Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrer
1.
Contraception ; 103(2): 103-106, 2021 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098849

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: We examined whether provision of contraception at discharge following delivery was associated with lower rates of postpartum visit (PPV) attendance. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who received pregnancy care at a Midwestern medical center in 2013. Attendance at the postpartum visit was compared for women with sterilization, contraception initiated prior to discharge (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or etonogestrel implant), hormonal contraception prescription, or no contraception provided at postpartum discharge. Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were used to estimate the relative risk of postpartum visit attendance controlling for age, race, and parity, insurance status, and histories of both depression and drug abuse. RESULTS: Of the 1015 women who met inclusion criteria, 55% had been prescribed contraception, had initiated contraception prior to discharge, or were sterilized at the time of discharge following delivery. After adjustment for confounders, there was no association between receiving contraception and PPV attendance (relative risk for prescribed contraception = 1.09 [95% CI 0.85, 1.39], for contraception initiated prior to discharge = 0.83 [95% CI 0.67, 1.03], for sterilization = 0.86 [95% CI 0.63, 1.17] compared to no contraception). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that prescribing or administering contraception post-delivery was associated with lower rates of return for postpartum follow up. IMPLICATIONS: This single site study suggests that providing effective contraception at discharge following delivery does not appear to impact PPV attendance.


Sujet(s)
Contraception , Sortie du patient , Femelle , Humains , Période du postpartum , Grossesse , Études rétrospectives , Stérilisation contraceptive
2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 102(3): 511-519, 2017 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28160288

RÉSUMÉ

High-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation remains the standard of care for eligible patients with multiple myeloma, but disease response and toxicity, including severe mucositis, varies among patients. Our randomized trial investigated duration of cryotherapy (2 and 6 h) for reduction of mucositis prevalence and severity and explored factors associated with variability in pharmacokinetics and outcomes from melphalan therapy. The results demonstrate that 2-h is at least as effective as 6-h cryotherapy in decreasing severe mucositis. From a population pharmacokinetic model, we identified that fat-free mass, hematocrit, and creatinine clearance were significant covariates, as reported previously. Furthermore, we observed the rs4240803 SLC7A5 polymorphism was significantly associated with pharmacokinetic variability, and pharmacokinetics was associated with both mucositis and neutropenia. However, melphalan exposure was not associated with progression-free or overall survival in our dataset. These findings contribute to ongoing efforts to personalize melphalan dosing in transplant patients.


Sujet(s)
Antinéoplasiques alcoylants/administration et posologie , Cryothérapie/méthodes , Melphalan/administration et posologie , Myélome multiple/thérapie , Stomatite/prévention et contrôle , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Antinéoplasiques alcoylants/effets indésirables , Antinéoplasiques alcoylants/pharmacocinétique , Association thérapeutique , Créatinine/métabolisme , Survie sans rechute , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Femelle , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/méthodes , Humains , Transporteur-1 d'acides aminés neutres à longue chaîne/génétique , Mâle , Melphalan/effets indésirables , Melphalan/pharmacocinétique , Adulte d'âge moyen , Polymorphisme génétique , Stomatite/induit chimiquement , Taux de survie , Facteurs temps
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 124(2): 221-4, 2012 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22055764

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Hematologic, gastrointestinal, and neurologic complications are common side effects of the platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy used in the primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). These side effects and the impact of the resultant chemotherapy dose modification on disease free interval have not been extensively studied. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of chemotherapy delays and dose reductions on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: A review of patients with primary epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinoma treated between 1/2000 and 12/2007 was performed. Inclusion criteria were advanced stage disease and first line chemotherapy with a platinum and taxane regimen. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the effect of chemotherapy reductions and delays on PFS and OS. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into four groups: no delays or reductions (48%), delay only (27%), reduction only (8%), and both delay and reduction (18%). The mean number of delays/reductions per patient was 1.1 (range=0-5) and therapy was delayed a mean of 8 days. The most common reasons for delays/reductions were neutropenia (n=51), thrombocytopenia (n=45), and neuropathy (n=18). There were no differences detected in PFS or OS between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences detected in survival between patients who required dose adjustments and treatment delays and those who did not. The lack of association between survival and chemotherapy alterations suggests that in specific circumstances patients with advanced ovarian cancer should have individualized treatment plans.


Sujet(s)
Antinéoplasiques/administration et posologie , Tumeurs épithéliales épidermoïdes et glandulaires/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Carcinome épithélial de l'ovaire , Survie sans rechute , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Calendrier d'administration des médicaments , Femelle , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs épithéliales épidermoïdes et glandulaires/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/anatomopathologie , Études rétrospectives , Taux de survie , Jeune adulte
4.
Ann Oncol ; 16(7): 1087-93, 2005 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15849219

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I trial to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of non-pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (Myocet; D-99) administered with weekly docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with no prior chemotherapy for MBC received D-99 (60 or 50 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 and escalating doses of docetaxel (25, 30 and 35 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8 in cohorts of three to six patients. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 50 mg/m2 of D-99 in combination with 25 mg/m2 of weekly docetaxel. The most common grade 4 toxicity was neutropenia that occurred in 42 (41%) of treatment cycles, with 10 hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia. Serious protocol-defined cardiac events occurred in three (14%) patients, with two (10%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1% to 30%) developing congestive heart failure (CHF) after a total cumulative anthracycline dose (adjuvant doxorubicin + D-99) of 540 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: D-99 in combination with weekly docetaxel, at the doses and schedule as administered in this trial, is not recommended for phase II testing. Additional trials, using different doses and schedules, are required to evaluate the potential side-effects and efficacy of D-99 and docetaxel.


Sujet(s)
Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Tumeurs du sein/traitement médicamenteux , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/administration et posologie , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/effets indésirables , Tumeurs du sein/anatomopathologie , Docetaxel , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Doxorubicine/administration et posologie , Calendrier d'administration des médicaments , Femelle , Coeur/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Humains , Liposomes , Adulte d'âge moyen , Métastase tumorale , Analyse de survie , Taxoïdes/administration et posologie
5.
Ann Epidemiol ; 11(3): 186-93, 2001 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11248582

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: This study assesses the accuracy of 1989-1992 birth certificate data from New Jersey for a group of high-risk women. METHODS: Birth records were linked to data on women who participated in HealthStart, a program of enriched prenatal care for pregnant women on Medicaid. Concordance was assessed for all variables common to the two data sets. RESULTS: The birth records had accurate reporting of birth-weight, demographic characteristics, and most methods of delivery. Prenatal care use was over-reported, and alcohol, tobacco, transfer status, medical risk factors, obstetric procedures, as well as complications of labor and delivery were underreported. CONCLUSIONS: While many variables are reported very accurately on birth certificates, other measures must be used cautiously. Analyses using birth certificate data, particularly those focusing on high-risk women, need to take the low levels of sensitivity for many risk factors into consideration.


Sujet(s)
Certificats de naissance , Protection maternelle/statistiques et données numériques , Medicaid (USA)/organisation et administration , Prise en charge prénatale/statistiques et données numériques , Évaluation de programme/méthodes , Poids de naissance , Femelle , Âge gestationnel , Humains , Nouveau-né , Medicaid (USA)/statistiques et données numériques , Dossiers médicaux/normes , New Jersey/épidémiologie , Complications du travail obstétrical/épidémiologie , Planification des soins du patient , Grossesse , Grossesse à haut risque , Prise en charge prénatale/organisation et administration , Contrôle de qualité , Reproductibilité des résultats , Appréciation des risques , Facteurs de risque
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...