Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 80(4): 545-552, 2024 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253701

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: Many atrial fibrillation (AF) patients use cardiovascular medications for indications other than AF. These medications can affect morbidity and mortality. We aim to investigate the characteristics of AF patients who use different medication classes and their clinical course. METHODS: We collected data from the prospective, multicenter registry, JoFib study. We identified classes of non-AF medications (medications not used for rate control, rhythm control, or anticoagulation), described demographic and clinical characteristics, and investigated AF-related outcomes according to these medication classes. RESULTS: From a total of 2020 patients, five classes of cardiovascular non-AF medications were identified, aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, statins, and diuretics. The most commonly used non-AF medications were diuretics and ACE inhibitors/ARBs (39.2%, and 39%, respectively). 51% of AF patients took more than one non-AF medication. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy independently reduced the risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (aHR 0.50, 95%CI 0.37-0.68; aHR 0.51, 95%CI 0.34-0.75, respectively) and that statin therapy reduced the risk of cardiovascular mortality (aHR 0.68, 95%CI 0.48-0.98) in AF patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated a protective effect of statin therapy against the secondary outcome, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) (adjusted OR 0.62 95%CI 0.42-0.94). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a protective effect of ACE inhibitors/ARBs against all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, statins against cardiovascular mortality, and CRNMB in patients with AF. Accordingly, these medications should be encouraged in patients with AF when indicated. Additionally, future research should explore whether these medications should be offered to AF patients more routinely. The study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier number: NCT03917992, Registration date:14/4/2019).


Sujet(s)
Fibrillation auriculaire , Agents cardiovasculaires , Maladies cardiovasculaires , Inhibiteurs de l'hydroxyméthylglutaryl-CoA réductase , Humains , Antagonistes des récepteurs aux angiotensines/usage thérapeutique , Inhibiteurs de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine/usage thérapeutique , Fibrillation auriculaire/traitement médicamenteux , Agents cardiovasculaires/usage thérapeutique , Maladies cardiovasculaires/traitement médicamenteux , Diurétiques/usage thérapeutique , Hémorragie/induit chimiquement , Inhibiteurs de l'hydroxyméthylglutaryl-CoA réductase/usage thérapeutique , Études prospectives
2.
Vasc Health Risk Manag ; 19: 145-155, 2023.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36968249

RÉSUMÉ

Aim: The risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients were assessed according to the "Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic or Artificial" (EHRA) classification. Additionally, the safety and efficacy of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were compared in AF patients with EHRA type 2 valvular heart disease (VHD) versus those with no VHD. Methods: AF patients enrolled in the "Jordan Atrial Fibrillation (JoFib)" study were followed up for thromboembolic events and major bleeding at 30, 180, and 365 days. Patients in the EHRA type 2 VHD and non-VHD groups were sub-grouped to compare different OACs. Results: 2020 AF patients were recruited. The thromboembolic risk was higher in EHRA type 2 VHD patients compared to non-VHD controls. Major bleeding also occurred at higher rates in EHRA type 2 patients. In addition, NOACs were more effective in preventing thromboembolic events than VKAs and non-anticoagulation in EHRA type 2 VHD patients. Furthermore, EHRA type 2 VHD patients taking rivaroxaban had significantly less thromboembolic risk than their non-anticoagulated counterparts. At the same time, apixaban and warfarin did not significantly lower the risk of thromboembolism compared to non-anticoagulation. Conclusion: AF patients with EHRA type 2 VHD are at significant risk of thromboembolism and major bleeding. Furthermore, NOACs were more effective than VKAs in preventing thromboembolic events in this group of patients without conferring an added risk of major bleeding. Moreover, rivaroxaban appears to be particularly efficacious.


Sujet(s)
Fibrillation auriculaire , Valvulopathies , Accident vasculaire cérébral , Thromboembolie , Humains , Fibrillation auriculaire/complications , Fibrillation auriculaire/diagnostic , Fibrillation auriculaire/traitement médicamenteux , Rivaroxaban/effets indésirables , Anticoagulants/effets indésirables , Administration par voie orale , Jordanie , Accident vasculaire cérébral/prévention et contrôle , Hémorragie/induit chimiquement , Thromboembolie/diagnostic , Thromboembolie/épidémiologie , Thromboembolie/étiologie , Valvulopathies/complications , Valvulopathies/diagnostic , Valvulopathies/traitement médicamenteux
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE