Meta-Analysis of Visual Evoked Potential and Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested that visual evoked potential (VEP) was impaired in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), but the results were inconsistent. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore whether the VEP was significantly different between PD patients and healthy controls. Case-control studies of PD were selected through an electronic search of the databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We calculated the pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between individuals with PD and controls using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Twenty case-control studies which met our inclusion criteria were included in the final meta-analysis. We found that the P100 latency in PD was significantly higher compared with healthy controls (pooled WMD = 6.04, 95% CI: 2.73 to 9.35, P=0.0003, n=20). However, the difference in the mean amplitude of P100 was not significant between the two groups (pooled WMD = 0.64, 95% CI: -0.06 to 1.33, P=0.07) based on 10 studies with the P100 amplitude values available. CONCLUSIONS: The higher P100 latency of VEP was observed in PD patients, relative to healthy controls. Our findings suggest that electrophysiological changes and functional defect in the visual pathway of PD patients are important to our understanding of the pathophysiology of visual involvement in PD.

Four novel mutations in the GCH1 gene of Chinese patients with dopa-responsive dystonia.

Mutation detection in the guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase I gene (GCH1) was performed from 4 female patients with dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD). DNA sequencing revealed the presence of four novel mutations including c.2T>C(M1T), c.239G>A(S80N), c.245T>C(L82P), and IVS5+3 del AAGT. These four mutations were not found in 100 genetically unrelated healthy controls with the same ethnic background band. In all 3 childhood-onset patients, DRD started in the legs, and missense mutations were located in the coding region of GCH1. Deletion mutation in the fifth exon-intron boundary of GCH1 was detected in the adult-onset patient. Although the data presented here do not provide sufficient evidence to establish a genotype-phenotype correlation of DRD, it is important to know the clinic features and genetic defects of DRD patients, which will help prenatal diagnosis, early diagnosis, evaluate the prognosis, and facilitate causal therapy with levodopa.