Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 13(6): 411-8, 2011 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21680302

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: In advanced-stage (IIIB or IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), combination chemotherapy has demonstrated response rates of 20% and a 1-year survival rate of 30%. We conducted a multicentre, open-label, nonrandomised phase II trial to determine the efficacy and tolerability of sequential monotherapy with gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2002 and July 2004, the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) conducted a study in which 34 patients with advanced (stage IIIB or IV) NSCLC received 1200 mg/m(2) of i.v. gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for a total of 3 cycles followed by 100 mg/m(2) of weekly i.v. paclitaxel for a maximum of 8 weeks. If objective response or stable disease was achieved, 70 mg/m(2) of weekly i.v. paclitaxel was maintained until disease progression was evident or toxic effects were intolerable. Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) analysis was performed. Baseline levels of serum VEGF, EGFR, telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and K-ras mutations were analysed. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. RESULTS: The median age of the 34 patients who were enrolled was 67 years (range 46-77), but later 8 patients were excluded; 78.8% were men, 81.8% had performance status 1 and also 81.8% had metastatic disease at diagnosis. The objective response rate was 28% (95% CI, 14.2-47.8); the median overall survival was 7.2 months (95% CI, 2.1-12.3) and the median time to progression (TTP) was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.5-5.3). Grade 3 or 4 drug-related haematological toxicities were observed in 6 patients. Patients with lower baseline serum VEGF levels had significantly longer survival. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential therapy with gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel was well tolerated with a low proportion of grade 3 or 4 adverse events, the absence of unexpected toxicity and with an improvement in quality of life. Unfortunately, the response rate did not meet the minimally required rate of 20% and the study was prematurely closed. VEGF was identified as a poor prognostic factor for TTP and survival.


Sujet(s)
Adénocarcinome/traitement médicamenteux , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Carcinome à grandes cellules/traitement médicamenteux , Carcinome pulmonaire non à petites cellules/traitement médicamenteux , Carcinome épidermoïde/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs du poumon/traitement médicamenteux , Adénocarcinome/anatomopathologie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Carcinome à grandes cellules/anatomopathologie , Carcinome pulmonaire non à petites cellules/secondaire , Carcinome épidermoïde/anatomopathologie , Désoxycytidine/administration et posologie , Désoxycytidine/analogues et dérivés , Femelle , Humains , Tumeurs du poumon/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du poumon/secondaire , Métastase lymphatique , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Récidive tumorale locale/traitement médicamenteux , Récidive tumorale locale/anatomopathologie , Paclitaxel/administration et posologie , Taux de survie , Résultat thérapeutique , Gemcitabine
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 13(4): 249-53, 2011 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21493185

RÉSUMÉ

In May 2007, the Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia created the position of "Liaison Oncologist". The holder of this position is responsible for coordinating specialised and primary hospital care in the geographic area of Valencia known as Health Care Department 9 to reduce the waiting time between cancer diagnosis and treatment. In this article we describe the implementation of the innovative proposal of the Liaison Oncologist's Consultation Clinic, which, apart from speeding up and directing diagnostic processes, facilitates access to treatment, prevents duplication of consultations and exploratory procedures by establishing therapeutic plans (preferential channels), gives continuity to diagnostic and therapeutic mechanisms, and permits active follow-up of patients who have finished treatment. An analysis of the results obtained shows that the clinic has allowed us to integrate the various aspects of medical oncology into one system and make it available to patients and primary and specialised care professionals. This system provides the patient with the highest quality of integrated health care, ensures the availability of continued health care to long-term survivors and establishes preferential channels between primary care and specialised cancer care to achieve a quick diagnosis.


Sujet(s)
Établissements de soins ambulatoires/organisation et administration , Soins ambulatoires/organisation et administration , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/organisation et administration , Oncologie médicale/organisation et administration , Survivants , Humains
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE