Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 47(8): 1020-30, 2003 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12904196

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Muscle pain is a major clinical problem but the underlying mechanisms and its pharmacological modulation need further investigation. This study on 15 volunteers evaluates if two experimental muscle pain models are sensitive to micro -receptor agonists and to an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist. METHODS: In the left tibialis anterior, intramuscular electrical (IMES) pain thresholds were determined for single (SPTmuscle) and five (RPTmuscle) repeated stimuli. Also pain to suprathreshold stimulation at 150% of RPTmuscle, 10 s, was assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) as AUCimes (area under the VAS curve). In the right TA muscle, pain intensity on infusion of 0.5 ml of hypertonic saline, 5% (AUCsaline) and pain distribution indicated as local and referred were evaluated. Pain variables were assessed before, during and after intravenous infusions of morphine (10 microg x kg-1 min-1, 10 min), alfentanil (target-controlled infusion, plasma concentration; 60 ng ml-1, 60 min) and ketamine (10 microg x kg-1 min-1, 60 min). All data were normalized to baseline pain values (before drug infusions were initiated) and compared with placebo (midazolam, 2 microg x kg-1 min-1, 10 min). RESULTS: SPTmuscle increased (log mean values +/- SD, mA) with morphine (0.11 +/- 0.17, P < 0.05), alfentanil (0.28 +/- 0.24, P < 0.001) and ketamine (0.19 +/- 0.18, P < 0.01) as compared with placebo (-0.03 +/- 0.12). Alfentanil and ketamine also increased RPTmuscle (0.25 +/- 0.21, P < 0.01 and 0.21 +/- 0.19, P < 0.05, respectively) as compared with placebo (0.00 +/- 0.17). Pain to IMES (AUCimes) was reduced (median values [25th-75th percentiles], cm x s) by alfentanil and ketamine (-19.7 [-14.6 - -29.6] and-12.8 [-8.3 - -27.8], P < 0.05, respectively) vs. placebo (-0.8 [1.6 - -12.3]). Similar drug effects were seen when pain to infusion of hypertonic saline (AUCsaline) was assessed (alfentanil:-388 [-99 - -677] and ketamine:-326 [-227 - -573], P < 0.05 compared with placebo: 150 [449--240]). Ketamine also reduced the size of the local pain area (-58.4 [-21.2 - -176.1], < 0.05) as compared with placebo (-0.4 [70.6 - -13.4]). The frequency of referred pain was also lower when ketamine was given (3/13, P < 0.05) vs. placebo (9/14). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that experimental muscle pain induced in humans by electrical stimulation and infusion of hypertonic saline is sensitive to pharmacological modulation similar to preclinical animal tests and clinical trials. The data suggest that these models can be valuable tools in analgesic drug development.


Sujet(s)
Alfentanil/pharmacologie , Kétamine/pharmacologie , Morphine/pharmacologie , Muscles squelettiques/physiologie , Douleur/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Stimulation électrique , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Douleur/physiopathologie , Seuil nociceptif/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Récepteurs du N-méthyl-D-aspartate/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Récepteurs du N-méthyl-D-aspartate/physiologie , Récepteur mu/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Récepteur mu/physiologie , Solution saline hypertonique
2.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 4(4): 201-6, 1998 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18591111

RÉSUMÉ

In a crossover study we compared the single dose effect of 200mg levodopa (plus decarboxylase inhibitor) in the form of Madopar with that of Madopar Dispersible on the motor performance of eight patients with Parkinson's disease, after 12h without their ordinary anti-parkinsonian medication and food intake. Objective recording of their performance was done with an opto-electronic camera and automatic computerised treatment of the movement data and with scoring according to the United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. We conclude that Madopar Dispersible has a much faster and more constant onset of action than the standard preparation (25 vs 46min.). The effect duration and the effects on motor performance were otherwise the same.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE