2 were used. CHSs were 10, 15, 17.5, and 20 mm, respectively. Fifteen static loadings were carried out simultaneously with 20-kg weights via a custom-built loading apparatus at 30° to the vertical axis. RESULTS: Occlusal force application at 30° showed a statistically significant increase in both buccal (1,911.65 ± 110 vs 3,252.06 ± 150) and palatal (35.58 ± 7 vs 286.85 ± 15) microstrain values as the C/I ratio increased from 1:1 to 1:1.5 (P < .001). Force application at 30° in cases with C/I ratios of 1:1.75 and 1:2 resulted in fracture of the abutment screw followed by dislodgement of the crowns. Failures were noted at a CHS of 15 mm or greater. CONCLUSIONS: In this biomechanical mode, splinting does not prevent prosthetic failure when the CHS is 15 mm or greater. Vertical bone augmentation is highly recommended in cases with a CHS of 15 mm or greater.

The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations.

PURPOSE: To measure the transfer of axial and nonaxial load in unsplinted fixed implant supported restoration with varying crown to implant (C/I) ratios and crown height space (CHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A photoelastic block model was constructed. Three holes were drilled vertically in a straight line in the mid axis of the photoelastic model at predetermined locations to lengths of 12 mm. Three implants were inserted into the model. Two strain gauges were cemented onto the neck of each implant on the buccal and lingual aspects, which provided a simultaneous direct reading of strain. Four groups of cement retained restorations with C/I ratios of 1:1; 1:1.5; 1:1.75, and 1:2 were used. CHS were 10, 15, 17.5, and 20 mm, respectively. Fifteen static loadings were carried out simultaneously with 20 kg weights via a custom-built loading apparatus at 0 and 30 degrees to the vertical axis. Descriptive analysis consisted of mean and standard deviation of microstrain values for each group. Groups were compared by the use of the 1-way parametric analysis of variance. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Occlusal force application at 30 degrees showed a statistically significant increase in both buccal (1,588 ± 150 vs 2,610.59 ± 150) and palatal (64.92 ± 7 vs 146.59 ± 15) microstrain values as C/I ratio increased from 1:1 to 1:1.5 (P < .001). Force application at 30 degrees in cases with C/I ratio of 1:1.75 and 1:2 resulted in fracture of the abutment screw followed by dislodgment of the crowns. Failures were noted at CHS >15 mm. CONCLUSIONS: CHS is more significant than the C/I ratio in assessing biomechanical-related detrimental effects. Prosthetic failure occurred at CHS ≥ 15 mm.

Long-term prosthetic aftercare of direct vs. indirect attachment incorporation techniques to mandibular implant-supported overdenture.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this long-term study was to compare the need for prosthetic aftercare of direct vs. indirect attachment incorporation techniques to mandibular implant-supported overdenture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients were included (130 implants were placed). Treatment was randomly allocated, resulting in 22 patients (group A) to be treated with direct ball attachment incorporation and 23 patients (group B) to be treated with indirect ball attachment incorporation. All patients were treated by experienced oral-maxillofacial surgeons/periodontists and experienced prosthodontists/residents. From the first day that the patients visited the clinic up to 20 years after the first treatment session, all surgical or prosthetic therapeutic interventions were recorded. The recorded data for the present study included the number of aftercare visits and dental treatment received (pressure sores relieve, liner changes due to loss of retention and attachment replacement due to wear). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 93±57 months. No implants were lost. Statistical analysis revealed a statistically significantly (P<0.001) greater need for prosthetic interventions in group B vs. group A. The mean number of visits dedicated to - pressure sores relieve (7.04±1.4 vs. 3.63±0.84); liner exchange due to loss of retention (3.6±1.3 vs. 1.09±1.06) was significantly higher in group B. Attachment replacement due to wear occurred only in group B (11/23 - 47.8%). CONCLUSION: The direct technique for attachment incorporation in mandibular implant-supported overdentures using ball attachments is superior to the indirect technique from the aftercare perspective during a long-term evaluation period.

Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible.

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the outcome of ridge augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried block bone allografts in the posterior atrophic mandible followed by placement of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A bony deficiency of at least 3 mm, horizontally, vertically, or both, according to computerized tomography (CT) para-axial reconstruction served as inclusion criteria. Implants were inserted after a healing period of 6 months. Bone measurements were taken prior to bone augmentation, during implant placement, and at second-stage surgery. Marginal bone loss and crown-to-implant ratio were also measured. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cancellous allogeneic bone blocks were placed in 21 patients. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Bone block survival rate was 79.3%. Mean horizontal and vertical bone gains were 5.6 and 4.3 mm, respectively. Mean buccal bone resorption was 0.5 mm at implant placement and 0.2 mm at second-stage surgery. A total of 85 implants were placed. Mean bone thickness buccal to the implant neck was 2.5 mm at implant placement and 2.3 mm at second-stage surgery. There was no evidence of vertical bone loss between implant placement and second-stage surgery. Implant survival rate was 95.3%. All patients received a fixed implant-supported prosthesis. At the last follow-up, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.5 mm. The mean crown-to-implant ratio was 0.96. CONCLUSION: Implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible following augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried bone block allografts may be regarded as a viable treatment alternative.

Analysis of complications following augmentation with cancellous block allografts.

BACKGROUND: Bone grafting may be associated with soft and hard tissue complications. Recipient site complications encountered using cancellous block allografts for ridge augmentation are analyzed. METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive patients (62 females and 39 males; mean age 44 ± 17 years) were treated with implant-supported restoration of 137 severe atrophic alveolar ridges augmented with cancellous bone-block allografts. Alveolar ridge deficiency locations were classified as anterior maxilla (n = 58); posterior maxilla (n = 32 sinuses); posterior mandible (n = 32); and anterior mandible (n = 15). A total of 271 rough-surface implants were placed. Recipient site complications associated with block grafting (infection, membrane exposure, incision line opening, perforation of mucosa over the grafted bone, partial graft failure, total graft failure, and implant failure) were recorded. RESULTS: Partial and total bone-block graft failure occurred in 10 (7%) and 11 (8%) of 137 augmented sites, respectively. Implant failure rate was 12 (4.4%) of 271. Soft tissue complications included membrane exposure (42 [30.7%] of 137); incision line opening (41 [30%] of 137); and perforation of the mucosa over the grafted bone (19 [14%] of 137). Infection of the grafted site occurred in 18 (13%) of 137 bone blocks. Alveolar ridge deficiency location had a statistically significant effect on the outcome of recipient site complications. More complications were noted in the mandible compared to the maxilla. Age and gender had no statistically significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: Failures caused by complications were rarely noted in association with cancellous block grafting. The incidence of complications in the mandible was significantly higher. Soft tissue complications do not necessarily result in total loss of cancellous block allograft.

Intrasocket reactive soft tissue for primary closure after augmentation of extraction sites with severe bone loss before implant placement.

PURPOSE: The normal bone resorption after tooth extraction can be significantly aggravated in the case of pre-existing severe bone loss and chronic infection. Bone augmentation procedures have been proposed, but they require adequate closure of soft tissues. We propose the use of intrasocket reactive tissue to cover extraction sites augmented by bovine bone mineral graft to promote the success of the graft procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 24 patients with severe bone loss and chronic pathology in 27 sites. The intrasocket reactive soft tissue was elevated from the bony walls in a subperiosteal plane. Porous bovine or allograft bone mineral was placed in the extraction site without membranes, and the intrasocket reactive soft tissue was sutured over the grafting material to seal the coronal portion of the socket. Twenty-seven implants were placed 6 months after bone augmentation. RESULTS: Healing progressed uneventfully. Postoperative morbidity was minimal. There was no leakage or infection of the grafting material. The mean time to implant placement was 7.8 months. Supplemental augmentation was not needed. There were no implant failures. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months (mean, 15 months). All implants were rehabilitated with fixed prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Intrasocket reactive soft tissue can be used predictably to obtain primary closure of augmented extraction sites with severe bone loss with minimal postoperative morbidity.