Anal encirclement with a simple prosthetic sling for faecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Millions of people suffer from anal incontinence not currently treated due to the complexity and cost of the surgical techniques in use. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the results of anal encirclement with a simple device in a group of patients with faecal incontinence of multiple causes. METHODS: Surgery was performed as a modified Thiersch procedure through minimal perianal incisions, and a flat band of silicone was introduced to encircle the anus. Results were assessed by clinical response and objectively evaluated by comparing pre- and post-operative manometry, Jorge-Wexner and QOL (Rockwood) scores. RESULTS: Over a period of 5 years, this procedure was performed in 20 women and 13 men, mean age 54 years (27-86 years). Causes of incontinence were iatrogenic (5), obstetric (5), idiopathic (5), restorative proctectomy (5), rectal prolapsed (4), congenital (4), neuropathic (3), trauma (1) and mixed (1). Mortality was nil and morbidity was related to early infection (n = 2) and late skin erosion/infection (n = 2). Early or late breaking of the sling occurred in nine patients, due to the inappropriate method of closing the device. There were 13 explants: 3 as definitive and 10 re-implantations. All but one patient improved the clinical status which was objectively assessed by Jorge-Wexner and QOL scores, with significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This simple, safe and low-cost technique is useful for treating from disturbing soiling to severe incontinence in all those patients with failed sphincteroplasty or not amenable to sphincter repair. However, a proper device needs to be designed.

Management of biliary duct confluence injuries produced by hepatic hydatidosis.

From 1978 to 1999 a total of 850 patients underwent surgical treatment for hydatid disease of the liver at our surgical department. Biliary duct confluence injuries produced by hepatic hydatidosis (HH) were founded in six patients (0.7%). Surgical intervention was undertaken to relieve the obstructive jaundice and clinical manifestations of cholangitis and to treat the hydatid cyst. A partially open cystopericystectomy technique was used in three patients with a double bilioenteric Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The remaining three patients (two with prehepatic portal hypertension and one with triple hepatic duct confluence) were subjected to a cystojejunostomy. There were no hospital deaths. Two cases of anastomotic leakage following a high bilioenteric anastomosis occurred but did not require surgical treatment. During the follow-up (5-19 years) one patient suffered local recurrence of the hydatid disease 7 years after cystojejunostomy. The site of intrahepatic biliary and vascular involvement, the presence of biliary duct anomalies, and the presence of portal hypertension are decisive factors when choosing the "ideal" procedure for reconstruction. Conservative surgical approaches (partial cystectomy and cystojejunostomy) are the treatments of choice. Radical surgery is often a serious matter.