Understanding current ergonomics setup for urologists conducting anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate surgeries: Survey analysis from the endourological society.

BACKGROUND: Ensuring ergonomic posture and safety for surgeons is key to preventing work-related injuries and promoting sustained practice. We evaluated ergonomic aspects of Anatomic Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate (AEEP) and its relation to musculoskeletal injuries. METHOD: A two-month online survey involving 119 Endourological Society members provided an in-depth analysis of AEEP practices and their musculoskeletal impacts. RESULTS: The sample experienced general (65.5%), back (32.8%), neck (35.3%) and shoulder (37%) pain. Female AEEP surgeons reported greater back pain. Experience and age were inversely related to MSK injuries, and operative times over 2 â€‹h increased back pain. AEEP procedures predominantly involved sitting (86%) on backless stools (58%), with most surgeons wearing protective eyewear (75.6%) and using large resectoscopes (76.5%). Monitors were usually above eye-level (57%) and beyond 1 â€‹m (68.9%). CONCLUSION: Musculoskeletal complaints are prevalent among AEEP endourologists. More awareness and further studies on risk factors are necessary to limit work-related injuries in urology.

Reimagining Ambulatory Care in Urology: Conversion of the Urology Clinic into a Procedure Center Improves Patient's Experience.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic made it necessary to practice social distancing and limited in-person encounters in health care. These restrictions created alternative opportunities to enhance patient access to care in the ambulatory setting. We hypothesized that by transforming clinics into centers that prioritize procedures and transitioning ambulatory appointments to telehealth, we could establish a secure, streamlined, and productive method for providing patient care. Methods: Clinic templates were restructured to allow the use of the physical space to perform procedure-based clinics exclusively, while switching to virtual telemedicine for all nonprocedural encounters. Staff members were given specific roles to support one of the patient care modalities for a given day (Procedures vs. Telehealth). Performance and patient satisfaction metrics were collected between two periods of time defined as P1 (February-June 2019) and P2 Post-COVID (February-June 2020) and compared. These served as proxies of periods when the clinic workflow and templates were structured in the traditional versus the emerging way. Statistical analysis was performed using bivariate analyses. Results: The percentage of procedures performed among all in-person visits were higher in P2 compared to P1 (45% vs. 29%, p < 0.001). Although total charges and relative value units were lower in P2, the overall revenue generated was higher compared to P1 ($4,597,846 vs. $4,517,427$, respectively). This increase in revenue was mainly driven by the higher relative income generated by procedures. Patient experience, reflected through patient-reported outcomes, was more favorable in P2 where patients seemed more likely to "Recommend this provider office" (90% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.01), report improved "Access overall" (56% vs. 49%, p = 0.02), and felt they were "Moving through your visit overall" (59% vs. 51%, p = 0.007). Conclusions: Our data suggest that reorganizing urology clinics into a space that is centered around outpatient procedures can represent a model that improves the patient's access to care and clinical experience, while simultaneously improving operational financial strength. This efficient care model could be considered for many practice settings and drive high-value outpatient care.

Voided volume may not impact stone outcomes: Review of a large institutional nephrolithiasis cohort.

Background: Urologic guidelines universally recommend increasing fluid intake for kidney stone prevention. Increased voided volume is thought to help reduce stone recurrence and severity, but supporting evidence is limited. Patients and Methods: Nephrolithiasis outcomes and 24-h urine data for patients from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU), a registry of nephrolithiasis patients collected between 2015 and 2020, were retrospectively analysed. Outcome was stone events, either an office visit where a patient reports symptomatic passage of stones or surgery for stone removal. Results: We identified 450 stone patients with 24-h urine and kidney stone outcome data. There was no significant difference in 24-h voided volume between patients with one stone event and patients with two or more stone events. On multivariable logistic regression, after controlling for age, gender, BMI, and 24-h sodium and creatinine per kilogram, no significant associations were found between voided volume and stone events. There was a statistically significant negative correlation noted between voided volume and stone events in calcium oxalate dihydrate stone formers (Spearman R = -0.42, p = 0.04), but not others. Conclusions: Twenty-four-hour voided volume was not associated with stone events in a large institutional cohort, and subset analysis reveals that some stone formers may benefit more from increased voided volume than others; identifying such patients represents a novel precision medicine opportunity.

Clinical and postoperative characteristics of stentless ureteroscopy patients: a prospective analysis from ReSKU.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical characteristics as well as the postoperative course of urolithiasis patients undergoing a ureteroscopy (URS) without stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective case cohort study utilizing data collected in the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU) from a single institution between October 2015 and December 2020. We identified all consecutive patients undergoing URS for stone disease and analyzed data encompassing demographics, medical history, intra and postoperative characteristics, including complications and postoperative symptoms. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed based on the presence or absence of an indwelling ureteral stent. RESULTS: A total of 470 patients were included for analysis, 92 patients in the stentless group (19.5%). Factors associated with stentless ureteroscopy were a lower stone burden (p < 0.001), the pre-existence of a ureteral stent (37.4% vs. 27.9% p = 0.011), absence of an access sheath (14.6% vs. 69.5% p < 0.001), and a shorter operative time (31 vs. 58 min p < 0.001). Postoperative gross hematuria and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were reported less frequently in stentless patients (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, respectively). There was no difference in postoperative complications between both groups (15.2% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.385). On multivariate analysis, the risk of postoperative complications was associated with obesity, stone burden ≥ 1 cm, and positive preoperative urine culture. There was no patient who required emergent stent placement in the stentless group. CONCLUSION: Our data show that, in well selected patients, omitting ureteral stent placement after URS can decrease postoperative gross hematuria and LUTS without increasing postoperative complications.

Ultrasound-Only Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is Safe and Effective Compared to Fluoroscopy-Directed Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Introduction: Outcomes after ultrasound-only percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), in which no fluoroscopy is used, are not well known. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes of ultrasound-only and fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter database were reviewed for all patients who underwent PCNL at one academic center from 2015 to 2021. Primary outcomes were complications and stone-free rates (no residual fragments ≥3 mm). Results: Of the 141 patients who underwent ultrasound-only PCNL and 147 who underwent fluoroscopy-directed PCNL, there was no difference in complication rates (15% vs 16%, p = 0.87) or stone-free status (71% vs 65%, p = 0.72), respectively. After adjusting for body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score, ultrasound-only PCNL was not associated with any increased odds of complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-1.6, p = 0.41) or residual stone fragments ≥3 mm (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-1.9, p = 0.972) compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL. Ultrasound-only PCNL was associated with shorter operative time (median 99.5 vs 126 minutes, p < 0.001), and the use of ultrasound remained a significant predictor of short operative time (<100 minutes) after controlling for supine positioning, stone size, and stone complexity by Guy score (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.29, p = 0.048). Patients in the ultrasound-only group were spared a mean radiation exposure dose of 10 mGy per procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasound-only PCNL is safe and achieves similar stone-free rates compared with fluoroscopy-directed PCNL with the added benefit of avoidance of radiation.

Single-Use Ureteroscopes Are Associated with Decreased Risk of Urinary Tract Infection After Ureteroscopy for Urolithiasis Compared to Reusable Ureteroscopes.

Objective: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common complication after ureteroscopy. Despite sterilization, there is evidence that reusable ureteroscopes can still harbor bacteria. Whether this property is associated with increased risk of UTI is unknown. The objective of this study was to compare rates of postoperative UTI after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis performed with single-use ureteroscopes vs reusable ureteroscopes. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent ureteroscopy for urolithiasis between June 2012 and March 2021. Outcomes were compared between those who underwent stone removal with single-use and reusable ureteroscopes. The primary endpoint was postoperative UTI. The secondary endpoints were intra-operative and postoperative outcomes, and health service utilization after surgery. Results: Of 991 patients identified, 500 (50.4%) underwent ureteroscopy with a single-use ureteroscope. Rates of postoperative UTI were lower in those undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal with a single-use ureteroscope compared to a reusable ureteroscope (6.5% vs 11.9%, p = 0.018). In multivariable analysis, use of a single-use ureteroscope was associated with lower odds of postoperative UTI compared to a reusable ureteroscope when adjusting for risk (odds ratio 0.37, p = 0.015). Use of a single-use ureteroscope was associated with a higher stone clearance rate compared to a reusable ureteroscope (90.0% vs 83.9%, p = 0.005). There was no difference in operative time, overall complication rate, readmission, or emergency department visits between two groups. Conclusion: Single-use ureteroscopes are associated with a twofold decreased risk of UTI and increased stone clearance rate after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis compared to reusable ureteroscopes.

Maternal family history of urolithiasis is associated with earlier age of onset of stone disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of detailed family history on the severity of disease and age of onset in patients with urolithiasis. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from a single institution between October 2015 and December 2020 were analyzed. Our primary endpoint was the number of patients experiencing at least one recurrent stone during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Of 1566 patients analyzed, 603 (39%) reported at least one family member with a history of stones. The percentage of patients experiencing at least one recurrent stone event was higher in patients with a family history of stones (38%) compared to those without a family history of stones (28%) over a median follow-up period of 8 months (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the presence of any family history of urolithiasis increased risk of recurrent stone events (odds ratio [OR] 1.62, p < 0.001). The presence of both a first- and a second-degree relative with urolithiasis was associated with higher odds for a recurrent stone event (OR 2.17; p = 0.003) and a younger age of onset for stones, (OR 3.32; < 0.001). A maternal-side relative with stones conferred a higher odds ratio for younger age of first onset of stones (OR 2.93; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Any family history of kidney stone disease imparts an increased risk of recurrent stone event and an earlier age of onset for urolithiasis. The presence of both first- and second-degree relatives or a maternal-side relative with kidney stones may be a predictor for an earlier age of onset for urolithiasis.

Determinants of ureteral obstruction after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

BACKGROUND: Ureteral obstruction after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) may require prolonged drainage with a nephrostomy tube (NT) or ureteral stent, but it is not well understood how and why this occurs. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors associated with postoperative ureteral obstruction to help guide drainage tube selection. METHODS: Prospective data from adult patients enrolled in the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU) who underwent PCNL from 2016 to 2020 were used. Patients who had postoperative NTs with antegrade imaging-based flow assessment on postoperative day one (POD1) were included. Patients with transplanted kidneys or those without appropriate preoperative imaging were excluded. We assessed the association between patient demographics, stone characteristics, and intraoperative factors using POD1 antegrade flow, a proxy for ureteral patency, as the primary outcome. Stepwise selection was used to develop a multivariate logistic regression model controlling for BMI, stone location, stone burden, ipsilateral ureteroscopy (URS), access location, estimated blood loss, and operative time. RESULTS: We analyzed 241 cases for this study; 204 (84.6%) had a visual clearance of stone. Antegrade flow on POD1 was absent in 76 cases (31.5%). A multivariate logistic regression model found that stones located anywhere other than in the renal pelvis (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.29-5.53; p = 0.01), non-lower pole access (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.42-5.74; p < 0.01), and concurrent ipsilateral URS (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.02-4.65; p = 0.05) increased the likelihood of obstruction. BMI, pre-operative stone burden, EBL, and operative time did not affect antegrade flow outcomes. CONCLUSION: Concurrent ipsilateral URS, absence of stones in the renal pelvis, and non-lower pole access are associated with increased likelihood of ureteral obstruction after PCNL. Access location appears to be the strongest predictor. Recognizing these risk factors can be helpful in guiding postoperative tube management.

The Journey and Barriers to Treatment of Patients With Renal Nutcracker Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand renal nutcracker syndrome (NCS) from a patients' perspective starting at presentation and followed through to diagnosis and management METHODS: This descriptive study was conducted on a national level via a self-selected online survey distributed via river sampling by a post on the Facebook Page 'Renal Nutcracker Syndrome Support Group.' RESULTS: Of the 22 responses collected, 95.5% were female and 91% self-identified as White. 43% experienced symptoms as teenagers and 62% were diagnosed as young adults. Prior to receiving a definitive diagnosis, over half of the respondents were worked up for kidney stones (57%) and ovarian cysts (48%) and saw at least 10-15 providers. Nearly 80% experienced constant pain throughout the day. Pain management included prescription oral pain relievers (38%), prescription patches (29%), and physical therapy (19%). Surgical procedures included nephrectomy with auto transplant (38%), left renal vein transposition (10%), and laparoscopic extravascular stent placement (10%). Respondents had high healthcare utilization for management of NCS. Nearly 30% were unable to work and had filed for disability. CONCLUSION: Awareness of NCS should increase among healthcare providers of all specialties to improve quality of care to those living with NCS. It is crucial to keep NCS within the differential diagnosis in patients presenting with gross hematuria and unusual abdominal and/or flank pain.

A large staghorn stone diagnosed and managed in an asymptomatic patient using the "Kidney Injury Test (Kit)" spot urine assay: A case report.

The Kidney Injury Test (KIT) Stone-Score provides an objective measure of stone burden. Unlike urinary supersaturation the KIT Stone-Scores assess underlying stone disease rather than urinary solute composition. We report a case of a 43-year-old woman with no history of nephrolithiasis who underwent an elective, voluntary KIT assay and was diagnosed with a large staghorn renal stone after an unanticipated markedly elevated score. This clinical scenario highlights the potential future use of the non-invasive urinary KIT assay as a reliable non-invasive tool to detect and monitor urinary stone disease.

Nedosiran Dramatically Reduces Serum Oxalate in Dialysis-Dependent Primary Hyperoxaluria 1: A Compassionate Use Case Report.

Primary hyperoxaluria 1 (PH1) is a devastating condition involving recurrent urolithiasis, early end-stage renal disease and multisystemic deposition of calcium oxalate crystals. Treatment options for PH1 are limited, inevitably requiring transplantation, usually combined kidney and liver transplant. Here we report successful compassionate use of Nedosiran, an RNA interference targeting lactate dehydrogenase, in an index patient. Monthly Nedosiran injections led to dramatically decreased plasma oxalate levels, decreased frequency of weekly hemodialysis sessions from 6 to 3, and deferral of combined kidney and liver transplant. Nedosiran represents a novel and impactful potential therapeutic for PH1 patients with end-stage renal disease.

Use of testicular sperm in couples with SCSA-defined high sperm DNA fragmentation and failed intracytoplasmic sperm injection using ejaculated sperm.

Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) has been linked with male infertility, and previous studies suggest that SDF can have negative influence on pregnancy outcomes with assisted reproduction. We performed a retrospective review of consecutive couples with a high SDF level that had intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using testicular sperm (T-ICSI). We compared the T-ICSI outcomes to that of two control groups: 87 couples with failed first ICSI cycle and who had a second ICSI cycle using ejaculated sperm (Ej-ICSI), and 48 consecutive couples with high sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA)-defined SDF (>15%) that underwent an ICSI cycle using ejaculated sperm after one or more failed ICSI cycles (Ej-ICSI-high SDF). The mean number of oocytes that were retrieved and the total number of embryos were not different among the three groups. The mean number of transferred embryos in the T-ICSI group was higher than the Ej-ICSI group but not significantly different than the Ej-ICSI-high SDF group (1.4, 1.2, and 1.3, respectively, P < 0.05). Clinical pregnancy rate in the T-ICSI group was not significantly different than the Ej-ICSI and Ej-ICSI-high SDF groups (48.6%, 48.2%, and 38.7%, respectively, P > 0.05). No significant difference was found in live birth rate when comparing T-ICSI to Ej-ICSI and Ej-ICSI-high SDF groups. The results suggest that pregnancy outcomes and live birth rates with T-ICSI are not significantly superior to Ej-ICSI in patients with an elevated SCSA-defined sperm DNA fragmentation and prior ICSI failure(s).