Breast adipose tissue concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls and other organochlorines and breast cancer risk.

Numerous studies have examined the relationship between organochlorines and breast cancer, but the results are not consistent. In most studies, organochlorines were measured in serum, but levels in breast adipose tissue are higher and represent cumulative internal exposure at the target site for breast cancer. Therefore, a hospital-based case-control study was conducted in Ontario, Canada to evaluate the association between breast cancer risk and breast adipose tissue concentrations of several organochlorines. Women scheduled for excision biopsy of the breast were enrolled and completed a questionnaire. The biopsy tissue of 217 cases and 213 benign controls frequency matched by study site and age in 5-year groups was analyzed for 14 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners, total PCBs, and 10 other organochlorines, including p,p'-1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the magnitude of risk. While adjusting for age, menopausal status, and other factors, odds ratios (ORs) were above 1.0 for almost all organochlorines except five pesticide residues. The ORs were above two in the highest concentration categories of PCB congeners 105 and 118, and the ORs for these PCBs increased linearly across categories (Ps for trend < or =0.01). Differences by menopausal status are noted especially for PCBs 105 and 118, with risks higher among premenopausal women, and for PCBs 170 and 180, with risks higher among postmenopausal women. Clear associations with breast cancer risk were demonstrated in this study for some PCBs measured in breast adipose tissue.

Assessment of treatment for patients with primary ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast.

BACKGROUND: Current mammographic technology has resulted in increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). It is necessary to assess which patients presenting with DCIS are good candidates for breast conservation and which of these patients should receive adjuvant radiation. METHODS: We accrued clinical data for 124 patients with a primary diagnosis of DCIS from 1979 through 1994. Primary therapy was a mastectomy for 18 patients, and a lumpectomy for 106 patients. Only 18 of the latter group of patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. For the 88 lumpectomy-alone patients (median follow-up, 5.2 years), we evaluated the effects of clinical (age and initial presentation) and pathologic (nuclear grade, architecture, parenchymal involvement, calcifications, and measured margins) factors on recurrence of DCIS or the development of invasive breast cancer. RESULTS: Patients who underwent lumpectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (median follow-up, 5.0 years) were significantly more likely to have recurrence of DCIS (P=.05) than those who underwent mastectomy (median follow-up, 6.7 years): 18% (19/106) versus 0% (0/18), respectively; lumpectomy-alone patients experienced a 19% (17/88) rate of DCIS recurrence. All recurrent DCIS was ipsilateral. For lumpectomy-alone patients, the factors associated with ipsilateral recurrence of DCIS were extent of involvement of the parenchyma (P=.01, for univariate; P=.07, for multivariate) and initial presentation (P=.05, for univariate; P=.07, for multivariate). Eleven lumpectomy-alone patients developed invasive breast cancer (6 ipsilateral, 5 contralateral); none of the 18 lumpectomy patients who received adjuvant radiation developed invasive disease. None of the factors investigated, including primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, were associated with a significant effect on the development of invasive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Longer follow-up is required to determine if the benefits of either mastectomy or radiotherapy following lumpectomy persist. There is a suggestion that patients under 40 years of age or women who present with nipple discharge might be considered for either adjuvant radiotherapy following lumpectomy or a simple mastectomy.

Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the combined and individual predictive values of fine-needle aspiration (FNA), physical examination (PE) of the breast and mammography (the "triple test") in diagnosing breast cancer in relation to the results of open surgical biopsy. DESIGN: A study of the records of patients who received both FNA and open surgical biopsy for the same palpable breast lump. The results of diagnostic assessment and open surgical biopsy were categorized as positive or negative. Concordance (percentage of tests found to be correct at biopsy), sensitivity, specificity (percentage of patients without breast cancer for whom the diagnostic test was negative) and positive predictive value (percentage of patients with a positive test found to have breast cancer) were determined for the triple test for each diagnostic modality. In addition, prognostic variables (tumour size, node positivity, estrogen and progesterone receptor status) and outcomes were assessed in patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer. SETTING: A university-affiliated general hospital with a special focus on women's health. PATIENTS: Of 290 patients who had both FNA and open surgical biopsy, 191 underwent all three diagnostic procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The diagnostic accuracy of FNA, PE and mammography to permit preoperative definitive therapy or to allow observation without mandating open surgical biopsy. RESULTS: In 81 patients all three diagnostic modalities were in agreement for a diagnosis of either benign or malignant disease; the concordance for the triple test was 98.8% specificity was 100% and sensitivity was 95.5%. Nodal status, tumour size and outcome were similar whether or not the triple test was positive, but, interestingly, when the triple-test results were positive, estrogen (p < 0.05) and progesterone (p < 0.03) receptor values were more likely to be negative. CONCLUSIONS: When all three diagnostic modalities were in agreement for a diagnosis of malignant disease, the combination of FNA, PE and mammography had excellent concordance with the results of open surgical biopsy, and in this situation definitive treatment may be carried out. If all three modalities are in agreement for a diagnosis of benign disease, a period of close observation with repetition of FNA may be safely entertained. Lack of concordance of the three diagnostic modalities mandates biopsy. Triple-test positively does not predict a worse outcome.

Total mastectomy is not always mandatory for the treatment of recurrent breast cancer after lumpectomy alone.

To determine the treatment that offered the best local control for isolated local recurrences of breast cancer after lumpectomy without radiotherapy, the authors reviewed 355 patients initially treated by lumpectomy (with or without axillary dissection) without radiotherapy. Local breast cancer recurred in 79 patients. They underwent either repeat partial mastectomy (PM) or completion total mastectomy (TM). Twenty-four patients (5 TM, 19 PM) received radiotherapy. Local control was defined as the absence of further recurrence of breast or chest-wall cancer. The 19 patients treated with repeat PM and radiotherapy had an actuarial local control rate of 82% at 5 years. Those treated with TM (28 patients) [corrected] or TM plus radiation (5 patients) had rates of local control of 60% and 52% respectively. Although there were no significant differences between the TM and PM plus radiotherapy groups, the 27 patients who had a repeat PM without radiotherapy had a significantly lower rate of local control (32%, p < 0.005). Treatment of recurrent breast cancer with PM and radiotherapy is a viable alternative to TM for enhancing local control. Repeat PM alone gave much poorer results. The authors conclude that local cancer recurrences after lumpectomy alone do not necessarily require TM and can often be treated with repeat excision and radiotherapy.

Prospective evaluation of physical examination of the breast.

The reliability of physical examination of the breast was evaluated by determining the extent of agreement among four experienced breast surgeons who examined the same 100 patients. The consequences of disagreements among surgeons were assessed by determining the diagnostic accuracy of each examiner. Despite differences in the frequency with which each surgeon found abnormalities or masses, or recommended mammography or biopsy, the diagnostic accuracy of the surgeons was very similar, and most disagreements concerned the findings in patients who did not have breast cancer. Breast examination carried out by more than one surgeon may reduce the frequency with which biopsy is performed in patients who do not have breast cancer.