Seropersistence of SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (COVID-19 vaccine): 6-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled, observer-blind, phase 2/3 immuno-bridging study in Indian adults.

AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) is a replication-deficient adenoviral vectored coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vaccine that is manufactured as SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 by the Serum Institute of India Pvt Ltd following technology transfer from Oxford University/AstraZeneca. The non-inferiority of SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 with AZD1222 was previously demonstrated in an observer-blind, phase 2/3 immuno-bridging study (trial registration: CTRI/2020/08/027170). In this analysis of immunogenicity and safety data 6 months post first vaccination (Day 180), 1,601 participants were randomized 3:1 to SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or AZD1222 (immunogenicity/reactogenicity cohort n = 401) and 3:1 to SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or placebo (safety cohort n = 1,200). Immunogenicity was measured by anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike (anti-S) binding immunoglobulin G and neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers. A decline in anti-S titers was observed in both vaccine groups, albeit with a greater decline in SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinees (geometric mean titer [GMT] ratio [95% confidence interval (CI) of SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 to AZD1222]: 0.60 [0.41-0.87]). Consistent similar decreases in nAb titers were observed between vaccine groups (GMT ratio [95% CI]: 0.88 [0.44-1.73]). No cases of severe COVID-19 were reported following vaccination, while one case was observed in the placebo group. No causally related serious adverse events were reported through 180 days. No thromboembolic or autoimmune adverse events of special interest were reported. Collectively, these data illustrate that SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 maintained a high level of immunogenicity 6 months post-vaccination. SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was safe and well tolerated.

Economic Burden of Gaucher Disease at a Tertiary Care Public Hospital in Mumbai.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the economic burden of patients diagnosed with Gaucher disease at a public hospital from a societal perspective. METHODS: Data from 30 Gaucher patients visiting the Genetic Clinic of the Department of Pediatrics at the study site in Mumbai was analyzed between January 2019 and January 2021. A cost of illness analysis was undertaken to estimate direct, indirect and intangible costs. Costs in treated and treatment naive groups were compared. RESULTS: The total cost (direct and indirect) for 30 patients was ₹25,45,74,743/- (3440199.2 USD). Majority of this cost (99.8%) was due to direct costs of which medications [Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and Substrate reduction therapy (SRT)] constituted 98.8%. The notional cost was ₹1,43,94,695. Total costs of 14 treated patients were ₹25,29,67,279 and 16 treatment naive patients were ₹16,15,064 with a ratio of 157:1. Direct costs and cost of school absenteeism were significantly higher in the treated subgroup. Overall, direct, total costs and costs of school absenteeism were significantly associated with age and disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of Gaucher disease is a staggering amount. This is an underestimate, as the expenses are highly subsidized in a public health facility. The highest contributor to cost component was direct costs, especially medication costs. Against the backdrop of the National Policy for Rare Diseases, resource allocation towards Gaucher disease should consider short term measures for judicious funding or reimbursement of disease-specific therapy and long-term cost-effective measures for promoting preventive strategies as the most practically feasible solution to reduce this economic burden.

Low-dose emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with severe hemophilia A: a retrospective study bringing new hope for our patients.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose emicizumab can potentially offer a cost-effective treatment option in persons with hemophilia A, especially in developing countries. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose emicizumab with those on low-dose factor (F)VIII prophylaxis via chart review. METHODS: After ethics approval, chart data of 2 groups of patients were reviewed: group 1 (low-dose emicizumab, n = 10; 3 mg/kg monthly without a loading dose) and group 2 (low-dose FVIII prophylaxis, n = 10; 10-20 IU/kg of FVIII concentrates twice a week). Outcomes were target joints, annual bleeding rate, annual joint bleeding rate, Hemophilia Joint Health Score, nonactivated thromboelastometry-rotational thromboelastometry clotting time, plasma emicizumab levels, and direct costs of treatment. RESULTS: All outcome measures were significantly better in the low-dose emicizumab group than in the low-dose FVIII prophylaxis group. For nonactivated thromboelastometry-rotational thromboelastometry, median values after 6 months in the low-dose emicizumab group were comparable with values seen in patients with mild hemophilia, while the values in the low-dose FVIII prophylaxis group were similar to those of patients with moderate hemophilia. The direct cost of low-dose emicizumab was found to be approximately US $6000 and that for low-dose recombinant FVIII prophylaxis used in our study was US $6282 (the cost may range from US $3432 to $7920 depending on the type of factor) when compared to approximately US $15 000 for standard-dose emicizumab. CONCLUSION: Low-dose emicizumab offers a cost-effective treatment option and can improve access in developing countries. These findings need to be confirmed in a larger and better-controlled study.

Economic burden of beta-thalassaemia major receiving hypertransfusion therapy at a public hospital in Mumbai.

Background Treating beta-thalassaemia major may entail high costs with considerable out-of-pocket expenditure. Therefore, determination and valuation of the economic costs of a common haemoglobinopathy such as beta-thalassaemia major in India may provide insights to evolve policies for reduction or elimination of the disease. We estimated economic burden of beta-thalassaemia major in Mumbai in terms of cost to the family and the healthcare system. Methods This single-centre, prospective, cross-sectional, non-interventional study included children <12 years of age treated at the thalassaemia day care centre of a public hospital in Mumbai. The demographic data and treatment-related information was recorded. Cost of illness was studied from a societal perspective by the prevalence-based approach. Direct (medical and non-medical), indirect (loss of wages and loss of school days) and intangible costs (closed-ended iterative bidding) were calculated for each patient by interview. Results The total annual cost of treating 130 children with beta-thalassaemia major in Mumbai was ₹86 72 412 (US$ 127 535) or ₹66 710 (US$ 981) per patient per year and ₹12 82 30 412 (US$ 1 885 741) including intangible costs. Direct costs contributed to 94% of the cost of illness with chelation therapy (23%) and blood investigations (21%) being major contributors. Direct and indirect costs correlated significantly with duration of blood transfusion (p<0.05 and p=0.006, respectively), whereas indirect costs correlated with socioeconomic status (rho=0.25). Conclusion The majority (94%) of costs incurred by families for treatment of beta-thalassaemia major are direct costs, especially expenses for chelation and blood investigations. Even at subsidized rates, financial burden to the families from lower socioeconomic strata is likely to be considerable as these are out-of-pocket expenses. In consideration of the economic impact of treating beta-thalassaemia major in individual families, the healthcare system and society, it is prudent to promote and pursue long-term and short-term measures with urgent emphasis on prevention as a public health activity at the national level in India.

Safety and immunogenicity of SII-NVX-CoV2373 (COVID-19 vaccine) in adults in a phase 2/3, observer-blind, randomised, controlled study.

Background: NVX-CoV2373, a Covid-19 vaccine was developed in the USA with ∼90% efficacy. The same vaccine is manufactured in India after technology transfer (called as SII-NVX-CoV2373), was evaluated in this phase 2/3 immuno-bridging study. Methods: This was an observer-blind, randomised, phase 2/3 study in 1600 adults. In phase 2, 200 participants were randomized 3:1 to SII-NVX-CoV2373 or placebo. In phase 3, 1400 participants were randomized 3:1 to SII-NVX-CoV2373 or NVX-CoV2373 (940 safety cohort and 460 immunogenicity cohort). Two doses of study products (SII-NVX-CoV2373, NVX-CoV2373 or placebo) were given 3 weeks apart. Primary objectives were to demonstrate non-inferiority of SII-NVX-CoV2373 to NVX-CoV2373 in terms of geometric mean ELISA units (GMEU) ratio of anti-S IgG antibodies 14 days after the second dose (day 36) and to determine the incidence of causally related serious adverse events (SAEs) through 180 days after the first dose. Anti-S IgG response was assessed using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and neutralizing antibodies (nAb) were assessed by a microneutralization assay using wild type SARS CoV-2 in participants from the immunogenicity cohort at baseline, day 22, day 36 and day 180. Cell mediated immune (CMI) response was assessed in a subset of 28 participants from immunogenicity cohort by ELISpot assay at baseline, day 36 and day 180. The total follow-up was for 6 months. Trial registration: CTRI/2021/02/031554. Findings: Total 1596 participants (200 in Phase 2 and 1396 in Phase 3) received the first dose. SII-NVX-CoV2373 was found non-inferior to NVX-CoV2373 (anti-S IgG antibodies GMEU ratio 0.91; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.06). At day 36, there was more than 58-fold rise in anti-S IgG and nAb titers compared to baseline in both the groups. On day 180 visit, these antibody titers declined to levels slightly lower than those after the first dose (13-22 fold-rise above baseline). Incidence of unsolicited and solicited AEs was similar between the SII-NVX-CoV2373 and NVX-CoV2373 groups. No adverse event of special interest (AESI) was reported. No causally related SAE was reported. Interpretation: SII-NVX-CoV2373 induced a non-inferior immune response compared to NVX-CoV2373 and has acceptable safety profile. Funding: SIIPL, Indian Council of Medical Research, Novavax.

An audit of US FDA warning letters issued to sponsors, institutional review boards and investigators over a six-year period.

The present audit was carried out with the objective of evaluating warning letters (WLs) issued to trial sponsors, clinical investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) by the United States Food and Drug Administration during a six-year period and compare it with two similar earlier audits. WLs were reviewed and classified as per stakeholders and further categorised as per predefined violation themes. The chi-square test was performed for trend analysis of WLs. A total of 62 WLs were issued to the three stakeholders. The maximum number of WLs were issued to the clinical investigators (36/62, 58.06%), followed by sponsors (19/62, 30.64%), and least to the IRBs (7/62, 11.29%). Among sponsors, lack of standard operating procedures for the monitoring, receipt, evaluation and reporting of post-marketing adverse drug events was the most common violation theme (8/19, 42.1%). Among clinical investigators, deviation from investigational plan was the most common violation theme (31/36, 86.11%.). For IRBs, inadequate documentation was the most common violation theme (6/7, 85.71%). We saw an overall reduction in the number of WLs issued to the stakeholders. Thus, we identified multiple areas on which each stakeholder should work for improvement.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Safety of Hydroxychloroquine in a Randomized Controlled Trial and Observational Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has recently become the focus of attention in the current COVID-19 pandemic. With an increase in the off-label use of HCQ, concern for the safety of HCQ has been raised. We, therefore, performed this systematic review to analyze the safety data of HCQ against placebo and active treatment in various disease conditions. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and Observational Studies (OSs) that evaluated HCQ for the treatment of any disease other than COVID19 in adult patients up to May 2020. We assessed the quality of the included studies using Risk of Bias 2 (for RCTs) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (for OSs). Data were analyzed with randomeffect meta-analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to identify heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 6641 studies were screened, and 49 studies (40 RCTs and 9 OSs) with a total sample size of 35044 patients were included. The use of HCQ was associated with higher risks of TDAEs as compared to placebo/no active treatment [RR 1.47, 95%CI 1.03-2.08]. When HCQ was compared with active treatments, the risks of AEs [RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86] and TDAEs were less in the HCQ arm [RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.81]. The outcomes did not differ in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the use of HCQ was associated with a lower risk of AEs and TDAEs as compared to active treatment, whereas posing higher risk of TDAEs as compared to placebo.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of fosfomycin versus nitrofurantoin for the treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (UTI) in women - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are among the most frequent medical conditions requiring outpatient treatment. Single dose oral fosfomycin (300 mg) and the older nitrofurantoin (100 mg for 5 days) have been found to be more effective than other first-line drugs in multiple studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out with the objective of evaluating their comparative efficacy and safety in the management of uncomplicated UTI. Two authors independently searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, and Google Scholar till Nov 2020 using MeSH terms and free text. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing both drugs for efficacy and safety in uncomplicated UTI in adult women were included. The primary outcome measures were microbiological and clinical cure rates. The search resulted in n = 663 studies out of which only four studies (three for treatment of uncomplicated UTI in women and one for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy) satisfied the selection criteria. No significant differences in clinical, (RR 0.95, 95% CI - 0.81, 1.12) and microbiological cure, (RR 0.96, 95% CI - 0.84, 1.08) were found within 4 weeks of treatment. The incidence of adverse events was found to be more in fosfomycin relative to the nitrofurantoin group (RR 1.05, 95% CI - 0.59, 1.87). Hence, single-dose fosfomycin presents a potentially useful and safe treatment option for the treatment of uncomplicated UTI in women and asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy.

An analysis of invitations for article submission received via emails.

Predatory journals charge publication fees from authors and publish without an adequate peer review, and often do not provide editorial and/or publishing services. Our objective was to evaluate e-mail solicitations received by authors in a defined time period to identify attributes of these solicitations as a metric to identify legitimacy of the journal. All e-mails seeking article submission received between January 1 and September 30, 2019, were evaluated. Each e-mail along with its respective webpage was evaluated for the journal's and publisher's names, mention of peer review, any assurance of publication, a mention of article processing charges (APC), composite invites [in the e-mail] and mention of peer review, the presence and functionality of archives, presence of manuscript management tab, mention of APC [on the webpage]. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis. Of the 135 e-mails screened, 100 were finally included in the analysis. We found that 72% of the journals and/ or publishers were included in Beall's list. According to our criteria, a total of 85% of the solicitations were from journals that we identified as "presumed predatory". Our study has identified assurance of publication, rapid turnaround time, ambiguous information in the email and webpage, false claims of indexing as some descriptors which may help young authors and researchers assess a journal's legitimacy.

Evaluation of satisfaction and reasons for participation in a Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial: A single-centre, observational study.

Background In May 2020, WHO recognized the role of extensive immunization for interrupting the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The development of such vaccines in clinical trials relies upon participants who are expected to be vested in the research process. Assessment of participant factors such as motivation and satisfaction are hence important to gauge perspective and ensure successful conduct and completion of these trials. Methods We administered a validated three-domain questionnaire to and documented the binary categorical responses (yes/no) of participants (after informed consent) who had taken both doses of COVOVAX™ in a phase 3 trial at our institute. Association of the dependent variables (participant responses) with the independent variables (participant demographics and socioeconomic strata) was computed using Chi-square test at 5% significance. In case of a significant association, Bonferroni post-hoc test was applied for multiple comparisons. Results Of the 78 participants who were administered the questionnaire, two-thirds were highly satisfied with their experience at our site. Gaining access to a new vaccine was a primary motivation overall (74%) and also in graduates (p=0.03) and middle-class population (p=0.002), whereas the lower-middle class population (p<0.0001) and those educated till secondary school (p=0.003) took part due to the long wait for government-approved vaccines. Conclusion Participants in a Covid-19 vaccine trial at Mumbai were largely satisfied with the care given to them though altruism did not feature as a primary reason for participation.

A phase 2/3, participant-blind, observer-blind, randomised, controlled study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (COVID-19 vaccine) in adults in India.

BACKGROUND: This phase 2/3 immunobridging study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Coronavirus Vaccine (Recombinant) (SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19), manufactured in India at the Serum Institute of India Pvt Ltd (SIIPL), following technology transfer from the AstraZeneca. METHODS: This participant-blind, observer-blind study randomised participants 3:1 to SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) (immunogenicity/reactogenicity cohort) and 3:1 to SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or placebo (safety cohort). The study participants were enrolled from 14 hospitals across India between August 25 and October 31, 2020. Two doses of study products were given 4 weeks apart. The primary objectives were to demonstrate non-inferiority of SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 to AZD1222 in terms of geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibodies 28 days after the second dose (defined as lower limit of 95% CI >0·67) and to determine the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) causally related to SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. The anti-spike IgG response was assessed using a multiplexed electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay. Safety follow-up continued until 6 months after first dose. Trial registration: CTRI/2020/08/027170. FINDINGS: 1601 participants were enrolled: 401 to the immunogenicity/reactogenicity cohort and 1200 to the safety cohort. After two doses, seroconversion rates for anti-spike IgG antibodies were more than 98·0% in both the groups. SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was non-inferior to AZD1222 (GMT ratio 0·98; 95% CI 0·78-1·23). SAEs were reported in ≤ 2·0% participants across the three groups; none were causally related. A total of 34 SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported; of which 6 occurred more than 2 weeks after the second dose; none were severe. INTERPRETATION: SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 has a non-inferior immune response compared to AZD1222 and an acceptable safety/reactogenicity profile. Pharmacovigilance should be maintained to detect any safety signals. FUNDING: SIIPL funded the contract research organisation and laboratory costs, while the site costs were funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research. The study vaccines were supplied by SIIPL and AstraZeneca.

A two-year evaluation of the minutes of Investigational New Drug committee meetings.

INTRODUCTION: The Investigational New Drug (IND) committee advises the Drug Controller General of India on matters pertaining to clinical trials (CTs) of IND for clinical development. An audit of the minutes of this committee's meetings would shed light on the drug discovery in India. METHODS: Minutes of the IND committee meetings available in the public domain (2-year period) were evaluated. The applications which were postponed were excluded from the study. Outcome measures were therapeutic areas of IND, purpose of the applications, status of registration with the CT Registry of India (CTRI), and the innovator country. RESULTS: The minutes of N = 7 meetings were available in the public domain for the period January 2017-December 2018 with N = 45 agenda items. One agenda item was excluded, and n = 44 agenda items were finally analyzed. The total number of therapeutic agents discussed was N = 29, of which n = 7/29 and n = 6/29 belonged to infectious diseases (ID) and oncology, respectively. The total number of purposes of these applications was N = 46, of which n = 35/46 (76%) were to seek permission to conduct a CT, and n = 31/35 (88.6%) were found registered with CTRI as on April 01, 2019. Of the N = 46 purposes, n = 33/46 (71.7%) were approved. Of the n = 29 INDs discussed, n = 19/29 (65.52%) were of the Indian origin. CONCLUSIONS: Although a majority (65%) of INDs discussed in the meetings were of the Indian origin, the drug discovery was not in line to tackle the top ten causes of years of life lost prematurely (barring ID).

Evaluation of Allergic Reactions following COVID - 19 Vaccination in Patients with Documented Allergies.

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: The government guidance regarding COVID-19 vaccination lists food allergy, drug allergy and history of anaphylaxis as contraindications for receiving vaccination. This study was planned to evaluate such patients listed in the database of an allergy center and who took any COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: Data on n=255 patients was mined. Inclusions were those over 18 years, any allergic diathesis and receipt of at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. Age, gender, nature of allergy and type of COVID vaccine taken along with outcome of interest [occurrence or otherwise of all allergic reaction post vaccination] was collated. RESULTS: Data of 227 patients were finally analysed. Eighty one took the first dose and 33 took both doses. None with food and/or drug allergy and/or a history of anaphylaxis developed any adverse event (AE) post vaccination. Three AEs were seen in those with other allergic diathesis. Two AEs [One to COVAXIN™ and one to COVISHIELD™] were only generalized itching that were self-limiting. A female patient had itching with palmar erythema [post COVISHIELD™] which subsided after a week's treatment with an antihistamine. She had a history of allergy to radiocontrast media containing polyethylene glycol/PEG] indicating possible allergy to polysorbate 80 [PEG related compound contained in COVISHIELD™]. CONCLUSION: No patient fitting contraindications for COVID-19 vaccination laid down by the Indian government developed any allergic reaction post vaccination. The guidelines for vaccination may be revisited to make them more inclusive with appropriate training of the vaccination centre staff.

An evaluation of drug lag for new drugs approved by the Indian regulator relative to the United States, European Union, and Japanese regulatory agencies: A 15-year analysis (2004-2018).

BACKGROUND: The approval process of every drug regulatory agency differs, and hence, the time required for the approval of a new drug varies. This results in a drug lag and India is no exception to this phenomenon. A drug lag precludes Indian patients from accessing new medicines at the same time as they are approved elsewhere. Against this backdrop, we assessed the absolute and relative drug lags of the Indian regulator relative to three regulators in mature markets, namely United States (US), European Union (EU), and Japan. METHODS: International nonproprietary names were used to identify new drugs. Their dates of approval (2004-2018) from the online database of four regulatory agencies were identified. Both absolute and relative drug lags were calculated for India as compared to US, EU, and Japan as well for all the agencies relative to the Indian regulator. RESULTS: We identified a total of 453, 473, 424, and 472 new drugs approved over the study period in India, US, EU, and Japan, respectively. The absolute drug lag of Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) was 19 and 18 relative to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Japan Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), respectively. The relative drug lag for the CDSCO vis-a-vis the US FDA, European Medicines Agency, and PMDA was 43.2 (2.1-1287.8), 25.6 (0.03-1310.5), and 30.3 (1.2-1242) months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study shows a significant drug lag between India and other three developed nations (US, EU, and Japan). However, in some therapeutic areas, Indian regulator has proactively approved new drugs much before other agencies. The New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rule of 2019 has brought hope for reduction in drug lag in the near future.

Evaluation of vanillin as a probe drug for aldehyde oxidase and phenotyping for its activity in a Western Indian Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Aldehyde oxidase (AO), a molybdoflavoenzyme, is emerging as a key player in drug discovery and metabolism. Despite having several known substrates, there are no validated probes reported for studying the activity of AO in vivo. Vanillin (4-hydroxy 3-methoxy benzaldehyde) is an excellent substrate of AO, in vitro. In the present study, vanillin has been validated as an in vivo probe for AO. Subsequently, a phenotyping study was carried out using vanillin in a subset of Indian population with 100 human volunteers. METHODS: For the purposes of in vitro probe validation, initially the metabolism of vanillin was characterized in partially purified guinea pig AO fraction. Further, vanillin was incubated with partially purified xanthine oxidase fraction and AO fractions, and liver microsomes obtained from different species (in presence and absence of specific inhibitors). For the phenotyping study, an oral dose of 500 mg of vanillin was administered to the participants in the study and cumulative urine samples were obtained up to 8 h after giving the dose. The samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography and metabolic ratios were calculated as peak area ratio of vanillic acid/vanillin. RESULTS: (a) The results of the in vitro validation studies clearly indicated that vanillin is preferentially metabolized by AO. (b) Normal distribution tests and probit analysis revealed that AO activity was not normally distributed and that 73.72% of the participants were fast metabolizers, 24.28% intermediate metabolizers, and 2% were slow metabolizers. CONCLUSIONS: Data of the phenotyping study suggest the existence of AO polymorphism, in a Western Indian cohort.

Has mandatory prospective registration of all studies brought about a change? A 1-year audit of studies registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India [CTRI] before and after April 1, 2018.

INTRODUCTION: The Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI) that initially permitted retrospective registration moved to mandatory prospective registration of studies with effect from April 1, 2018. The present study was an audit that compared registration 1 year post the rule versus a year prior to it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All studies registered with the CTRI from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2018, and subsequently from April 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019, were included for the analysis. The extents of retrospective registration a year pre and a year post April 1, 2018, of all studies were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 4628 studies were registered prior to April 1, 2018, and 5438 post that. Pre April 1, 2018, 2687 / 4628 (58.06%) studies were retrospectively registered, while post that, 1100 / 5438 (20.23%) studies were retrospectively registered (cOR: 5.46 [5.0, 5.9], P < 0.001). Regardless of whether the studies were PG theses, regulatory studies, observational studies, or interventional studies, there was a statistically significant reduction in the number retrospectively registered post April 1, 2018, relative to the year predating it. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The success of CTRI's decision to move to prospective registration is seen in the overall reduction in the total number of retrospective registrations from nearly two-thirds in the year predating April 1, 2018, to just a quarter in the year post that, indicating significant inroads made by the CTRI with regard to raising awareness. Some regulatory studies continue to be retrospectively registered and this presents a significant ethical and regulatory breach. This could be potentially addressed by linking ethics committee approval with trial registration.

Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Diazepam from an Intranasal Aqua-Triggered In-Situ (ATIS) Gelling Microemulsion: Monitoring Brain Uptake by Microdialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An innovative intranasal aqua-triggered in-situ (ATIS) gel is a polymer-free in-situ gelling microemulsion which gels instantaneously on contact with minute quantities of water to form a mucoadhesive gel. The objective of the study was to develop ATIS diazepam (ATIS-diazepam) as an alternative to the injection for epileptic emergencies and evaluate its brain uptake and nose-to-brain targeting efficiency in rats. METHODS: ATIS-diazepam (1 mg/100 µL) was prepared and characterized for in vitro formulation characteristics. An LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the bioanalysis of diazepam. In vivo studies for pharmacokinetics, brain uptake and nasal irritation of intranasal ATIS-diazepam were conducted in rats. Brain uptake was investigated with brain microdialysis, a highly sensitive technique enabling quantification of free drug, which correlates to efficacy. RESULTS: ATIS-diazepam exhibited globule size < 200 nm, low viscosity, negative zeta potential and good stability. A significant increase in mucoadhesion was exhibited by ATIS-diazepam following the addition of a small quantity of water. ATIS-diazepam showed burst release in pH 6.4 with 50% diazepam release in ~ 10 min, which was sustained over 1 h. The absolute bioavailability was ~ 50% with both intranasal free-diazepam and ATIS-diazepam. Intranasal administration of ATIS-diazepam revealed immediate absorption with rapid and high brain extracellular fluid concentration compared to intravenous free-diazepam solution. The estimated direct transport potential and drug targeting efficiency of intranasal ATIS-diazepam was significantly higher (2-fold) than intranasal free-diazepam solution, which was attributed to the mucoadhesive and microemulsion properties of ATIS-diazepam. The nasal irritation study revealed the safety of ATIS-diazepam compared to free-diazepam solution. CONCLUSION: Intranasal ATIS-diazepam showed promise of higher direct nose-to-brain targeting, better safety and hence has an immense implication in the treatment of epileptic emergencies.

Factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: A five-year audit.

INTRODUCTION: A key determinant of the success of any study is the recruitment and subsequent retention of participants. Screen failure and dropouts impact both the scientific validity and financial viability of any study. We carried out this audit with the objective of evaluating the recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted over the last five years at our center. METHODS: Studies completed between 2014 and 2018 at our center were included. Screening ledgers and study trackers were hand searched for screen failures and dropouts. Four pre-identified predictors were evaluated - risk as per the classification of Indian Council of Medical Research 2017 Ethical Guideline, nature of funding, study design, and nature of participants. Association of the predictors with screen failures and dropouts was determined using crude odds ratios along with 95% confidence intervals. All analyses were done at 5% significance using Microsoft Excel 2016. RESULTS: A total of n = 19 completed studies had n = 2567 screened and n = 2442 enrolled participants with a screen failure and dropout rate of 5% and 4%, respectively. We found 59% screen failures due to abnormal laboratory values. The main reasons for dropouts were lost to follow-up 86 (88%). High-risk and interventional studies were the predictors for both screen failures and dropouts, but pharmaceutical industry-funded studies and healthy participants were predictors for only screen failures. CONCLUSION: Risk, funding, study design, and nature of participants are important to be considered while planning studies to minimize screen failures and dropouts.

Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: Challenges and solutions.

Drug development is a tedious and expensive procedure and it takes roughly 10 to 15 years to take a potential treatment from bench to bedside and costs the pharmaceutical companies as much as USD ~2 billion for the process. Delay in investigator-initiated studies can cause financial loss to grant providers (either public or private) and investigator's reputation may also be at stake. Participant recruitment and retention are two major bottlenecks in conducting clinical trials and contribute vastly to the delays. They are essential for both scientific validity of the clinical study and economic reasons. Thus, issues in recruitment and retention should be addressed and minimized. A proper recruitment and retention plan incorporating adequate communication between all stakeholders will eventually avoid the delays in drug development and make treatments available to the consumer at an earlier date and at a more affordable price. Awareness of challenges and reviewing strategies that can optimise recruitment and retention will facilitate drug development. The article gives a first-person perspective on challenges and proposed solutions from an experienced clinical study centre in a tertiary care hospital.