Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
1.
Nephrol Ther ; 17(4): 252-259, 2021 Aug.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034972

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: The health crisis linked to the COVID-19 epidemic has required lockdown measures in France and changes in practices in dialysis centers. The objective was to assess the depressive and anxiety symptoms during lockdown in hemodialysis patients and their caregivers. METHODS: We sent, during lockdown period, between April and May 2020, self-questionnaires to voluntary subjects (patients and caregivers), treated by hemodialysis or who worked in hemodialysis in one of the 14 participating centers in France. We analyzed their perception of dialysis sessions (beneficial or worrying), their stress level (VAS rated from 0 to 10), their anxiety and depressive symptoms (Hospital anxiety and depression scale). Factors associated with stress, anxiety and depression were analyzed with multiple linear regression models. RESULTS: 669 patients and 325 caregivers agreed to participate. 70 % of participants found it beneficial to come to dialysis during confinement. The proportions of subjects with a stress level ≥ 6 linked to the epidemic, confinement, fear of contracting COVID-19 and fear of infecting a loved one were respectively 23.9%, 26.2%, 33.4% and 42%. 39.2% presented with certain (13.7%) or doubtful (19.2%) anxious symptoms. 21.2% presented a certain (7.9%) or doubtful (13.3%) depressive symptomatology. Age, gender, history of psychological disorders and perception of dialysis sessions were associated with levels of stress, anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: During the lockdown period, in France, the majority of hemodialysis patients and caregivers found it beneficial to come to dialysis. One in three subjects had anxiety symptoms and one in five subjects had depressive symptoms.


Sujet(s)
Anxiété/étiologie , COVID-19 , Contrôle des maladies transmissibles , Dépression/étiologie , Peur , Stress psychologique/étiologie , Facteurs âges , Sujet âgé , Aidants/psychologie , Épidémies , Femelle , France/épidémiologie , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Facteurs sexuels , Enquêtes et questionnaires
2.
Nephrol Ther ; 12(7): 525-529, 2016 Dec.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27771192

RÉSUMÉ

Early information about the kidney transplant is recommended to begin quickly the process of registration on the kidney transplantation waiting list, even for the patients not dialyzed at stage V of the renal insufficiency. It is a strategic choice for the patient care. From the arrival of all the patients in our center of dialysis, a systematic evaluation of the access to the kidney transplant waiting list is organized thanks to a clinical pathway. The impact of this new organization was estimated at 18 months with regard to the information about the kidney transplant transmitted to the patient, of the time required for the assessment of pre-kidney transplant evaluation, and of putting in contraindication. On 78 incident patients, 64 received the information concerning the kidney transplant. After 18 months, 50 clinical pathways are finalized at the time of the analysis among which 25 with a period lower than 6 days and 25 with a median of 169 days. A significant difference of age exists between both groups. The main causes of definitive medical contraindications were estimated. Twenty-two percent of the clinical pathway finalized is awaiting lifting of temporary contraindication. The management of the patient is improved, due to motivation of all the medical teams and a considerable work of coordination between the secretarial department and the department of transplantation in teaching hospital.


Sujet(s)
Programme clinique , Défaillance rénale chronique/chirurgie , Transplantation rénale/enseignement et éducation , Éducation du patient comme sujet , Listes d'attente , Sujet âgé , Indice de masse corporelle , Femelle , Humains , Communication interdisciplinaire , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sélection de patients , Orientation vers un spécialiste , Reproductibilité des résultats , Facteurs de risque
3.
Nephrol Ther ; 9(4): 215-21, 2013 Jul.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23755943

RÉSUMÉ

In order to rationalize the cost of care for dialysis patients in Centre, regulatory authorities urge establishments to favor the orientation of the patients in Medical Dialysis Unit where the medical presence is not permanent. This involves clinical skills for nurses in the conduct of the dialysis session. Faced with this changing work patterns, we present two security tools of the dialysis session. The first is a "check-list", simple, quick and easy to use, it enables secure connection phase of the patient. It was quickly integrated practice of all professionals. The second tool developed is a combination of indicators "DEAUP" for Pain, Purification, Blood access, Ultrafiltration and other Problems for assessing the quality of the course of the dialysis session. The aim is to reduce the occurrence of adverse events, the DEAUP rating certain criteria depending on the occurrence of incidents, from 0 to 2, 2 corresponding to the appearance of an incident having required the call of the doctor and constitute a precious tool of evaluation of the session for all the professionals. All nurses have joined the practice of evaluation, 98% of the realized sessions are informed and quoted; 8.4% of sessions required call nephrologists before or at the connection. The evaluation at the end of dialysis session found 15% of the sessions listed 2. Calls have resulted in an adjustment to the prescription of the sessions.


Sujet(s)
Défaillance rénale chronique/thérapie , Qualité des soins de santé , Dialyse rénale/méthodes , Liste de contrôle , Recherche sur les services de santé , Humains , Dialyse rénale/effets indésirables , Dialyse rénale/normes
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...