A 5-hydroxymethylcytosine-based non-invasive model for early detection of colorectal carcinomas and advanced adenomas: the METHOD-2 study.

PURPOSE: Detection of colorectal carcinomas (CRC) at a time when there are more treatment options is associated with better outcomes. This prospective case-control study assessed the 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) biomarkers in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for early detection of CRC and advanced adenomas (AA) Experimental Design: Plasma cfDNA samples from 2,576 study participants from the multi-center METHOD-2 study (NCT03676075) were collected, comprising patients with newly diagnosed CRC (n=1,074), AA (n=356), other solid tumors (n=80), and non-CRC/AA controls (n=1,066), followed by genome-wide 5hmC profiling using the 5hmC-Seal technique and the next-generation sequencing (NGS). A weighted diagnostic model for CRC (stage I-III) and AA was developed using the elastic net regularization in a discovery set and validated in independent samples. RESULTS: Distribution of 5hmC in cfDNA reflected gene regulatory relevance and tissue of origin. Besides being confirmed in internal validation, a 96-gene model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 90.7% for distinguishing stage I-III CRC from controls in 321 samples from multiple centers for external validation, regardless of primary location or mutation status. This model also showed cancer-type specificity as well as high capacity for distinguishing AA from controls with an AUC of 78.6%. Functionally, differential 5hmC features associated with CRC and AA demonstrated relevance to CRC biology, including pathways such as calcium and MAPK signaling. CONCLUSIONS: Genome-wide mapping of 5hmC in cfDNA shows the promise as a highly sensitive and specific non-invasive blood test to be integrated in screening programs for improving early detection of CRC and high-risk AA.

Comparison of Short-term and Three-year Oncological Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Large Multicenter Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer. BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes of RG over LG have not yet been effectively demonstrated. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 3599 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy at eight high-volume hospitals in China from January 2015 to June 2019. Propensity score matching was performed between patients who received RG and LG. The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 1034 pairs of patients were enrolled in a balanced cohort for further analysis. The 3-year DFS in the RG and LG was 83.7% and 83.1% ( P =0.745), respectively, and the 3-year overall survival was 85.2% and 84.4%, respectively ( P =0.647). During 3 years of follow-up, 154 patients in the RG and LG groups relapsed (cumulative incidence of recurrence: 15.0% vs 15.0%, P =0.988). There was no significant difference in the recurrence sites between the 2 groups (all P >0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed that RG had comparable 3-year DFS (77.4% vs 76.7%, P =0.745) and overall survival (79.7% vs 78.4%, P =0.577) to LG in patients with advanced (pathologic T2-4a) disease, and the recurrence pattern within 3 years was also similar between the 2 groups (all P >0.05). RG had less intraoperative blood loss, lower conversion rate, and shorter hospital stays than LG (all P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For resectable gastric cancer, including advanced cases, RG is a safe approach with comparable 3-year oncological outcomes to LG when performed by experienced surgeons.

Aspartoacylase promotes the process of tumour development and is associated with immune infiltrates in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Aspartoacylase (ASPA) is a gene that plays an important role in the metabolic reprogramming of cancer. However, the clinical relevance of ASPA in gastric cancer (GC) has not been demonstrated. METHODS: The link between ASPA and the clinical features of GC was determined using two public genomic databases. The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and generalised linear regression model were applied to examine whether the ASPA level is associated with the prognosis and other pathological factors. In addition, the role of specific genes in the infiltration of immune cells in the setting of GC was investigated using a further immunological database. The expression level of various proteins was detected using a western blotting assay. Transwell and methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium tests were applied for the detection of cellular invasion and proliferation, with small hairpin ribonucleic acid used to knockdown ASPA. RESULTS: According to the multivariate Cox regression results, the down-regulated ASPA expression is a distinct prognostic factor. Furthermore, ASPA has significant positive correlations with the infiltration of immune cells in GC lesions. Compared to the non-cancer tissues, the GC tissues had a significantly lower level of ASPA expression (p < 0.05). Using knockdown and overexpression techniques, it was demonstrated that ASPA affects the capacity of cell lines for GC to both proliferate and invade. CONCLUSION: Overall, ASPA could promote the occurrence and development of GC and presents a promising predictive biomarker for the disease since it is favourably connected with immune infiltrates and negatively correlated with prognosis.

Evaluation of the advantages of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal cancer increases with aging. Curative-intent surgery based on a minimally invasive concept is expected to bring survival benefits to elderly patients (aged over 80 years) with colorectal cancer who are frequently with fragile health status and advanced tumors. The study explored survival outcomes in this patient population who received robotic or laparoscopic surgery and aimed to identify an optimal surgical option for those patients. METHODS: We retrieved the clinical materials and follow-up data on elderly patients with colorectal carcinoma who received robotic or laparoscopic surgery in our institution. The pathological and surgical outcomes were compared to examine the efficacy and safety of the two approaches. The DFS (disease-free survival) and OS (overall survival) results at 3 years after surgery were assessed to explore the survival benefits. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were screened for the study, including 55 in the robotic group and 56 in the laparoscopic group. The demographic details were generally similar between the two groups. No statistically significant difference in the number of removed lymph nodes was observed between the two approaches, with a median of 15 versus 14 (P = 0.053). The intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced by robotic technique when compared to the laparoscopic approach, with a mean of 76.9 ml versus 161.6 ml (P = 0.025). There were no significant differences in operation time, conversion, postoperative complications and recovery, and long-term outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery was prized for elderly patients with colorectal cancer who developed anemia and/or hematological conditions.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of colorectal cancer patients reveals differences in mutational landscapes among clinical and pathological subgroups.

With the widespread of colonoscopy, colorectal cancer remains to be one of the most detrimental types of cancer. Though there were multiple studies investigating the genomic landscape of colorectal cancer, a comprehensive analysis uncovering the differences between various types of colorectal cancer is still lacking. In our study, we performed genomic analysis on 133 patients with colorectal cancer. Mutated FAT1 and PKHD1 and altered Hippo pathway genes were found to be enriched in early-onset colorectal cancer. APOBEC signature was prevalent in microsatellite stable (MSS) patients and was related to lymph node metastasis. ZNF217 mutations were significantly associated with early-stage colorectal cancer. In all, this study represents a comprehensive genomic analysis uncovering potential molecular mechanisms underneath different subgroups of colorectal cancer thus providing new targets for precision treatment development.

CREPT Disarms the Inhibitory Activity of HDAC1 on Oncogene Expression to Promote Tumorigenesis.

Histone deacetylases 1 (HDAC1), an enzyme that functions to remove acetyl molecules from ε-NH3 groups of lysine in histones, eliminates the histone acetylation at the promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes to block their expression during tumorigenesis. However, it remains unclear why HDAC1 fails to impair oncogene expression. Here we report that HDAC1 is unable to occupy at the promoters of oncogenes but maintains its occupancy with the tumor suppressors due to its interaction with CREPT (cell cycle-related and expression-elevated protein in tumor, also named RPRD1B), an oncoprotein highly expressed in tumors. We observed that CREPT competed with HDAC1 for binding to oncogene (such as CCND1, CLDN1, VEGFA, PPARD and BMP4) promoters but not the tumor suppressor gene (such as p21 and p27) promoters by a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) qPCR experiment. Using immunoprecipitation experiments, we deciphered that CREPT specifically occupied at the oncogene promoter via TCF4, a transcription factor activated by Wnt signaling. In addition, we performed a real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis on cells that stably over-expressed CREPT and/or HDAC1, and we propose that HDAC1 inhibits CREPT to activate oncogene expression under Wnt signaling activation. Our findings revealed that HDAC1 functions differentially on tumor suppressors and oncogenes due to its interaction with the oncoprotein CREPT.

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer is gaining popularity, but evidence on long-term oncological outcomes is scarce. We aimed to compare surgical quality and long-term oncological outcomes of robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with middle and low rectal cancer. Here we report the short-term outcomes of this trial. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial was done at 11 hospitals in eight provinces of China. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years with middle (>5 to 10 cm from the anal verge) or low (≤5 cm from the anal verge) rectal adenocarcinoma, cT1-T3 N0-N1 or ycT1-T3 Nx, and no evidence of distant metastasis. Central randomisation was done by use of an online system and was stratified according to participating centre, sex, BMI, tumour location, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive robotic or conventional laparoscopic surgery. All surgical procedures complied with the principles of total mesorectal excision or partial mesorectal excision (for tumours located higher in the rectum). Lymph nodes at the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery were dissected. In the robotic group, the excision procedures and dissection of lymph nodes were done by use of robotic techniques. Neither investigators nor patients were masked to the treatment allocation but the assessment of pathological outcomes was masked to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was 3-year locoregional recurrence rate, but the data for this endpoint are not yet mature. Secondary short-term endpoints are reported in this article, including two key secondary endpoints: circumferential resection margin positivity and 30-day postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher). The outcomes were analysed according in a modified intention-to-treat population (according to the original assigned groups and excluding patients who did not undergo surgery or no longer met inclusion criteria after randomisation). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02817126. Study recruitment has completed, and the follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between July 17, 2016, and Dec 21, 2020, 1742 patients were assessed for eligibility. 502 patients were excluded, and 1240 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either robotic surgery (620 patients) or laparoscopic surgery (620 patients). 69 patients were excluded (34 in the robotic surgery group and 35 in the laparoscopic surgery group). 1171 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (586 in the robotic group and 585 in the laparoscopic group). Six patients in the robotic surgery group received laparoscopic surgery and seven patients in the laparoscopic surgery group received robotic surgery. 22 (4·0%) of 547 patients in the robotic group had a positive circumferential resection margin as did 39 (7·2%) of 543 patients in the laparoscopic group (difference -3·2 percentage points [95% CI -6·0 to -0·4]; p=0·023). 95 (16·2%) of patients in the robotic group had at least one postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher) within 30 days after surgery, as did 135 (23·1%) of 585 patients in the laparoscopic group (difference -6·9 percentage points [-11·4 to -2·3]; p=0·003). More patients in the robotic group had a macroscopic complete resection than in the laparoscopic group (559 [95·4%] of 586 patients vs 537 [91·8%] of 585 patients, difference 3·6 percentage points [0·8 to 6·5]). Patients in the robotic group had better postoperative gastrointestinal recovery, shorter postoperative hospital stay (median 7·0 days [IQR 7·0 to 11·0] vs 8·0 days [7·0 to 12·0], difference -1·0 [95% CI -1·0 to 0·0]; p=0·0001), fewer abdominoperineal resections (99 [16·9%] of 586 patients vs 133 [22·7%] of 585 patients, difference -5·8 percentage points [-10·4 to -1·3]), fewer conversions to open surgery (10 [1·7%] of 586 patients vs 23 [3·9%] of 585 patients, difference -2·2 percentage points [-4·3 to -0·4]; p=0·021), less estimated blood loss (median 40·0 mL [IQR 30·0 to 100·0] vs 50·0 mL [40·0 to 100·0], difference -10·0 [-20·0 to -10·0]; p<0·0001), and fewer intraoperative complications (32 [5·5%] of 586 patients vs 51 [8·7%] of 585 patients; difference -3·3 percentage points [-6·3 to -0·3]; p=0·030) than patients in the laparoscopic group. INTERPRETATION: Secondary short-term outcomes suggest that for middle and low rectal cancer, robotic surgery resulted in better oncological quality of resection than conventional laparoscopic surgery, with less surgical trauma, and better postoperative recovery. FUNDING: Shenkang Hospital Development Center, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Shanghai, China), and Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University (Shanghai, China).

Vitamin C Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Erastin-Induced Ferroptosis by Activating the AMPK/Nrf2/HMOX1 Pathway.

Ferroptosis is a type of regulated cell death that displays a promising therapeutic pathway for drug-resistant tumor cells. However, some pancreatic cancer (PC) cells are less sensitive to erastin-induced ferroptosis, and normal pancreatic cells are susceptible to this newly discovered cell death. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find drugs to enhance the sensitivity of these PC cells to erastin while limiting side effects. Here, we found that the oxidized form of vitamin C-dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) can be transported into PC cells expressing high levels of GLUT1, resulting in ferroptosis. Moreover, pharmacological vitamin C combined with erastin can synergistically induce ferroptosis of PC cells involving glutathione (GSH) reduction and ferrous iron accumulation while inhibiting the cytotoxicity of normal cells. Mechanistically, as a direct system Xc- inhibitor, erastin can directly suppress the synthesis of GSH, and the recycling of vitamin C and DHA is performed through GSH consumption, which is denoted as the classical mode. Furthermore, oxidative stress induced by erastin and vitamin C could enhance the expression of HMOX1 via the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) pathway to increase the labile iron level, which is named the nonclassical mode. In vivo experiments showed that erastin and vitamin C can significantly slow tumor growth in PC xenografts. In summary, the combination of erastin and vitamin C exerts a synergistic effect of classical and nonclassical modes to induce ferroptosis in PC cells, which may provide a promising therapeutic strategy for PC.

The Learning Curve of Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 76 Cases at a Single Center.

Background and Aims: Robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) has many benefits in treating colon cancer, but it is a new technology that needs to be evaluated. This study aims to assess the learning curve (LC) of RARH procedures with the complete mesoscopic exception and D3 lymph node dissection for colon carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive series of 76 patients who underwent RARH from July 2014 to March 2018. The operation time was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to analyze the LC. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the LC: Phase I and Phase II. Statistical methods were used to compare clinicopathological data on intraoperative and perioperative outcomes at different stages of the study. Results: The peak point of the LC was observed in the 27th case. Using the CUSUM method, we divide the LC into two stages. Stage 1 (initial learning stage): Cases 1-27 and Stage 2 (proficiency phase): Cases 28-76. There were no obvious distinctions between the two patients' essential characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, clinical stage, and ASA score). The mean operation time of each group is 187.37 ± 45.56 min and 161.1 ± 37.74 min (P = 0.009), respectively. The intraoperative blood loss of each group is 170.4 ± 217.2 ml and 95.7 ± 72.8 ml (P = 0.031), respectively. Conclusion: Based on the LC with CUSUM analysis, the data suggest that the learning phase of RARH was achieved after 27 cases. The operation time and the intraoperative blood loss decrease with more cases performed.

The Expression, Prognostic Value, and Immunological Correlation of MCEMP1 and its Potential Role in Gastric Cancer.

Purpose: Gastric cancer (GC) is a lethal cancer with a poor 5-year relative survival, which requires a new research perspective. Our study aims to explore the biological impact of the mast cell-expressed membrane protein 1 (MCEMP1) in GC, which includes its expression and potential biological functions. Methods: The expression of MCEMP1 was assessed through public databases. The GO, KEGG, and GESA analyses were conducted to explore the biofunction of MCEMP1. And ssGSEA was used to analyze the infiltration of the immune cells for MCEMP1. The proliferation, migration, and invasion of GC cells were analyzed through CCK8, colony-forming, wound healing, Transwell, and Western blot assay. Results: The expression of MCEMP1 was higher in GC tissues. Further, we found a close relationship between MCEMP1 and poorer prognosis of gastric cancer by prognostic analysis. The functional analysis showed that MCEMP1 is involved in immune, inflammation, and metabolism-related pathways. The ssGSEA analysis indicated MCEMP1 mRNA expression was associated with immune infiltration of multiple immune cells. In cellular experiments, the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells could be promoted by regulating the rise of MCEMP1 expression. Western blot analysis showed that regulation of MCEMP1 expression can affect EMT-related protein expression and that NF-κB expression is involved in this process. Conclusion: MCEMP1 shows a potential value for the prognosis in GC. And, abnormal expression of MCEMP1 in GC is correlated with tumor immune cell infiltration. In in vitro experiments, MCEMP1 can affect the proliferation, migration, and invasion of GC cells by regulating EMT, in which TLR4/NOD2/NF-κB was involved.

Construction of immune-related lncRNA signature to predict aggressiveness, immune landscape, and drug resistance of colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer remains one of the most common malignancies across the world. Thus far, a biomarker, which can comprehensively predict the survival outcomes, clinical characteristics, and therapeutic sensitivity, is still lacking. METHODS: We leveraged transcriptomic data of colon cancer from the existing datasets and constructed immune-related lncRNA (irlncRNA) pairs. After integrating with clinical survival data, we performed differential analysis and identified 11 irlncRNAs signature using Lasso regression analysis. We next plotted the 1-, 5-, and 10-year curve lines of receiver operating characteristics, calculated the areas under the curve, and recognized the optimal cutoff point. Then, we validated the pair-risk model in terms of the survival outcomes of the patients involved. Moreover, we tested the reliability of the model for predicting tumor aggressiveness and therapeutic susceptibility of colon cancer. Additionally, we reemployed the 11 of irlncRNAs involved in the pair-risk model to construct an expression-risk model to predict the prognostic outcomes of the patients involved. RESULTS: We recognized a total of 377 differentially expressed irlncRNAs (DEirlcRNAs), including 28 low-expressed and 349 high-expressed irlncRNAs in colon cancer patients. After performing a univariant Cox analysis, we identified 115 risk irlncRNAs that were significantly correlated with survival outcomes of patients involved. By taking the overlap of the DEirlcRNAs and the risk irlncRNAs, we ultimately recognized 55 irlncRNAs as core irlncRNAs. Then, we established a Cox HR model (pair-risk model) as well as an expression HR model (exp-risk model) based on 11 of the 55 core irlncRNAs. We found that both of the two models significantly outperformed the commonly used clinical characteristics, including age, T, N, and M stages when predicting survival outcomes. Moreover, we validated the pair-risk model as a potential tool for studying the tumor microenvironment of colon cancer and drug susceptibility. Additionally, we noticed that combinational use of the pair-risk model and the exp-risk model yielded a more robust approach for predicting the survival outcomes of patients with colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS: We recognized 11 irlncRNAs and created a pair-risk model and an exp-risk model, which have the potential to predict clinical characteristics of colon cancer, either solely or conjointly.

Immunodeficiencies Push Readmissions in Malignant Tumor Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the Nationwide Readmission Database.

BACKGROUND: Immunodeficiency diseases (IDDs) are associated with an increased proportion of cancer-related morbidity. However, the relationship between IDDs and malignancy readmissions has not been well described. Understanding this relationship could help us to develop a more reasonable discharge plan in the special tumor population. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we established a retrospective cohort study that included patients with the 16 most common malignancies, and we defined two groups: non-immunodeficiency diseases (NOIDDs) and IDDs. RESULTS: To identify whether the presence or absence of IDDs was associated with readmission, we identified 603,831 patients with malignancies at their time of readmission in which 0.8% had IDDs and in which readmission occurred in 47.3%. Compared with NOIDDs, patients with IDDs had a higher risk of 30-day (hazard ratio (HR) of 1.32; 95% CI of 1.25-1.40), 90-day (HR of 1.27; 95% CI of 1.21-1.34) and 180-day readmission (HR of 1.28; 95% CI of 1.22-1.35). More than one third (37.9%) of patients with IDDs had readmissions that occurred within 30 days and most (82.4%) of them were UPRs. An IDD was an independent risk factor for readmission in patients with colorectal cancer (HR of 1.32; 95% CI of 1.01-1.72), lung cancer (HR of 1.23; 95% CI of 1.02-1.48), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (HR of 1.16; 95% CI of 1.04-1.28), prostate cancer (HR of 1.45; 95% CI of 1.07-1.96) or stomach cancer (HR of 2.34; 95% CI of 1.33-4.14). Anemia (44.2%), bacterial infections (28.6%) and pneumonia (13.9%) were the 30-day UPR causes in these populations. (4) Conclusions: IDDs were independently associated with higher readmission risks for some malignant tumors. Strategies should be considered to prevent the causes of readmission as a post discharge plan.

Association of CSMD1 with Tumor Mutation Burden and Other Clinical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy is considered as a powerful and promising clinical approach for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). However, it is still challenging to precisely screen patients who potentially benefit from immune checkpoint therapy (ICT). Identification of potential biomarkers for selecting patients sensitive to immunotherapy was urgently needed. METHODS: Public sequence data and corresponding clinical data were used to explore the potential biomarkers for immunotherapy. RESULTS: We found that CSMD1 is the most frequently mutated gene and its mutation is highly correlated with prognosis in gastric cancer patients. Interestingly, patients with mutated CSMD1 exhibit a high mutation burden and upregulated PDL1 expression. The ratio of microsatellite instability (MSI) in the CSMD1 mutation cohort was higher than that in the cohort without CSMD1 mutation. Furthermore, patients with CSMD1 mutation have been found to possess a higher number of activated CD4+ T cells and neoantigens. CONCLUSION: CSMD1 mutation may act as a novel biomarker for assessing the survival and immune therapy response in patients with gastric cancer.

Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal perioperative chemotherapeutic regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative and postoperative S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) compared with postoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy. METHODS: We did this open-label, phase 3, superiority and non-inferiority, randomised trial at 27 hospitals in China. We recruited antitumour treatment-naive patients aged 18 years or older with historically confirmed cT4a N+ M0 or cT4b Nany M0 gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with Karnofsky performance score of 70 or more. Patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) via an interactive web response system, stratified by participating centres and Lauren classification, to receive adjuvant CapOx (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day), adjuvant SOX (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral S-1 40-60 mg twice a day), or perioperative SOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day plus oral S-1 40-60 mg twice a day for three cycles preoperatively and five cycles postoperatively followed by three cycles of S-1 monotherapy). The primary endpoint, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, 3-year disease-free survival to assess the superiority of perioperative-SOX compared with adjuvant-SOX and the non-inferiority (hazard ratio non-inferiority margin of 1·33) of adjuvant-SOX compared with adjuvant-CapOx. Safety analysis were done in patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01534546. FINDINGS: Between Aug 15, 2012, and Feb 28, 2017, 1094 patients were screened and 1022 (93%) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, of whom 345 (34%) patients were assigned to the adjuvant-CapOx, 340 (33%) patients to the adjuvant-SOX group, and 337 (33%) patients to the perioperative-SOX group. 3-year disease-free survival was 51·1% (95% CI 45·5-56·3) in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 56·5% (51·0-61·7) in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 59·4% (53·8-64·6) in the perioperative-SOX group. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0·77 (95% CI 0·61-0·97; Wald p=0·028) for the perioperative-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group and 0·86 (0·68-1·07; Wald p=0·17) for the adjuvant-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events was neutropenia (32 [12%] of 258 patients in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 21 [8%] of 249 patients in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 30 [10%] of 310 patients in the perioperative-SOX group). Serious adverse events were reported in seven (3%) of 258 patients in adjuvant-CapOx group, two of which were related to treatment; eight (3%) of 249 patients in adjuvant-SOX group, two of which were related to treatment; and seven (2%) of 310 patients in perioperative-SOX group, four of which were related to treatment. No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Perioperative-SOX showed a clinically meaningful improvement compared with adjuvant-CapOx in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who had D2 gastrectomy; adjuvant-SOX was non-inferior to adjuvant-CapOx in these patients. Perioperative-SOX could be considered a new treatment option for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. FUNDING: National Key Research and Development Program of China, Beijing Scholars Program 2018-2024, Peking University Clinical Scientist Program, Taiho, Sanofi-Aventis, and Hengrui Pharmaceutical. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

MicroRNA-124 suppresses the invasion and proliferation of breast cancer cells by targeting TFAP4.

MicroRNA (miRNA/miR)-124 is widely accepted as the suppressor of different tumors. The present study aimed to improve understanding of the potential role of miR-124 in breast cancer. The gene expression profile change derived from the overexpression of miR-124 was investigated using RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of the breast cancer cell line SKBR3. The results demonstrated that the gene expression profile of SKBR3 cells significantly changed. In addition, the transcription factor activating enhancer-binding protein 4 (TFAP4) gene was identified among the top 10 differentially expressed genes, and was identified as a novel target gene of miR-124 using a dual-luciferase reporter assay. TFAP4 knockdown in notably impaired SKBR3 cell migration and proliferation, which was consistent with decreasing migration and proliferation ability following overexpression of miR-124. Taken together, these results suggest that overexpression of miR-124 can suppress the migration and proliferation of SKBR3 cells by tarsgeting TFAP4. Thus, TFAP4 may act as a novel therapeutic target of breast cancer.

CREPT/RPRD1B promotes tumorigenesis through STAT3-driven gene transcription in a p300-dependent manner.

BACKGROUND: Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) has been shown to upregulate gene transcription during tumorigenesis. However, how STAT3 initiates transcription remains to be exploited. This study is to reveal the role of CREPT (cell cycle-related and elevated-expression protein in tumours, or RPRD1B) in promoting STAT3 transcriptional activity. METHODS: BALB/c nude mice, CREPT overexpression or deletion cells were employed for the assay of tumour formation, chromatin immunoprecipitation, assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing. RESULTS: We demonstrate that CREPT, a recently identified oncoprotein, enhances STAT3 transcriptional activity to promote tumorigenesis. CREPT expression is positively correlated with activation of STAT3 signalling in tumours. Deletion of CREPT led to a decrease, but overexpression of CREPT resulted in an increase, in STAT3-initiated tumour cell proliferation, colony formation and tumour growth. Mechanistically, CREPT interacts with phosphorylated STAT3 (p-STAT3) and facilitates p-STAT3 to recruit p300 to occupy at the promoters of STAT3-targeted genes. Therefore, CREPT and STAT3 coordinately facilitate p300-mediated acetylation of histone 3 (H3K18ac and H3K27ac), further augmenting RNA polymerase II recruitment. Accordingly, depletion of p300 abolished CREPT-enhanced STAT3 transcriptional activity. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that CREPT is a co-activator of STAT3 for recruiting p300. Our study provides an alternative strategy for the therapy of cancers related to STAT3.

Perioperative and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopy-assisted hemicolectomy for left-sided colon cancers: a retrospective study.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted hemicolectomy (RAH) versus laparoscopy-assisted hemicolectomy (LAH) for left-sided colon cancers. Patients who underwent RAH and LAH from January 2012 to December 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Follow-up consultations were conducted to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these procedures. A total of 460 patients were included (RAH, n = 205; LAH, n = 255). There was no difference in patient characteristics between the two groups. Compared with the LAH group, the RAH group showed longer operative time (150.23 ± 43.77 min vs. 125.85 ± 38.67 min, p < 0.001) and higher surgery cost (6.33 ± 1.50 vs. 2.88 ± 0.72 thousand $, p < 0.001) and total hospital cost (14.97 ± 3.05 vs. 9.05 ± 2.31 thousand $, p < 0.001). No significant differences in tumor pathology, TNM staging, and perioperative outcomes were observed. There were no obvious differences in the 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) or 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival. Cox multivariate analyses showed that age, body mass index, and intravascular cancer embolus were independent risk factors for OS. Moreover, the robotic approach was not an independent risk factor for prognosis of left-sided colon cancers. RAH is an appropriate operation method for left-sided colon cancer, with perioperative and long-term outcomes comparable to those of laparoscopy. Meanwhile, RHA has longer operative time and higher cost.

CREPT is required for murine stem cell maintenance during intestinal regeneration.

Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) residing in the crypts are critical for the continual self-renewal and rapid recovery of the intestinal epithelium. The regulatory mechanism of ISCs is not fully understood. Here we report that CREPT, a recently identified tumor-promoting protein, is required for the maintenance of murine ISCs. CREPT is preferably expressed in the crypts but not in the villi. Deletion of CREPT in the intestinal epithelium of mice (Vil-CREPTKO) results in lower body weight and slow migration of epithelial cells in the intestine. Vil-CREPTKO intestine fails to regenerate after X-ray irradiation and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) treatment. Accordingly, the deletion of CREPT decreases the expression of genes related to the proliferation and differentiation of ISCs and reduces Lgr5+ cell numbers at homeostasis. We identify that CREPT deficiency downregulates Wnt signaling by impairing ß-catenin accumulation in the nucleus of the crypt cells during regeneration. Our study provides a previously undefined regulator of ISCs.