Revisiting the use of the EORTC QLQ-STO22 to assess health-related quality of life of patients with gastric cancer: incorporating updated treatment options and cross-cultural perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The EORTC QLQ-STO22 (QLQ-STO22) is a firmly established and validated measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for people with gastric cancer (GC), developed over two decades ago. Since then there have been dramatic changes in treatment options for GC. Also, East Asian patients were not involved in the development of QLQ-STO22, where GC is most prevalent and the QLQ-STO22 is widely used. A review with appropriate updating of the measure was planned. This study aims to capture HRQoL issues associated with new treatments and the perspectives of patients and health care professionals (HCPs) from different cultural backgrounds, including East Asia. METHODS: A systematic literature review and open-ended interviews were preformed to identify potential new HRQoL issues relating to GC. This was followed by structured interviews where HCPs and patients reviewed the QLQ-STO22 alongside new issues regarding relevance, importance, and acceptability. RESULTS: The review of 267 publications and interviews with 104 patients and 18 HCPs (48 and 9 from East Asia, respectively) generated a list of 58 new issues. Three of these relating to eating small amounts, flatulence, and neuropathy were recommended for inclusion in an updated version of the QLQ-STO22 and covered by five additional questions. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the content validity of the QLQ-STO22, suggesting its continued relevance to patients with GC, including those from East Asia. The updated version with additional questions and linguistic changes will enhance its specificity, but further testing is required.

A phase II study of retifanlimab (INCMGA00012) in patients with squamous carcinoma of the anal canal who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy (POD1UM-202).

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced or metastatic squamous carcinoma of the anal canal (SCAC) has poor prognosis following platinum-based chemotherapy. Retifanlimab (INCMGA00012), a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death protein-1 (PD-1), demonstrated clinical activity across a range of solid tumors in clinical trials. We present results from POD1UM-202 (NCT03597295), an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II study evaluating retifanlimab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic SCAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years of age had measurable disease and had progressed following, or were ineligible for, platinum-based therapy. Retifanlimab 500 mg was administered intravenously every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review. Secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 94 patients were enrolled. At a median follow-up of 7.1 months (range, 0.9-19.4 months), ORR was 13.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.6% to 22.5%], with one complete response (1.1%) and 12 partial responses (12.8%). Responses were observed regardless of human immunodeficiency virus or human papillomavirus status, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, or liver metastases. Stable disease was observed in 33 patients (35.1%) for a DCR of 48.9% (95% CI 38.5% to 59.5%). Median DOR was 9.5 months (range, 5.6 months-not estimable). Median (95% CI) PFS and OS were 2.3 (1.9-3.6) and 10.1 (7.9-not estimable) months, respectively. Retifanlimab safety in this population was consistent with previous experience for the PD-(L)1 inhibitor class. CONCLUSIONS: Retifanlimab demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic SCAC who have progressed on or are intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Accurate population-based model for individual prediction of colon cancer recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Prediction models are useful tools in the clinical management of colon cancer patients, particularly when estimating the recurrence rate and, thus, the need for adjuvant treatment. However, the most used models (MSKCC, ACCENT) are based on several decades-old patient series from clinical trials, likely overestimating the current risk of recurrence, especially in low-risk groups, as outcomes have improved over time. The aim was to develop and validate an updated model for the prediction of recurrence within 5 years after surgery using routinely collected clinicopathologic variables. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based cohort from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry of 16,134 stage I-III colon cancer cases was used. A multivariable model was constructed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Three-quarters of the cases were used for model development and one quarter for internal validation. External validation was performed using 12,769 stage II-III patients from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. The model was compared to previous nomograms. RESULTS: The nomogram consisted of eight variables: sex, sidedness, pT-substages, number of positive and found lymph nodes, emergency surgery, lymphovascular and perineural invasion. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.78 in the model, 0.76 in internal validation, and 0.70 in external validation. The model calibrated well, especially in low-risk patients, and performed better than existing nomograms in the Swedish registry data. The new nomogram's AUC was equal to that of the MSKCC but the calibration was better. CONCLUSION: The nomogram based on recently operated patients from a population registry predicts recurrence risk more accurately than previous nomograms. It performs best in the low-risk groups where the risk-benefit ratio of adjuvant treatment is debatable and the need for an accurate prediction model is the largest.

Treatment strategies and overall survival for incurable metastatic colorectal cancer - A EURECCA international comparison including 21,196 patients from the Netherlands and Norway.

BACKGROUND: The potential benefit of surgery of the primary tumour in patients with asymptomatic metastatic colorectal cancer is debated. This EURECCA international comparison analyses treatment strategies and overall survival in the Netherlands and Norway in patients with incurable metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: National cohorts (2007-2013) from the Netherlands and Norway including all patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer were compared on treatment strategy and overall survival. Using country as an instrumental variable, we assessed the effect of different treatment strategies on mortality in the first year. RESULTS: Of 21,196 patients (16,144 Dutch and 5052 Norwegian), 38.6% Dutch and 51.5% (p < 0.001) Norwegian patients underwent resection of the primary tumour. In the Netherlands, 58.2% received chemotherapy compared with 21.4% in Norway. Radiotherapy was given in 9.5% of Dutch patients and 7.2% of Norwegian patients. Using the Netherlands as reference, the adjusted HR for overall survival was 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.99; p = 0.024). Instrumental variable analysis showed an adjusted OR of 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.02; p = 0.741). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategies varied significantly between the Netherlands and Norway, with more surgery and less radiotherapy in Norway. Adjusted overall survival was better in Norway for all patients and patients <75 years, but not for patients ≥75 years. Instrumental variable analysis showed no benefit in one-year mortality for a treatment strategy with a higher proportion of surgery and a lower proportion of radiotherapy. Our findings emphasise the need for further research to select patients with incurable metastatic colorectal cancer for different treatment options.

CMS-dependent prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAFV600E mutations in primary colorectal cancer.

Background: The prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAFV600E mutations in primary colorectal cancer (CRC) varies with microsatellite instability (MSI) status. The gene expression-based consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of CRC define molecularly and clinically distinct subgroups, and represent a novel stratification framework in biomarker analysis. We investigated the prognostic value of these mutations within the CMS groups. Patients and methods: Totally 1197 primary tumors from a Norwegian series of CRC stage I-IV were analyzed for MSI and mutation status in hotspots in KRAS (codons 12, 13 and 61) and BRAF (codon 600). A subset was analyzed for gene expression and confident CMS classification was obtained for 317 samples. This cohort was expanded with clinical and molecular data, including CMS classification, from 514 patients in the publically available dataset GSE39582. Gene expression signatures associated with KRAS and BRAFV600E mutations were used to evaluate differential impact of mutations on gene expression among the CMS groups. Results: BRAFV600E and KRAS mutations were both associated with inferior 5-year overall survival (OS) exclusively in MSS tumors (BRAFV600E mutation versus KRAS/BRAF wild-type: Hazard ratio (HR) 2.85, P < 0.001; KRAS mutation versus KRAS/BRAF wild-type: HR 1.30, P = 0.013). BRAFV600E-mutated MSS tumors were strongly enriched and associated with metastatic disease in CMS1, leading to negative prognostic impact in this subtype (OS: BRAFV600E mutation versus wild-type: HR 7.73, P = 0.001). In contrast, the poor prognosis of KRAS mutations was limited to MSS tumors with CMS2/CMS3 epithelial-like gene expression profiles (OS: KRAS mutation versus wild-type: HR 1.51, P = 0.011). The subtype-specific prognostic associations were substantiated by differential effects of BRAFV600E and KRAS mutations on gene expression signatures according to the MSI status and CMS group. Conclusions: BRAFV600E mutations are enriched and associated with metastatic disease in CMS1 MSS tumors, leading to poor prognosis in this subtype. KRAS mutations are associated with adverse outcome in epithelial (CMS2/CMS3) MSS tumors.

Resection of synchronous liver metastases between radiotherapy and definitive surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: short-term surgical outcomes, overall survival and recurrence-free survival.

AIM: There is debate as to the correct treatment algorithm sequence for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with liver metastases. The aim of the study was to assess safety, resectability and survival after a modified 'liver-first' approach. METHOD: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy for the primary rectal tumour, followed by liver resection and, finally, resection of the primary tumour. Short-term surgical outcome, overall survival and recurrence-free survival are reported. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2013, 45 patients underwent liver resection after preoperative radiotherapy. Thirty-four patients (76%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 24 (53%) concomitant chemotherapy during radiotherapy and 17 (43%) adjuvant chemotherapy. The median time interval from the last fraction of radiotherapy to liver resection and rectal surgery was 21 (range 7-116) and 60 (range 31-156) days, respectively. Rectal resection was performed in 42 patients but was not performed in one patient with complete response and two with progressive metastatic disease. After rectal surgery three patients did not proceed to a planned second stage liver (n = 2) or lung (n = 1) resection due to progressive disease. Clavien-Dindo ≥Grade III complications developed in 6.7% after liver resection and 19% after rectal resection. The median overall survival and recurrence-free survival in the patients who completed the treatment sequence (n = 40) were 49.7 and 13.0 months, respectively. Twenty of the 30 patients who developed recurrence underwent further treatment with curative intent. CONCLUSION: The modified liver-first approach is safe and efficient in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and allows initial control of both the primary tumour and the liver metastases.

Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study.

BACKGROUND: As studies on gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3) (GI-NEC) are limited, we reviewed clinical data to identify predictive and prognostic markers for advanced GI-NEC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from advanced GI-NEC patients diagnosed 2000-2009 were retrospectively registered at 12 Nordic hospitals. RESULTS: The median survival was 11 months in 252 patients given palliative chemotherapy and 1 month in 53 patients receiving best supportive care (BSC) only. The response rate to first-line chemotherapy was 31% and 33% had stable disease. Ki-67<55% was by receiver operating characteristic analysis the best cut-off value concerning correlation to the response rate. Patients with Ki-67<55% had a lower response rate (15% versus 42%, P<0.001), but better survival than patients with Ki-67≥55% (14 versus 10 months, P<0.001). Platinum schedule did not affect the response rate or survival. The most important negative prognostic factors for survival were poor performance status (PS), primary colorectal tumors and elevated platelets or lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced GI-NEC patients should be considered for chemotherapy treatment without delay.PS, colorectal primary and elevated platelets and LDH levels were prognostic factors for survival. Patients with Ki-67<55% were less responsive to platinum-based chemotherapy, but had a longer survival. Our data indicate that it may not be correct to consider all GI-NEC as one single disease entity.

Dietary intake and nutritional indicators are transiently compromised during radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rectal cancer receive curative radiotherapy towards the pelvis for 5 weeks. Little is known about the impact of radiotherapy on dietary intake and nutritional status. The objective was to examine whether curative radiotherapy for rectal cancer promoted altered intake of energy and nutrients, and change in nutritional indicators. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Department of Oncology in a tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS: A total of 31 consecutive patients receiving radiotherapy for rectal cancer (50 Gray). INTERVENTIONS: A 7-day food intake registration, body weight, upper arm circumference, and analyses of blood samples were performed at the start and the end of radiotherapy, and at follow-up 4-6 weeks and 1 year after the end of radiotherapy. RESULTS: At the end of 5 weeks of radiotherapy, the mean daily energy intake was reduced by 15% from 8.9 to 7.6 MJ as compared with baseline (P = 0.002), and the intake of several nutrients was reduced (P < 0.01). The percentages of energy derived from fat, protein, and carbohydrates did not change, nor did the nutrient density. A transient body weight reduction of < 1 kg was observed (P = 0.009). Serum concentrations of vitamin A and 25-OH vitamin D did not change during radiotherapy. The daily intake of energy and nutrients, and body weight, had increased towards pretreatment values 4-6 weeks after radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for rectal cancer caused a transient reduction in energy intake and nutritional indicators. The nutritional quality of the diet was unchanged during radiotherapy.

Demonstration of EGFR gene copy loss in colorectal carcinomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): a surrogate marker for sensitivity to specific anti-EGFR therapy?

AIMS: To investigate EGFR gene copy number heterogeneity in colorectal carcinomas compared with copy number of chromosome 7 and immunohistochemical expression of the EGFR protein. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization of the EGFR gene and CEP7 was carried out on paraffin-embedded material from 48 rectal carcinomas combined with immunohistochemical detection of EGFR with a polymer detection kit. EGFR gene copy number had a range of 1.4-7.3 with a mean of 2.5. CEP7 copy number had a range of 1.5-6.1 with a mean of 2.5. The EGFR gene/CEP7 ratio ranged from 0.4 to 1.5 with a mean of 0.96. Most cases had a balanced EGFR gene/CEP7 ratio (37 cases = 77%). Copy gain was found in seven cases (15%) with a ratio of up to 1.5, consistent with gain of one EGFR gene copy in one chromosome. Copy loss was found in four cases (8%). All cases with EGFR gene copy loss were immunohistochemically positive. CONCLUSIONS: Demonstration of EGFR gene copy loss might be a surrogate marker for EGFR mutation/deletion and could be used in a routine setting in pathology departments. Further studies are needed to determine whether this may be used to select patients that might benefit from specific anti-EGFR therapy.

Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.

AIMS: The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and functional outcome in patients following anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer, and (2) whether these outcomes were dependent on the level of anastomosis. METHODS: Patients who were without recurrent or metastatic disease were identified from the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry. QoL was assessed by the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and rectal function by a short questionnaire. Of 319 patients studied, 229 had undergone AR and 90 APR. The median age was 73 years, and the median time since surgery was 64 months. RESULTS: Mean QoL scores for body image and male sexual problems were better following AR than APR (P<0.01), also in patients with a low (< or = 3 cm) anastomosis. Patients who had undergone AR had higher mean scores for constipation (P<0.001) and more often used anti-diarrhoeal medication (P=0.005), than patients who had undergone APR. Patients with a low anastomosis (< or = 3 cm) had more incontinence for gas and solid stools (P<0.05), and had more incontinence (P=0.006) compared with patients with higher anastomosis, but there was no difference in QoL. Subgroup analysis showed that irradiated patients (n=34) had worse rectal function in terms of frequency, urgency, and incontinence (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although rectal function was impaired in patients with low anastomosis, patients who had undergone AR had better QoL than patients who had undergone APR.

Quality of life during radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to assess symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL) during (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy 50 Gy for rectal cancer, were studied prospectively (n=42). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires quality of life-core 30 QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 and a 5-day symptom diary were completed at the start and end of radiotherapy and 4-6 weeks later. At the end of radiotherapy, mean scores of diarrhoea, fatigue and appetite loss had significantly increased (P<0.01) compared with pretreatment scores, but this was not observed for scores for nausea or pain. At the end of radiotherapy, diarrhoea, fatigue, appetite loss, physical function, social function and global quality of life (QL) were significantly worse than the population-based norms. 64% of the patients reported an increase in fatigue and 52% an increase in diarrhoea during radiotherapy. HRQL scores had returned to pre-treatment levels 4-6 weeks after radiotherapy. Thus, diarrhoea, fatigue and appetite loss increased transiently during pelvic radiotherapy.

Quality of life in patients with urinary diversion after operation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

AIMS: When locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer involves the bladder or prostate, curative treatment often requires pelvic exenteration. The aim was to assess the quality of life (QoL) in disease-free patients with urinary diversion after extensive surgery for advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Twelve patients with urinary diversion (cases) were compared with 25 randomly selected patients given the same treatment, but without urinary diversion (controls). An age- and gender-adjusted general population was identified (reference). QoL was assessed with the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR38, and parts of the QLQ-BLM30. RESULTS: The cases did not report significantly worse overall QoL than the controls or the reference population. Both cases and controls had low mean scores of sexual function, and high mean scores of male sexual problems. In the nine cases that had two stomas, overall QoL was not worse than in the control or reference groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour-free patients did not report worse QoL scores than the controls or the general population, despite most having two stomas and low sexual function. Fear of reducing the patient's QoL should not be a major contraindication when surgery with urinary diversion is warranted to obtain curative resection.