Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 42(1): 55-61, 2013 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22818976

RÉSUMÉ

Neurosensory status and craniomandibular function of 19 patients (mean age 35.2 years, range 17.8-58.8 years) treated by combined surgical orthodontic treatment with distraction osteogenesis of the mandibular anterior alveolar process (DO group) was compared with that in 41 orthodontically treated patients (mean age 22.9 years, range 15.1-49.0 years; control group). Clinical examination took place on average 5.9 years (DO group) and 5.4 years (control group) after treatment ended. Neurosensory status was determined by two-point discrimination (2-pd) and the pointed and blunt test. Lateral cephalograms evaluated advancement of the mandibular alveolar process and possible relapse. There was no significant difference in craniomandibular function and neurosensory status between the groups. Age was significantly correlated with 2-pd at the lips (DO: p=0.01, R=0.575; control group: p=0.039, R=0.324) and chin (DO: p=0.029, R=0.501; control group: p=0.008, R=0.410). Younger patients had smaller 2-pd values. Gender, age, the amount of advancement, and relapse at point B or incision inferior show no correlation with craniomandibular function and neurosensory impairment. DO of the mandibular anterior alveolar process is a valuable and safe method with minor side effects regarding neurosensory impairment.


Sujet(s)
Processus alvéolaire/chirurgie , Mandibule/chirurgie , Nerf mandibulaire/physiologie , Ostéogenèse par distraction/méthodes , Articulation temporomandibulaire/physiologie , Toucher/physiologie , Adolescent , Adulte , Facteurs âges , Processus alvéolaire/anatomopathologie , Céphalométrie/méthodes , Menton/innervation , Menton/anatomopathologie , Algie faciale/étiologie , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Incisive/anatomopathologie , Lèvre/innervation , Lèvre/anatomopathologie , Mâle , Mandibule/anatomopathologie , Avancement mandibulaire/instrumentation , Avancement mandibulaire/méthodes , Maxillaire/anatomopathologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Os nasal/anatomopathologie , Orthodontie correctrice/instrumentation , Ostéogenèse par distraction/instrumentation , Amplitude articulaire/physiologie , Récidive , Selle turcique/anatomopathologie , Facteurs sexuels , Jeune adulte
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 42(3): 337-44, 2013 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23153785

RÉSUMÉ

17 patients (14 female; 3 male) were analysed retrospectively for skeletal and dental relapse before distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the mandibular anterior alveolar process at T1 (17.0 days), after DO at T2 (mean 6.5 days), at T3 (mean 24.4 days), at T4 (mean 2.0 years), and at T5 (mean 5.5 years). Lateral cephalograms were traced by hand, digitized, superimposed, and evaluated. Skeletal correction (T5-T1) was mainly achieved through the distraction of the anterior alveolar segment in a rotational manner where the incisors were more proclined. The horizontal backward relapse (T5-T3) measured -0.3mm or 8.3% at point B (non-significant) and -1.8mm or 29.0% at incision inferior (p<0.01). Age, gender, amount and type (rotational vs. translational) of advancement were not correlated with the amount of relapse. High angle patients (NL/ML'; p<0.01) showed significant smaller relapse rates at point B. Overcorrection of the overjet achieved by the distraction could be a reason for dental relapse. Considering the amount of long-term skeletal relapse the DO could be an alternative to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement in selected cases.


Sujet(s)
Processus alvéolaire/chirurgie , Malocclusion de classe II/chirurgie , Avancement mandibulaire/méthodes , Développement maxillofacial , Ostéogenèse par distraction/méthodes , Adolescent , Adulte , Facteurs âges , Céphalométrie , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Mâle , Malocclusion de classe II/complications , Avancement mandibulaire/instrumentation , Adulte d'âge moyen , Procédures de chirurgie orthognathique/instrumentation , Procédures de chirurgie orthognathique/méthodes , Ostéogenèse par distraction/instrumentation , Surocclusion/complications , Surocclusion/chirurgie , Reproductibilité des résultats , Études rétrospectives , Résultat thérapeutique , Jeune adulte
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 42(3): 345-51, 2013 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23182400

RÉSUMÉ

Soft tissue changes were analysed retrospectively in 17 patients following distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the mandibular anterior alveolar process. Lateral cephalograms were traced by hand, digitized, superimposed, and evaluated at T1 (17.0 days), after DO at T2 (mean 6.5 days), at T3 (mean 24.4 days), at T4 (mean 2.0 years), and at T5 (mean 5.5 years). Statistical analysis was carried out using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and linear backward regression analysis. 5.5 years postoperatively, the net effect for the soft tissue at point B' was 88% of the advancement at point B while the lower lip (labrale inferior) followed the advancement of incision inferior to 24%. Increased preoperative age was correlated (p<0.05) with more horizontal backward movement (T5-T3) for labrale inferior and pogonion'. Higher NL/ML' angles were significantly correlated (p<0.05) to smaller horizontal soft tissue change at labrale inferior (T5-T3). The amount of advancement at point B was significantly correlated with an upward movement (T5-T3) of labrale inferior (p<0.01) and stomion inferior (p<0.05). It can be concluded that further change in soft tissues occurred between 2.0 and 5.5 years postoperatively. The physiological process of ageing and loss of soft tissue elasticity should be considered as possible reasons.


Sujet(s)
Processus alvéolaire/chirurgie , Malocclusion de classe II/chirurgie , Avancement mandibulaire/méthodes , Développement maxillofacial , Ostéogenèse par distraction/méthodes , Adolescent , Adulte , Facteurs âges , Céphalométrie , Face/anatomie et histologie , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Mâle , Malocclusion de classe II/complications , Avancement mandibulaire/instrumentation , Adulte d'âge moyen , Procédures de chirurgie orthognathique/instrumentation , Procédures de chirurgie orthognathique/méthodes , Ostéogenèse par distraction/instrumentation , Surocclusion/complications , Surocclusion/chirurgie , Reproductibilité des résultats , Études rétrospectives , Résultat thérapeutique , Jeune adulte
4.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 41(5): 553-9, 2012 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22356741

RÉSUMÉ

33 patients (27 females; 6 males) were retrospectively analysed for skeletal and dental relapse before distraction osteogenesis (DOG) of the mandibular anterior alveolar process at T1 (17.0 days), after DOG at T2 (mean 6.5 days), at T3 (mean 24.4 days), and at T4 (mean 2.0 years). Lateral cephalograms were traced by hand, digitized, superimposed, and evaluated. Skeletal correction (T3-T1) was mainly achieved through the distraction of the anterior alveolar segment in a rotational manner where the incisors were more proclined. The horizontal backward relapse (T4-T3) measured -0.8mm or 19.0% at point B (p<0.001) and -1.6mm or 25.0% at incision inferior (p<0.001). Age, gender, amount and type (rotational versus translational) of advancement were not correlated with the amount of relapse. High angle patients (NL/ML'; p<0.01) and patients with large gonial angle (p<0.05) showed significantly smaller relapse rates at point B. Overcorrection of the overjet achieved by the distraction was seen in a third of the patients and could be a reason for relapse. Considering the amount of skeletal relapse the DOG could be an alternative to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement in selected cases.


Sujet(s)
Processus alvéolaire/chirurgie , Mandibule/chirurgie , Avancement mandibulaire/méthodes , Ostéogenèse par distraction/méthodes , Adolescent , Adulte , Processus alvéolaire/anatomopathologie , Céphalométrie/méthodes , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Traitement d'image par ordinateur/méthodes , Incisive/anatomopathologie , Mâle , Malocclusion de classe II/chirurgie , Mandibule/anatomopathologie , Maxillaire/anatomopathologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Os nasal/anatomopathologie , Surocclusion/chirurgie , Récidive , Études rétrospectives , Rotation , Selle turcique/anatomopathologie , Jeune adulte
5.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 41(5): 560-5, 2012 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22204924

RÉSUMÉ

This study evaluated soft tissue changes in adult patients treated with distraction osteogenesis (DOG) of the anterior mandibular alveolar process and related it to different parameters. 33 patients (27 females; 6 males) were analysed retrospectively before surgery at T1 (17.0 days), after surgery at T2 (mean 6.5 days), at T3 (mean 24.4 days), and at T4 (mean 2.0 years). Lateral cephalograms were traced by hand, digitized, superimposed, and evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired t test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and linear backward regression analysis. 2 years postoperatively (T4), the net effect of the soft tissue at point B' was 100% of the advancement at point B whilst the lower lip (labrale inferior) followed the advancement of incision inferior to 46%. Increased preoperative age was correlated (p<0.05) with more horizontal backward movement (T4-T3) for labrale superior and pogonion'. Higher NL/ML' angles were significantly correlated (p<0.05) with smaller horizontal soft tissue change at point B'. Gender and the amount of skeletal and dental advancement were not correlated with postoperative soft tissue changes (T4-T3). DOG of the anterior mandibular alveolar process is a valuable alternative for mandibular advancement regarding soft tissue change and predictability.


Sujet(s)
Processus alvéolaire/chirurgie , Face , Mandibule/chirurgie , Avancement mandibulaire/méthodes , Ostéogenèse par distraction/méthodes , Adolescent , Adulte , Facteurs âges , Processus alvéolaire/anatomopathologie , Céphalométrie/méthodes , Menton/anatomopathologie , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Traitement d'image par ordinateur/méthodes , Lèvre/anatomopathologie , Mâle , Malocclusion de classe II/chirurgie , Mandibule/anatomopathologie , Maxillaire/anatomopathologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Os nasal/anatomopathologie , Surocclusion/chirurgie , Études rétrospectives , Jeune adulte
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE