Evaluation of the incidence of radial artery occlusion using different introducer sheaths and hemostasis techniques.

BACKGROUND: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains one of the most important complications of transradial access (TRA). Despite the identification of multiple predictors, the interaction between these predictors on the occurrence of RAO has not been evaluated. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing TRA coronary angiography (CA) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were retrospectively analyzed to compare the effect of standard patent hemostasis using a one-bladder band versus two-bladder band with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression and two introducer sizes on the primary endpoint of RAO. Access was obtained using 6-Fr slender introducer sheath or 7-Fr slender introducer sheath and hemostasis with either a one-bladder band or a two-bladder band. The radial artery was evaluated using ultrasound. RESULTS: Total of 2019 patients undergoing CA or PCI were included in the analysis. In the one-bladder band group, the incidence of RAO with a 6-Fr slender introducer sheath was 4.2%. In those receiving hemostasis with a two-bladder band, RAO occurred in 1% of patients receiving a 6-Fr slender introducer sheath versus 0.9% in those receiving a 7-Fr slender introducer sheath (p = 0.68). Larger radial artery diameter, larger body weight, and a two-bladder hemostasis band with ipsilateral ulnar compression were independently associated with a lower incidence of RAO. CONCLUSION: A two-bladder band with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression when used for radial artery hemostasis, is associated with a lower incidence of RAO, and can mitigate the penalty for a larger catheter with reassuring implications for use of a 7-Fr capable system for complex transradial PCI.

Factors Affecting Image Resolution in a Modern Angiographic Suite: A Phantom-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in angiographic imaging systems technology provide options to decrease radiation exposure. The effect of these variations on image resolution is unknown. METHODS: Using an American National Standards Institution phantom, a high-contrast (line-pair) and low contrast (Gammex 151) phantoms, 5 second images were acquired using a Phillips Allure angiographic suite, using fluoroscopic capture (FC) as well as cineangiography (CA) in posterior anterior (PA) and left anterior oblique (LAO) projections as well as high and low table positions. Image resolutions were measured as ranked by three independent trained observers blinded to the purpose of the assessments. Comparative analyses were performed. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. RESULTS: High contrast image resolution was significantly lower with FC compared to CA (median [interquartile range], 1.69 [1.52-1.69] mm, vs 2.09 [1.88-2.09] mm, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in between PA and LAO projections as well as low and high table positions. Low contrast resolution was also lower with FC compared to CA (5 [6.5-5] vs 3 [5-3] mm, P < 0.001). No significant differences in high-contrast or low-contrast resolution were noted between PA and LAO projections, or high and low table positions. Both low and high-contrast image resolution improved with higher radiation exposure. Good interobserver agreement was noted (Fleiss-Kappa ranging from 0.69-0.74). CONCLUSION: Image resolution was perceived to be better with CA compared to FC, although not significantly affected by beam angulation or table height. Aligning resolution needs with imaging modality and maximizing table height may improve procedural efficacy and safety.

Myocardial revascularization in patients with left main coronary disease.

While coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the standard of care for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease, advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have made stent placement a reasonable alternative in selected patients. In this review, we address the results of studies comparing PCI with CABG, discuss the invasive evaluation of these patients, and the technical approach to percutaneous revascularization. Furthermore, we discuss future pivotal trials, which will help define long-term outcomes comparing PCI with surgery.

Left ventricular assist for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

As percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is being applied to higher-risk patients, ie, those with unprotected left main, multi-vessel disease, last remaining vessel, compromised left ventricular function, and ongoing ischemia, interventional cardiologists have used different percutaneous assist devices in an attempt to reduce procedure risk. The definition of high risk has varied among trials. There is no definitive evidence for superiority of the more invasive devices over the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP); furthermore, a prophylactic strategy of IABP insertion has not proven superior to a provisional strategy. The purpose of this report is to review the physiologic mechanism of action of the devices and discuss indications, limitations, and clinical outcomes during high-risk PCI.