Erythropoiesis in Cushing syndrome: sex-related and subtype-specific differences. Results from a monocentric study.

CONTEXT: Cushing syndrome (CS) is associated with different hematological abnormalities. Nevertheless, conflicting data about erythropoiesis in CS have been reported. Furthermore, it is unclear whether CS sex and subtype-specific alterations in red blood cells (RBC) parameters are present. OBJECTIVE: To investigate sex and subtype-specific changes in RBC in patients with CS at initial diagnosis and after remission. DESIGN: Retrospective, monocentric study including 210 patients with CS (women, n = 162) matched 1:1 for sex and age to patients with pituitary microadenomas or adrenal incidentalomas (both hormonally inactive). RBC parameters were evaluated at initial diagnosis and after remission. RESULTS: Women with CS had higher hematocrit (median 42.2 vs 39.7%), hemoglobin (14.1 vs 13.4 g/dl) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (91.2 vs 87.9 fl) compared to the controls (all p < 0.0001). Women with Cushing disease (CD) showed higher hematocrit, RBC and hemoglobin levels than those with ectopic Cushing (ECS) (all p < 0.005). Men with CS had lower hematocrit (42.9 vs 44.7%), RBC count (4.8 vs 5.1n*106/µl) and hemoglobin (14.2 vs 15.4 g/dl), but higher MCV (90.8 vs 87.5 fl) than controls (all p < 0.05). In men with CS, no subtype-specific differences were identified. Three months after remission hemoglobin decreased in both sexes. CONCLUSION: CS is characterized by sexual and subtype-specific differences in RBC parameters. Compared to controls, women with CS showed higher hematocrit/hemoglobin levels, whereas men had lower hematocrit/hemoglobin, which further decreased directly after remission. Therefore, anemia should be considered as complication of CS in men. In women, differences in RBC parameters may help to differentiate CD from ECS.

S-GRAS score for prognostic classification of adrenocortical carcinoma: an international, multicenter ENSAT study.

OBJECTIVE: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has an aggressive but variable clinical course. Prognostic stratification based on the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours stage and Ki67 index is limited. We aimed to demonstrate the prognostic role of a points-based score (S-GRAS) in a large cohort of patients with ACC. DESIGN: This is a multicentre, retrospective study on ACC patients who underwent adrenalectomy. METHODS: The S-GRAS score was calculated as a sum of the following points: tumour stage (1-2 = 0; 3 = 1; 4 = 2), grade (Ki67 index 0-9% = 0; 10-19% = 1; ≥20% = 2 points), resection status (R0 = 0; RX = 1; R1 = 2; R2 = 3), age (<50 years = 0; ≥50 years = 1), symptoms (no = 0; yes = 1), and categorised, generating four groups (0-1, 2-3, 4-5, and 6-9). Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The discriminative performance of S-GRAS and its components was tested by Harrell's Concordance index (C-index) and Royston-Sauerbrei's R2D statistic. RESULTS: We included 942 ACC patients. The S-GRAS score showed superior prognostic performance for both PFS and DSS, with best discrimination obtained using the individual scores (0-9) (C-index = 0.73, R2D = 0.30, and C-index = 0.79, R2D = 0.45, respectively, all P < 0.01vs each component). The superiority of S-GRAS score remained when comparing patients treated or not with adjuvant mitotane (n = 481 vs 314). In particular, the risk of recurrence was significantly reduced as a result of adjuvant mitotane only in patients with S-GRAS 4-5. CONCLUSION: The prognostic performance of S-GRAS is superior to tumour stage and Ki67 in operated ACC patients, independently from adjuvant mitotane. S-GRAS score provides a new important guide for personalised management of ACC (i.e. radiological surveillance and adjuvant treatment).