Long-Term Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations of the Swiss Society of Pulmonology.

Long-term mechanical ventilation is a well-established treatment for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF). It is aimed at improving CHRF-related symptoms, health-related quality of life, survival, and decreasing hospital admissions. In Switzerland, long-term mechanical ventilation has been increasingly used since the 1980s in hospital and home care settings. Over the years, its application has considerably expanded with accumulating evidence of beneficial effects in a broad range of conditions associated with CHRF. Most frequent indications for long-term mechanical ventilation are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, neuromuscular and chest wall diseases. In the current consensus document, the Special Interest Group of the Swiss Society of Pulmonology reviews the most recent scientific literature on long-term mechanical ventilation and provides recommendations adapted to the particular setting of the Swiss healthcare system with a focus on the practice of non-invasive and invasive home ventilation in adults.

[Pulmonary rehabilitation - a modern and patient-centred treatment approach in COPD]. / Pulmonale Rehabilitation - Ein moderner und patientenorientierter Therapieansatz in der COPD.

Physical exercise is highly effective to improve exercise capacity and quality of life of patients with COPD and to reduce the risk for hospital admissions in patients with exacerbations.The combination of physical exercise,patient education and pharmacotherapy,as typically performed during pulmonary rehabilitation, has become the modern disease management for COPD patients. Unfortunately, there is still a lack of evidence on effective treatments to increase levels of physical activity. But there are currently major research efforts to evaluate drug and non-drug treatments for increasing levels of physical activity. This raises hopes that effective treatments could,through an increase in physical activity,reduce the risk for hospital admissions and early death in COPD patients.

Early versus late pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute exacerbations: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Around the world, the timing of referral of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients for pulmonary rehabilitation differs from immediately after exacerbation (early) to later on when patients are in a stable state (late). There are no trials comparing the different time points of referral for pulmonary rehabilitation. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to compare the effects of early and late pulmonary rehabilitation on exacerbation rates and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in COPD patients with exacerbations. METHODS: We randomized COPD patients (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stages II-IV) with a recent exacerbation to early (within 2 weeks) or late pulmonary rehabilitation (starting 6 months after randomization and in a stable state). The primary outcome was the exacerbation rate over 18 months, and secondary outcomes included HRQOL and mortality. We used multivariate analyses and an intention-to-treat analysis approach. RESULTS: We randomized 36 patients to pulmonary rehabilitation. On average, patients with early rehabilitation (n = 19) had 2.61 (SD 2.96) exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics, compared to 2.77 (SD 3.41) in patients with late rehabilitation (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.63; p = 0.60). Over the 18-month period, patients with late rehabilitation experienced more dyspnea (difference on Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea domain 0.74 and on the Medical Research Council dyspnea scale 0.37), but neither these differences nor any difference in HRQOL domains reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any statistically significant differences between early and late pulmonary rehabilitation. However, our trial indicates that early rehabilitation may lead to faster recovery of HRQOL after exacerbations compared to rehabilitation later on when patients are in a stable state.

Accuracy of the piko-1 pocket spirometer.

BACKGROUND: Good asthma control is the main goal of long-term asthma treatment. According to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines (www.ginasthma.com), medical professionals assess asthma control based on specific questions regarding asthma symptoms and by spirometry measuring forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)). Patients trained in early self-detection of asthma exacerbations use a symptom-based questionnaire, such as the Asthma Control Test (ACT) [Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, et al. Development of the Asthma Control Test. A survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113:59-64]. However, some patients may prefer harder indicators, like peak flow values, when considering how to act within their regular asthma self-management plan. OBJECTIVES: Monitoring of FEV(1) at home could be an even more valuable alternative to recording peak flow values. The inexpensive handheld pocket spirometer "Piko-1®" offers the opportunity to monitor and store consecutive FEV(1) values. This study assesses the accuracy of the Piko-1 device. METHODS: Twenty volunteers tested 20 Piko-1 devices over five consecutive days. All results were compared to daily FEV(1) values, as measured by a calibrated reference spirometer. RESULTS: Overall, the accuracy was acceptable, although Piko-1 tended to underestimate FEV(1) in the lower range. Moreover, there was no evidence of major heterogeneity between Piko-1 devices. CONCLUSION: The Piko-1 FEV(1) measurements are sufficiently accurate to start a clinical trial to compare the detection of asthma exacerbations with this device and based on asthma symptoms alone.

A single dose of Sildenafil does not enhance FeNO: a randomised, cross-over and placebo-controlled study.

Monitoring of asthma control can be performed with different means including measurement of the concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air. Due to its action on the NO-metabolism; we hypothesized that the intake of Sildenafil might augment and falsify the NO-values in exhaled air of subjects taking the drug to treat erectile dysfunction. This randomised, placebo-controlled cross-over study including 10 male non-asthmatic volunteers taking a single dose of 50 mg Sildenafil did not confirm this assumption in non-asthmatic subjects. We cannot think of any reason why asthmatics should behave differently. On the basis of these results, it does not seem necessary to ask asthma patients with elevated NO-values if they had taken any selective inhibitor of the cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase Type 5 as Sildenafil prior to the test.

Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective: a postal survey.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of randomized trials often depends on successful patient recruitment. Although numerous recruitment barriers have been identified it is unclear which of them complicate recruitment most. Also, most surveys have focused on the patients' perspective of recruitment barriers whereas the perspective of recruiting physicians has received less attention. Therefore, our aim was to conduct a postal survey among recruiting physicians of a multi-center trial to weigh barriers according to their impact on recruitment. METHODS: We identified any potential recruitment barriers from the literature and from our own experience with a multi-center trial of respiratory rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We developed and pilot-tested a self-administered questionnaire where recruiting physicians were asked to express their agreement with statements about recruitment barriers on a Likert-type scale from 1 (full agreement with statement = very substantial recruitment barrier) to 7 (no agreement with statement = no recruitment barrier). RESULTS: 38 of 55 recruiting physicians returned questionnaires (69% response rate), of which 35 could be analyzed (64% useable response rate). Recruiting physicians reported that "time constraints" (median agreement of 3, interquartile range 2-5) had the most negative impact on recruitment followed by "difficulties including identified eligible patients" (median agreement of 5, IQR 3-6). Other barriers such as "trial design barriers", "lack of access to treatment", "individual barriers of recruiting physicians" or "insufficient training of recruiting physicians" were perceived to have little or no impact on patient recruitment. CONCLUSION: Physicians perceived time constraints as the most relevant recruitment barrier in a randomized trial. To overcome recruitment barriers interventions, that are affordable for both industry- and investigator-driven trials, need to be developed and tested in randomized trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN84612310.

Improvements in PM10 exposure and reduced rates of respiratory symptoms in a cohort of Swiss adults (SAPALDIA).

RATIONALE: Reductions in mortality following improvements in air quality were documented by several studies, and our group found, in an earlier analysis, that decreasing particulate levels attenuate lung function decline in adults. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether decreases in particulates with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 microm (PM10) were associated with lower rates of reporting respiratory symptoms (i.e., decreased morbidity) on follow-up. METHODS: The present analysis includes 7,019 subjects who underwent detailed baseline examinations in 1991 and a follow-up interview in 2002. Each subject was assigned model-based estimates of average PM10 during the 12 months preceding each health assessment and the difference was used as the exposure variable of interest (DeltaPM10). Analyses were stratified by symptom status at baseline and associations between DeltaPM10 and change in symptom status during follow-up were adjusted for important baseline characteristics, smoking status at follow-up, and season. We then estimated adjusted odds ratios for symptoms at follow-up and numbers of symptomatic cases prevented due to the observed reductions in PM10. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Residential exposure to PM10 was lower in 2002 than in 1991 (mean decline 6.2 microg/m3; SD = 3.9 microg/m3). Estimated benefits (per 10,000 persons) attributable to the observed changes in PM10-levels were: 259 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 102-416) fewer subjects with regular cough, 179 (95% CI, 30-328) fewer subjects with chronic cough or phlegm and 137 (95% CI, 9-266) fewer subjects with wheezing and breathlessness. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in particle levels in Switzerland over the 11-year follow-up period had a beneficial effect on respiratory symptoms among adults.

Pulmonary rehabilitation in Switzerland.

Pulmonary rehabilitation is a form of therapy for patients with chronic lung disease that is evidence based, which ameliorates performance and endurance of the patient and improves quality of life significantly. Pulmonary rehabilitation also diminishes the amount of hospitalisations and the duration of stay in hospitals. It can improve capacity of work and diminishes the absenteeism. Motivated patients who have stopped or intend to stop smoking are the best candidates for a pulmonary rehabilitation programme.