RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is an important challenge for the Nigerian healthcare system and multiple stakeholder mitigation is imperative. Faith institution mitigation is evolving but the opinion of healthcare leaders on their involvement in hypertension remains an important gap. OBJECTIVE: To explore the perspectives of a cross-section of leaders of healthcare institutions in Lagos (Nigeria) on faith institution-facilitated hyper tension inter vention against the background of current practice. METHODS: Attempts were made to recruit 152 healthcare institution leaders who were contacted using electronic mails, telephone conversations, institutional social media communication, institutions' web-mails and other contacts. The views of consenting leaders were gathered using an exploratory questionnaire survey, and analysed. RESULTS: The views of 23 leaders from the variety of institutions were that most (60%) hypertension cases were diagnosed during emergency presentations; and the public's hypertension health knowledge remains generally inadequate. Hypertension information dissemination was mostly verbal rather than in written/print form. Basic resources are deployed in hypertension management. There was majority support for collaboration in hypertension health promotion (90.0%), blood pressure screening (95.7%) and hypertension referral (95.5%). Fewer institutions had the resources to support hypertension health promotion (55.0%) and blood pressure screening (42.1%) compared to hypertension referral (90.9%). CONCLUSION: There is good support for faith institution involvement in hypertension health, with a particular interest in and capacity for health system referral. Deploying scarce resources to collaborate may be challenging. However, collaboration and better resources could improve hypertension prevention and management. Further work is needed for context specific innovation so faith institutions can contribute to hypertension health.
CONTEXTE: L'hypertension représente un défi majeur pour le système de santé nigérian, et une atténuation impliquant plusieurs parties prenantes est impérative. L'atténuation par les institutions religieuses est en évolution, mais l'opinion des leaders de la santé sur leur implication dans l'hypertension reste une lacune importante. OBJECTIF: Explorer les perspectives d'un échantillon de leaders d'institutions de santé à Lagos, Nigeria, sur l'intervention contre l'hypertension facilitée par les institutions religieuses, dans le contexte de la pratique actuelle. MÉTHODES: Des tentatives ont été faites pour recruter 152 dirigeants d'établissements de santé qui ont été contactés par courriels électroniques, conversations téléphoniques, communication sur les médias sociaux institutionnels, courriers électroniques des établissements et autres contacts. Les points de vue des dirigeants consentants ont été recueillis à l'aide d'une enquête par questionnaire exploratoire, puis analysés. RÉSULTATS: Les opinions de 23 dirigeants provenant de divers établissements indiquaient que la plupart des cas d'hypertension (60%) étaient diagnostiqués lors de présentations aux urgences; et les connaissances du public sur la santé liée à l'hypertension demeurent généralement insuffisantes. La diffusion d'informations sur l'hypertension se faisait principalement de manière verbale plutôt que sous forme écrite/imprimée. Des ressources de base sont utilisées dans la gestion de l'hypertension. Une majorité soutenait la collaboration dans la promotion de la santé liée à l'hypertension (90,0%), le dépistage de la tension artérielle (95,7%) et l'orientation des patients atteints d'hypertension (95,5%). Moins d'institutions avaient les ressources pour soutenir la promotion de la santé liée à l'hypertension (55,0 %) et le dépistage de la pression artérielle (42,1 %) par rapport à l'orientation vers l'hypertension (90,9 %). CONCLUSION: Il existe un soutien significatif pour l'implication des institutions religieuses dans la santé liée à l'hypertension, avec un intérêt particulier et une capacité à orienter vers le système de santé. Le déploiement de ressources limitées pour la collaboration peut présenter des défis. Cependant, la collaboration et de meilleures ressources pourraient améliorer la prévention et la gestion de l'hypertension. Des travaux supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour des innovations spécifiques au contexte afin que les institutions religieuses puissent contribuer à la santé liée à l'hypertension. MOTS- CLÉS: Hypertension, Lagos, Institutions religieuses, Responsables de la santé, Intervention.
Sujet(s)
Hypertension artérielle , Humains , Nigeria , Mâle , Études transversales , Femelle , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Adulte , Leadership , Promotion de la santé/méthodes , Adulte d'âge moyen , Organisations confessionnellesRÉSUMÉ
There is ongoing scientific and policy debate about the role e-cigarettes play in tobacco control, with concerns centring around unknown long-term effects, and the potential industry co-option of harm reduction efforts, including marketing to youths. There is substantial evidence of the influence of conventional cigarette promotion on smoking behaviours in Anglophone countries, and the popularity of social networking sites, as well as the lack of marketing regulations on the commercial promotion of electronic cigarettes online, suggest an urgent need to explore this topic further. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence related to the influence of e-cigarette commercial promotion on social media on positive perceptions of vaping and vaping behaviours in core Anglophone countries. Searches were conducted in CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Embase, Epistemonikos, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Science Citation Index, on the 21st of July 2022. From 1,385 studies, 11 articles were included in the final review, using diverse study designs, including focus groups, content analysis, cross-sectional studies, and experiments. The studies were primarily based in the U.S. and evidenced the association between the commercial promotion of e-cigarettes on social media with positive perceptions of vaping and vaping behaviours, particularly among young people, addressing diverse themes including celebrities' sponsorship, e-liquid appeal (including flavours and nicotine levels), users' engagement with ads, and other marketing strategies. Further, social networking sites commercially promoting e-cigarettes might increase positive attitudes towards vaping and vaping behaviours, particularly among youths. Future research should be conducted in broader settings, incorporate larger and diverse sample sizes, ensure research transparency, cover multiple social networking sites, emphasize ecological validity, and foment longitudinal studies.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy during pregnancy. DESIGN: We used regular expressions to identify publicly available social media posts from pregnant people expressing at least one reason for their decision not to accept COVID-19 vaccine. SETTING: Two social media platforms - WhatToExpect and Twitter. SAMPLE: A total of 945 pregnant people in WhatToExpect (1017 posts) and 345 pregnant people in Twitter (435 tweets). METHODS: Two annotators manually coded posts according to the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) working group's 3Cs vaccine hesitancy model (confidence, complacency and convenience barriers). Within each 3Cs we created subthemes that emerged from the data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subthemes were derived according to the people's posting own words. RESULTS: Safety concerns were most common and largely linked to the perceived speed at which the vaccine was created and the lack of data about its safety in pregnancy. This led to a preference to wait until after the baby was born or to take other precautions instead. Complacency surrounded a belief that they are young and healthy or already had COVID-19. Misinformation led to false safety and efficacy allegations, or even conspiracy theories, and fed into creating confidence and complacency barriers. Convenience barriers (such as availability) were uncommon. CONCLUSION: The information in this study can be used to highlight the questions, fears and hesitations pregnant people have about the COVID-19 vaccine. Highlighting these hesitations can help public health campaigns and improve communication between healthcare professionals and patients.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Médias sociaux , Femelle , Grossesse , Humains , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/usage thérapeutique , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Réticence à l'égard de la vaccination , VaccinationRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective but challenging procedure. To facilitate ESD, several methods that apply traction are available; however, the optimal one remains to be established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the double-endoscope assisted ESD (DEA-ESD) by improving traction to treat complex colorectal lesions. METHODS: Naïve or previously treated lesions in the rectum and sigmoid colon were included. A grasping forceps advanced through a small-caliber endoscope (GIF-XP190N, Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan, 5.4 mm outer diameter) was used to apply traction to the mucosal flap. Lesions were deemed complex when they exceeded a total of nine points on the SMSA scoring system (size, morphology, site, and access) and recurrent when they were previously treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Outcome measures included procedural success, total procedure time, complications, and recurrence rate at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Nine patients (mean age 62.3 ± 14.5 years) were included; five had rectal and four had tumors in the sigmoid colon. The median SMSA score was 14 (SMSA Level IV-complex polyp), while three patients were pre-treated with EMR. DEA-ESD was technically feasible in all cases. En bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 100%, respectively, with a mean procedure time of 128.4 ± 54.1 min. No immediate or delayed complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: DEA-ESD is a feasible and safe method for treating complex or recurrent tumors in the rectum and distal colon.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs colorectales , Mucosectomie endoscopique , Sujet âgé , Côlon , Endoscopes , Mucosectomie endoscopique/effets indésirables , Études de faisabilité , Humains , Muqueuse intestinale , Adulte d'âge moyen , Récidive tumorale locale , Rectum , Études rétrospectives , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
The rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic presents challenges for actively monitoring its transmission. In this study, we extend a social media mining approach used in the US to automatically identify personal reports of COVID-19 on Twitter in England, UK. The findings indicate that natural language processing and machine learning framework could help provide an early indication of the chronological and geographical distribution of COVID-19 in England.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) is a well-established tool in the diagnosis and therapy of small bowel diseases. Ink tattooing of the small bowel is used to mark pathologic lesions or the depth of small bowel insertion. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, the detection rate, and the clinical relevance of ink tattooing during BAE. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all 81 patients who received an ink tattooing during BAE between 2010 and 2015. RESULTS: In all patients, ink tattooing was performed with no complications. 26 patients received a capsule endoscopy after BAE. The tattoo could be detected via capsule endoscopy in 19 of these 26 patients. The tattoo of the previous BAE could be detected via opposite BAE in 2 of 11 patients. In 9 patients, ink tattooing influenced the choice of approach for reenteroscopy. In 7 patients, the tattoo was used for intraoperative localization and in 3 patients for intraoperative localization as well as for reenteroscopy. The intraoperative detection rate of the tattoo was 100%. CONCLUSION: Ink tattooing of the small intestine is a safe endoscopic procedure to mark the depth of scope insertion or a pathologic lesion during balloon-assisted enteroscopy.
RÉSUMÉ
Background. In patients with known or suspected risk factors for gastrointestinal stenosis, the PillCam patency capsule (PC) is given before a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in order to minimize the risk of capsule retention (CR). CR is considered unlikely upon excretion of the PC within 30 hours, excretion in an undamaged state after 30 hours, or radiological projection to the colon. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 38 patients with risk factors for CR, who received a PC from 02/2013 to 04/2015 at Klinikum Augsburg. Results. Sixteen of our 38 patients observed a natural excretion after a mean time of 34 hours past ingestion. However, only 8 patients observed excretion within 30 hours, as recommended by the company. In 20 patients passage of the PC into the colon was shown via RFID-scan or radiological imaging (after 33 and 45 hours, resp.). Only 2 patients showed a pathologic PC result. In consequence, 32 patients received the VCE; no CR was observed. Conclusion. Our data indicates that a VCE could safely be performed even if the PC excretion time is longer than 30 hours and the excreted PC was not screened for damage.
RÉSUMÉ
Endoscopic hemostasis is the daily challenge that must be mastered by gastroenterologists. An emergency colonoscopy is the procedure of choice for lower gastrointestinal bleeding because of the diagnostic and therapeutic potential. Colonoscopy should be performed after oral preparation with 4-6 l polyethylene glycol solution within 12 h. In the case of massive hematochezia, colonoscopy without oral preparation employinga mechanical pump is possible and is not associated with a higher rate of complications. Many different endoscopic techniques are available (injection therapy, hemoclips, thermal coagulation, topical hemostatic substances). The suitable and most effective method must be chosen depending on the source of bleeding.
Sujet(s)
Maladies du côlon/étiologie , Maladies du côlon/thérapie , Coloscopie/méthodes , Soins de réanimation/méthodes , Hémorragie gastro-intestinale/étiologie , Hémorragie gastro-intestinale/thérapie , Maladies du rectum/thérapie , Techniques d'hémostase , Humains , Polyéthylène glycols/administration et posologie , Maladies du rectum/étiologie , Irrigation thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The German hospital reimbursement system (G-DRG) is incomplete for endoscopic interventions and fails to differentiate between complex and simple procedures. This is caused by outdated methods of personnel-cost allocation. METHODS: To establish an up-to-date service catalogue 50 hospitals made their anonymized expense-budget data available to the German-Society-of-Gastroenterology (DGVS). 2.499.900 patient-datasets (2011-2013) were used to classify operation-and-procedure codes (OPS) into procedure-tiers (e.g. colonoscopy with biopsy/colonoscopy with stent-insertion). An expert panel ranked these tiers according to complexity and assigned estimates of physician time. From June to November 2014 exact time tracking data for a total 38.288 individual procedures were collected in 119 hospitals to validate this service catalogue. RESULTS: In this three-step process a catalogue of 97 procedure-tiers was established that covers 99% of endoscopic interventions performed in German hospitals and assigned validated mean personnel-costs using gastroscopy as standard. Previously, diagnostic colonoscopy had a relative personnel-cost value of 1.13 (compared to gastroscopy 1.0) and rose to 2.16, whereas diagnostic ERCP increased from 1.7 to 3.62, more appropriately reflecting complexity. Complex procedures previously not catalogued were now included (e.g. gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: 16.74). DISCUSSION: This novel service catalogue for GI-endoscopy almost completely covers all endoscopic procedures performed in German hospitals and assigns relative personnel-cost values based on actual physician time logs. It is to be included in the national coding recommendation and should replace all prior inventories for cost distribution. The catalogue will contribute to a more objective cost allocation and hospital reimbursement - at least until time tracking for endoscopy becomes mandatory.
Sujet(s)
Catalogues comme sujet , Groupes homogènes de malades/économie , Endoscopie gastrointestinale/classification , Endoscopie gastrointestinale/économie , Gastroentérologie/économie , Coûts hospitaliers/classification , Ventilation des coûts/économie , Ventilation des coûts/méthodes , Barème d'honoraires/économie , Allemagne , Remboursement par l'assurance maladie/économieRÉSUMÉ
Summary In children undergoing tonsillectomy, dexamethasone is recommended to reduce the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting while non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used for pain relief. We aimed to determine whether children who receive dexamethasone or dexamethasone with NSAID are more likely to experience haemorrhage post-tonsillectomy. Randomized and non-randomized studies in which children undergoing tonsillectomy received dexamethasone or dexamethasone and NSAID were sought within bibliographic databases and selected tertiary sources. The risk of bias assessment and evaluation of haemorrhage rate data collection and reporting were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and McHarm tool. Synthesis methods comprised pooled estimate of the effect of dexamethasone on the risk of haemorrhage rate using the Peto odds ratio (OR) method. The pooled estimate for haemorrhage rate in children who received dexamethasone was 6.2%, OR 1.41 (95% confidence interval 0.89-2.25, P=0.15). There was risk of bias and inconsistent data collection and reporting rates of haemorrhage in many of the included studies. Clinical heterogeneity was observed between studies. The pooled analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in the risk of post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage with dexamethasone with/without NSAID use in children. However, the majority of the included studies were not designed to investigate this endpoint, and thus large studies which are specifically designed to collect data on haemorrhage rate are needed.
Sujet(s)
Anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens/effets indésirables , Dexaméthasone/effets indésirables , Hémorragie postopératoire/induit chimiquement , Amygdalectomie/effets indésirables , Anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens/usage thérapeutique , Enfant , Dexaméthasone/usage thérapeutique , Humains , Hémorragie postopératoire/étiologie , Vomissements et nausées postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet/méthodes , Appréciation des risques/méthodesRÉSUMÉ
A 60-year-old man developed stomach pains and early morning vomiting as well as fatigue over the last few months. Severe hypercalcemia was found in combination with a significantly reduced renal function. Laboratory tests as well as histological findings from the kidneys led to the working diagnosis of sarcoidosis with renal and possible osseous manifestations. After 14 days of oral medication with steroids the symptoms were significantly improved and renal parameters normalized.
Sujet(s)
Hypercalcémie/complications , Hypercalcémie/diagnostic , Insuffisance rénale chronique/diagnostic , Insuffisance rénale chronique/étiologie , Administration par voie orale , Anti-inflammatoires/administration et posologie , Humains , Hypercalcémie/traitement médicamenteux , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Prednisolone/administration et posologie , Insuffisance rénale chronique/traitement médicamenteux , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To update the previous systematic review of the use of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin for patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), investigating the optimal duration of treatment and effects of withdrawal from treatment. DATA SOURCES: Ten electronic databases and internet resources were searched from 2003 to February 2007, including MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, BIOSIS, CENTRAL and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone were used to evaluate clinical effectiveness and safety. Inclusion criteria included any comparator trial for duration of treatment studies, and any study design conducted in patients with NSTE-ACS, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), stroke, peripheral artery disease (PAD) or ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for evidence of rebound on withdrawal of treatment. The existing model was updated to provide a more robust approach to evaluating the cost-effectiveness of alternative durations of clopidogrel and to assess the potential value of further research using value of information approaches. RESULTS: Two RCTs were included for the review of clinical effectiveness and safety. The only RCTs identified that evaluated different durations of clopidogrel treatments were conducted in patients with stroke, PAD, STEMI or PCI. Two small RCTs and one uncontrolled retrospective cohort study were identified for the review of rebound after thienopyridine withdrawal in patients with medically-treated NSTE-ACS. On broadening the criteria, five RCTs, two observational cohorts, nine case series and 33 case reports were identified in patients post-PCI, and two case series and two case reports were identified in patients with stroke, PAD or STEMI. The CURE trial reported that the proportion of patients experiencing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke was lower in the clopidogrel group at 30 days [relative risk (RR) 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.92] and from 30 days to 12 months (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.95). Clopidogrel seems to be effective in reducing adverse cardiovascular events in patients with NSTE-ACS at intermediate and high risk of ischaemic events, and appears to increase the risk of bleeding when compared with aspirin in patients with intermediate risk of ischaemic events. In terms of the cost-effectiveness of alternative durations of clopidogrel, the updated model reinforced the conclusions from the earlier analysis, i.e. a policy of 12 months of clopidogrel for patients with NSTE-ACS appears to be cost-effective in both 'average' patients and higher-risk patients. The incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) of 12 months' duration ranged from 13,380 pounds to 20,661 pounds per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) across the different scenarios. For lower-risk patients, treatment beyond 3 months does not appear to be cost-effective. The ICER of 12 months' treatment with clopidogrel varied between 49,436 pounds and 58,691 pounds per QALY. Estimates of expected value of perfect information (EVPI) were higher for the combined analysis and for analysis of high-risk patients alone (between 48.69 million pounds and 108.4 million pounds at a threshold of 30,000 pounds per QALY). At a threshold of 20,000 pounds-30,000 pounds per QALY, total EVPI ranged between 3.27 million pounds and 20.38 million pounds in the lower-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The review was limited by the lack of available data. There is considerable variation in the costs of uncertainty surrounding the different scenarios and populations considered. The validity of these may also be less reliable in the higher-risk groups owing to changes in clinical practice. An adequately powered, well-conducted RCT that directly compares different durations of clopidogrel treatment in patients with NSTE-ACS would ideally be required to provide more robust evidence in relation to the impact of clopidogrel withdrawal.
Sujet(s)
Syndrome coronarien aigu/traitement médicamenteux , Antiagrégants plaquettaires/administration et posologie , Ticlopidine/analogues et dérivés , Syndrome coronarien aigu/épidémiologie , Syndrome coronarien aigu/étiologie , Syndrome coronarien aigu/physiopathologie , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Acide acétylsalicylique/administration et posologie , Acide acétylsalicylique/pharmacologie , Acide acétylsalicylique/usage thérapeutique , Clopidogrel , Association de médicaments , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Antiagrégants plaquettaires/économie , Antiagrégants plaquettaires/pharmacologie , Antiagrégants plaquettaires/usage thérapeutique , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Ticlopidine/administration et posologie , Ticlopidine/économie , Ticlopidine/pharmacologie , Ticlopidine/usage thérapeutique , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutique , Royaume-Uni/épidémiologie , Abstention thérapeutique , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) compared with anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) from the perspective of the UK NHS. DESIGN: Bayesian evidence synthesis and decision analytical model. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted and Bayesian statistical methods used to synthesise the effectiveness evidence from randomised control trials. A decision analytical model was developed to assess the costs and consequences associated with the primary outcome of the trials over a lifetime time horizon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Costs from a health service perspective and outcomes measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of RFCA varied between pound7763 and pound7910 for each additional QALY according to baseline risk of stroke, with a probability of being cost-effective from 0.98 to 0.99 for a cost-effectiveness threshold of pound20 000. Results were sensitive to the duration of quality of life benefits from treatment. CONCLUSIONS: RFCA is potentially cost-effective for the treatment of paroxysmal AF in patients' predominantly refractory to AAD therapy provided the quality-of-life benefits from treatment are maintained for more than 5 years. These findings remain subject to limitations in the existing evidence regarding the nature of life benefits and the prognostic importance of restoring normal sinus rhythm conferred using RFCA.
Sujet(s)
Fibrillation auriculaire/thérapie , Ablation par cathéter/économie , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Antiarythmiques/économie , Antiarythmiques/usage thérapeutique , Fibrillation auriculaire/économie , Théorème de Bayes , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Coûts des médicaments , Humains , Accident vasculaire cérébral/économie , Accident vasculaire cérébral/prévention et contrôle , Résultat thérapeutique , Royaume-UniRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of radio frequency catheter ablation (RCFA) for the curative treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and typical atrial flutter. DATA SOURCES: For the systematic reviews of clinical studies 25 bibliographic databases and internet sources were searched in July 2006, with subsequent update searches for controlled trials conducted in April 2007. For the review of cost-effectiveness a broad range of studies was considered, including economic evaluations conducted alongside trials, modelling studies and analyses of administrative databases. REVIEW METHODS: Systematic reviews of clinical studies and economic evaluations of catheter ablation for AF and typical atrial flutter were conducted. The quality of the included studies was assessed using standard methods. A decision model was developed to evaluate a strategy of RFCA compared with long-term antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment alone in adults with paroxysmal AF. This was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of RFCA in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) under a range of assumptions. Decision uncertainty associated with this analysis was presented and used to inform future research priorities using the value of information analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4858 studies were retrieved for the review of clinical effectiveness. Of these, eight controlled studies and 53 case series of AF were included. Two controlled studies and 23 case series of typical atrial flutter were included. For atrial fibrillation, freedom from arrhythmia at 12 months in case series ranged from 28% to 85.3% with a weighted mean of 76%. Three RCTs suggested that RFCA is more effective than long-term AAD therapy in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Single RCTs also suggested superiority of RFCA over electrical cardioversion followed by long-term AAD therapy and of RFCA plus AAD therapy over AAD maintenance therapy alone in drug-refractory patients. The available RCTs provided insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of RFCA beyond 12 months or in patients with persistent or permanent AF. Adverse events and complications were generally rare. Mortality rates were low in both RCTs and case series. Cardiac tamponade and pulmonary vein stenosis were the most frequently recorded complications. For atrial flutter, freedom from arrhythmia at 12 months in case series ranged from 85% to 92% with a weighted mean of 88%. Neither of the atrial flutter RCTs reported freedom from arrhythmia at 12 months. One RCT found a statistically significant benefit favouring ablation over AADs in terms of freedom from arrhythmia at a mean follow-up of 22 months. A second RCT reported a more modest effect favouring ablation in terms of freedom from atrial flutter at follow-up in older patients (mean age 78 years) after their first episode of flutter. In the atrial flutter case series, mortality was rare and the most frequent complications were atrioventricular block and haematomas. Complications in the RCTs were similar, except for those events likely to have been caused by AAD therapy (e.g. thyroid dysfunction). The review of cost-effectiveness evidence found one relevant study, which from a UK NHS perspective had a number of important limitations. The base-case analysis in the decision model demonstrated that if the quality of life benefits of RFCA are maintained over the remaining lifetime of the patient then the cost-effectiveness of RFCA appears clear. These findings were robust over a wide range of alternative assumptions, being between 7763 and 7910 pounds per additional QALY with very little uncertainty. If the quality of life benefits of RFCA are assumed to be maintained for no more than 5 years, cost-effectiveness of RFCA is dependent on a number of factors. Estimates of cost-effectiveness that explored the influence of these factors ranged from 23,000 to 38,000 pounds per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: RFCA is a relatively safe and efficacious procedure for the therapeutic treatment of AF and typical atrial flutter. There is some randomised evidence to suggest that RFCA is superior to AADs in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF in terms of freedom from arrhythmia at 12 months. RFCA appears to be cost-effective if the observed quality of life benefits are assumed to continue over a patient's lifetime. However, there remain uncertainties around longer-term effects of the intervention and the extent to which published effectiveness findings can be generalised to 'typical' UK practice. All catheter ablation procedures for the treatment of AF or atrial flutter undertaken in the UK should be recorded prospectively and centrally and measures to increase compliance in recording RFCA procedures may be needed. This would be of particular value in establishing the long-term benefits of RFCA and the true incidence and impact of any complications. Collection of appropriate quality of life data within any such registry would also be of value to future clinical and cost-effectiveness research in this area. Any planned multicentre RCTs comparing RFCA against best medical therapy for the treatment of AF and/or atrial flutter should be conducted among 'non-pioneering' centres using the techniques and equipment typically employed in UK practice and should measure relevant outcomes.
Sujet(s)
Antiarythmiques/usage thérapeutique , Fibrillation auriculaire/thérapie , Flutter auriculaire/thérapie , Ablation par cathéter/statistiques et données numériques , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Résultat thérapeutique , Adulte , Antiarythmiques/économie , Ablation par cathéter/économie , Bases de données bibliographiques , Humains , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Sécurité , Évaluation de la technologie biomédicale/économie , Royaume-UniRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of circular stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) for the treatment of haemorrhoids. DATA SOURCES: Main electronic databases were searched up to July 2006. REVIEW METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 20 or more participants that compared SH with any conventional haemorrhoidectomy (CH) technique in people of any age with prolapsing haemorrhoids for whom surgery is considered a relevant option, were used to evaluate clinical effectiveness. An economic model of the surgical treatment of haemorrhoids was developed. RESULTS: The clinical effectiveness review included 27 RCTs (n = 2279; 1137 SH; 1142 CH). All had some methodological flaws; only two reported recruiting patients with second, third and fourth degree haemorrhoids, and 37% reported using an appropriate method of randomisation and/or allocation concealment. In the early postoperative period 95% of trials reported less pain following SH; by day 21 the pain reported following SH and CH was minimal, with little difference between the two techniques. Significantly fewer patients had unhealed wounds at 6 weeks following SH [odds ratio (OR) 0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 0.19, p < 0.001]. Residual prolapse was more common after SH (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.00 to 11.47, p = 0.05, nine RCTs, results of a sensitivity analysis). There was no difference between SH and CH in the incidence of bleeding or postoperative complications. SH resulted in shorter operating times, hospital stay, time to first bowel movement and return to normal activity. In the short term (between 6 weeks and a year) prolapse was more common after SH (OR 4.68, 95% CI 1.11 to 19.71, p = 0.04, six RCTs). There was no difference in the number of patients complaining of pain between SH and CH. In the long term (1 year and over), there was a significantly higher rate of prolapse after SH (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.67 to 11.28, p = 0.003, 12 RCTs). There was no difference in the number of patients experiencing pain, or the incidence of bleeding, between SH and CH. There was no difference in the total number of reinterventions, or reinterventions for pain, bleeding or complications, between SH and CH. Significantly more reinterventions were undertaken after SH for prolapse at 12 months or longer (OR 6.78, 95% CI 2.00 to 23.00, p = 0.002, six RCTs). Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complications between SH and CH. In the economic assessment it was found that, on average, CH dominated SH. However, CH and SH had very similar costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). On average, the difference in costs between the procedures was 19 pounds and the difference in QALY was -0.001, favouring CH, over 3 years. In terms of QALYs, the superior quality of life due to lower pain levels in the early postoperative period with SH was offset by the higher rate of symptoms over the follow-up period, compared with CH. The results are very sensitive to modelling assumptions, particularly the valuation of utility in the early postoperative period. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that, at a threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 20,000-30,000 pounds per QALY, SH had a 45% probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: SH was associated with less pain in the immediate postoperative period, but a higher rate of residual prolapse, prolapse in the longer term and reintervention for prolapse. There was no clear difference in the rate or type of complications associated with the two techniques and the absolute and relative rates of recurrence and reintervention for both are still uncertain. CH and SH had very similar costs and QALYs, the cost of the staple gun being offset by savings in hospital stay. Should the price of the gun change, the conclusions of the economic analysis may also change. Some training may be required in the use of the staple gun; this is not expected to have major resource implications. Given the currently available clinical evidence and the results of the economic analysis, the decision as to whether SH or CH is conducted could primarily be based on the priorities and preferences of the patient and surgeon. An adequately powered, good-quality RCT is required, comparing SH with CH, recruiting patients with second, third and fourth degree haemorrhoids, and having a minimum follow-up period of 5 years to ensure an adequate evaluation of the reintervention rate. Other areas for research are the effectiveness of SH in patients with fourth degree haemorrhoids and patients with co-morbid conditions, the reintervention rates for all treatments for haemorrhoids, utilities of patients up to 6 months postoperatively, the trade-offs of patients for short-term pain versus long-term outcomes, and the ability of SH to reduce hospital stays in a real practice setting.
Sujet(s)
Hémorroïdes/économie , Hémorroïdes/chirurgie , Matériaux de suture/économie , Comorbidité , Hémorroïdes/épidémiologie , Humains , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Années de vie ajustées sur la qualité , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Facteurs de risque , Évaluation de la technologie biomédicale/économie , Évaluation de la technologie biomédicale/méthodes , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence for different models of community-based respite care for frail older people and their carers, where the participant group included older people with frailty, disability, cancer or dementia. Where data permitted, subgroups of carers and care recipients, for whom respite care is particularly effective or cost-effective, were to be identified. DATA SOURCES: Major databases were searched from 1980 to March 2005. Ongoing and recently completed research databases were searched in July 2005. REVIEW METHODS: Data from relevant studies were extracted and quality assessed. The possible effects of study quality on the effectiveness data and review findings were discussed. Where sufficient clinically and statistically similar data were available, data were pooled using appropriate statistical techniques. RESULTS: Twenty-two primary studies were included. Most of the evidence came from North America, with a minority of effectiveness and economic studies based in the UK. Types of service studied included day care, host family, in-home, institutional and video respite. Effectiveness evidence suggests that the consequences of respite upon carers and care recipients are generally small, with better controlled studies finding modest benefits only for certain subgroups. However, many studies report high levels of carer satisfaction. No reliable evidence was found that respite can delay entry to residential care or that respite adversely affects care recipients. Randomisation validity in the included randomised studies was sometimes unclear. Studies reported many different outcome measures, and all of the quasi-experimental and uncontrolled studies had methodological weaknesses. The descriptions of the studies did not provide sufficient detail of the methods of data collection or analysis, and the studies failed to describe adequately the groups of study participants. In some studies, only evidence to support respite care services was presented, rather than a balanced view of the services. Only five economic evaluations of respite care services were found, all of which compared day care with usual care and only one study was undertaken in the UK. Day care tended to be associated with higher costs and either similar or a slight increase in benefits, relative to usual care. The economic evaluations were based on two randomised and three quasi-experimental studies, all of which were included in the effectiveness analysis. The majority of studies assessed health and social service use and cost, but inadequate reporting limits the potential for exploring applicability to the UK setting. No study included generic health-related quality of life measures, making cost-effectiveness comparisons with other healthcare programmes difficult. One study used sensitivity analysis to explore the robustness of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: The literature review provides some evidence that respite for carers of frail elderly people may have a small positive effect upon carers in terms of burden and mental or physical health. Carers were generally very satisfied with respite. No reliable evidence was found that respite either benefits or adversely affects care recipients, or that it delays entry to residential care. Economic evidence suggests that day care is at least as costly as usual care. Pilot studies are needed to inform full-scale studies of respite in the UK.
Sujet(s)
Aidants , Analyse coût-bénéfice , Services de santé pour personnes âgées/économie , Soins de relève/statistiques et données numériques , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Femelle , Personne âgée fragile , Politique de santé , Services de santé pour personnes âgées/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé pour personnes âgées/tendances , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Royaume-UniRÉSUMÉ
AIMS: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 6-month survival rate of patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with irinotecan and gemcitabine plus 5-fluorouracil. Secondary efficacy end points included response rate, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients with histologically proven pancreatic carcinoma and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion were enrolled. Of the patients, 83% had metastatic and 17% locally advanced disease. One cycle, lasting 21 days, comprised treatment on days 1 and 8 consisting of 75 mg/m(2) irinotecan i.v. for 90 min, 1,000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine i.v. for 30 min and 2,000 mg/m(2) fluorouracil (5-FU) for 24 h. A total of six cycles was planned for each patient. RESULTS: 28 patients competed at least one treatment cycle and were therefore assessable for efficacy, and 75% of them achieved the primary end point of the study (survival after 6 months). One-year survival was 25%. Stabilization (partial response and stable disease) was observed in 35.7% (10/28) and partial remission in 7.1% (2/28). The objective response rate was 7.1% (2/28) after completion of the six cycles. Median TTP was 3.4 months (1.2-11.5), and median OS was 8.3 months (2.1-36.2). Regarding severe hematological toxicities, only neutropenia was observed (grade 3 20.7%, 6/29, and grade 4 3.5%, 1/29). In spite of anti-emetic supportive care, nausea affected most of the patients: 79.3% (23/29). Grade 3 vomiting was observed in 4 of the 29 patients (13.8%) and grade 4 in 1 patient (3.5%). Only 1 patient experienced diarrhea grade 3 (3.5%) and 1 patient (3.5%) suffered from a grade 3 peroneal nerve enervation. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of irinotecan, gemcitabine and 5-FU is feasible and shows considerable efficacy in patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Due to its low toxicity, this combination might be an interesting cytotoxic regimen in addition to targeted therapies.
Sujet(s)
Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/administration et posologie , Tumeurs du pancréas/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/effets indésirables , Camptothécine/administration et posologie , Camptothécine/effets indésirables , Camptothécine/analogues et dérivés , Désoxycytidine/administration et posologie , Désoxycytidine/effets indésirables , Désoxycytidine/analogues et dérivés , Évolution de la maladie , Femelle , Fluorouracil/administration et posologie , Fluorouracil/effets indésirables , Humains , Irinotécan , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs du pancréas/mortalité , Tumeurs du pancréas/anatomopathologie , Analyse de survie ,RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is a feasible examination technique and a suitable tool for population-based screening, but very little is known about determinants of endoscopic screening participation. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptance rate and the factors influencing the decision of participating in a screening program for patients in an outpatient clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, a colorectal cancer screening by FS was offered to 631 patients older than 40 years. Three strategies were available, (1) to have the endoscopy on the same day, (2) to make an appointment for another day, or (3) to take time to think about if they wanted the procedure. The reasons for refusal of the FS were documented. RESULTS: 419 of the 631 (66.4%) patients had no interest to take part in the screening program during their outpatient visit. Two hundred twelve (33.6%) patients were primarily interested on FS, but only 110 of them were finally examined. In total, 102 patients did not make an appointment for FS or did not appear for the endoscopy. The participation rate was therefore 17.4% (110/631) of all patients. Of the patients who agreed to receive an on-site examination, 78.3% were examined compared to 18.8% of patients who fixed the appointment for another day or after taking time to reflect upon the FS procedure. More male than female patients accepted the FS screening. Recommended colonoscopy was finally performed in 76%. Thirty-three polyps were found during the screening program of which 18 were larger than 0.5 cm. No CRC was detected. All patients agreed to repeat the FS every 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a screening examination will be most likely performed if it is done as an on-site examination. In contrast, the participation rate is low if the patient has to make an appointment by himself. Acceptance of FS screening is also dependent on the patient's gender and family history of cancer. Additional strategies are needed to further improve participation.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs colorectales/diagnostic , Dépistage de masse/méthodes , Rectosigmoïdoscopie/statistiques et données numériques , Établissements de soins ambulatoires , Rendez-vous et plannings , Prise de décision , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Acceptation des soins par les patients , Études prospectives , Rectosigmoïdoscopie/psychologieRÉSUMÉ
Detecting the source of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding can be difficult. Capsule endoscopy is a promising diagnostic tool for investigating patients with this condition, although identifying the source of intermittent or low-grade bleeding remains a diagnostic challenge. We present case reports of two patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, in whom the source of recurrent bleeding episodes was diagnosed by capsule endoscopy while they were on anticoagulation therapy. The first patient, an 81-year-old white woman, was on long-term oral anticoagulation because she had chronic atrial fibrillation. Capsule endoscopy demonstrated a bleeding tumor in the region of the terminal ileum. The second patient, a 59-year-old white man, underwent an initial capsule endoscopy, which was negative. After initiation of anticoagulation with heparin, a second capsule endoscopy procedure in this patient revealed several small bleeding lesions in the proximal small bowel. In both cases a gastrointestinal stromal tumor was identified as the bleeding source and was resected. These two cases demonstrate that provocation of bleeding during capsule endoscopy may increase its sensitivity.