Water with food intake does not influence caloric intake after gastric bypass (GBP): a cross-over trial.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric patients seeking information meet very different recommendations on postoperative diet and eating behaviour. A reason for variability may be lack of hard evidence. A national survey on current dietary advice was conducted to serve as background for the present study on how drinking during a meal influenced caloric consumption. METHODS: A standardised questionnaire was sent to all units in the Scandinavian Obesity surgery registry (SOReg) in order to obtain information regarding current diet advice after gastric bypass. Twenty-eight patients, 14 in each group, were studied either 2 months or 1 year after a standard gastric bypass (GBP). A standardised lunch was served on two separate days with or without water in randomised order. Meal and water weights were measured before and after. Hunger/satiety scores were obtained using visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Response rate for surgeons was low, for dieticians 75 %. No clear consensus for liquid intake during meals was found; few surgeons advised patients whether or not to drink with meals. All patients ate to full satiety. Two months post-GBP, 7/14 patients consumed more solid food when allowed drinking water; the increase in caloric consumption was not significant. One year post-GBP, 5/14 patients consumed more solid food when allowed drinking water, the difference not reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Our study does not indicate that patients should refrain from drinking during meals the first year after a GBP, at least not from a caloric intake point of view.

High-volume bariatric surgery in a single center: safety, quality, cost-efficacy and teaching aspects in 2,000 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Obesity surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity and the fastest growing area in surgery. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the gold standard procedure in many countries. Optimization of the treatment process is important in order to keep the morbidity rate down and cost of treatment as low as possible. METHODS: In September 2005, we established a bariatric surgery program. Until December 2010, 2,000 patients underwent LRYGB. Clinical pathways were established, with focus on safety, fast-track methodology and training of surgeons. Time recordings from all parts of the treatment, as well as clinical outcome, were prospectively registered. RESULTS: Time consumption for the total procedure in the operating theater was reduced from 102 to 54 min (P < 0.001). With only 11 min turnover between patients, the total time for one patient has been reduced to 65 min, enabling us to perform six operations in a single operating theater during ordinary daytime. Early complication rate was 2.8%, and mean hospital stay was 2.3 days. We were able to double the patients treated in 2010 compared to 2007 with only 10% increase in staff. Three surgeons were trained during the period into fully qualified senior bariatric surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal evidence-based care within the fast-track methodology and routine time recordings was successful in order to increase the production volumes and reduce costs, without compromising the safety or quality for the patients. This kind of approach may be transferred to other types of standardized surgery.

Effects of prolonged increased intra-abdominal pressure on gastrointestinal blood flow in pigs.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of prolonged intra-abdominal pressure on systemic hemodynamics and gastrointestinal blood circulation. METHODS: The intra-abdominal pressure in anesthetized pigs was elevated to 20 mmHg (7 animals), 30 mmHg (7 animals), and 40 mmHg (4 animals), respectively. These pressures were maintained for 3 h by intra-abdominal infusion of Ringer's solution. A control group of seven animals had normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Transit time flowmetry and colored microspheres were used to measure blood flow. RESULTS: An IAP of 20 mmHg did not cause significant changes in systemic hemodynamics or tissue blood flow. An IAP of 30 mmHg caused reduced blood flow in the portal vein, gastric mucosa, small bowel mucosa, pancreas, spleen, and liver. Serum lactate increased in animals with an IAP of 30 mmHg, but microscopy did not disclose mucosal damage in the stomach or small bowel. An IAP of 40 mmHg was followed by severe circulatory changes. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged IAP at 20 mmHg did not cause changes in general hemodynamics or gastrointestinal blood flow. Prolonged IAP at 30 mmHg caused reduced portal venous blood flow and reduced tissue flow in various abdominal organs, but no mucosal injury. A prolonged IAP of 40 mmHg represented a dangerous trauma to the animals.