Neonatal B-Cell Levels and Infant Health in Newborns Potentially Exposed to Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies During Pregnancy or Lactation.

OBJECTIVES: To report CD19+ B-cell counts and possible adverse effects on infants of mothers exposed to anti-CD20 mAbs ≤6 months before/during pregnancy or lactation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using data from the German nationwide neuroimmunologic pregnancy registry. Inclusion criteria involved infants whose mothers received anti-CD20 mAbs ≤6 months before/during pregnancy or lactation, with ≥1 postnatal CD19+ B-cell count. Main outcomes were absolute and relative CD19+ B-cell counts. Comparison with reference values was performed conservatively in a subgroup with maternal exposure ≤3 months before/during pregnancy. Additional outcomes included pregnancy results, severe infections, and lymphocyte counts. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 49 infants (F:M 25:24) exposed to anti-CD20 mAbs ≤6 months before/during pregnancy or lactation. CD19+ B-cell and lymphocyte counts in 40 infants with maternal exposure ≤3 months before/during pregnancy were comparable with normative values. Only 2 cases of complete CD19+ B-cell depletion occurred after second-trimester and third-trimester ocrelizumab exposure, with repopulation observed within 2 months. Exclusive lactation exposure had no significant effect on infants' absolute CD19+ B-cell counts. DISCUSSION: Administering anti-CD20 mAbs before or at the pregnancy onset, or during lactation, seems safe without significant impact on infant B-cell development. However, second-trimester or third-trimester exposure can cause CD19+ B-cell depletion due to placental transfer, necessitating monitoring and postponing live vaccines.

Early postpartum treatment strategies and early postpartum relapses in women with active multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Relapse risk after delivery is increased in women with active multiple sclerosis (MS), the best strategy to reduce it is unknown. We aimed to assess the association of four different postpartum strategies with relapses during the first 6 months post partum. METHODS: This cohort study includes data prospectively collected through structured telephone interviews from the German Multiple Sclerosis and Pregnancy Registry. Pregnancies with active MS (fingolimod or natalizumab treatment OR relapse within 1 year before pregnancy) and postpartum follow-up of ≥6 months were included. We compared four strategies: (1) intention to breastfeed exclusively without disease-modifying therapy (DMT) (exclusive breast feeding ≥2 months or switching to non-exclusive/weaning within 2 weeks after a relapse during the first 2 months), (2) early treatment with natalizumab/fingolimod and (3) other DMT initiated within 6 weeks post partum before a relapse. If women did not or only partially breastfed, or started DMT≤6 weeks after delivery after a relapse or later, we assumed (4) no-DMT-no-exclusive- breastfeeding-strategy. Main outcome was time to postpartum MS relapses. RESULTS: In 867 women with 911 pregnancies, most (n=416) intended to breastfeed exclusively or had no-DMT-no-exclusive-breastfeeding-strategy (n=290); fewer started fingolimod (n=38), natalizumab (n=74) or another DMT (n=93) early. Recurrent time-to-event analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in relapse hazard only with the natalizumab/fingolimod-strategy as of months 3-4 post partum compared with intention-to-breastfeed-exclusively-strategy. The very early relapse risk was highest in no-DMT-no-exclusive-breastfeeding-strategy. CONCLUSION: In active MS, an early postpartum treatment strategy should be determined well before delivery. Natalizumab/fingolimod-strategy reduced postpartum relapse hazard from month 3, but none diminished the early postpartum relapse hazard.

Disease activity and neonatal outcomes after exposure to natalizumab throughout pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: After natalizumab discontinuation severe relapses can occur despite pregnancy, but third trimester exposure is associated with neonatal haematological abnormalities (HA). The best time point for stopping natalizumab during pregnancy is unclear. METHODS: Prospective, observational cohort with 350 natalizumab exposed pregnancies from the German Multiple Sclerosis and Pregnancy Registry. Clinical disease activity and neonatal outcomes are compared between women with natalizumab discontinuation during (1st Trim-group) versus after the first trimester (maintaining-group) and for subgroup analysis before (<30-subgroup) or after (≥30-subgroup) the 30th gestational week (gw). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the 1st Trim-group (n=179; median exposure duration: 2.60 gw, IQR 1.30-3.60) and the maintaining-group (n=171; median exposure duration: 30.9 gw, IQR 26.9-33.3). Fewer relapses occurred during pregnancy and the postpartum year in the maintaining-group (25.7%) compared with the 1st Trim-group (62.6%; p<0.001). Women in ≥30-subgroup had a significantly lower relapse risk in the first 6 months postpartum (relapse rate ratio: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.84). In total, 7.5% retained meaningful disability 12 months postpartum. No significant effect on neonatal outcomes were observed, but anaemia (OR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.12 to 6.52) and thrombocytopaenia (OR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.15 to 6.46) were significantly more common in the ≥30-subgroup. 21.8% of all neonates were born small for gestational age, independent of the timing of natalizumab discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Continuing natalizumab during pregnancy after gw 30 decreases the relapse risk postpartum going along with a higher risk for HA in the newborns. These results add relevant knowledge as a basis for informed risk-benefit discussion.

Glatiramer acetate or IFN-ß bridging therapy in women with relapsing multiple sclerosis planning a pregnancy.

Aim: To assess bridging glatiramer acetate (GA) or IFN-ß for relapse prevention in women with relapsing multiple sclerosis planning pregnancy. Materials & methods: Participants discontinued disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and received GA/IFN (early- or delayed-start) or no DMT (control) until pregnancy. Results: Annualized relapse rate was lower in delayed-start GA/IFN cohort versus control during washout/bridging. During washout/bridging, bridging with GA/IFN in this cohort reduced clinical activity, while disease activity increased in controls versus baseline. Conclusion: More data on GA/IFN bridging are needed. Women with low relapsing multiple sclerosis activity in the year prior to DMT discontinuation due to pregnancy planning benefited from GA/IFN bridging with lower annualized relapse rate versus no treatment and reduced clinical activity versus baseline during washout/bridging and pregnancy.

When women with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) plan a pregnancy, doctors must think about the possible effects of medicines. Patients can take medicines with a well-defined safety profile to reduce the risk of attacks after stopping strong treatments. In this study, women stopped taking their RMS medicines and either: took well-defined RMS medicines, glatiramer acetate (GA) or IFN-ß; or stopped all RMS medicines. The rate of attacks (in a year) was lower in patients who started taking GA/IFN a while after stopping their previous RMS medicines compared with patients who took no more medication. Women with low RMS activity in the year before stopping RMS treatment because of pregnancy planning may benefit from GA/IFN treatment prior to conception.

Safety evaluations of offspring breastfed by mothers receiving glatiramer acetate for relapsing multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Although the relapse risk is increased after birth in women with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), only a very few disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are approved during breastfeeding. Glatiramer acetate (GA, Copaxone®) is one of three DMTs that can be used in breastfeeding. The real-world safety of Copaxone® in Offsprings of Breastfeeding and treated RMS pAtients (COBRA) study demonstrated that offspring parameters (hospitalisations, antibiotic use, developmental delays, growth parameters) were similar between offspring breastfed by mothers taking GA or no DMT (control) during breastfeeding. COBRA data analyses were extended to provide further safety data on the impact of maternal GA treatment during breastfeeding on offspring. METHODS: COBRA was a non-interventional, retrospective study using German Multiple Sclerosis and Pregnancy Registry data. Participants had RMS, gave birth and had GA or no DMT during breastfeeding. Offspring total adverse events (AEs), non-serious AEs (NAEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) up to 18 months postpartum were assessed. Reasons for offspring hospitalisations and antibiotic treatments were explored. RESULTS: Baseline maternal demographics and disease characteristics were similar between cohorts. Each cohort had 60 offspring. Numbers of offspring AEs were comparable between cohorts; total AEs: 82 (GA) vs 83 (control); NAEs: 59 vs 61; SAEs: 23 vs 22. AEs in both cohorts were diverse with no specific patterns. Duration of GA-exposed breastfeeding was 6 to >574 days for offspring with any AE. For all-cause hospitalisations, 11 offspring had 12 hospitalisations (GA cohort) and 12 control offspring had 16 hospitalisations. Most common reason for hospitalisation was infection: 5/12 (41.7%; GA) vs 4/16 (25.0%, control). Two out of 12 (16.7%) hospitalisations due to infection occurred during GA-exposed breastfeeding; the others occurred 70, 192 and 257 days after discontinuation of GA-exposed breastfeeding. Median (range) duration of GA-exposed breastfeeding was 110 (56 to ≥285) days for offspring hospitalised for infections and 137 (88-396) days for those hospitalised for other reasons. Nine offspring had 13 antibiotic treatments (GA cohort) and nine control offspring had 10 treatments. Ten out of 13 (76.9%) antibiotic treatments occurred during GA-exposed breastfeeding, of which four were primarily due to double kidney with reflux. Other antibiotic treatments occurred 193, 229 and 257 days after discontinuation of GA-exposed breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: GA treatment of mothers with RMS during breastfeeding did not increase AEs, hospitalisations or antibiotic use in their offspring versus control offspring. These data support previous COBRA data that the benefit of maternal RMS treatment with GA during breastfeeding outweighs the potential, apparently low risk of untoward events, in their breastfed offspring.

Eighteen-month safety analysis of offspring breastfed by mothers receiving glatiramer acetate therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis - COBRA study.

BACKGROUND: Safety data on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) during breastfeeding are limited. OBJECTIVE: Assess safety outcomes for offspring breastfed by mothers undergoing glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone®) treatment. METHODS: This non-interventional, retrospective study used German Multiple Sclerosis and Pregnancy Registry data. Participants had RMS, a live birth, and received GA or no DMT during breastfeeding. RESULTS: GA cohort: 58 mothers/60 offspring; matched controls: 60 mothers/60 offspring; 86.7% (GA) and 25% (control) of offspring were born to mothers who had GA at some point during pregnancy. Maternal demographics and disease activity were comparable. Annualized number of hospitalizations was similar for breastfed offspring: 0.20 (95% confidence interval: 0.09-0.31; GA) and 0.25 (0.12-0.38, controls). Proportion of offspring requiring hospitalization was comparable between cohorts (18.33% vs. 20.00%). Annualized number of antibiotic uses was similar in both cohorts (0.22, 0.10-0.33 (GA) vs. 0.17, 0.06-0.27 (controls)) The proportion of offspring requiring antibiotics was 15.00% (both cohorts). More developmental delays were identified in controls versus the GA cohort (3 (5.36%) vs. 0). Growth parameters were comparable between cohorts. CONCLUSION: Maternal intake of GA during breastfeeding did not adversely affect offspring safety outcomes assessed during the first 18 months of life.