A Practical Guide to Using Oral JAK Inhibitors for Atopic Dermatitis from the International Eczema Council.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) have the potential to dramatically alter the landscape of atopic dermatitis (AD) management due to their promising efficacy results from phase 3 trials and rapid onset of action. However, JAKinibs are not without risk, and their use is not appropriate for all AD patients, making this a medication class that dermatologists should understand and consider when treating patients with moderate-to-severe AD. OBJECTIVE: This consensus expert opinion statement from the International Eczema Council (IEC) provides a pragmatic approach to prescribing JAKinibs, including choosing appropriate patients, dosing, clinical and lab monitoring, as well as long-term use. METHODS: An international cohort of authors from the IEC with expertise in JAKinibs selected topics of interest and were formed into authorship groups covering 10 subsections. The groups performed topic-specific literature reviews, consulted up-to-date adverse event (AE) data, referred to product labels and provided analysis and expert opinion. The manuscript guidance and recommendations were reviewed by all authors as well as the IEC Research Committee. RESULTS: We recommend JAKinibs be considered for patients with moderate to severe AD seeking the benefits of rapid reduction in disease burden and itch, oral administration, and the potential for flexible dosing. Baseline risk factors should be assessed prior to prescribing JAKinibs, including increasing age, venous thromboembolisms, malignancy, cardiovascular health, kidney/liver function, pregnancy and lactation, and immunocompetence. Patients being considered for JAKinib therapy should be current on vaccinations and we provide a generalized framework for laboratory monitoring, though clinicians should consult individual product labels for recommendations as there are variations among the JAKinib class. Patients who achieve disease control should be maintained on the lowest possible dose, as many of the observed AEs occurred in a dose-dependent manner. Future studies are needed in AD patients to assess the durability and safety of continuous long-term use of JAKinibs, combination medication regimens, and the effects of flexible, episodic treatment over time. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to initiate a JAKinib should be shared among patient and provider, accounting for AD severity and personal risk/benefit assessment, including consideration of baseline health risk factors, monitoring requirements and treatment costs.

Biomarkers and patient-related factors associated with clinical outcomes in dupilumab-treated atopic dermatitis.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic eczematous skin disease with severe pruritus. Several new therapeutic agents for AD such as dupilumab, an anti-IL-4Rα antibody, have been developed in recent years. We need to predict which agent is the best choice for each patient, but this remains difficult. Objective: Our aim was to examine clinical background factors and baseline biomarkers that could predict the achievement of improved clinical outcomes in patients with AD treated with dupilumab. Methods: A multicenter, prospective observational study was conducted on 110 patients with AD. The Eczema Area and Severity Index was used as an objective assessment, and the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure and Numerical Rating Scale for Pruritus were used as patient-reported outcomes. In addition, some clinical background factors were evaluated. Results: The achievement of an absolute Eczema Area and Severity Index of 7 or less was negatively associated with current comorbidity of food allergy and baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. There were negative associations between achievement of a Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score of 7 or less and duration of severe AD and between achievement of an itching Numerical Rating Scale for Pruritus score of 1 or less and current comorbidity of allergic conjunctivitis or baseline serum periostin level. Furthermore, signal detection analysis showed that a baseline serum LDH level less than 328 U/L could potentially be used as a cutoff value for predicting the efficacy of dupilumab. Conclusion: Baseline biomarkers such as LDH and periostin and clinical background factors such as current comorbidity of food allergy and a long period of severe disease may be useful indicators when choosing dupilumab for systemic treatment for AD, as they can predict the efficacy of dupilumab.

Lebrikizumab Combined with Topical Corticosteroids Improves Patient-reported Outcomes in Japanese Patients with Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis.

Lebrikizumab has previously demonstrated efficacy in Phase 3 trials: ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 (as monotherapy), ADhere, and ADhere-J (in combination with topical corticosteroids). Here, the impact of lebrikizumab combined with low- to mid-potency topical corticosteroids on patient-reported outcomes at 16 weeks in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis is evaluated. Eligible patients (n = 286) were randomized 2:2:3 to receive placebo+ topical corticosteroids, 250 mg lebrikizumab every 4 weeks (LEBQ4W+topical corticosteroids, 500 mg loading dose at baseline), or 250 mg lebrikizumab every 2 weeks (LEBQ2W+ topical corticosteroids, 500 mg loading dose at baseline and Week 2) by subcutaneous injection. All PRO endpoints for the study were met; patients in the lebrikizumab in combination with topical corticosteroids groups demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements compared with placebo in combination with topical corticosteroids in Skin Pain NRS, DLQI, POEM, WPAI-AD, and SCORAD scales. Lebrikizumab combined with topical corticosteroids compared with placebo+topical corticosteroids improved patient-reported outcomes in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Combining treat-to-target principles and shared decision-making: International expert consensus-based recommendations with a novel concept for minimal disease activity criteria in atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Current treat-to-target recommendations for atopic dermatitis (AD) may not include high enough treatment targets and do not fully consider patient needs. OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for optimized AD management, including disease severity assessments, treatment goals and targets, and guidance for treatment escalation/modification. METHODS: An international group of expert dermatologists drafted a series of recommendations for AD management using insights from a global patient study and 87 expert dermatologists from 44 countries. Experts voted on recommendations using a modified eDelphi voting process. RESULTS: The Aiming High in Eczema/Atopic Dermatitis (AHEAD) recommendations establish a novel approach to AD management, incorporating shared decision-making and a concept for minimal disease activity (MDA). Consensus (≥70% agreement) was reached for all recommendations in 1 round of voting; strong consensus (≥90% agreement) was reached for 30/34 recommendations. In the AHEAD approach, patients select their most troublesome AD feature(s); the clinician chooses a corresponding patient-reported severity measure and objective severity measure. Treatment targets are chosen from a list of 'moderate' and 'optimal' targets, with achievement of 'optimal' targets defined as MDA. CONCLUSIONS: Patient and expert insights led to the development of AHEAD recommendations, which establish a novel approach to AD management. Patients were not involved in the eDelphi voting process used to generate consensus on each recommendation. However, patient perspectives were captured in a global, qualitative patient research study that was considered by the experts in their initial drafting of the recommendations.

Patient-reported burden in adults with atopic dermatitis: an international qualitative study.

The objective was to study a large, international, ethnically diverse population of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) to support the creation of patient-centric recommendations for AD management. Qualitative data were generated from 45-min, 1:1 telephone interviews conducted across 15 countries in each patient's native language. Interviews explored the impact of AD on patients' lives, patients' most important symptoms, treatment expectations, and treatment decision-making. Participants were also questioned on their current knowledge of AD scoring systems and what was most important to include in these tools. In total, 88 adult patients (≥ 18 years old) receiving treatment for AD were recruited through a market research database, clinician referrals, and local advertising. All patients were screened to ensure a balanced and diverse sample in terms of age, gender, educational level, employment status, geographic location, and AD severity. Patients involved in market research or activities supporting advocacy groups within the previous 6 months or affiliated with or employed by pharmaceutical companies were excluded. AD had a substantial impact on patients' lives. Itch, skin redness, and dry/flaky skin were the most frequently reported symptoms, with > 75% of patients experiencing these symptoms every 1-3 days. Mental health issues were common and resulted in the greatest negative impact on patients' daily lives. Patients perceived clinicians to underestimate the burden of their AD. Patients had little awareness of AD scoring systems and indicated a preference for these to be more clearly incorporated in clinical practice. For an ideal scoring system, patients favored using a combination of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes to reflect disease burden and ensure consistency across all settings. This global study generated diverse patient perspectives on the disease burden of AD, their expectations of treatment, and their views on AD scoring methods. These data provide evidence to support the development of patient-centric recommendations for AD management.

Measuring Signs of Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: A HOME-CP Consensus Statement.

Importance: Outcome measurement is an essential component of value-based health care and can aid patient care, quality improvement, and clinical effectiveness evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Clinical Practice initiative aims to identify a list of validated, feasible, outcome measurement instruments recommended to measure atopic dermatitis (AD) in the clinical practice setting. The clinical practice set is a list of instruments that clinicians can pick and choose from to suit their needs in the context of clinical care. Objective: To recommend instruments to measure clinical signs of AD in clinical practice. Evidence Review: Following the predefined roadmap, a mixed methods design was implemented and incorporated systematic reviews and qualitative consensus methods. Previous systematic reviews identified few clinical signs instruments with sufficient validation for recommendation. An updated systematic review evaluating the validity of clinical signs instruments informed an international meeting to reach consensus on recommended instruments to measure AD clinical signs in clinical practice. Consensus was defined as less than 30% disagreement. An in-person consensus exercise was held in Montreal, Canada, on October 16, 2022. The 34 attendees included patient and patient advocate research partners, health care professionals, researchers, methodologists, and industry representatives. Findings: The updated systematic review found that the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis, and objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis were the only instruments that demonstrated sufficient performance in all assessed measurement properties. The modified EASI and Signs Global Assessment × Body Surface Area instruments were also recommended. The EASI, Validated Investigator Global Assessment, and Investigator's Global Assessment multiplied by or measured concurrently with a body surface area measure achieved consensus in criteria and were adopted. Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus statement by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative suggests that when assessing and documenting clinical signs of AD, there are several valid and feasible instruments that can best fit a clinician's specific practice needs. These instruments should improve and standardize the documentation of signs severity, help determine the effect of treatment, facilitate the generation of clinical effectiveness evidence, and enhance the implementation of value-based health care.

Correlation Analysis of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Japanese Adults with Atopic Dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing condition with high disease burden and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Correlations between clinician- and patient-reported outcomes tend to be poor, and limited data in Asian patients are available. METHODS: ADDRESS-J was a prospective, non-interventional, longitudinal study that evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of AD treatment in Japanese adults (aged 20-59 years) with moderate-to-severe AD. Three clinician-reported AD severity outcomes (Investigator's Global Assessment, Eczema Area and Severity Index, and body surface area affected), three dermatological patient-reported outcomes (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale), and two general HRQoL patient-reported outcomes (5-dimension EuroQoL questionnaire and EuroQol Visual Analog Scale) were collected at baseline and every 3 months throughout the 24-month observation period. Four biomarkers were also analyzed when available (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine [TARC], lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], total immunoglobulin E [IgE], and peripheral blood eosinophil counts [PB EOS]). Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated using all available pooled data from baseline through 24 months. RESULTS: Correlations between the three clinician-reported outcomes were high/very high (Spearman's correlation coefficients 0.76-0.92); those between the three dermatological patient-reported outcomes were moderate (0.53-0.64), and those between the clinician-reported and dermatological patient-reported outcomes were low/moderate (0.37-0.51). Correlations between the general HRQoL patient-reported outcomes and the clinician-reported and dermatological patient-reported outcomes were negligible-moderate (0.26-0.60). Biomarker correlations with the clinician-reported and dermatological patient-reported outcomes were low/moderate for TARC and LDH (0.44-0.63), but negligible/low for PB EOS and total IgE (0.01-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that clinician- and patient-reported outcomes do not necessarily correlate well in Japanese adults with AD. This highlights the importance of including patient-reported outcomes when assessing disease severity/impact, planning treatment, and assessing response to treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) Identifier UMIN000022623.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a long-term recurring skin disease that needs monitoring over time. Various measures (outcomes) are used to assess the severity of AD and its effect on patients. Some outcomes are based on examinations used by clinicians (doctors). Others are based on questionnaires used by patients themselves to report how severe they feel their AD is, and how it affects their lives. It is not known how well these different measures correlate with one another (how a severity score given by one outcome agrees with that given by another outcome), especially in Asian patients. This analysis used information from ADDRESS-J, a study that followed Japanese adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were treated for AD in the real world for a period of 2 years. It used a statistical method to compare three clinician-reported severity outcomes, three dermatological (skin-related) patient-reported outcomes, and two general health-related quality of life patient-reported outcomes. Agreement between the three clinician-reported outcomes was high or very high. Agreement between the three dermatological patient-reported outcomes was moderate. However, importantly, agreement between the clinician-reported outcomes and the dermatological patient-reported outcomes was low or moderate. Agreement between the general health-related quality of life outcomes and all other dermatological outcomes (whether clinician- or patient-reported) was low or moderate. The study showed that clinician-reported and patient-reported AD outcomes do not necessarily agree well in Japanese adults with AD. This highlights the importance of including patient-reported outcomes when evaluating AD, planning treatment, or judging how well patients are responding to treatment.

Tralokinumab Provides Clinically Meaningful Responses at Week 16 in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Do Not Achieve IGA 0/1.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Investigator's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) is a difficult endpoint to achieve after short-term treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, and does not fully reflect clinically meaningful changes in other parameters. We assessed the impact of tralokinumab versus placebo on other clinically meaningful parameters in patients not achieving IGA 0/1 at week 16 using pooled data from two monotherapy phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and 2. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included patients (n = 1328) from ECZTRA 1 and 2 who did not achieve the co-primary endpoint, IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication. Endpoints evaluating atopic dermatitis extent and severity included proportions of patients achieving IGA 0/1, 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50/75/90); endpoints evaluating patient-reported outcomes included a ≥ 3-point improvement in worst daily pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), a ≥ 3-point improvement in eczema-related sleep interference (sleep) NRS, a ≥ 4-point improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and DLQI ≤ 5. Specifically, clinically meaningful responses were defined as EASI-50, a ≥ 3-point improvement in itch NRS, or a ≥ 4-point improvement in DLQI at week 16. RESULTS: Among ECZTRA 1 and 2 patients who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved EASI-50 (33.0% vs 13.0%), a ≥ 3-point improvement in itch NRS (22.6% vs 9.4%), or a ≥ 4-point improvement in DLQI (41.2% vs 24.5%) at week 16. In addition, compared with placebo, a numerically greater proportion of tralokinumab-treated patients achieved all three measures of clinically meaningful response (30% vs 18%) or a clinically meaningful change in at least one outcome (48.8% vs 28.5%). Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved additional clinician-reported and patient-reported outcomes, such as EASI-75 (13.5% vs 4.1%), EASI-90 (3.5% vs 1.1%), DLQI ≤ 5 (22.5% vs 12.5%), and a ≥ 3-point improvement in sleep NRS (24.5% vs 11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab provided clinically meaningful responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 and/or used rescue medication. Using multiple validated outcome measures of both efficacy and quality of life, alongside IGA scores, can better characterize tralokinumab treatment responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. [Video abstract available] CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03131648 (ECZTRA 1); study start date: 30 May, 2017; primary completion date: 7 August, 2018; study completion date: 10 October, 2019. NCT03160885 (ECZTRA 2); study start date: 12 June, 2017; primary completion date: 4 September, 2019; study completion date: 14 August, 2019. Video abstract: Tralokinumab provides clinically meaningful responses at week 16 in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who do not achieve IGA 0/1 (MP4 362818 KB).

How to use the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Core Outcome Set for atopic dermatitis trials: a users' guide.

BACKGROUND: The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has agreed upon the Core Outcome Set (COS) for use in atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials, but additional guidance is needed to maximize its uptake. OBJECTIVES: To provide answers to some of the commonly asked questions about using the HOME COS; to provide data to help with the interpretation of trial results; and to support sample size calculations for future trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We provide practical guidance on the use of the HOME COS for investigators planning clinical trials in patients with AD. It answers some of the common questions about using the HOME COS, how to access the outcome measurement instruments, what training/resources are needed to use them appropriately and clarifies when the COS is applicable. We also provide exemplar data to inform sample size calculations for eczema trials and encourage standardized data collection and reporting of the COS. CONCLUSIONS: By encouraging adoption of the COS and facilitating consistent reporting of outcome data, it is hoped that the results of eczema trials will be more comprehensive and readily combined in meta-analyses and that patient care will subsequently be improved.

Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib for Atopic Dermatitis in Japan: Analysis of the 3-Year Phase 3 Rising Up Study.

INTRODUCTION: Upadacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor approved in multiple countries for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Here we present long-term data for up to 3 years of continuous upadacitinib treatment in Japanese patients with AD. METHODS: Rising Up was a phase 3, randomized, multicenter study in Japan investigating the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients aged 12-75 years (weight ≥ 40 kg if < 18 years) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo through week 16 (all in combination with topical corticosteroids). At week 16, patients who received placebo were rerandomized 1:1 to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg; topical corticosteroids were optional per investigator discretion from weeks 16-160. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs). Efficacy assessments included patients who achieved ≥ 75%/≥ 90% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75/90), clear/almost clear on the validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD 0/1), or a ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS). RESULTS: Of 272 patients enrolled, 230 completed the study. Through week 160, the long-term incidence rate of overall AEs was numerically higher with upadacitinib 30 mg than 15 mg; rates of serious AEs, AEs considered possibly related to study drug, AEs leading to discontinuation, and AEs of special interest were generally low and similar between dose groups. EASI 75, EASI 90, vIGA-AD 0/1, and WP-NRS response rates were generally greater with upadacitinib 30 mg than 15 mg and maintained through week 160 with either dose. CONCLUSION: For up to 3 years of continuous treatment, upadacitinib was well tolerated in Japanese patients, with a similar safety profile to that of short-term studies and durable long-term response rates for skin clearance and itch improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03661138.

[JAPANESE TRANSLATION AND LINGUISTIC VALIDATION OF THE RECAP OF ATOPIC ECZEMA (RECAP)].

BACKGROUND: The Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP), a new core outcome of the atopic dermatitis trial, was translated into Japanese and linguistically validated. METHODS: Translation into Japanese was accomplished according to the ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research) guidelines and the basic guidelines for scale translation. The translation process included two forward translations, reconciliation with native English speakers, third-party back translation, cognitive debriefing, review and harmonization by the original authors. Twenty-seven atopic dermatitis and pediatric specialists from 21 centers in Japan participated in the translation process. Cognitive debriefing was conducted through face-to-face interviews using a think-aloud method with the interview guide including questions about comprehensibility, relevance, comprehensiveness, recall period and suggested improvements, based on the COSMIN methodology. RESULTS: No linguistic or cultural problems were encountered in the translation into Japanese. Cognitive debriefings were conducted with 10 adult patients and 10 parents of pediatric patients. Some minor modifications were made following discussion and approval by the research team and the original authors. The Japanese version of RECAP was considered to be understandable, comprehensive and relevant for adult patients and families of pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: The Japanese version of the RECAP, which has been validated as linguistically equivalent to the original version, is now available. Further evaluation of the measurement properties is needed in the future.

Tralokinumab Efficacy Over 1 Year in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Data from Two Phase III Trials.

BACKGROUND: Two phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and 2, confirmed the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab versus placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). To further explore the long-term efficacy of tralokinumab for AD, a pooled analysis of these trials was conducted. METHODS: ECZTRA 1 and 2 patients (n = 1596 total) were randomized to tralokinumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks (q2w) over 16 weeks. Patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) and/or 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) at Week 16, were re-randomized to tralokinumab q2w, every 4 weeks (q4w), or placebo (tralokinumab withdrawal) for another 36 weeks. Patients not achieving the response criteria at Week 16 received open-label tralokinumab q2w plus optional topical corticosteroids (TCS). A pooled, prespecified analysis assessed the proportions of Week 16 responders that maintained IGA 0/1 and/or EASI-75 at Week 52. Pooled data from all patients initiated with tralokinumab, regardless of the response at Week 16 or dosing regimen received thereafter, were analyzed post hoc. RESULTS: In patients who achieved the primary endpoints at Week 16, IGA 0/1 responses were maintained at Week 52 without rescue treatment (including TCS) by 55.9%, 42.4%, and 34.0% of patients re-randomized to tralokinumab q2w, q4w, or placebo (tralokinumab withdrawal), respectively, while EASI-75 responses were maintained by 57.3%, 50.4%, and 26.4%, respectively (prespecified analysis). In a post hoc analysis of all patients initiated with tralokinumab, response rates improved over time with continued tralokinumab treatment beyond Week 16 to Week 52 for EASI-50 (63.1-82.7%), EASI-75 (37.6-61.8%), EASI-90 (20.4-37.3%), and IGA 0/1 (23.0-36.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab treatment provides progressive and sustained improvement over 1 year in the extent and severity of AD in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03131648 (ECZTRA 1); study start date: 30 May 2017; primary completion date: 7 August 2018; study completion date: 10 October 2019. NCT03160885 (ECZTRA 2); study start date: 12 June 2017; primary completion date: 4 September 2019; study completion date: 14 August 2019. INFOGRAPHIC.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by excessively dry and itchy skin, resulting in a considerable burden of disease. Patients with AD often require long-term treatment. Tralokinumab is an injectable antibody treatment that targets a protein called interleukin-13, which substantially contributes to the signs and symptoms of AD. In the ECZTRA 1 and 2 phase III clinical trials, funded by LEO Pharma A/S, adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with tralokinumab every other week for 16 weeks showed significant improvement in disease extent and severity compared with patients receiving placebo. To further explore the long-term efficacy of tralokinumab for AD, we performed a new analysis combining the almost 1600 patients of ECZTRA 1 and 2. A large proportion of patients treated with tralokinumab who achieved clear or almost clear skin at Week 16 were able to maintain clear or almost clear skin at Week 52 with less frequent dosing (every 4 weeks). Additionally, combining all patients treated with tralokinumab, regardless of Week 16 response or dose frequency thereafter, showed that most patients achieved a significant reduction in disease extent and severity at Week 52. These results demonstrate that many tralokinumab-treated patients continue to improve beyond Week 16, and highlight that efficacy results at Week 16 may not be representative of the outcome of longer-term tralokinumab treatment. These findings may help health care providers better advise patients regarding when to modify treatment with tralokinumab.

English version of Japanese guidance for biologics in treating atopic dermatitis.

This is the English version of the Japanese guidance for biologics in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). The signaling pathway mediated by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 contributes to type 2 inflammatory responses and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. IL-31 is a cytokine mainly produced by activated T cells and is known to be involved in the pruritus of AD. Biologics for AD have been approved, including dupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor α antibody that was approved for expanded use in AD in 2018. In 2022, nemolizumab, an anti-IL-31 receptor α antibody, was approved for pruritus of AD, and tralokinumab, an anti-IL-13 antibody, was approved for AD. Physicians who intend to use these drugs should sufficiently understand and comply with the contents of the guidelines prepared by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to promote the optimal use of the drugs. In treatment with biologics, it is important to consider disease factors (activity and severity), treatment factors (dosage and administration as well as the efficacy and safety), and patients' background characteristics (age and comorbidities) and share this information with patients when choosing treatment options. This guidance was developed for board-certified dermatologists who specialize in treating AD, and for promoting the proper use of biologics, taking into account the variety of factors in individual patients.

The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) implementation roadmap.

BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets (COS) are consensus-driven sets of minimum outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials. COS aim to reduce heterogeneity in outcome measurement and reporting, and selective outcome reporting. Implementing COS into clinical trials is challenging. Guidance to improve COS uptake in dermatology is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To develop a structured practical guide to COS implementation. METHODS: Members of the Harmonising Outcome Measurement for Eczema (HOME) executive committee developed an expert opinion-based roadmap founded on a combination of a review of the COS implementation literature, the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative resources, input from HOME members and experience in COS development and clinical trials. RESULTS: The data review and input from HOME members was synthesized into themes, which guided roadmap development: (a) barriers and facilitators to COS uptake based on stakeholder awareness/engagement and COS features; and (b) key implementation science principles (assessment-driven, data-centred, priority-based and context-sensitive). The HOME implementation roadmap follows three stages. Firstly, the COS uptake scope and goals need to be defined. Secondly, during COS development, preparation for future implementation is supported by establishing the COS as a credible evidence-informed consensus by applying robust COS development methodology, engaging multiple stakeholders, fostering sustained and global engagement, emphasizing COS ease of use and universal applicability, and providing recommendations on COS use. Thirdly, incorporating completed COS into primary (trials) and secondary (reviews) research is an iterative process starting with mapping COS uptake and stakeholders' attitudes, followed by designing and carrying out targeted implementation projects. Main themes for implementation projects identified at HOME are stakeholder awareness/engagement; universal applicability for different populations; and improving ease-of-use by reducing administrative and study burden. Formal implementation frameworks can be used to identify implementation barriers/facilitators and to design implementation strategies. The effect of these strategies on uptake should be evaluated and implementation plans adjusted accordingly. CONCLUSIONS: COS can improve the quality and applicability of research and, so, clinical practice but can only succeed if used and reported consistently. The HOME implementation roadmap is an extension of the original HOME roadmap for COS development and provides a pragmatic framework to develop COS implementation strategies.

Dupilumab Provides Clinically Meaningful Responses in Children Aged 6-11 Years with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Post Hoc Analysis Results from a Phase III Trial.

BACKGROUND: Children with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have a multidimensional disease burden. OBJECTIVE: Here we assess the clinically meaningful improvements in AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life (QoL) in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD treated with dupilumab compared with placebo. METHODS: R668-AD-1652 LIBERTY AD PEDS was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III clinical trial of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS) in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD. This post hoc analysis focuses on 304 patients receiving either dupilumab or placebo with TCS and assessed the percentage of patients considered responsive to dupilumab treatment at week 16. RESULTS: At week 16, almost all patients receiving dupilumab + TCS (95%) demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in AD signs, symptoms, or QoL compared with placebo + TCS (61%, p < 0.0001). Significant improvements were seen as early as week 2 and sustained through the end of the study in the full analysis set (FAS) and the subgroup of patients with an Investigator's Global Assessment score greater than 1 at week 16. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the post hoc nature of the analysis and that some outcomes were not prespecified; the small number of patients in some subgroups potentially limits generalizability of findings. CONCLUSION: Treatment with dupilumab provides significant and sustained improvements within 2 weeks in AD signs, symptoms, and QoL in almost all children with severe AD, including those who did not achieve clear or almost clear skin by week 16. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03345914. Video Abstract: Does dupilumab provide clinically meaningful responses in children 6 to 11 years old with severe atopic dermatitis? (MP4 99484 kb).

Abrocitinib efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from phase 3 studies, including the long-term extension JADE EXTEND study.

BACKGROUND: Abrocitinib improved signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) at 12 or 16 weeks in phase 3 studies with a manageable safety profile. Further understanding of the abrocitinib long-term efficacy and safety profile is important for its appropriate use in treating chronic AD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the abrocitinib efficacy up to 48 weeks and long-term safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: JADE EXTEND (NCT03422822) is an ongoing, phase 3, long-term extension study that enrolled patients from previous abrocitinib AD trials. This analysis focusses on patients from the phase 3 JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060), JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871) and JADE COMPARE (NCT03720470) studies who completed the full treatment period of placebo or abrocitinib (200 mg or 100 mg once daily) and subsequently entered JADE EXTEND. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving skin clearance (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1 [clear/almost clear]; ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI-75]) and itch response (Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS] severity ≥4-point improvement). Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Data cut-off: April 22, 2020. RESULTS: As of the data cut-off, ~70% and ~45% of patients received abrocitinib for ≥36 and ≥48 weeks, respectively. Nasopharyngitis, atopic dermatitis, nausea and upper respiratory tract infections were the most frequent TEAEs. Serious TEAEs occurred in 7% and 5% and TEAEs leading to study discontinuation occurred in 9% and 7% of patients receiving abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively. Week 48 efficacy responses with abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg were as follows: IGA 0/1 52% and 39%; EASI-75 82% and 67%, and PP-NRS severity ≥4-point improvement 68% and 51%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe AD, long-term abrocitinib treatment resulted in clinically meaningful skin and pruritus improvement. The long-term safety profile was manageable and consistent with previous reports.