Removal of uncemented components: hope for the best, prepare for the worst-technical tips and tricks.

Removing well-fixed uncemented components can be challenging. With thoughtful surgical planning, appropriate surgical instruments, and proper surgical techniques, most implants can be removed expeditiously with little bone loss and minimal impact on the subsequent reconstruction. Preoperative planning is one of the most essential steps to remove uncemented implants. Obtaining previous surgical records, although tedious, should always be attempted preoperatively to determine if specific instruments will be required and to help anticipate which steps may need special attention. These include the presence of ceramic or metal bearings and the presence of acetabular screws or stem collars. Without proper preparation and available tools, the removal of implants can negatively impact the subsequent reconstruction and patient outcomes. We will describe techniques and practical tips for removing uncemented stems from the top (intramedullary) or transfemoral using an extended trochanteric osteotomy. We will also describe techniques and tools to remove uncemented acetabular shells efficiently. Case examples will highlight these clinical situations where careful planning is necessary and potential problems that may be encountered with the recurring theme of preparing for the worst but hoping for the best. We have also included cases such as removing well-fixed cementless collared stems, broken stems, and fully coated stems.

A Scoping Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Survival and Reoperation Rates in Patients of 55 Years or Younger: Health Services Implications for Revision Surgeries.

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in younger patients is projected to increase by a factor of 5 by 2030 and will have important implications for clinical practice, policymaking, and research. This scoping review aimed to synthesize and summarize THA implants' survival, reoperation, and wear rates and identify indications and risk factors for reoperation following THA in patients ≤55 years old. Material and methods: Standardized scoping review methodology was applied. We searched 4 electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science) from January 1990 to May 2019. Selection criteria were patients aged ≤55 years, THA survival, reoperation, and/or wear rate reported, a minimum of 20 reoperations included, and minimum level III based on the Oxford Level of Evidence. Two authors independently reviewed the citations, extracted data, and assessed quality. Results: Of the 2255 citations screened, 35 retrospective cohort studies were included. Survival rates for THA at 5 and 20 years were 90%-100% and 60.4%-77.7%, respectively. Reoperation rates at ≤5-year post THA ranged from 1.6% to 5.4% and increased at 10-20 years post THA (8.2%-67%). Common causes for reoperation were aseptic loosening of hip implants, osteolysis, wear, and infection. Higher reoperation and lower survival rates were seen with hip dysplasia and avascular necrosis than with other primary diagnoses. Conclusions: Over time, THA prosthetic survival rates decreased, and reoperation increased in patients ≤55 years. Aseptic loosening of hip implants, osteolysis, wear, and infection were the most frequent reasons for the reoperation.

Opioid prescribing practices prior to elective foot and ankle surgery: a population-based evaluation using health administrative data from a tertiary hospital in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Complex elective foot and ankle surgery is known to be painful so most patients are prescribed opioids at the time of surgery; however, the number of patients prescribed opioids while waiting for surgery in Canada is unknown. Our primary objective was to describe the pre and postoperative prescribing practices for patients in Alberta, Canada undergoing complex elective foot and ankle surgery. Secondarily, we evaluated postoperative opioid usage and hospital outcomes. METHODS: In this population-based retrospective analysis, we identified all adult patients who underwent unilateral elective orthopedic foot and ankle surgery at a single tertiary hospital between May 1, 2015 and May 31, 2017. Patient and surgical data were extracted from a retrospective chart review and merged with prospectively collected, individual level drug dispensing administrative data to analyze opioid dispensing patterns, including dose, duration, and prescriber for six months before and after foot and ankle surgery. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 45 had at least one opioid prescription dispensed within six months before surgery, and of these, 19 were long-term opioid users (> 90 days of continuous use). Most opioid users obtained opioid prescriptions from family physicians both before (78%) and after (65%) surgery. No preoperative non-users transitioned to long-term opioid use postoperatively, but 68.4% of the preoperative long-term opioid users remained long-term opioid users postoperatively. During the index hospitalization, preoperative long-term opioid users consumed higher doses of opioids (99.7 ± 120.5 mg/day) compared to opioid naive patients (28.5 ± 36.1 mg/day) (p < 0.001). Long-term opioid users stayed one day longer in hospital than opioid-naive patients (3.9 ± 2.8 days vs 2.7 ± 1.1 days; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients were dispensed opioids before and after foot and ankle surgery with the majority of prescriptions coming from primary care practitioners. Patients who were prescribed long-term opioids preoperatively were more likely to continue to use opioids at follow-up and required larger in-hospital opioid dosages and stayed longer in hospital. Further research and education for both patients and providers are needed to reduce the community-based prescribing of opioid medication pre-operatively and provide alternative pain management strategies prior to surgery to improve postoperative outcomes and reduce long-term postoperative opioid use.

Effect of preoperative long-term opioid therapy on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of multicentre population-based administrative data.

Background: Up to 40% of patients are receiving opioids at the time of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the United States despite evidence suggesting opioids are ineffective for pain associated with arthritis and have substantial risks. Our primary objective was to determine whether preoperative opioid users had worse knee pain and physical function outcomes 12 months after TKA than patients who were opioid-naive preoperatively; our secondary objective was to determine the prevalence of opioid use before and after TKA in Alberta, Canada. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of population-based data, we identified adult patients who underwent TKA between 2013 and 2015 in Alberta. We used multivariable linear regression to examine the association between preoperative opioid use and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function scores 12 months after TKA, adjusting for potentially confounding variables. Results: Of the 1907 patients, 592 (31.0%) had at least 1 opioid dispensed before TKA, and 124 (6.5%) were classified as long-term opioid users. Long-term opioid users had worse adjusted WOMAC pain and physical function scores 12 months after TKA than patients who were opioid-naive preoperatively (pain score ß = 7.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0 to 11.6; physical function score ß = 7.8, 95% CI 4.0 to 11.6; p < 0.001 for both). The majority (89 ([71.8%]) of patients who were long-term opioid users preoperatively were dispensed opioids 180-360 days after TKA, compared to 158 (12.0%) patients who were opioid-naive preoperatively. Conclusion: A substantial number of patients were dispensed opioids before and after TKA, and patients who received opioids preoperatively had worse adjusted pain and functional outcome scores 12 months after TKA than patients who were opioidnaive preoperatively. These results suggest that patients prescribed opioids preoperatively should be counselled judiciously regarding expected outcomes after TKA.

Contexte: Jusqu'à 40 % des patients se font prescrire des opioïdes lors d'une chirurgie pour prothèse totale du genou (PTG) aux États-Unis, et ce, malgré des données selon lesquelles les opioïdes sont inefficaces pour la douleur associée à l'arthrite et comportent des risques substantiels. Notre objectif principal était de déterminer si les patients qui utilisaient déjà des opioïdes en période préopératoire obtenaient des résultats plus négatifs aux plans de la douleur et du fonctionnement 12 mois après leur PTG, comparativement aux patients qui ne prenaient pas d'opioïdes avant leur intervention; notre objectif secondaire était de mesurer la prévalence du recours aux opioïdes avant et après la PTG en Alberta, au Canada. Méthodes: Dans cette analyse rétrospective menée sur des données de population, nous avons identifié les patients adultes soumis à une PTG entre 2013 et 2015 en Alberta. Nous avons utilisé un modèle de régression linéaire multivarié pour examiner le lien entre l'utilisation d'opioïdes en période préopératoire et les scores de douleur et de fonctionnement à l'échelle WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) 12 mois après la PTG, en tenant compte de potentielles variables de confusion. Résultats: Sur les 1907 patients, 592 (31,0 %) ont reçu au moins 1 opioïde avant leur PTG, et 124 (6,5 %) en étaient considérés des utilisateurs de longue date. Les utilisateurs d'opioïdes de longue date présentaient de moins bons scores WOMAC ajustés pour les domaines de douleur et de fonctionnement 12 mois après la PTG, comparativement aux patients qui n'en prenaient pas avant l'intervention (score de douleur ß = 7,7, intervalle de confiance [IC] de 95 % 4,0 à 11,6; score de fonctionnement ß = 7,8, IC de 95 % 4,0 à 11,6; p < 0,001 pour les 2 domaines). La majorité (89 [71,8 %]) des patients utilisateurs d'opioïdes de longue date avant l'intervention se sont fait servir des opioïdes 180­360 jours après la PTG, comparativement à 158 patients (12,0 %) qui n'en prenaient pas avant l'intervention. Conclusion: Un nombre substantiel de patients ont reçu des opioïdes avant et après la PTG, et ceux qui en prenaient avant l'intervention présentaient des scores de douleur et de fonctionnement ajustés plus défavorables 12 mois après la PTG, comparativement aux patients qui n'en prenaient pas avant l'intervention. Selon ces résultats, il faut adresser des conseils judicieux aux patients qui sont déjà sous opioïdes en période préopératoire et les informer des résultats possibles de la PTG.

The Influence of Allowable Refill Gaps on Detecting Long-Term Opioid Therapy: An Analysis of Population-Based Administrative Dispensing Data Among Patients with Knee Arthritis Awaiting Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: It is challenging to detect long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) using administrative data, as refill gaps can disrupt opioid utilization episodes. Previous studies have used various methods to define LTOT and allowable refill gaps with little supporting evidence. OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of allowable refill gaps on detecting LTOT among a cohort of patients with arthritis awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using 3 different methods. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of multicenter population-based data between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016, identified patients prescribed opioids before TKA in Alberta, Canada. We described 3 methods to detect LTOT based on a (1) fixed number of days between prescriptions; (2) fraction of the preceding prescription length; and (3) combination method that selected whichever refill gap was greatest. We then compared the number of patients classified as long-term opioid users by varying the number of days between prescriptions from 1-90 days (fixed method) or 0.04-3.2 times the duration (fraction method) for each method and refill gap. RESULTS: Of the 14,252 patients included in our cohort, 4,393 patients (31%) had an opioid prescription within 180 days before TKA. Detection of LTOT varied from 4.4% to 14.6% (fixed method), 4.2% to 13.2% (fraction method), and 4.5% to 15.1% (mixed method) as refill gaps varied from minimum to maximum. As refills gaps increased, the dose and duration of opioids in the utilization episode decreased for all 3 methods. CONCLUSIONS: The allowable refill gap between opioid prescriptions can influence the estimated rate of LTOT when using administrative pharmaceutical dispensing data. Definitional parameters should be carefully considered when using administrative data to define consistent opioid use. DISCLOSURES: This work was supported by the Department of Surgery's Clinical Research Grant at the University of Alberta (RES0039945). The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Preoperative opioid use is associated with worse patient outcomes after Total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A significant number of patients use opioids prior to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in North America and there is growing concern that preoperative opioid use negatively impacts postoperative patient outcomes after surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the current evidence investigating the influence of preoperative opioid use on postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL on February 15th, 2018. Studies reporting baseline and postoperative PRO among those prescribed preoperative opioids and those who were not prior to total knee and hip arthroplasty were included. Standardized mean differences (SMD) in absolute difference and relative change in PRO measures between the two groups was calculated using random effect models. RESULTS: Six studies were included (n = 7356 patients); overall 24% of patients were prescribed preoperative opioids. Patients with preoperative opioid use had worse absolute postoperative PRO scores when compared to those with no preoperative opioid use (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.53, 95% Confidence interval (CI) -0.75, - 0.32, p < 0.0001). When relative change in PRO score was analyzed, as measured by difference between postoperative and preoperative PRO scores, there was no group differences (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.56, 0.05, p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Patients prescribed preoperative opioids may attain worse overall pain and function benefits after TJA when compared to opioid-naïve patients, but do still benefit from undergoing TJA. These results suggest preoperative opioid users should be judiciously counselled regarding potential postoperative pain and function improvements after TJA.