Dual Incontinence and Risk of Fall: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: Although there is a known association between urinary incontinence (UI) and fall risk, it is unclear if having both UI and fecal incontinence, or dual incontinence (DI), increases this risk. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to elucidate a relationship between DI and falls. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary academic health system of female patients 65 years and older presenting for a new patient visit to a urogynecology health care professional for UI from 2019 to 2021. Demographic data and responses to intake questionnaires on fall and markers of frailty were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with fall adjusting for covariates identified upon univariate comparison. RESULTS: A total of 2,814 women were included in the analysis; 2,661 patients reported UI alone, and 153 reported DI. A greater proportion of women with DI reported a fall in the past year compared with those with UI alone (22.9% vs 12.2%, P < 0.001). Univariable comparison showed that these 2 groups differed regarding age, body mass index, and estimated median household income. On multivariable logistic regression, DI was significantly associated with falls (adjusted odds ratio 2.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-5.46). Other factors independently associated with falls in older women with UI include (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval): lower income groups (2.35, 1.50-3.67 for $20,000-$40,000, compared with $100,000 and higher-income group), difficulty with activities of daily living (1.60, 1.25-2.13), and unintentional weight loss (1.68, 1.05-2.68). CONCLUSION: Patients with DI have a 2-fold higher risk of fall compared with patients with UI alone.

Relationship Between Opioid Prescriptions and Number of Chronic Pain Conditions in Women With Interstitial Cystitis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between opioid prescriptions and number of chronic pain conditions in women with interstitial cystitis (IC). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Women diagnosed with IC based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision/Tenth Revision codes over an 11-year period (2010-2020) were identified from electronic medical records. Data on comorbidities and ambulatory opioid prescriptions were also extracted. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between opioid prescriptions and the number and type of coexisting chronic pain conditions. RESULTS: Of the 1,219 women with IC, 207 (17%) had received at least 1 opioid prescription. The proportions of women with opioid prescriptions for no, 1, 2, and 3 or more coexisting chronic pain conditions were 13%, 20%, 28%, and 32%, respectively. On univariable analysis, factors significantly associated with opioid use were higher body mass index ( P < 0.001), depression ( P < 0.001), sleep disorder ( P < 0.001), endometriosis ( P < 0.05), chronic pelvic pain ( P < 0.001), fibromyalgia ( P < 0.05), joint pain ( P < 0.001), and number of coexisting chronic pain diagnoses ( P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, opioid prescriptions remained significantly associated with the number of coexisting chronic pain diagnoses: 1 diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.7), 2 diagnoses (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.3), 3 or more diagnoses (aOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.5), diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.5), endometriosis (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3), chronic joint pain (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9), and sleep disorders (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6-3.6). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of opioid prescriptions in women with IC increases with the number and type of coexisting chronic pain conditions and sleep disorders.

Trends in Same-Day Discharge Rate After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy and Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Postoperative Complication Rates Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to review trends in the same-day discharge (SDD) rate after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISCP). The secondary aim was to compare the composite 30-day postoperative complication rates between propensity score-matched SDD and admitted cohorts. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2015 to 2019. Patients who underwent MISCP were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Concurrent hysterectomy, anterior or posterior repairs, rectopexy, and midurethral sling were also identified. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score matching were performed. RESULTS: A total of 12,762 MISCP patients were captured: 3,968 underwent MISCP only, 4,065 underwent MISCP with total laparoscopic hysterectomy, 734 underwent MISCP with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and 3,995 underwent MISCP with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Overall, the SDD rate was 16.3%, with an increase from 12.3% in 2015 to 23.1% in 2019. Multivariable logistic regression showed that admitted patients were more likely to be older, to be of Black race, have an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 3 or 4, have hypertension requiring medication, have longer operative time, and have undergone concurrent anterior or posterior repair, rectopexy, or sling. After propensity score matching, the composite postoperative complication rates were similar between the 2 cohorts (5.7% vs 6.4%, P = 0.818). However, superficial surgical site infection was more likely in the SDD cohort (adjusted odds ratio, 2.3; P < 0.001) and blood transfusion in the admitted cohort (adjusted odds ratio, 11.9; P = 0.0.34). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of SDD after MISCP seems to be increasing. Composite postoperative complication rates are similar between SDD and admitted cohorts.

Review of Malpractice Litigations Involving Vesicovaginal and Rectovaginal Fistulas Following Elective Hysterectomy for Benign Indications in the United States From 1970 to 2020.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to review malpractice litigations involving vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas after elective hysterectomy for benign indications in the United States and identify the most common themes in allegations by the plaintiffs and defenses by the defendants. METHODS: Using the Lexis Nexis legal database, we searched for and reviewed all U.S. malpractice litigations pertinent to this question between 1970 and 2020. RESULTS: Out of 82 cases that were identified and reviewed, 17 cases met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. These cases were decided between 1973 and 2019. Nine cases involved total abdominal hysterectomies, 1 involved total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), 1 involved total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), and the rest were not specified. Fifteen cases involved vesicovaginal fistulas and 2 involved rectovaginal fistulas. Three cases were ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, with monetary compensation ranging from $250,000 to $753,722 (approximately $364,120 to $1.8 million when adjusted for inflation), whereas 14 cases were ruled in favor of the defending surgeons. Common allegations were negligence in 15 cases and lack of informed consent in 2 cases. Factors that strengthened the defendants' arguments were thorough documentation, informed consent, and prompt referral to specialists. Intraoperative cystoscopy may have benefited in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: Thorough documentation, informed consent, and prompt referral to specialists strengthened the defendants' legal arguments. Intraoperative cystoscopy may also be beneficial.

Cetuximab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab versus carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in advanced NSCLC (SWOG S0819): a randomised, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: EGFR antibodies have shown promise in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly with squamous cell histology. We hypothesised that EGFR copy number by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) can identify patients most likely to benefit from these drugs combined with chemotherapy and we aimed to explore the activity of cetuximab with chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who are EGFR FISH-positive. METHODS: We did this open-label, phase 3 study (SWOG S0819) at 277 sites in the USA and Mexico. We randomly assigned (1:1) eligible patients with treatment-naive stage IV NSCLC to receive paclitaxel (200 mg/m2; every 21 days) plus carboplatin (area under the curve of 6 by modified Calvert formula; every 21 days) or carboplatin plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg; every 21 days), either with cetuximab (250 mg/m2 weekly after loading dose; cetuximab group) or without (control group), stratified by bevacizumab treatment, smoking status, and M-substage using a dynamic-balancing algorithm. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival in patients with EGFR FISH-positive cancer and overall survival in the entire study population. We analysed clinical outcomes with the intention-to-treat principle and analysis of safety outcomes included patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00946712). FINDINGS: Between Aug 13, 2009, and May 30, 2014, we randomly assigned 1313 patients to the control group (n=657; 277 with bevacizumab and 380 without bevacizumab in the intention-to-treat population) or the cetuximab group (n=656; 283 with bevacizumab and 373 without bevacizumab in the intention-to-treat population). EGFR FISH was assessable in 976 patients and 400 patients (41%) were EGFR FISH-positive. The median follow-up for patients last known to be alive was 35·2 months (IQR 22·9-39·9). After 194 progression-free survival events in the cetuximab group and 198 in the control group in the EGFR FISH-positive subpopulation, progression-free survival did not differ between treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·75-1·12; p=0·40; median 5·4 months [95% CI 4·5-5·7] vs 4·8 months [3·9-5·5]). After 570 deaths in the cetuximab group and 593 in the control group, overall survival did not differ between the treatment groups in the entire study population (HR 0·93, 95% CI 0·83-1·04; p=0·22; median 10·9 months [95% CI 9·5-12·0] vs 9·2 months [8·7-10·3]). In the prespecified analysis of EGFR FISH-positive subpopulation with squamous cell histology, overall survival was significantly longer in the cetuximab group than in the control group (HR 0·58, 95% CI 0·36-0·86; p=0·0071), although progression-free survival did not differ between treatment groups in this subgroup (0·68, 0·46-1·01; p=0·055). Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ among patients who were EGFR FISH non-positive with squamous cell histology (HR 1·04, 95% CI 0·78-1·40; p=0·77; and 1·02, 0·77-1·36; p=0·88 respectively) or patients with non-squamous histology regardless of EGFR FISH status (for EGFR FISH-positive 0·88, 0·68-1·14; p=0·34; and 0·99, 0·78-1·27; p=0·96; respectively; and for EGFR FISH non-positive 1·00, 0·85-1·17; p=0·97; and 1·03, 0·88-1·20; p=0·69; respectively). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (210 [37%] in the cetuximab group vs 158 [25%] in the control group), decreased leucocyte count (103 [16%] vs 74 [20%]), fatigue (81 [13%] vs 74 [20%]), and acne or rash (52 [8%] vs one [<1%]). 59 (9%) patients in the cetuximab group and 31 (5%) patients in the control group had severe adverse events. Deaths related to treatment occurred in 32 (6%) patients in the cetuximab group and 13 (2%) patients in the control group. INTERPRETATION: Although this study did not meet its primary endpoints, prespecified subgroup analyses of patients with EGFR FISH-positive squamous-cell carcinoma cancers are encouraging and support continued evaluation of anti-EGFR antibodies in this subpopulation. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute and Eli Lilly and Company.

A randomized open-label trial with a crossover comparison of sexual self-confidence and other treatment outcomes following tadalafil once a day vs. tadalafil or sildenafil on-demand in men with erectile dysfunction.

AIM: To compare Sexual Self-Confidence and other treatment outcomes following 8 weeks of treatment with tadalafil 5 mg once a day (OaD) vs. tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil 100 mg as needed (pro re nata [PRN]) in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: A randomized, open-label, crossover study in men ≥18 years of age with history of ED and satisfactory response to current oral phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor PRN. Data were analyzed with a mixed effects model for crossover design. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the Sexual Self-Confidence domain of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS) between tadalafil OaD and sildenafil PRN. SECONDARY OUTCOMES INCLUDED: Time Concerns and Spontaneity domains of PAIRS, and the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) scale. RESULTS: Men naive to tadalafil OaD were enrolled (N = 378), with 61-69% prior PDE5 inhibitor use. There were improvements in all PAIRS domains from baseline when comparing tadalafil OaD and PRN with sildenafil PRN (P < 0.001). The Sexual Self-Confidence domain improved from baseline and was 0.50 ± 0.78 following tadalafil OaD, 0.5 ± 0.72 for tadalafil PRN, and 0.39 ± 0.67 for sildenafil PRN. The difference in least-squares mean was 0.12 ± 0.04 (confidence interval [CI] = 0.04, 0.19; P = 0.001) between tadalafil OaD and sildenafil PRN and 0.01 ± 0.04 (CI = -0.06, 0.08; P = 0.872) between tadalafil OaD and tadalafil PRN. The Time Concerns domain score was lower with tadalafil OaD than tadalafil PRN (P < 0.001). There were no differences in SEAR scores between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil OaD and tadalafil PRN compared with sildenafil PRN demonstrated greater improvements in Sexual Self-Confidence, Time Concerns, and Spontaneity. There was no significant difference in Sexual Self-Confidence between tadalafil OaD and tadalafil PRN. Changes in SEAR, the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction scores from baseline to end point were similar.

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil once daily in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of an international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tadalafil is being investigated for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-LUTS). OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy, including onset, and safety of tadalafil on BPH-LUTS and the subject's and clinician's perception of changes in urinary symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trial enrolled men ≥45 yr of age with BPH-LUTS for >6 mo, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥13, and maximum urine flow rate (Q(max)) ≥4 to ≤15 ml/s. INTERVENTION: Tadalafil 5mg (n=161) or placebo (n=164), once daily. MEASUREMENTS: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) modeling evaluated change from baseline in continuous efficacy variables. Categoric efficacy variables were analyzed with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, and between-group differences in treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS AND LIMITATION: Tadalafil significantly improved IPSS results, from baseline to endpoint, compared to placebo (-5.6 vs -3.6; p=0.004). Reduction in IPSS results was apparent after 1 wk and significant after 4 wk (tadalafil -5.3 vs placebo -3.5; p=0.003). The BPH Impact Index (BII) was not assessed at week 1; however, BII improvement was apparent at 4 wk (tadalafil -1.8 vs placebo -1.2; p=0.029) and continued at 12 wk (tadalafil -1.8 vs placebo -1.3; p=0.057). Tadalafil significantly improved the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function score in sexually active men with erectile dysfunction (ED; 6.7 vs 2.0; p<0.001) at 12 wk (not assessed at week 1). Few subjects reported one TEAE or more (p=0.44). For tadalafil, the most common TEAEs were headache (3.7%) and back pain (3.1%). Tadalafil did not significantly improve Q(max) or reduce postvoid residual volume. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil 5mg once daily for 12 wk resulted in a clinically meaningful reduction in total IPSS results as early as 1 wk and achieved statistical significance at 4 wk in men with BPH-LUTS. The adverse event profile was consistent with that previously reported in men with ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial is registered on the clinicaltrials.gov website (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). The registration number is NCT00827242.

Treatment issues surrounding hepatitis C in renal transplantation: a review.

Hepatitis C infection is prevalent in candidates for and recipients of solid organ transplants. In the renal transplant population, HCV infection has been shown to decrease long-term patient and graft survival. The outcomes of HCV in recipients of other solid organ transplants are yet to be established and prospective studies will be needed in the future. In the absence of effective and safe antiviral treatment for HCV infection in renal, heart, and lung transplant recipients, the management of these patients remains a challenge and has led to an increased focus on identifying and treating hepatitis C in patients prior to transplantation. Interferon-based therapy for HCV prior transplantation appears to improve outcomes after transplantation. On the other hand, post-transplant interferon therapy is associated with an increased risk of graft rejection. Given the paucity of information on HCV treatment in solid organ transplant recipients, there is a great need for large-scale, multi-centre randomized controlled trials to determine the optimal approach to HCV infection in this population. This article will summarize the current peer-reviewed literature focusing on the efficacy of amantadine, ribavirin and both standard and pegylated interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in renal, transplant recipients.

Impact on erectile function and sexual quality of life of couples: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tadalafil taken once daily.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical research on erectile dysfunction (ED) has focused primarily on the male and the impact of treatment on their erectile function (EF) and sexual quality of life. However, ED affects the quality of life of both the male and the female partner. The literature examining the impact on the female partner resulting from treating the male's ED is somewhat limited. AIMS: To determine the efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg taken once daily compared with placebo on men's EF and sexual quality of life, and to determine the impact of this treatment on the female partner's sexual quality of life. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The co-primary outcome measures for this study were changes from baseline to end point in the EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) question 2 (SEP-2) and question 3 (SEP-3), and the Sexual Quality of Life (SQoL) domain of the Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire (SLQQ) (subject and partner). Methods. Following a 4-week treatment-free run-in phase, 342 subjects and their partners were randomly assigned to either placebo (N = 78) or tadalafil 5 mg (N = 264) for 12 weeks. The subjects' and partners' responses to study measures were collected throughout the study. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, tadalafil-treated subjects showed a significant improvement on efficacy measures (P < 0.001) including changes in the IIEF-EF, SEP-2 and SEP-3. In addition, the sexual quality of life of men and their female partners, as measured by the SQoL domain, was significantly improved with tadalafil 5 mg taken once daily (P < 0.001) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil 5 mg once daily significantly improved EF and sexual quality of life for men with ED. In addition, the sexual quality of life of the female partners of the men treated with tadalafil was significantly improved.