RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The treatment of acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) has evolved over the last several decades with the availability of several new treatment modalities. This study was undertaken to evaluate the contemporary presentation and outcomes of ALLI patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from a prospectively collected database of all patients who presented to our tertiary referral hospital with acute ischemia of the lower extremity between May 2016 and October 2020. The cause of death was obtained from the Michigan State Death Registry. RESULTS: During the study period, 233 patients (251 lower limbs) were evaluated for ALLI. Seventy-three percent had thrombotic occlusion, 24% had embolic occlusion, and 3% due to a low flow state. Rutherford classification of ischemia severity was 7%, 49%, 40%, and 4% for Rutherford grade I, IIA, IIB, and III, respectively. Five percent underwent primary amputations, and 6% received medical therapy only. The mean length of stay was 11 ± 9 days. Nineteen percent of patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. At 30 days postoperatively, mortality was 9% and limb loss was 19%. On multivariate analysis, 1 or no vessel runoff to the foot postoperatively was associated with higher 30-day limb loss. Patients with no run-off vessels postoperatively had significantly higher 30-day mortality. Cardiovascular complications accounted for most deaths (48%). At 1-year postoperatively, mortality and limb loss reached 17% and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in treatment modalities and cardiovascular care, patients presenting with ALLI continue to have high mortality, limb loss, and readmission rates at 30 days.
RÉSUMÉ
Tissue engineering has driven significant research in the strive to create a supply of tissues for patient treatment. Cell integration into engineered tissues maximizes functional capabilities, however, issues of rejection remain. Autologous cell sources able to solve this issue are difficult to identify for tissue engineering purposes. Here, we present the efficacy of patient-sourced cells derived from adipose (adipose-derived stem cells, ASCs) and skin tissue (dermal fibroblasts, PtFibs) to build a combined engineered tunica media and adventitia graft, respectively. Patient cells were integrated into our lab's vascular tissue engineering technique of forming vascular rings that are stacked into a tubular structure to create the vascular graft. For the media layer, ASCs were successfully differentiated into the smooth muscle phenotype using angiotensin II followed by culture in smooth muscle growth factors, evidenced by significantly increased expression of αSMA and myosin light chain kinase. Engineered media vessels composed of differentiated ASCs (ASC-SMCs) exhibited an elastic modulus (45.2 ± 18.9 kPa) between that of vessels of undifferentiated ASCs (71.8 ± 35.3 kPa) and control human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs; 18.7 ± 5.49 kPa) (p<0.5). Tensile strength of vessels composed of ASCs (41.3 ± 15.7 kPa) and ASC-SMCs (37.3 ± 17.0 kPa) were higher compared to vessels of HASMCs (28.4 ± 11.2 kPa). ASC-based tissues exhibited a significant increase in collagen content and fiber maturity- both factors contribute to tissue strength and stability. Furthermore, vessels gained stability and a more-uniform single-tubular shape with longer-term 1-month culture. This work demonstrates efficacy of ASCs and PtFibs to create patient-specific vessels.
Sujet(s)
Adventice , Tunique moyenne , Humains , Aorte , Collagène , Cellules souchesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Aberrant subclavian artery (ASA) with or without Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) is a rare anatomic aortic arch anomaly that can cause dysphagia and/or life-threatening rupture. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of ASA/KD repair in patients with a left versus right aortic arch. METHODS: Using the Vascular Low Frequency Disease Consortium methodology, a retrospective review was performed of patients ≥18 years old with surgical treatment of ASA/KD from 2000 to 2020 at 20 institutions. RESULTS: 288 patients with ASA with or without KD were identified; 222 left-sided aortic arch (LAA), and 66 right-sided aortic arch (RAA). Mean age at repair was younger in LAA 54 vs. 58 years (P = 0.06). Patients in RAA were more likely to undergo repair due to symptoms (72.7% vs. 55.9%, P = 0.01), and more likely to present with dysphagia (57.6% vs. 39.1%, P < 0.01). The hybrid open/endovascular approach was the most common repair type in both groups. Rates of intraoperative complications, death within 30 days, return to the operating room, symptom relief and endoleaks were not significantly different. For patients with symptom status follow-up data, in LAA, 61.7% had complete relief, 34.0% had partial relief and 4.3% had no change. In RAA, 60.7% had complete relief, 34.4% had partial relief and 4.9% had no change. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ASA/KD, RAA patients were less common than LAA, presented more frequently with dysphagia, had symptoms as an indication for intervention, and underwent treatment at a younger age. Open, endovascular and hybrid repair approaches appear equally effective, regardless of arch laterality.
Sujet(s)
Troubles de la déglutition , Diverticule , Cardiopathies congénitales , Maladies vasculaires , Adolescent , Humains , Aorte thoracique/imagerie diagnostique , Aorte thoracique/chirurgie , Aorte thoracique/malformations , Troubles de la déglutition/étiologie , Troubles de la déglutition/chirurgie , Diverticule/imagerie diagnostique , Diverticule/chirurgie , Diverticule/complications , Cardiopathies congénitales/complications , Artère subclavière/imagerie diagnostique , Artère subclavière/chirurgie , Artère subclavière/malformations , Résultat thérapeutique , Maladies vasculaires/complications , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyenRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Aberrant subclavian artery (ASA) and Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) are rare vascular anomalies that may be associated with lifestyle-limiting and life-threatening complications. The aim of this study is to report contemporary outcomes after invasive treatment of ASA/KD using a large international dataset. METHODS: Patients who underwent treatment for ASA/KD (2000-2020) were identified through the Vascular Low Frequency Disease Consortium, a multi-institutional collaboration to investigate uncommon vascular disorders. We report the early and mid-term clinical outcomes including stroke and mortality, technical success, and other operative outcomes including reintervention rates, patency, and endoleak. RESULTS: Overall, 285 patients were identified during the study period. The mean patient age was 57 years; 47% were female and 68% presented with symptoms. A right-sided arch was present in 23%. The mean KD diameter was 47.4 mm (range, 13.0-108.0 mm). The most common indication for treatment was symptoms (59%), followed by aneurysm size (38%). The most common symptom reported was dysphagia (44%). A ruptured KD was treated in 4.2% of cases, with a mean diameter of 43.9 mm (range, 18.0-100.0 mm). An open procedure was performed in 101 cases (36%); the most common approach was ASA ligation with subclavian transposition. An endovascular or hybrid approach was performed in 184 patients (64%); the most common approach was thoracic endograft and carotid-subclavian bypass. A staged operative strategy was employed more often than single setting repair (55% vs 45%). Compared with endovascular or hybrid approach, those in the open procedure group were more likely to be younger (49 years vs 61 years; P < .0001), female (64% vs 36%; P < .0001), and symptomatic (85% vs 59%; P < .0001). Complete or partial symptomatic relief at 1 year after intervention was 82.6%. There was no association between modality of treatment and symptom relief (open 87.2% vs endovascular or hybrid approach 78.9%; P = .13). After the intervention, 11 subclavian occlusions (4.5%) occurred; 3 were successfully thrombectomized resulting in a primary and secondary patency of 95% and 96%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 39 months. Among the 33 reinterventions (12%), the majority were performed for endoleak (36%), and more reinterventions occurred in the endovascular or hybrid approach than open procedure group (15% vs 6%; P = .02). The overall survival rate was 87.3% at a median follow-up of 41 months. The 30-day stroke and death rates were 4.2% and 4.9%, respectively. Urgent or emergent presentation was independently associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 19.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-116.6), overall mortality (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.2-11.2) and intraoperative complications (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 2.8-25.1). Females had a higher risk of reintervention (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0-6.5). At an aneurysm size of 44.4 mm, receiver operator characteristic curve analysis suggested that 60% of patients would have symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of ASA/KD can be performed safely with low rates of mortality, stroke and reintervention and high rates of symptomatic relief, regardless of the repair strategy. Symptomatic and urgent operations were associated with worse outcomes in general, and female gender was associated with a higher likelihood of reintervention. Given the worse overall outcomes when symptomatic and the inherent risk of rupture, consideration of repair at 40 mm is reasonable in most patients. ASA/KD can be repaired in asymptomatic patients with excellent outcomes and young healthy patients may be considered better candidates for open approaches versus endovascular or hybrid modalities, given the lower likelihood of reintervention and lower early mortality rate.
Sujet(s)
Anévrysme , Implantation de prothèses vasculaires , Diverticule , Procédures endovasculaires , Accident vasculaire cérébral , Humains , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mâle , Endofuite/étiologie , Anévrysme/imagerie diagnostique , Anévrysme/chirurgie , Anévrysme/complications , Artère subclavière/imagerie diagnostique , Artère subclavière/chirurgie , Artère subclavière/malformations , Procédures endovasculaires/effets indésirables , Accident vasculaire cérébral/étiologie , Diverticule/imagerie diagnostique , Diverticule/chirurgie , Aorte thoracique/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutique , Implantation de prothèses vasculaires/effets indésirablesRÉSUMÉ
Raynaud's phenomenon of the tongue after radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy is an exceedingly rare complication. Symptoms are similar to Raynaud's disease of other sites and involve pallor and discomfort on exposure to cold temperatures that resolve with rewarming. Presentation occurs approximately 18-24 months after radiotherapy on average and can usually be managed effectively with lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy. Here, we present a case of lingual Raynaud's following surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy in a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: Surgical simulation is an integral component of training and has become increasingly vital in the evaluation and assessment of surgical trainees. Simulation proficiency determination has been traditionally based on accuracy and time to completion of various simulated tasks, but we were interested in assessing clinical judgment during a simulated crisis scenario. This study assessed the feasibility of creating a crisis simulator station for vascular surgery and evaluated the performance of vascular surgery integrated residents (0+5) and vascular surgery fellows (5+2) during a technical testing with an integrated crisis scenario. METHODS: A Modified Delphi method was used to create vascular surgery crisis simulation stations containing a clinical scenario in conjunction with either an open or endovascular simulator. Senior level vascular surgery trainees from both integrated residencies (0+5) and traditional vascular surgery fellowships (5+2) were then evaluated on two simulation stations: 1) Elective carotid endarterectomy (CEA) where the crisis is a postoperative stroke and 2) Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Each simulation had a crisis scenario incorporated into the procedure. Assessment was completed using a performance assessment tool containing a Likert scale. Total score was calculated as a percentage. Scores were also sub-divided in the following four categories: Situation Recognition and Decision-making, Procedural Flow, Technical Skills, and Interpretation and Use of Imaging Skills. Student's t-test was used for analysis. RESULTS: 40 senior-level trainees were evaluated (27 fellows and 13 integrated residents) completing 80 simulations. The CEA crisis simulation yielded similar results between both groups (0+5 vs. 5+2, pâ¯=â¯1.00). The 0+5 residents in vascular surgery were graded to be more proficient in the EVAR for rAAA crisis simulation and demonstrated significant differences in Total Score (pâ¯=â¯0.04), Procedural Flow (p=0.03), and Interpretation and Use of Imaging Skills (pâ¯=â¯0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The creation of crisis-based simulation for trainees in vascular surgery is feasible and actionable. Integrated 0+5 residents performed similarly to 5+2 fellows on an open carotid endarterectomy (CEA) crisis simulation, but 0+5 residents scored significantly higher compared to traditional 5+2 fellows in an endovascular rAAA crisis simulation. Crisis simulation may offer better educational experiences and improved value compared to routine simulation. Further studies using different procedural models and clinical scenarios are needed to assess the validity of crisis simulation in vascular surgery and to better understand the performance disparities found between these training paradigms.
Sujet(s)
Anévrysme de l'aorte abdominale , Implantation de prothèses vasculaires , Procédures endovasculaires , Internat et résidence , Formation par simulation , Anévrysme de l'aorte abdominale/chirurgie , Compétence clinique , Programme d'études , Enseignement spécialisé en médecine/méthodes , Procédures endovasculaires/enseignement et éducation , Études de faisabilité , Humains , Procédures de chirurgie vasculaire/enseignement et éducationRÉSUMÉ
The ideal engineered vascular graft would utilize human-derived materials to minimize foreign body response and tissue rejection. Current biological engineered blood vessels (BEBVs) inherently lack the structure required for implantation. We hypothesized that an ECM material would provide the structure needed. Skin dermis ECM is commonly used in reconstructive surgeries, is commercially available and FDA-approved. We evaluated the commercially-available decellularized skin dermis ECM Alloderm for efficacy in providing structure to BEBVs. Alloderm was incorporated into our lab's unique protocol for generating BEBVs, using fibroblasts to establish the adventitia. To assess structure, tissue mechanics were analyzed. Standard BEBVs without Alloderm exhibited a tensile strength of 67.9 ± 9.78 kPa, whereas Alloderm integrated BEBVs showed a significant increase in strength to 1500 ± 334 kPa. In comparison, native vessel strength is 1430 ± 604 kPa. Burst pressure reached 51.3 ± 2.19 mmHg. Total collagen and fiber maturity were significantly increased due to the presence of the Alloderm material. Vessels cultured for 4 weeks maintained mechanical and structural integrity. Low probability of thrombogenicity was confirmed with a negative platelet adhesion test. Vessels were able to be endothelialized. These results demonstrate the success of Alloderm to provide structure to BEBVs in an effective way.
Sujet(s)
Adventice/cytologie , Matériaux biocompatibles , Matrice extracellulaire/physiologie , Ingénierie tissulaire , Structures d'échafaudage tissulaires , Adhérence cellulaire , Derme , Cellules endothéliales de la veine ombilicale humaine , Humains , Test de matériaux , Matériaux de sutureRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The unprecedented pandemic spread of the novel coronavirus has severely impacted the delivery of healthcare services in the United States and around the world, and has exposed a variety of inefficiencies in healthcare infrastructure. Some states have been disproportionately affected such as New York and Michigan. In fact, Detroit and its surrounding areas have been named as the initial Midwest epicenter where over 106,000 cases have been confirmed in April 2020. METHOD, RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Facilities in Southeast Michigan have served as the frontline of the pandemic in the Midwest and in order to cope with the surge, rapid, and in some cases, complete restructuring of care was mandatory to effect change and attempt to deal with the emerging crisis. We describe the initial experience and response of 4 large vascular surgery health systems in Michigan to COVID-19.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Rationnement des services de santé , Restructuration hospitalière , Prévention des infections , Allocation des ressources , Maladies vasculaires , Procédures de chirurgie vasculaire , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , COVID-19/thérapie , Protection civile/normes , Restructuration hospitalière/méthodes , Restructuration hospitalière/organisation et administration , Humains , Prévention des infections/méthodes , Prévention des infections/organisation et administration , Michigan/épidémiologie , Innovation organisationnelle , Sélection de patients , SARS-CoV-2 , Télémédecine/organisation et administration , Maladies vasculaires/diagnostic , Maladies vasculaires/épidémiologie , Maladies vasculaires/chirurgie , Procédures de chirurgie vasculaire/organisation et administration , Procédures de chirurgie vasculaire/statistiques et données numériquesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: In-stent stenosis is a frequent complication of superficial femoral artery (SFA) endovascular intervention and can lead to stent occlusion or symptom recurrence. Arterial duplex stent imaging (ADSI) can be used in the surveillance for recurrent stenosis; however, its uniform application is controversial. In this study, we aimed to determine, in patients undergoing SFA stent implantation, whether surveillance with ADSI yielded a better outcome than in those with only ankle-brachial index (ABI) follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing SFA stent implantation for occlusive disease at a tertiary care referral center between 2009 and 2016. The patients were divided into those with ADSI and those with ABI follow-up only. Life-table analysis comparing stent patency, major adverse limb events (MALEs), limb salvage, and mortality between groups was performed. RESULTS: There were 248 patients with SFA stent implantation included, 160 in the ADSI group and 88 in the ABI group. Groups were homogeneous in clinical indications of claudication and critical limb-threatening ischemia (for ADSI, 39% and 61%; for ABI, 38% and 62%; P = .982) and TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus class A, B, C, and D lesions (for ADSI, 17%, 45%, 16%, and 22%; for ABI, 21%, 43%, 16%, and 20%; P = .874). Primary patency was similar between groups at 12, 36, and 56 months (ADSI, 65%, 43%, and 32%; ABI, 69%, 34%, and 34%; P = .770), whereas ADSI patients showed an improved assisted primary patency (84%, 68%, and 54%) vs ABI patients (76%, 38%, and 38%; P = .008) and secondary patency. There was greater freedom from MALEs in the ADSI group (91%, 76%, and 64%) vs the ABI group (79%, 46%, and 46%; P < .001) at 12, 36, and 56 months of follow-up. ADSI patients were more likely to undergo an endovascular procedure as their initial post-SFA stent implantation intervention (P = .001), whereas ABI patients were more likely to undergo an amputation (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In SFA stent implantation, patients with ADSI follow-up demonstrate an advantage in assisted primary patency and secondary patency and are more likely to undergo an endovascular reintervention. These factors are likely to have effected a decrease in MALEs, indicating the benefit of a more universal adoption of post-SFA stent implantation follow-up ADSI.
Sujet(s)
Artériopathies oblitérantes/chirurgie , Prothèse vasculaire , Procédures endovasculaires/méthodes , Artère fémorale/imagerie diagnostique , Endoprothèses , Échographie-doppler duplex/méthodes , Sujet âgé , Artériopathies oblitérantes/diagnostic , Femelle , Artère fémorale/chirurgie , Humains , Mâle , Période postopératoire , Conception de prothèse , Études rétrospectives , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: The policies of insurance carriers have used the truncal vein size as a criterion for coverage. The objective of the present study was to compare the effect of great saphenous vein (GSV) size ≥5 mm vs <5 mm on patient presentation and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients in a national cohort were prospectively captured in the Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry. From January 2015 to October 2017, the Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry database was queried for all patients who had undergone varicose vein procedures. The CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification, Venous Clinical Severity Score, and patient-reported outcomes were compared by GSV size (<5 mm, group 1; ≥5 mm, group 2) before and after the procedures. A 2-sample Wilcoxon test was performed to assess the differences between the 2 groups stratified by GSV size. To assess for postoperative improvement, a matched-pairs Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed for each group separately. RESULTS: During the study period, 5757 vein ablation procedures had been performed for GSV: 770 for GSV size <5 mm and 4987 for GSV size ≥5 mm. Patients in group 1 were more likely to be women (81.7% vs 68.4%; P = .001) and older (56.8 vs 55.6 years; P = .012). The CEAP clinical class was more advanced in group 2 than in group 1 (P = .001). The maximal GSV diameter in group 2 was significantly greater than in group 1 (8.32 vs 3.86 mm; P = .001); 64% of group 2 and 59.2% of group 1 had undergone radiofrequency thermal ablation (P = .001). No mortalities occurred in either group. Group 2 had more complications postoperatively (0.6% vs 0%; P = .027), required postoperative anticoagulation (8.8% vs 5%, P = .001), developed partial recanalization (0.8% vs 0.3%; P = .001), and missed more work days (2.32 vs 1.6 days) compared with group 1. A similar rate of hematoma developed in both groups, but group 1 had a higher rate of paresthesia. Both groups had improvement in the Venous Clinical Severity Score and HASTI (heaviness, achiness, swelling, throbbing, itching) score. The degree of symptomatic improvement between the 2 groups was similar. CONCLUSIONS: All patients demonstrated improvement in both clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes after endovenous ablation, regardless of GSV size. Patients with a preoperative GSV size ≥5 mm experienced similar improvement in symptoms but an increased complication rate. Patients with a smaller vein size should not be denied intervention or coverage by vein size.
Sujet(s)
Procédures endovasculaires , Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients , Ablation par radiofréquence , Veine saphène/chirurgie , Varices/chirurgie , Insuffisance veineuse/chirurgie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Bases de données factuelles , Procédures endovasculaires/effets indésirables , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Ablation par radiofréquence/effets indésirables , Enregistrements , Études rétrospectives , Appréciation des risques , Facteurs de risque , Veine saphène/imagerie diagnostique , Veine saphène/physiopathologie , Indice de gravité de la maladie , Facteurs sexuels , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutique , Varices/imagerie diagnostique , Varices/physiopathologie , Insuffisance veineuse/imagerie diagnostique , Insuffisance veineuse/physiopathologieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, central venous access line teams were implemented at many hospitals throughout the world to provide access for critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to describe the structure, practice patterns, and outcomes of these vascular access teams during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-reported study of central venous access line teams in hospitals afflicted with the COVID-19 pandemic. To participate in the study, hospitals were required to meet one of the following criteria: development of a formal plan for a central venous access line team during the pandemic; implementation of a central venous access line team during the pandemic; placement of central venous access by a designated practice group during the pandemic as part of routine clinical practice; or management of an iatrogenic complication related to central venous access in a patient with COVID-19. RESULTS: Participants from 60 hospitals in 13 countries contributed data to the study. Central venous line teams were most commonly composed of vascular surgery and general surgery attending physicians and trainees. Twenty sites had 2657 lines placed by their central venous access line team or designated practice group. During that time, there were 11 (0.4%) iatrogenic complications associated with central venous access procedures performed by the line team or group at those 20 sites. Triple lumen catheters, Cordis (Santa Clara, Calif) catheters, and nontunneled hemodialysis catheters were the most common types of central venous lines placed by the teams. Eight (14%) sites reported experience in placing central venous lines in prone, ventilated patients with COVID-19. A dedicated line cart was used by 35 (59%) of the hospitals. Less than 50% (24 [41%]) of the participating sites reported managing thrombosed central lines in COVID-19 patients. Twenty-three of the sites managed 48 iatrogenic complications in patients with COVID-19 (including complications caused by providers outside of the line team or designated practice group). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a dedicated central venous access line team during a pandemic or other health care crisis is a way by which physicians trained in central venous access can contribute their expertise to a stressed health care system. A line team composed of physicians with vascular skill sets provides relief to resource-constrained intensive care unit, ward, and emergency medicine teams with a low rate of iatrogenic complications relative to historical reports. We recommend that a plan for central venous access line team implementation be in place for future health care crises.
Sujet(s)
Cathétérisme veineux central , Infections à coronavirus/thérapie , Prestation intégrée de soins de santé/organisation et administration , Besoins et demandes de services de santé/organisation et administration , Maladie iatrogène/prévention et contrôle , Prévention des infections/organisation et administration , Pneumopathie virale/thérapie , Betacoronavirus/pathogénicité , COVID-19 , Cathétérisme veineux central/effets indésirables , Infections à coronavirus/diagnostic , Infections à coronavirus/épidémiologie , Infections à coronavirus/virologie , Études transversales , Enquêtes sur les soins de santé , Interactions hôte-pathogène , Humains , Maladie iatrogène/épidémiologie , Pandémies , Pneumopathie virale/diagnostic , Pneumopathie virale/épidémiologie , Pneumopathie virale/virologie , Appréciation des risques , Facteurs de risque , SARS-CoV-2RÉSUMÉ
Arteriovenous fistula failure represents a major cause of hospitalization and a significant economic burden for end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis. The Optiflow (Bioconnect Systems Inc., Ambler, PA) is a new device developed to improve arteriovenous fistula outcomes and decrease failure rates by reducing the risk of stenosis and improving maturation rates. This case report describes a 50-year-old male with hypertensive nephropathy on dialysis who had multiple arteriovenous fistula failures in the past. He was scheduled to undergo brachiocephalic fistula construction using the Optiflow device. After 8 months of use, the new fistula developed a peri-anastomotic venous stenosis, just distal to the Optiflow device. To our knowledge, this is the first time such a complication has been reported.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The management of patients with aortic native and prosthetic infections is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We describe a single-center experience with the use of cryopreserved allografts for the treatment of aortic infections, and compare outcomes with rifampin-soaked grafts and extra-anatomic bypass. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent an operative intervention for aortic infection at our tertiary care center from August 2007 to August 2017. Demographic data, preoperative work-up, procedural details, and outcomes were collected for each treatment modality. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients had aortic revascularization for aortic infection. Seventeen patients had cryopreserved allografts, 10 had rifampin-soaked grafts, and 5 had extra-anatomic bypass. Sixteen patients (50%) had native aortic infection and 16 patients (50%) had prosthetic aortic infection. Eighteen had involvement of the infrarenal abdominal aorta, 12 of the paravisceral aorta, and 2 of the descending thoracic aorta. Early mortality was 5.9% (1/17) for the cryopreserved group, 10% (1/10) for the rifampin-soaked group, and 40% (2/5) for the extra-anatomic bypass group. Early graft-related complications occurred in 1 patient (cryopreserved group). Mean follow-up was 34.8 months. Late death occurred in 4 patients with cryopreserved allografts, 2 with rifampin-soaked grafts and none with extra-anatomic bypass. Late graft-related complications occurred in 4 patients (cryopreserved group). Only 1 patient had recurrence of aortic infection (cryopreserved group) and 2 patients had limb loss (1 from the cryopreserved group and 1 from the rifampin-soaked group). At 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years, estimated survival for patients with cryopreserved allografts was 94%, 82%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The management of aortic infections is challenging. In patients who do not need immediate intervention, in situ aortic reconstruction with cryopreserved allografts is a viable treatment modality with relatively low morbidity and mortality.
Sujet(s)
Aorte abdominale/chirurgie , Aorte thoracique/chirurgie , Implantation de prothèses vasculaires/instrumentation , Prothèse vasculaire , Cryoconservation , Infections dues aux prothèses/chirurgie , Sujet âgé , Allogreffes , Antibactériens/administration et posologie , Aorte abdominale/imagerie diagnostique , Aorte abdominale/microbiologie , Aorte thoracique/imagerie diagnostique , Aorte thoracique/microbiologie , Prothèse vasculaire/effets indésirables , Implantation de prothèses vasculaires/effets indésirables , Implantation de prothèses vasculaires/mortalité , Matériaux revêtus, biocompatibles , Ablation de dispositif , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Conception de prothèse , Infections dues aux prothèses/imagerie diagnostique , Infections dues aux prothèses/microbiologie , Infections dues aux prothèses/mortalité , Réintervention , Études rétrospectives , Rifampicine/administration et posologie , Facteurs de risque , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: The association between socioeconomic status (SES) and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is largely unknown. This study aimed to determine the influence of SES on postoperative survival after AAA repair. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of AAA at a tertiary referral center between January 1993 and July 2013 were retrospectively collected. Thirty-day postoperative mortality and long-term mortality were documented through medical record review and the Michigan Social Security Death Index. SES was quantified using the neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), which is a standardized and reproducible index used in research that summarizes eight domains of socioeconomic deprivation and is based on census tracts derived from patients' individual addresses. The association between SES and survival was studied by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 767 patients were included. The mean age was 73 years; 80% were male, 77% were white, and 20% were African American. There was no difference in SES of patients who underwent open vs endovascular repair of AAA (P = .489). The average NDI was -0.18 (minimum, -1.47; maximum, 2.35). After adjusting for the variables that were significant on univariable analysis (age, medical comorbidities, length of stay, and year of surgery), the association between NDI and long-term mortality was significant (P = .021; hazard ratio, 1.21 [1.05-1.37]). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term mortality after AAA repair is associated with SES. Further studies are required to assess which risk factors (behavioral, psychosocial) are responsible for this decreased long-term survival in low SES patients after AAA repair.
Sujet(s)
Anévrysme de l'aorte abdominale/chirurgie , Procédures endovasculaires/mortalité , Classe sociale , Déterminants sociaux de la santé , Procédures de chirurgie vasculaire/mortalité , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Anévrysme de l'aorte abdominale/mortalité , Procédures endovasculaires/effets indésirables , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Pauvreté , Caractéristiques de l'habitat , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutique , Procédures de chirurgie vasculaire/effets indésirablesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a frequently used quality outcome marker after peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). Whereas the factors associated with CIN development have been well documented, the long-term renal effects of CIN after PVI are unknown. This study was undertaken to investigate the long-term (1-year) renal consequences of CIN after PVI and to identify factors associated with renal function deterioration at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, patients who had PVI at our institution (who were part of a statewide Vascular Interventions Collaborative) were queried for those who developed CIN. CIN was defined by the Collaborative as an increase in serum creatinine concentration of at least 0.5 mg/dL within 30 days after intervention. Preprocedural dialysis patients or patients without postprocedural creatinine values were excluded. Preprocedural, postprocedural, and 1-year serum creatinine values were abstracted and used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). ΔGFR was defined as preprocedural GFR minus 1-year GFR. Univariate and multivariate analyses for ΔGFR were performed to determine factors associated with renal deterioration at 1 year. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2015, there were 1323 PVIs performed; 881 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 57 (6.5%) developed CIN; 47% were male, and 51% had baseline chronic kidney disease. CIN resolved by discharge in 30 patients (53%). Using multivariate linear regression, male sex (P = .027) and congestive heart failure (P = .048) were associated with 1-year GFR decline. Periprocedural variables related to 1-year GFR decline included percentage increase in 30-day postprocedural creatinine concentration (P = .025), whereas CIN resolution by discharge (mean, 13.1 days) was protective for renal function at 1 year (P = .02). A post hoc analysis was performed with 50 PVI patients (randomly selected) who did not develop CIN, comparing their late renal function with that of the CIN group stratified by the periprocedural 30-day variables. Patients with CIN resolution at discharge had similar 1-year renal outcomes to non-CIN patients, whereas the CIN-persistent (at discharge) patients had greater renal deterioration at 1 year compared with non-CIN patients (P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex and congestive heart failure are risk factors for further renal function decline in patients developing CIN after PVI. The magnitude and duration of increase in creatinine concentration (CIN persistence at discharge) correlated with late progressive renal dysfunction in CIN patients, suggesting that early-resolving CIN is relatively benign.
Sujet(s)
Atteinte rénale aigüe/induit chimiquement , Produits de contraste/effets indésirables , Procédures endovasculaires/effets indésirables , Débit de filtration glomérulaire/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Rein/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Maladie artérielle périphérique/thérapie , Radiographie interventionnelle/effets indésirables , Atteinte rénale aigüe/imagerie diagnostique , Atteinte rénale aigüe/épidémiologie , Atteinte rénale aigüe/physiopathologie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Marqueurs biologiques/sang , Créatinine/sang , Évolution de la maladie , Femelle , Défaillance cardiaque/épidémiologie , Humains , Incidence , Rein/physiopathologie , Mâle , Michigan/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Maladie artérielle périphérique/imagerie diagnostique , Maladie artérielle périphérique/épidémiologie , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Facteurs sexuels , Facteurs temps , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for chronic venous disease (CVD) have been widely reported in population health management. However, predisposing factors associated with patients treated for advanced stages of CVD have yet to be established. We examined the demographics and risk factors associated with advanced clinical presentation of CVD for patients referred for vein ablation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of our institutional Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry included endovenous laser treatment and radiofrequency ablation procedures at our tertiary institution, community hospital, and outpatient vein clinic between January 2015 and December 2016. All incompetent truncal veins were divided into two groups based on the Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology clinical class of CVD: mild-moderate (C1-C3) and severe (C4-C6). The two groups were compared in terms of their demographics and medical comorbidities using univariate and multivariate analysis. Data analysis was conducted on SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 650 incompetent truncal veins were ablated. The mean age of patients was 58 years, and 73% were female. Severe CVD composed 21% of the cohort. Male sex was a risk for advanced CVD (odds ratio, 2.6; P < .001). Older age was also associated with severe CVD; the average age was 63 years for patients with advanced stage CVD vs 56 years for mild to moderate CVD (P < .001). Race, diabetes, body mass index, number of pregnancies, congestive heart failure, history of venous thromboembolism, current anticoagulation, and history of smoking or current smoking status did not affect the severity of CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with vein ablation for superficial venous insufficiency, older age and male sex were associated with increased severity of advanced CVD. Despite the higher incidence of varicose veins among women, men are more likely to have clinically advanced CVD when they present for truncal vein ablation.
Sujet(s)
Varices/épidémiologie , Insuffisance veineuse/épidémiologie , Facteurs âges , Ablation par cathéter , Maladie chronique , Femelle , Humains , Incidence , Thérapie laser , Mâle , Michigan/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Enregistrements , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Indice de gravité de la maladie , Facteurs sexuels , Varices/imagerie diagnostique , Varices/chirurgie , Insuffisance veineuse/imagerie diagnostique , Insuffisance veineuse/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Cerebrovascular injury (CVI) is a recognized but underappreciated complication of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). This study was performed to determine risk factors for CVI associated with ATBAD and, in particular, the possible contributory role of aggressive anti-impulse therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients presenting to a tertiary medical center with an ATBAD between January 2003 and October 2012 was conducted. All CVIs were adjudicated by a vascular neurologist and assigned a probable cause. The initial intensity of anti-impulse therapy was defined as the difference in mean arterial pressure (ΔMAP) from presentation to subsequent admission to the intensive care unit. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were identified. The average age was 61 years; 64% were male, and 59% were African American. Twenty patients required operative intervention (14 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs and 6 open). CVI occurred in 13 patients (11.6%): 9 were hypoperfusion related (6 diffuse hypoxic brain injuries and 3 watershed infarcts), 2 were procedure related (both thoracic endovascular aortic repairs), 1 was an intracranial hemorrhage on presentation, and 1 was a probable embolic stroke on presentation. CVI patients had demographics and comorbidities comparable to those of the non-CVI patients. CVI was associated with operative intervention (54% vs 13%; P = .002). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in CVI patients (54% vs 6%; P < .001). Patients who suffered a hypoperfusion brain injury had a higher MAP on presentation to the emergency department (142 mm Hg vs 120 mm Hg; P = .034) and a significantly greater reduction in MAP (ΔMAP 49 mm Hg vs 15 mm Hg; P < .001) by the time they reached the intensive care unit compared with the non-CVI patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, CVI in ATBAD is more frequent than previously reported and is associated with increased mortality. The most common causes are related to cerebral hypoperfusion. Higher MAP on presentation and greater decline in MAP are associated risk factors for hypoperfusion-related CVI. A less aggressive approach to lowering MAP in ATBAD warrants further study in an attempt to reduce CVI in ATBAD.
Sujet(s)
Anévrysme de l'aorte/complications , /complications , Pression artérielle , Circulation cérébrovasculaire , Angiopathies intracrâniennes/étiologie , Maladie aigüe , /imagerie diagnostique , /physiopathologie , /thérapie , Antihypertenseurs/effets indésirables , Anévrysme de l'aorte/imagerie diagnostique , Anévrysme de l'aorte/physiopathologie , Anévrysme de l'aorte/thérapie , Pression artérielle/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Circulation cérébrovasculaire/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Angiopathies intracrâniennes/imagerie diagnostique , Angiopathies intracrâniennes/physiopathologie , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Pronostic , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Facteurs tempsRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Despite newer-generation valves using smaller-sized sheaths, 10% to 20% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) require nonfemoral artery access for valve delivery. To avoid a transthoracic procedure, we have used transcarotid (TC) and transcaval (TCav) approaches in these patients. This study compared the results of a contemporary experience with transfemoral (TF), TC, and TCav approaches. METHODS: Between January 2015 and March 2017, 491 patients underwent TAVR at our institution, of which 463 were included in this analysis. Valve delivery was TF in 373 patients, TCav in 58, and TC in 32. Patient characteristics and outcomes, including 1-year survival, were compared. RESULTS: Preoperative demographics and postoperative outcomes were similar for the three groups with several exceptions. TCav patients had higher The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score than TF patients (8.0 ± 5.2 vs 6.1 ± 4.3, p = 0.004). Lung disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease were more common in TC and TCav patients. Median length of stay was 2 days for TF, 3 days for TC, and 4 days for TCav (TF vs TCav, p = 0.001). Procedural mortality, percentage discharged home, and the 30-day readmission rate were similar for all. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival was also similar at 1 year (TF, 86%; TC, 83%; TCav, 80%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients unsuitable for TF TAVR treated with TC or TCav access had 30-day/in-hospital and 1-year survival similar to a contemporary cohort undergoing TF access. Avoiding surgical entry to the chest may offer procedural and intermediate-term outcomes equivalent to TF TAVR.
Sujet(s)
Sténose aortique/chirurgie , Artères carotides , Artère fémorale , Remplacement valvulaire aortique par cathéter/méthodes , Dispositifs d'accès vasculaires , Veine cave inférieure , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Sténose aortique/imagerie diagnostique , Sténose aortique/mortalité , Cathétérisme cardiaque/méthodes , Études de cohortes , Bases de données factuelles , Femelle , Mortalité hospitalière , Humains , Estimation de Kaplan-Meier , Durée du séjour , Modèles logistiques , Mâle , Analyse multifactorielle , Sécurité des patients , Sélection de patients , Études rétrospectives , Appréciation des risques , Taux de survie , Remplacement valvulaire aortique par cathéter/mortalité , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: It is not clear whether endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) results in an increase in renal insufficiency during the long term compared with open repair (OR). We reviewed our experience with AAA repair to determine whether there was a significant difference in postoperative and long-term renal outcomes between OR and EVAR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent AAA repair between January 1993 and July 2013 at a tertiary referral hospital. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative laboratory values, morbidity, and mortality were collected. Patients with ruptured AAAs, preoperative hemodialysis, juxtarenal or suprarenal aneurysm origin, and no follow-up laboratory values were excluded. Preoperative, postoperative, 6-month, and yearly serum creatinine values were collected. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated on the basis of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was classified using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Change in GFR was defined as preoperative GFR minus the GFR at each follow-up interval. Comparison was made between EVAR and OR groups using multivariate logistics for categorical data and linear regression for continuous variables. RESULTS: During the study period, 763 infrarenal AAA repairs were performed at our institution; 675 repairs fit the inclusion criteria (317 ORs and 358 EVARs). Mean age was 73.9 years. Seventy-nine percent were male, 78% were hypertensive, 18% were diabetic, and 31% had preoperative renal dysfunction defined as GFR below 60 mL/min. Using a multivariate logistic model to control for all variables, OR was found to have a 1.6 times greater chance for development of immediate postoperative AKI compared with EVAR (P = .038). Hypertension and aneurysm size were independent risk factors for development of AKI (P = .012 and .022, respectively). Using a linear regression model to look at GFR decline during several years, there was a greater decline in GFR in the EVAR group. This became significant starting at postoperative year 4. AKI and preoperative renal dysfunction were independent risk factors for long-term decline in renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Although AKI is less likely to occur after EVAR, patients undergoing EVAR experience a significant but delayed decline in GFR over time compared with OR. This became apparent after postoperative year 4. Studies comparing EVAR and OR may need longer follow-up to detect clinically significant differences in renal function.