Reported physical examination methods for screening of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to describe the method followed during physical examination and the anatomical structures of the head and neck assessed in screening for oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). STUDY DESIGN: An extensive literature search was carried out using MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, and gray literature. The risk of bias was available in all papers included. RESULTS: Of 9,688 records identified, 27 were included in this review, reporting data from 356,250 individuals screened and distributed across 11 countries. Most of these (n = 19) were based on 1 round of screening conducted by a dental professional or other health care workers. Most screening programs included visual inspection and palpation of the lips, oral cavity, and the most visible oropharyngeal sites, but the descriptions reported were imprecise. Additional inspection and palpation of the neck (submental, submandibular, cervical, and supraclavicular regions) to assess for the presence of swellings and any palpable neck nodes were also performed in 15 programs. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, there was considerable heterogeneity in the method of physical examination in screening programs for oral cancer and OPMDs among the included studies.

World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: Development of a core outcome set for dry mouth: the patient perspective.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a qualitative study of patients' perspectives on dry mouth outcomes to explore their personal experiences and investigate which outcomes are most important to them. This work was part of the WONDER initiative (World Workshop on Oral Medicine Outcomes Initiative for the Direction of Research) exploring Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials. STUDY DESIGN: Using a study-specific topic guide, we conducted digitally recorded, semi-structured interviews of focus groups of patients with dry mouth secondary to Sjögren syndrome and head and neck radiotherapy. We conducted interviews until data saturation had been achieved and evaluated all transcripts for accuracy before we anonymized the data. RESULTS: Two focus groups consisting of 4 participants per group identified 4 distinct themes: (1) impact on oral health and function, (2) social isolation and withdrawal, (3) frustration with dry mouth management, and (4) limited knowledge of the medical community and lack of understanding of family and friends. CONCLUSIONS: The diversity of self-reported outcomes and the complexity of patient perceptions identified in our work may represent additional barriers to successful dry mouth management that should be considered in the design of future clinical trials.