Direct puncture versus contralateral femoral artery approach for catheter-directed thrombolysis of occluded infra-inguinal arterial bypass grafts.

AIM: To compare the safety, effectiveness, and clinical outcome of percutaneous direct puncture approach versus contralateral femoral native vessel approach for catheter-directed thrombolysis of occluded infra-inguinal bypass grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed comprising a cohort of patients who underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis procedures of occluded infra-inguinal bypass grafts between January 2013 and January 2022, with a follow-up period until June 2022. This included 55 procedures via the native vessel approach and 18 procedures via the direct puncture approach. Primary outcomes were technical success and procedural safety; secondary outcomes included re-intervention rate, limb salvage, and mortality as assessed by log-rank testing and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups with regard to patient demographics, except for the number of previous vascular procedures (n=6.83 ± 3.07 direct approach versus n=4.96 ± 2.79 native vessel approach, p=0.025). Thrombolysis was comparably successful in both groups (n=13/18; 72% direct approach versus n=42/55; 76%, p=0.723). There were no differences in the duration of thrombolysis administration. The rate of adverse events was slightly lower in the direct approach group, but without significance (p=0.092). There were no adverse events related to the puncture site in the direct approach group. No differences were found between the time-to-event values for re-occlusion, re-intervention, amputation, or mortality respectively (p=0.662; p=0.520; p=0.816; p=0.462). CONCLUSION: The direct puncture approach seems to be a safe and efficient approach for catheter-directed thrombolysis procedures in infra-inguinal occluded bypass grafts, with clinical outcomes comparable to the native vessel approach.

Photodynamic therapy for atherosclerosis. The potential of indocyanine green.

AIM: The aim of this article is to summarize and review the use of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of atherosclerotic plaque and the prevention of intimal hyperplasia. Different photosensitizers are discussed and more specifically the role of indocyanine green as a potential photosensitizer. METHODS: Literature search with focus on the use of photodynamic therapy in atherosclerosis, the mechanism of action and the different photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. RESULTS: In-vitro and in-vivo studies confirm the possibilities of using photodynamic therapy for the treatment of atherosclerosis and the prevention of restenosis. Insufficient specificity in the accumulation of photosensitizer and thus phototoxicity, remains an important problem. Indocyanine green is a photosensitizer with features in favor of photodynamic therapy. Results obtained so far of photodynamic therapy with indocyanine green point towards the potential of indocyanine green as a photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy for atherosclerosis. CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy is a promising tool for treating atherosclerosis. Many of the studied photosensitizers have toxic effects. Indocyanine green might be a good photosensitizer for the use of photodynamic therapy in atherosclerosis. These data justify further research to the use of indocyanine green as a photosensitizer in the treatment of atherosclerotic plaque both de novo or in restenotic lesions.

Explantation of an Infected Fenestrated Abdominal Endograft with Autologous Venous Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications after FEVAR cause significant problems, with radical surgery considered to be the last resort for treatment. CASE REPORT: A 72 year old man presented with infection 1 month after FEVAR. Conservative therapy with percutaneous abscess drainage and antibiotics suppressed the infection for 10 months; however, when new peri-aortic abscesses developed, the patient agreed to revision surgery. The endograft was explanted and an autologous in situ venous reconstruction was performed. As a result of post-operative complications, the patient died 3 days later. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that autologous venous reconstruction is technically feasible. An earlier decision on such radical surgery could potentially have improved the patient's chances of survival.

Long-term Results of Totally Laparoscopic Aortobifemoral Bypass.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to estimate the long-term results and patency rates of totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass in aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD). METHODS: All 87 patients who received a laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for AIOD on an intention to treat basis between October 2003 and October 2013 were identified. All operations were performed by the same surgical team using a totally laparoscopic technique. Demographic, pre-operative, peri-operative, and follow up variables were collected and analyzed. Patients were followed up at 1 month post-operatively and annually thereafter. Patency rates were calculated in accordance with published patency reporting standards. RESULTS: The median age was 57 years (range 40-78 years). The conversion rate was 20.6% overall. The thirty-day post-operative mortality was 1.1%. Six patients required early re-intervention. There were no graft infections. The median length hospital stay was 6 days (range 4-39 days). The mean follow up was 58.0 months (range 1-133 months). Graft limb based primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were respectively 96.1%, 98.1% and 99.4% at 1 year, and 83.0%, 92.0% and 97.0% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass is a safe alternative to open surgery in selected patients, with excellent long-term patency rates, albeit at the cost of a steep learning curve.

Fenestrated and branched stent-grafting after previous open or endovascular aortic surgery.

AIM: Aim of the study was to review our experience with fenestrated and branched stent-grafts to treat juxtarenal (JAA) and thoracoabdominal (TAAA) aortic aneurysms after previous open or endovascular aortic surgery. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database including all consecutive patients with JAA or TAAA treated with fenestrated/branched stent-grafts after previous open or endovascular aortic surgery within the period March 2002-November 2013 was analyzed. Evaluated outcomes included initial technical success, operative mortality and morbidity and late procedure-related events with regard to survival, target vessel patency, and re-intervention. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients (110 male, 12 female; mean age mean age 70±9.5 years) were treated. Median time interval from previous aortic surgery to current fenestrated/branched stent-grafting was 80 months (range 3-261 months). Seventy-seven (63.1%) patients had previous open infrarenal aortic surgery, 33 (27%) had previous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), nine (7.4%) had previous open thoracic aortic surgery, and three (2.5%) had previous endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR). Indication for current treatment was a JAA in 65 (53.3%) patients and a TAAA in 57 (46.7%) patients. Technical success was achieved in 115 (94.3%) patients. Seven patients were considered as technical failure (open conversion; N.=1, target vessel loss; N.=6). Operative target vessel perfusion success rate with endovascular means was 98.5% (391/397). Intraoperative technical difficulties due to pre-existing stent-graft/surgical graft were encountered in 28 (23%) patients (access, N.=12; target vessel catheterisation, N.=16). Thirty-day operative mortality was 4.1% (5/122), with zero mortality in 65 JAA, and 8.8% (5/57) in TAAA, respectively. Cause of death was multiple organ failure (N.=3), acute gastrointestinal bleeding (N.=1), and subdural hematoma (N.=1). Major complications occurred in 20 (16.4%) patients. Median hospital stay was 7 days (range 3-50 days), and mean ICU stay 1.5±3.2 days. Mean follow-up was 22.5±21 months. All-cause late mortality was encountered in 23 patients, including one aneurysm-related mortality. Estimated survival was 91.2±3%, 83.3±4.2% and 81.1±4.6% at one, two and three years, respectively. During follow-up, eight target vessels occluded. Estimated target vessel patency was 97.2±1.1%, and 96.3±1.2% at one and three years, respectively. Reintervention during follow-up was required in 13 (10.6%) cases accounting for an estimated freedom from reintervention of 91.6±3.1%, and 82.1±5.4% at one and three years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Fenestrated and branched stent-grafting represents a feasible option for the repair of JAA and TAAA after prior endovascular or open aortic surgery. Despite increased technical difficulties it is associated with high technical success rate and is advantageous in terms of mortality and morbidity compared to redo open aortic surgery.

Trait and state aspects of internal and external performance monitoring in schizophrenia.

Disturbed internal performance monitoring has been repeatedly demonstrated in schizophrenia. Along with internal monitoring, efficiently processing external task-relevant performance feedback that goes unnoticed by the internal monitoring system is crucial for adequate performance. It is unknown whether external monitoring is disturbed in schizophrenia and whether it is trait or state dependent. The current study investigated the effects of treatment on both internal and external performance monitoring in schizophrenia. Twelve schizophrenia patients and twelve matched healthy controls performed a modified flanker task while ERPs and behavioral measures were obtained. Both groups were assessed twice, with a six-week interval, during which the patients received antipsychotic treatment. Internal monitoring was investigated by means of the response-locked error-related negativity (Ne/ERN), an event-related potential component elicited by erroneous responses. External monitoring was investigated by analyzing the feedback-locked P300 elicited by task-relevant external response-time feedback (late feedback). Compared to controls, schizophrenia patients showed diminished Ne/ERN amplitudes, which were insensitive to six weeks of treatment. Patients also had reduced P300 amplitudes in response to late feedback at the first assessment, but these were normalized at the second assessment. Also, patients showed increased performance following negative external feedback at the second session. This study demonstrates the importance of considering both forms of performance monitoring in schizophrenia. Diminished internal error processing seems to be an important 'trait' marker of the disorder, while processing of externally presented feedback appears to have a 'state' character, susceptible to treatment at both a neurophysiological and a behavioral level.

Laparoscopic versus open approach for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease--a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences between open and laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery for aorto-iliac occlusive disease on postoperative morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Between January 2007 and November 2009, 28 patients with severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease (TASC II C or D) were randomised between laparoscopic and open approach at one community hospital and one university hospital (TASC = Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus on the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease). RESULTS: The operation time was longer for the laparoscopic approach (mean 4 h 19 min (2 h 00 min to 6 h 20 min) vs. 3 h 30 min (1 h 42 min to 5 h 11 min); p = 0.101)). Nevertheless, postoperative recovery and in-hospital stay were significantly shorter after laparoscopic surgery. Also oral intake could be restarted earlier (mean 20 h 34 min (6 h 00 min to 26 h 55 min) vs. 43 h 43 min (19 h 40 min to 77 h 30 min); p = 0.00014)) as well as postoperative mobilisation (walking) (mean 46 h 15 min (16 h 07 min to 112 h 40 min) vs. mean 94 h 14 min (66 h 10 min to 127 h 23 min); p = 0.00016)). Length of hospitalisation was shorter (mean 5.5 days (2.5-15) vs. mean 13.0 days (7-45); p = 0.0095)). Visual pain scores and visual discomfort scores were both lower after laparoscopic surgery. Also return to normal daily activities was achieved earlier. There were no major complications in both groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery for aorto-iliac occlusive disease is a safe procedure with a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity and in-hospital stay and earlier recovery.

Arterioureteral fistula. An unusual cause of aortofemoral bypass infection. A case report.

We report a case of arterioureteral fistula after aortobifemoral bypass surgery and prolonged bilateral double J stents due to ureteral stenosis. A 70-year-old woman presented with a non-tender mass in the left groin and a single episode of haematuria 2 months earlier. A Computed Tomography (CT) revealed a pseudoaneurysm of the left distal suture of the graft. Surgical repair was performed. Because of suspicion of infection the entire aortobifemoral graft was removed and replaced by an autologous venous aortofemoral bypass to the right groin and femorofemoral crossover bypass from the right to the left. During surgery an arterioureteral fistula could be visualized. The urologists performed a left nephroureterectomy of the afunctional left kidney. The further postoperative course was uneventful during the 10 months of follow up.

Stent graft infection in the lower limb.

BACKGROUND: Poor wound healing can occur after limb amputation. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a patient with a persistent fistula after below-knee amputation. The fistula is maintained due to an infected stent graft. After removal of the stent graft and adequate antibiotic treatment the wounds healed and extended amputation was avoided. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of stent graft infection is challenging and requires aggressive treatment to prevent further amputation.

Ten years of experience with the GORE EXCLUDER® stent-graft for the treatment of aortic and iliac aneurysms: outcomes from a single center study.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the long-term outcome of selected patients with aortic, aortoiliac, and isolated common iliac aneurysms treated with the GORE EXCLUDER® stent-graft. METHODS: Between December 1998 and June 2010, 121 nonconsecutive patients underwent insertion of a GORE EXCLUDER® stent-graft to treat an aortic (n=80; 66%), aortoiliac (n=25; 21%), or isolated common iliac (n=16; 13%) aneurysm. Procedural and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Primary endpoints are overall survival, intervention-free survival, and freedom from aneurysm rupture. Secondary endpoints are device- and procedure-related complications, including all types of endoleaks or endotension, and reintervention. RESULTS: The mean follow-up is 4.98 years (standard deviation, 3.18; median follow-up, 4.05 years). The estimated percentage overall survival (with 95% confidence interval) after respectively 5 and 10 years of follow-up is 74.5% (65.8; 81.3) and 57.8% (47.7; 66.7). The estimated intervention-free survival after respectively 5 and 10 years is 90% (84.3; 96.1) and 77.7% (67; 88.4). There was no aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Early postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (13%); none were fatal. Late reinterventions were performed in 18 patients (15%). Finally, throughout the follow-up period, endoleaks were identified: type I (n=4; 3%); type II (n=39; 32%); type III (n=0; 0%); endotension was seen in 11 patients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm exclusion with use of the GORE EXCLUDER® stent-graft is durable through a mean follow-up of nearly 5 years. There was no postprocedural aneurysm rupture. Complications occurred throughout the follow-up period, requiring continued clinical and radiological surveillance.

Embolization of an internal iliac artery aneurysm after image-guided direct puncture.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of embolization of internal iliac artery aneurysm (IIAA) after percutaneous direct puncture under (cone-beam) computed tomography (CT) guidance. METHODS: A retrospective case series of three patients, in whom IIAA not accessible by way of the transarterial route, was reviewed. CT-guided puncture of the IIAA sac was performed in one patient. Two patients underwent puncture of the IIAA under cone-beam CT guidance. RESULTS: Access to the IIAA sac was successful in all three patients. In two of the three patients, the posterior and/or anterior division was first embolized using platinum microcoils. The aneurysm sac was embolized with thrombin in one patient and with a mixture of glue and Lipiodol in two patients. No complications were seen. On follow-up CT, no opacification of the aneurysm sac was seen. The volume of one IIAA remained stable at follow-up, and the remaining two IIAAs decreased in size. CONCLUSION: Embolization of IIAA after direct percutaneous puncture under cone-beam CT/CT-guidance is feasible and safe and results in good short-term outcome.

Treatment of mycotic aneurysms with involvement of the abdominal aorta: single-centre experience in 44 consecutive cases.

OBJECTIVE: To review our management of mycotic aneurysms involving the abdominal aorta over the past 2 decades to assess the safety and efficacy of in-situ and extra-anatomic repair combined with antibiotic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 1990 to August 2008, 44 patients with a mycotic aneurysm involving the abdominal aorta were treated at our University Hospital. For all patients, we recorded the aetiology, clinical findings and anatomic location of the aneurysm, as well as bacteriology results, surgical and antibiotic therapy and morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-one (47.7%) of the mycotic aneurysms had already ruptured at the time of surgery. Free rupture was present in nine patients (20.5%). Contained rupture was observed in 12 patients (27.3%). Urgent surgery was performed in 18 cases (40.9%). Revascularisation was achieved by in-situ reconstruction in 37 patients (84.1%), while extra-anatomic reconstruction was performed in six patients (13.6%). One patient (2.3%) was treated with a combined in-situ and extra-anatomic reconstruction. In one case (2.3%), endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was performed. In-hospital mortality was 22.7%, 50% in the extra-anatomic reconstruction group and 18.9% in the in-situ repair group. One-third (33.3%) of our patients, who presented with a ruptured mycotic aneurysm died in the peri-operative period. This mortality was 13% in the patient-group presenting with an intact aneurysm. Of the 34 surviving patients, 12 patients (27.3% of surviving patients died after discharge from our hospital. In half of these patients, an acute cardiac event was to blame. Three patients (8%) showed re-infection after in-situ reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Management of mycotic aortic aneurysms remains a challenging problem. The results of surgery depend on many factors. In our experience, in-situ repair remains a feasible and safe treatment option for patients who are in good general condition at the time of surgery.

Conversion during laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass: a failure?

OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of conversion on postoperative recovery, morbidity and mortality in laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery for aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. METHODS: Between November 2002 and December 2006, 139 patients were treated for severe AIOD with a laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass at one community and one university hospital. Demographic data, operative data, postoperative recovery data, morbidity and mortality were recorded and analysed according to a conversion and a non-conversion group. RESULTS: Conversion was needed in 13.7% of the patients. Morbidity was 16.5%-14.2% in the non-conversion group and 31.8% in the conversion group. Systemic morbidity was significantly higher in the conversion group (31.6% vs.10%; p=0.002), but only one patient had incomplete recovery; local morbidity was comparable in both groups (10.5% vs. 5.8%; p=0.337). Mortality rate was 2.2%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery is a safe procedure for the treatment of AIOD. The outcome of patients after conversion is not affected in the way that it could be an impediment to start a laparoscopic procedure. Conversion in time is a safe way to overcome the learning curve.

Endovascular aneurysm repair or open surgery for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with involvement of both common iliac arteries?

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) involving the entire common iliac arteries requires proximal coil embolisation of both internal iliac arteries and extension of the stent graft into the external iliac arteries (type E according to the Eurostar classification). A potential complication of this treatment is pelvic ischemia. Therefore, this type of aneurysm is a relative contra-indication for EVAR. In this case-report we describe a hybrid procedure preserving antegrade circulation in one of the internal iliac arteries in a patient with a type E aneurysm who was unfit for open surgery.

The learning curve of totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for occlusive disease. How many cases and how safe?

OBJECTIVES: Totally laparoscopic aortic surgery is appealing. However, the adoption of this technique in the broad vascular world is hampered by the steep learning curve and the fear of exposing patients to excessive morbidity and mortality. We assessed how many patients should be treated to overcome this learning curve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The first 50 patients treated with totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease were followed prospectively. Operative variables such as operative time, aortic clamping time, amount of blood loss, conversion to laparotomy etc were recorded (as well as 30-day mortality and morbidity). To discover a turning point we used the technique of sliding averages. These data were compared with the mortality and morbidity as predicted by POSSUM and P-POSSUM. RESULTS: A clear turning point, with improved operative variables, was seen after 20-30 patients. Mortality and morbidity were not higher than predicted by POSSUM and P-POSSUM. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm the intuition of most people involved in laparoscopic aortic surgery that the learning curve could be set at 25-30 cases. However, patients are not exposed to excessive morbidity and mortality during this learning curve.

Complex thoracic aortic aneurysm: a combined open and endovascular approach.

The authors wish to describe a combined open and endovascular approach to repair a complex thoracic aortic aneurysm. A 72-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aortic valvular insufficiency and diffuse thoracic aortic aneurysm underwent aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement by a Bentall-procedure and replacement of arch aneurysm using the elephant trunk technique, performed in a first procedure. During the second procedure, endovascular stenting of the descending thoracic aorta was done. Only a few similar case reports have been presented. Endovascular repair after an elephant trunk procedure for complex thoracic aortic aneurysms is an elegant approach to deal with such mega aortas. Further research is necessary to compare open and endovascular repair and to determine long-term follow-up with regard to endoleaks and mortality.