RÉSUMÉ
Background: The present study aimed to investigate the association between acute cardiac injury (ACI) and outcomes in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Iran. Methods: The current cohort study enrolled all consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (≥ 18 y) who had serum high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I (hs-cTnT) measurements on admission between March 2020 and March 2021. ACI was determined as hs-cTnT levels exceeding the 99th percentile of normal values. Data on demographics, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory characteristics, and outcomes were collected from Web-based electronic health records. Results: The study population consisted of 1413 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, of whom 319 patients (22.58%) presented with ACI. The patients with ACI had a significantly higher mortality rate than those without ACI (48.28% vs 15.63%; P<0.001) within a mean follow-up of 218.86 days from symptom onset. ACI on admission was independently associated with mortality (HR, 1.44; P=0.018). In multivariable logistic regression, age (OR, 1.034; P<0.001), preexisting cardiac disease (OR, 1.49; P=0.035), preexisting malignancy (OR, 2.01; P=0.030), oxygen saturation reduced to less than 90% (OR, 2.15; P<0.001), leukocytosis (OR, 1.45; P=0.043), lymphopenia (OR, 1.49; P=0.020), reduced estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) (OR, 0.99; P=0.008), and treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin during hospitalization (OR, 4.03; P=0.006) were independently associated with ACI development. Conclusion: ACI occurrence on admission was associated with long-term mortality in our hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The finding further underscores the significance of evaluating ACI occurrence on admission, particularly in individuals more prone to ACI, including older individuals and those with preexisting comorbidities, reduced oxygen saturation, and increased inflammatory responses.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with a hypercoagulopathy state; however, the efficacy of different anticoagulant regimens in preventing thrombotic events is not clear. We aimed to compare therapeutic versus prophylactic enoxaparin therapy in severe COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, adult patients with severe COVID-19 presentations and an increased D-dimer level of more than 4 times the normal upper limit were randomly assigned to receive either prophylactic or therapeutic dose of enoxaparin. All patients were observed for at least 4 months regarding the overall survival as the primary outcome. Hospitalization duration, the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, the need for mechanical ventilation, and major adverse events (MAEs) were also analyzed as the secondary outcomes. Survival analysis was done via Kaplan-Meier curves and the Log-rank test. Cox regression was used, adjusting for baseline variables. Results: Overall, 237 patients (152 men and 85 women) were randomized to either arm (121 to prophylactic and 116 to therapeutic groups). The mortality rate was 27 (22.3%) and 52 (44.8%) in prophylactic and therapeutic arms, respectively. Prophylactic enoxaparin was associated with better survival in the log-rank test (P < 0.001; HR, 0.42). Additionally, a significantly lower rate of ICU admission, a lower rate of MAEs, and shorter hospitalization were observed in the prophylactic arm (P < 0.001, P = 0.009, and P = 0.028, respectively). Conclusion: The results of the current study were in favor of anticoagulant treatment with prophylactic doses of enoxaparin. Still, due to the limitations of this paper, we suggest that these findings be treated cautiously.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: A few studies compared the characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients during the first and second surges of the disease. We aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 patients across the first, second, and third surges of the disease in Tehran, Iran. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 admitted to Sina hospital in Tehran, Iran, during three surges of COVID-19 from February 16 to October 28, 2020. RESULT: Surge 1 patients were younger with more prevalence of hypertension. They also presented with significantly higher oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate on admission. Patients had higher levels of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, Urea, CRP, and ESR, in surge 2. The incidence of dyspnea, chest pain, and neurological manifestations followed a significant increasing trend from surge 1 to surge 3. There was no difference in severity and in-hospital mortality between the surges. However, the length of hospital stays and acute cardiac injury (ACI) was less in surge 1 and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in surge 2 than in other surges. CONCLUSION: Patients did not significantly differ in disease severity, ICU admission, and mortality between surges; however, length of hospital stay and ACI increased during surges, and the number of patients developing ARDS was significantly less in surge 2 compared to other peaks.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Humains , Iran/épidémiologie , Études rétrospectives , SARS-CoV-2RÉSUMÉ
This pilot study aimed to determine early changes of LXA4 levels among the hospitalized patients confirmed as COVID-19 cases following the clinical management and its correlation with commonly used inflammatory markers, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), c-reactive protein (CRP), and ferritin. Thirty-one adult hospitalized patients infected with the non-severe COVID-19 were included. LXA4 levels were measured at the baseline and 48-72 hours after hospitalization. Accordingly, ESR and CRP levels were collected on the first day of hospitalization. Moreover, the maximum serum ferritin levels were determined during the five days. LXA4 levels significantly increased at 48-72 hours compared to the baseline. ESR, CRP, and ferritin levels were positively correlated with the increased LXA4. In contrast, aging was shown to negatively correlate with the increased LXA4 levels. LXA4 may be known as a valuable marker to assess the treatment response among non-elderly patients with non-severe COVID-19. Furthermore, LXA4 could be considered as a potential treatment option under inflammatory conditions. Further studies are necessary to clarify LXA4 role in COVID-19 pathogenesis, as well as the balance between such pro-resolving mediators and inflammatory parameters.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Rectus sheath hematoma is a rare self-limited presentation that has become a concern in hospitalized COVID-19 patients receiving anticoagulant therapies. Method: A retrospective multicentric study was conducted in referral hospitals affiliated with the Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran, between June and August 2021. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 that were complicated with rectus sheath hematoma during hospitalization were included. Median (lower quartile to upper quartile) was used to report the distribution of the results. Result: This study was conducted on nine patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia, including eight females and one male. The severity of viral pneumonia was above average in eight patients. The median age and median body mass index were 65 (55.5 to 78) years and 29.38 (23.97 to 31.71) kg/m2. The duration of anticoagulant therapy was 10 (6 to 14) days, and the median length of hospital stay was 20 (10 to 23.5) days. Rectus sheath hematoma occurred after a median reduction of 4 (2.7 to 6.6) units in blood hemoglobin. Although 66.7% received ICU care and all of them were under full observation in well-equipped hospitals, the mortality rate was 55.6%. Conclusion: In summary, increased levels of inflammatory markers such as lactic acid dehydrogenase along with an abrupt decrease in blood hemoglobin in COVID-19 patients should be considered as predisposing factors for rectus sheath hematoma, especially in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia under anticoagulant therapy. This complication had been considered a self-limited condition; however, it seems to be fatal in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Further studies in larger sample sizes should be conducted to find out suitable management for this complication.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Anticoagulants/effets indésirables , COVID-19/complications , Femelle , Hématome/complications , Hématome/diagnostic , Humains , Iran/épidémiologie , Mâle , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Owing to the imposed burden of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),the need for stratifying the prognosis of patients has never been timelier. Hence, we aimed to ascertain the value of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VASc-M (one point for male instead of female) scores to predict unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients above 18 years of age with confirmed COVID-19,who were admitted between February 16 and November 1, 2020. The primary endpoint of this study was three-month all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were considered four major in-hospital clinical features, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac injury,acute kidney injury, and mechanical ventilation. Results: A total of 1,406 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were studied, among which 301(21.40%) patients died during the follow-up period. Regarding the risk scores, CHADS 2≥1,CHA2DS2-VASc≥2, and CHA2DS2-VASc-M≥2 were significantly associated with mortality. The performance of all risk scores for predicting mortality was satisfactory (area under the curve:0.668, 0.668, and 0.681, respectively). Appraising secondary endpoints, we found that all three risk scores were associated with increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac injury, acute kidney injury, and mechanical ventilation. Lastly, we revealed that all risk scores were significantly correlated with serum levels of laboratory biomarkers. Conclusion: Our analysis illustrated that the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VASc-Mscores could aid prognostication of unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Therefore,these easily calculable methods could be integrated into the overall therapeutic strategy to guide the COVID-19 management more accurately.
RÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus-2019 disease (COVID-19)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) and its short and mid-term effect on kidney has been well established in the previous literature, indicating a high number of AKI in hospitalized patients associated with high rates of mortality, followed by high rates of unresolved kidney injury at the time of discharge. However, the long-term impact of AKI and its resulting lack of recovery at the time of discharge has not been investigated. Herein, we sought to explore the possible relationship between AKI and unresolved kidney injury and post-discharge mortality. METHOD: In this cohort study, patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who survived until discharge were followed for a median of 9.6 months. AKI during hospitalization based on the staging according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria and kidney injury status at discharge and other comorbidities and mortality during the follow-up period were recorded. The desired association was investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression after adjustment for potential confounders. RESULT: Among 1,017 discharged patients, 298 patients (29.3%) experienced AKI during hospitalization according to KDIGO criteria, of whom 178 patients (59.7%) were diagnosed with unresolved kidney injury at the time of discharge. After adjusting for potential confounders, Cox regression indicated that AKI stage 3 (hazard ratio (HR): 4.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89-10.99, p = 0.001) and unresolved kidney injury at the time of discharge (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.18-3.73, p = 0.011) were significantly associated with mortality during the post-discharge period. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival indicated an increased risk of mortality in patients with stage 2, stage 3 AKI, and unresolved kidney injury at the time of discharge (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall, it was shown that patients with COVID-19 who develop AKI, mainly stage 2 and 3, and patients with unresolved kidney injury at the time of discharge, were at an increased risk of mortality, even after hospitalization for an extended period of time.
Sujet(s)
Atteinte rénale aigüe , COVID-19 , Atteinte rénale aigüe/diagnostic , Post-cure , COVID-19/complications , Études de cohortes , Études de suivi , Humains , Rein , Sortie du patient , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risqueRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in hypertensive patients with COVID-19 has been controversial. Following our previous study, after one year, we intended to extend our sample size and results to investigate the effects of ARBs with both in-hospital outcomes and 7-month follow-up results in patients with COVID-19. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who were admitted to Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from February to October 2020 participated in this follow-up cohort study. The COVID-19 diagnosis was based on a positive polymerase chain reaction test or chest computed tomography scan according to guidelines. Patients were followed for disease severity, incurring in-hospital mortality, complications, and 7-month all-cause mortality. Results: We evaluated 1413 patients with COVID-19 in this study. After excluding 124 patients, 1289 including 561(43.5%) hypertensive patients, entered the analysis. During the study, 875(67.9%) severe disease, 227(17.6%) in-hospital mortality, and 307(23.8%) 7-month all-cause mortality were observed. After adjusting for possible confounders, ARB was not associated with severity, in-hospital and 7-month all-cause mortality, and in-hospital complications except for acute kidney injury. Discontinuation of ARBs was significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality and 7-month all-cause mortality (both P values<0.006). We observed a better 7-month outcome in those who continued their ARBs after discharge. Conclusion: The results of this study, along with the previous studies, provide reassurance that taking ARBs is not associated with the risk of mortality, complications, and poorer outcomes in hypertensive COVID-19 patients after adjustment for possible confounders.
RÉSUMÉ
The SARS-CoV-2 virus has been rapidly spreading globally since December 2019, triggering a pandemic, soon after its emergence. While Iran was among the first countries confronted with rapid spread of virus in February 2020, no real-time SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome tracking in early phase of outbreak was performed in the country. To address this issue, we provided 50 whole-genome sequences of viral isolates ascertained from different geographical locations in Iran during March-July 2020. The corresponding analysis on origins, transmission dynamics and genetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 virus, represented at least two introductions of the virus into the country, constructing two major clusters defined as B.4 and B.1*. The first entry of the virus might have occurred around very late 2019/early 2020, as suggested by the time to the most recent common ancestor, followed by a rapid community transmission that led to dominancy of B.4 lineage in early epidemic till the end of June. Gradually, reduction in dominancy of B.4 occurred possibly as a result of other entries of the virus, followed by surge of B.1* lineages, as of mid-May. Remarkably, variation tracking of the virus indicated the increase in frequency of D614G mutation, along with B.1* lineages, which showed continuity till October 2020. The increase in frequency of D614G mutation and B.1* lineages from mid-May onwards predicts a rapid viral transmission that may push the country into a critical health situation followed by a considerable change in composition of viral lineages circulating in the country.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animaux , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/médecine vétérinaire , Épidémies de maladies/médecine vétérinaire , Génome viral , Iran/épidémiologie , Phylogenèse , SARS-CoV-2/génétiqueRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The prognostic factors of long-term outcomes in hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus and COVID-19 are lacking. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients aged ≥ 18-years-old with the COVID-19 diagnosis who were hospitalized between Feb 20 and Oct 29, 2020, in the Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran. 1323 patients with COVID-19 entered in the final analysis, of whom 393 (29.7%) patients had diabetes. We followed up patients for incurring in-hospital death, severe COVID-19, in-hospital complications, and 7-month all-cause mortality. By doing univariate analysis, variables with unadjusted P-value < 0.1 in univariate analyses were regarded as the confounders to include in the logistic regression models. We made adjustments for possible clinical (model 1) and both clinical and laboratory (model 2) confounders. RESULTS: After multivariable regression, it was revealed that preadmission use of sulfonylureas was associated with a borderline increased risk of severity in both models [model 1, OR (95% CI):1.83 (0.91-3.71), P-value: 0.092; model 2, 2.05 (0.87-4.79), P-value: 0.099] and major adverse events (MAE: each of the severe COVID-19, multi-organ damage, or in-hospital mortality) in model 1 [OR (95% CI): 1.86 (0.90-3.87), P-value: 0.094]. Preadmission use of ACEIs/ARBs was associated with borderline increased risk of MAE in the only model 1 [OR (95% CI):1.83 (0.96-3.48), P-value: 0.066]. CONCLUSIONS: Preadmission use of sulfonylureas and ACEIs/ARBs were associated with borderline increased risk of in-hospital adverse outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-021-00901-4.
RÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Seasonal influenza is an annual common occurrence in cold seasons; but the COVID-19 pandemic is also currently ongoing. These two diseases can't be distinguished from their symptoms alone; therefore, the importance of preventing influenza by vaccination is more than ever. Due to the high exposure of hospital personnel, widespread influenza vaccination of these high-risk groups seems to be a necessity. This Study conducted to determine vaccination coverage in the personnel of four tertiary referral collegiate hospitals in 2019 and to further investigate individual obstacles for Influenza vaccination. METHODS: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 637 personnel were selected randomly from distinctive hospitals in a list-wised. Ones vaccinated filled the side effects questionnaire and who not vaccinated filled the vaccination obstacles questionnaire. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences with this reference number: IR.TUMS.IKHC.REC.1398.218. RESULTS: The mean vaccination coverage was 29.4% and the coverage difference among centers was not statistically significant (p = 0.192). The following items had the most impact on personnel decision: confidence about one's immune system (p < 0.05), the experience of side effects from previous vaccinations (p = 0.011), attitude about vaccination in colleagues (p = 0.021) and work experience (p < 0.05). About 23% of vaccinated individuals reported side effects following vaccination and the most common side effect was mild cold symptoms with 12.3% prevalence. CONCLUSION: The results of the current study revealed that influenza vaccination coverage among HCWs is not satisfactory in Iran. Hospital authorities and infection control units should plan to remove the obstacles of influenza vaccination.
Sujet(s)
Personnel de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Vaccins antigrippaux/administration et posologie , Grippe humaine/prévention et contrôle , Pandémies/prévention et contrôle , Couverture vaccinale/statistiques et données numériques , Vaccination/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , Attitude du personnel soignant , Études transversales , Femelle , Études de suivi , Personnel de santé/psychologie , Hôpitaux universitaires , Humains , Iran/épidémiologie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp) has emerged as a pathogen of global concern. In this study, both phenotypic and genotypic tests were used to detect hvKp. Antimicrobial resistance profiles and clonal relatedness of clinical isolates were also determined. We found that 34.2% (163/477) of the isolates were tellurite resistant, and among them 102 hvKp isolates detected with iucA or iutA or peg-344 as molecular markers. The blaSHV (80.4%), followed by blaCTX-M-15 (76.5%) and blaTEM (67.6%), blaOXA-48 (53.9%), and blaNDM-1 (32.3%) were detected, while blaKPC-1 was not present in any hvKp isolates. It was found that the majority of hvKp isolates belonged to capsular serotype K20 and ompK36 group C, which is related to clonal group (CG) 23 (e.g. ST23). A high percentage of multidrug-resistant hvKp (76.6%) and high resistance to imipenem (67%) indicated a serious problem that should be addressed in the clinical setting.
Sujet(s)
Infections à Klebsiella/diagnostic , Klebsiella pneumoniae/pathogénicité , Facteurs de virulence/génétique , Résistance bactérienne aux médicaments , Hôpitaux d'enseignement , Humains , Iran/épidémiologie , Infections à Klebsiella/épidémiologie , Klebsiella pneumoniae/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolement et purification , Tests de sensibilité microbienneRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and determine factors predicting disease prognosis and severity among patients with GI symptoms. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated laboratory confirmed (by real-time polymerase chain reaction) inpatient cases of coronavirus-associated disease 2019 (COVID-19), referred to Sina hospital, a tertiary educational hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, from March 10 to May 20, 2020. Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory data, outcomes and treatment data were extracted and analyzed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS: A total of 611 patients (234 women and 377 men) were included with 155 patients having GI symptoms. The most prevalent reported GI symptom was nausea/vomiting in 115 (18.8%) of patients. A total of 20 patients (3.2%) only had GI symptoms (without respiratory symptoms). There was no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcomes, disease severity, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality between patients with and without GI symptoms. Aspartate Aminotransferase level was associated with 446% increased risk of disease severity (adjusted odds ratio: 5.46, 95% CI: 2.01 to 14.81) (P=0.040) among patients with GI symptoms. Additionally, we found that treatment with antibiotics in addition to mechanical ventilation was associated with increased survival among patients with GI symptoms (Pearson Chi square: 6.22; P value: 0.013). CONCLUSION: More attention should be paid to patients with only GI symptoms for early patient detection and isolation. Moreover, patients with GI manifestations are not exposed to higher rates of disease severity or mortality.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19/épidémiologie , Maladies gastro-intestinales/épidémiologie , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Unités de soins intensifs/statistiques et données numériques , Pandémies , SARS-CoV-2 , Femelle , Maladies gastro-intestinales/diagnostic , Humains , Iran/épidémiologie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études rétrospectives , Indice de gravité de la maladieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: To investigate the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and its effect on adverse clinical outcomes, and parameters of immune function and mortality due to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. STUDY DESIGN: The hospital data of 235 patients infected with COVID-19 were analyzed. RESULTS: Based on CDC criteria, among our study patients, 74% had severe COVID-19 infection and 32.8% were vitamin D sufficient. After adjusting for confounding factors, there was a significant association between vitamin D sufficiency and reduction in clinical severity, inpatient mortality serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and an increase in lymphocyte percentage. Only 9.7% of patients older than 40 years who were vitamin D sufficient succumbed to the infection compared to 20% who had a circulating level of 25(OH)D< 30 ng/ml. The significant reduction in serum CRP, an inflammatory marker, along with increased lymphocytes percentage suggest that vitamin D sufficiency also may help modulate the immune response possibly by reducing risk for cytokine storm in response to this viral infection. CONCLUSION: Therefore, it is recommended that improving vitamin D status in the general population and in particular hospitalized patients has a potential benefit in reducing the severity of morbidities and mortality associated with acquiring COVID-19.
Sujet(s)
Infections à coronavirus/diagnostic , Pneumopathie virale/diagnostic , Vitamine D/analogues et dérivés , Adulte , Voies des issues indésirables , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Betacoronavirus , Protéine C-réactive/métabolisme , COVID-19 , Infections à coronavirus/mortalité , Infections à coronavirus/prévention et contrôle , Études transversales , Femelle , Humains , Immunité/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Iran , Numération des lymphocytes , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Pandémies/prévention et contrôle , Pneumopathie virale/mortalité , Pneumopathie virale/prévention et contrôle , Pronostic , SARS-CoV-2 , Résultat thérapeutique , Vitamine D/sang , Vitamine D/pharmacologie , Vitamine D/normesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing controversy about harms and benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in hypertensive patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given the unresolved debate, we investigated the association of ARBs with in-hospital outcomes of these patients. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we studied patients with COVID-19 who referred to Sina Hospital in Tehran, Iran, from 20 February to 29 May 2020. Patients with either positive real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction test of swab specimens, or high clinical suspicion according to the World Health Organization's interim guidance were included. We followed-up patients for incurring death, severe COVID-19, and in-hospital complications. RESULTS: We evaluated 681 patients with COVID-19 of whom 37 patients were excluded due to incomplete medical records and 8 patients who used ACEIs which left 636 patients in the analysis. In this cohort, 108 (17.0%) patients expired and 407 (64.0%) patients incurred severe COVID-19. Of 254 (39.9%) patients with hypertension, 122 (48.0%) patients were receiving an ARB. After adjustment for possible confounders, we found no independent association between taking ARBs and in-hospital outcomes except for acute kidney injury (AKI), in patients with confirmed or clinically suspected COVID-19, either hypertensive or not-hypertensive. We found that discontinuation of ARBs during hospitalization was associated with a greater risk of mortality, invasive ventilation, and AKI (all P Ë 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We found that taking ARBs by patients with hypertension and confirmed or clinically suspected COVID-19 is not associated with poorer in-hospital outcomes after adjustment for possible confounders.
Sujet(s)
Antagonistes des récepteurs aux angiotensines/usage thérapeutique , Antihypertenseurs/usage thérapeutique , COVID-19/thérapie , Hypertension artérielle/traitement médicamenteux , Atteinte rénale aigüe/mortalité , Sujet âgé , Antagonistes des récepteurs aux angiotensines/effets indésirables , Antihypertenseurs/effets indésirables , COVID-19/diagnostic , COVID-19/mortalité , Femelle , Mortalité hospitalière , Hospitalisation , Humains , Hypertension artérielle/diagnostic , Hypertension artérielle/mortalité , Iran , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études rétrospectives , Appréciation des risques , Facteurs de risque , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
In this study, we aimed to assess the association between development of cardiac injury and short-term mortality as well as poor in-hospital outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In this prospective, single-center study, we enrolled hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and highly suspicious patients with compatible chest computed tomography features. Cardiac injury was defined as a rise of serum high sensitivity cardiac Troponin-I level above 99th percentile (men: > 26 ng/mL, women: > 11 ng/mL). A total of 386 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were included. Cardiac injury was present among 115 (29.8%) of the study population. The development of cardiac injury was significantly associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate compared to those with normal troponin levels (40.9% vs 11.1%, p value < 0.001). It was shown that patients with cardiac injury had a significantly lower survival rate after a median follow-up of 18 days from symptom onset (p log-rank < 0.001). It was further demonstrated in the multivariable analysis that cardiac injury could possibly increase the risk of short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (HR = 1.811, p-value = 0.023). Additionally, preexisting cardiovascular disease, malignancy, blood oxygen saturation < 90%, leukocytosis, and lymphopenia at presentation were independently associated with a greater risk of developing cardiac injury. Development of cardiac injury in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was significantly associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality and poor in-hospital outcomes. Additionally, it was shown that development of cardiac injury was associated with a lower short-term survival rate compared to patients without myocardial damage and could independently increase the risk of short-term mortality by nearly two-fold.
Sujet(s)
Infections à coronavirus/complications , Lésions traumatiques du coeur/complications , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , /tendances , Pneumopathie virale/complications , Adulte , Sujet âgé , COVID-19 , Infections à coronavirus/épidémiologie , Infections à coronavirus/mortalité , Femelle , Lésions traumatiques du coeur/épidémiologie , Lésions traumatiques du coeur/mortalité , Hospitalisation/tendances , Humains , Iran/épidémiologie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , /statistiques et données numériques , Pandémies/statistiques et données numériques , Pneumopathie virale/épidémiologie , Pneumopathie virale/mortalité , Modèles des risques proportionnels , Études prospectives , Statistique non paramétrique , Taux de survie/tendancesRÉSUMÉ
An 80-year-old man with multiple comorbidities presented to the emergency department with tachypnea, tachycardia, fever, and critically low O2 saturation and definitive chest computerized tomography scan findings in favor of COVID-19 and positive PCR results in 48 hours. He received antiviral treatment plus recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) due to his severe anemia. After 7 days of treatment, he was discharged with miraculous improvement in his symptoms and hemoglobin level. We concluded that rhEPO could attenuate respiratory distress syndrome and confront the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus through multiple mechanisms including cytokine modulation, antiapoptotic effects, leukocyte release from bone marrow, and iron redistribution away from the intracellular virus.
Sujet(s)
Anémie/traitement médicamenteux , Infections à coronavirus/traitement médicamenteux , Érythropoïétine/usage thérapeutique , Fièvre/traitement médicamenteux , Pneumopathie virale/traitement médicamenteux , Tachycardie/traitement médicamenteux , Tachypnée/traitement médicamenteux , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Anémie/complications , Anémie/diagnostic , Anémie/virologie , Antiviraux/usage thérapeutique , Betacoronavirus/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Betacoronavirus/génétique , Betacoronavirus/pathogénicité , Marqueurs biologiques/sang , COVID-19 , Dépistage de la COVID-19 , Techniques de laboratoire clinique/méthodes , Convalescence , Infections à coronavirus/complications , Infections à coronavirus/diagnostic , Infections à coronavirus/virologie , Maladie grave , Fièvre/complications , Fièvre/diagnostic , Fièvre/virologie , Humains , Iran , Mâle , Pandémies , Pneumopathie virale/complications , Pneumopathie virale/diagnostic , Pneumopathie virale/virologie , ARN viral/sang , ARN viral/génétique , RT-PCR , SARS-CoV-2 , Tachycardie/complications , Tachycardie/diagnostic , Tachycardie/virologie , Tachypnée/complications , Tachypnée/diagnostic , Tachypnée/virologie , Tomodensitométrie , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
Objectives: We assessed the effect of selenium and zinc supplementation on CD4 cell count and the risk of developing opportunistic infections.Methods: In a double blind clinical trial, 146 HIV(+) patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy with CD4(+) >200/cubic millimeter were screened for comorbidities and opportunistic infections, and randomized to receive daily selenium (200 µg), zinc (50 mg) or placebo for 6 months, before a 3-month follow-up period. CD4 cell counts were measured in the 3th, 6th and 9th months. The serum selenium and zinc were measured in the 6th month. The incidence of opportunistic infection was assessed monthly for 6 months and at the end of the 9th month.Results: The final incidence of supplement deficiency for placebo, zinc and selenium were 46.7%, 44.7% and 50.0%, respectively. Overall compliance with supplementation was 99.42%. Although the changes from baseline were not statistically significant, zinc supplementation was significantly associated with reduced risk of opportunistic infections.Conclusion: Development of the opportunistic infections after zinc supplementation significantly decreased; however, significant improvement in CD4 count was not observed in this group.
Sujet(s)
Infections opportunistes liées au SIDA/prévention et contrôle , Thérapie antirétrovirale hautement active , Infections à VIH/traitement médicamenteux , Sélénium/usage thérapeutique , Oligoéléments/usage thérapeutique , Zinc/usage thérapeutique , Infections opportunistes liées au SIDA/sang , Infections opportunistes liées au SIDA/épidémiologie , Syndrome d'immunodéficience acquise/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Numération des lymphocytes CD4 , Méthode en double aveugle , Femelle , Infections à VIH/sang , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyenRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is a growing concern regarding the lack of new antibiotics, especially for multidrug- resistant bacteria that produce Extended Spectrum ß-Lactamases (ESBLs). The present study aims to assess the preva- lence of bacteria producing ESBLs, their antimicrobial resistance pattern, and its main determinants among hospitalized patients. METHODS: The study population included 383 consecutive patients with a definitive diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI). All eligible subjects for the study had a positive culture for gram-negative microorganisms in urine specimens. ESBL producing isolates were characterized phenotypically for ESBL production using the double disc synergy test. RESULTS: In total, 383 specimens were assessed, among which 212 (55.4%) were related to bacteria producing ESBLs (ESBL+). Of those with ESBL + infections, 65.5% were sourced from catheters (as hospital-associated UTIs), and 35.5% were categorized as community-associated UTIs. In the group consisting of bacteria producing ESBLs, the high- est sensitivity was observed with Imipenem (72.2%), while the highest resistance was revealed with ceftriaxone (100%). CONCLUSION: We have shown that our community faces a high prevalence of bacteria producing ESBLs, mostly sourced from the catheterization of hospitalized patients. The highest bacterial sensitivity was observed with Imipenem, nitrofu- rantoin, and amikacin, while the highest resistance was found with ceftriaxone and cotrimoxazole, suggesting the inef- fectiveness of using the two latter antibiotics for eradicating these bacterial infections. On the other hand, a history of urinary catheterization and previous hospitalization were two main determinants of their presence, a finding which em- phasizes the importance of avoiding catheterization and hospitalization of patients with UTIs without proper indications.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common disease considered as a major public health problem. It causes considerable morbidity and mortality despite antibiotic treatments. Hospital admission of CAP patients is a significant financial burden and many efforts are ongoing to decrease hospital stay durations. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased risk of respiratory infections. This study was designed to determine the association of vitamin D status with hospitalized CAP patient mortality and disease severity. METHODS: This prospective cohort study examined 180 CAP patients admitted to a teaching Hospital in Tehran, Iran during 2016-2017. Their demographic and anthropometric characteristics were recorded. The disease severity was evaluated based on CURB-65. Vitamin D status was determined by measuring by serum 25-hydroxylated vitamin D (25(OH)D) with ELISA. The patients were followed for 30 days to evaluate their vitality. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty pneumonia patients, including 104 males and 84 females, were recruited from respiratory disease, infectious disease, emergency, and ICU wards. Nearly 18% of the patients were current smokers. The CAP severity, evaluated by CURB-65, was determined to be non-severe in 74.4% of the patients. Patients were classified as vitamin D sufficient, insufficient, or deficient. Thirty percent of the patients were vitamin D sufficient, 18% were insufficient, and 52% were deficient. Thirty-day mortality was 40% (72 cases). Mortality was greater in males than in females (47.1% vs. 30.3%, p=0.03). The disease was significantly less severe in the patients who survived than in those who did not. The vitamin D status differed between males and females (p=0.027). The vitamin D status was lower in the more severe cases than in the less (p=0.036), and vitamin D deficiency was more prevalent in patients who died than in those who lived. Vitamin D concentration was negatively correlated with hospital stay duration. The 25(OH)D concentration was significantly greater in patients who survived than in those who did not (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pneumonia severity and mortality risk were greater and hospital stays longer in vitamin D-deficient patients than in those with higher vitamin D status.