Polymorphism of the Fcγ Receptor II as a Possible Predisposing Factor for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) represents a serious complication of heparin treatment. IgG antibodies binding platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin trigger the clinical manifestations of HIT. However, only a portion of the antibodies have the ability to activate platelets, and these can be identified by a platelet aggregation test (functional testing). However, this expression has been detected to have a molecular cause, which is a mutation of FcγRIIa. The FcγRIIa receptor is responsible for the activation of platelets by antibodies in HIT. METHODS: To determine HIT, impedance aggregometry using the Multiplate analyzer (MEA) as heparin-induced aggregation technique and the Technozym HIT IgG ELISA test were used. The MEA method uses sensitization of donor platelets with patient plasma in the presence of heparin at a concentration of 0.5 IU/mL. The results were compared with the ELISA test. Mutation of FcγRHa was assessed using the asymmetric real-time PCR method that is based on the reaction with two hybridization probes and melting curve analysis. RESULTS: Examined were 100 patients at a clinically intermediate and higher risk of HIT according to the 4T's score. All samples were examined by the ELISA test and MEA, with positive samples being further confirmed by high-concentration heparin. In the group of patients, 10.0% were positive by MEA as compared with 4% determined by ELISA. The results of genetic analysis of FcγRIIa did not provide statistically significant differences between positive patients found by the functional test as well as the ELISA test and seronegative patients. CONCLUSIONS: The genetic mutation FcγRIIa is a predisposing factor for manifestation of HIT in the form of thrombocytopenia, but the process of seroconversion apparently needs another inducing factor. Therefore, the examination of mutations can be classified as predisposing factors rather than to confirm the diagnosis of HIT.

Genetic polymorphisms of platelet receptors in patients with acute myocardial infarction and resistance to antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS: The studied group comprises 124 patients with acute myocardial infarction on dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and thienopyridines. Antiplatelet therapy was monitored by platelet-rich plasma light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) using the APACT 4004 analyzer (Helena Laboratories) and by whole blood impedance aggregometry (multiple electrode aggregometry [MEA]) using the Multiplate analyzer (Dynabyte). Platelet aggregation was detected after stimulation with arachidonic acid for detection of aspirin resistance and with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and prostaglandin E1 for detection of thienopyridine resistance. To determine the frequencies of P2Y12 (i-744T>C; rs2046934), P2Y12 (34C>T; rs6785930), COX-1 (-842A>G; rs10306114), GPVI (13254T>C; rs1613662), and GPIbA (5T>C; rs2243093) polymorphisms, DNA of patients with AIM was tested by real-time-polymerase chain reaction and melting curve analysis using the LightCycler 480 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics). RESULTS: The cut-off points used for patients with effective ASA therapy are 25% of aggregated platelets and 220 area under the curve (AUC)/min if LTA or MEA, respectively. The cut-off points used for effective thienopyridine therapy are 45% of aggregated platelets or 298 AUC/min, respectively. Both LTA and MEA found that aspirin and thienopyridine therapies failed in 14.51% and 25.8%, respectively. The data were statistically processed using the SPSS version 15 software (SPSS, Inc.). Associations between receptor mutation status and response to therapy were assessed with Fisher's exact test. The significance level was set at 0.05. CONCLUSION: The aim of our work was to use the two functional laboratory methods described earlier to assess both aspirin and thienopyridine resistance and to determine the contribution of genetic polymorphisms of platelet receptors to resistance to antiplatelet therapy in AIM. Fisher's exact test showed a significant statistical correlation between platelet function tests suitable for monitoring ASA resistance, that is, LTA and MEA, and mutation status of COX1_A1 (-A842G). Fisher's exact test showed no statistically significant correlations between platelet function tests suitable for monitoring ASA resistance, that is, LTA and MEA, and mutation status of GP1bA (-5T>C) and GP6 (T13254C). Fisher's exact test showed no statistically significant correlation between mutational statuses of the receptors P2RY12 (i-T744C), P2RY12 (C34T), GP1bA (-5T>C), or GP6 (T13254C) and response to antiplatelet therapy with 75 mg of clopidogrel.

The role of thrombophilia in patients with retinal vein occlusion and no systemic risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: The role of thrombophilia in the etiology of retinal vein occlusion (rVO) has not been adequately clarified. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of thrombophilia among RVO patients with and without systemic risk factors and among patients younger and older than 50 years. DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty one patients with RVO, including 92 with acquired risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus) and 29 without these factors. The control group included 60 persons matched for age, sex, and risk factors. METHODS: All participants were screened for Leiden mutation (FV Leiden), hyperprothrombinemia (20210 G/A mutation) and deficiency of protein C, S, and antithrombin. RESULTS: The prevalence of FV Leiden was significantly higher among RVO patients without risk factors (24.1%) than among controls without risk factors (0%; p = 0.034) and among RVO patients with acquired disorders (4.3%; p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in the prevalence of the other investigated thrombophilic factors. In all, 37.9% patients without acquired risk factors were positive for at least 1 thrombophilic factor compared with 7.6% RVO patients with acquired risk factors (p < 0.001) and 8.3% of the controls (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of thrombophilic disorders among RVO patients according to age. CONCLUSIONS: FV Leiden is significantly more frequent among RVO patients without acquired risk factors. Thrombophilia plays a much more important role in the pathogenesis of RVO in patients without acquired risk factors. Screening for thrombophilia is thus indicated only for patients in whom these factors have been excluded.

Molecular pathophysiology of thrombotic states and their impact to laboratory diagnostics.

BACKGROUND: Molecular genetic methods were implemented in the detection of thrombophilic disorders in the 1990's with the discovery of coagulation inhibitors antithrombin III (AT III), protein C (PC) and S (PS). The discovery of the molecular cause of activated protein C (APC) resistance by Bertina in 1994 greatly expanded their utilization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Currently, a broad group of molecular genetic markers with a clearly demonstrated risk of thrombophilia are used--mutation of FV Leiden 506R/Q, mutation of prothrombin (F II) 20210G/A, mutation of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C/T in homozygous form, mutation of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) 4G/5G, mutations of single coagulation inhibitors as well as a number of polymorphisms with controversial thrombophilic risk such as F XIII Val34Leu, platelet glycoproteins, endothelial protein C receptor and thrombomodulin. Another area utilizing molecular genetic methods is research of the pathophysiology of individual coagulation processes. To date, the greatest advances in regard to APC resistance have been achieved here. Although the molecular cause of APC resistance was clearly demonstrated in the 1990's, its clinical variability has not yet been fully explained. The same is true for the second most widespread mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, where only the latest research has hinted at a possible mechanism of expression of the genetic changes in the actual coagulation process. CONCLUSIONS: The future of molecular genetic methods is in achieving a complex understanding of the pathophysiology of thrombophilia and not only in its utilization as a method for detecting many polymorphisms with a very low risk of thrombosis.

Retrievable Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with acute deep venous thrombosis in perinatal period.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the retrievable Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis in the perinatal period and to discuss the technical demands associated with the filter's implantation and retrieval. METHODS: Between 1996 until 2007, eight women (mean age 27.4 years, range 20-42 years) with acute deep iliofemoral venous thrombosis in the perinatal period of pregnancy and increased risk of pulmonary embolism during delivery were indicated for retrievable Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter implantation. All filters were inserted and removed under local anesthesia from the jugular approach. RESULTS: The Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter was implanted suprarenally in all patients on the day of caesarean delivery. In follow-up cavograms performed just before planned filter removal, no embolus was seen in the filter in any patient. In all patients the filter was retrieved without complications on the 12th day after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Retrievable Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filters can be inserted and removed in patients during the perinatal period without major complications.

The prevalence of activated protein C (APC) resistance and factor V Leiden is significantly higher in patients with retinal vein occlusion without general risk factors. Case-control study and meta-analysis.

Several small case-control studies have investigated whether factor V Leiden (FVL) is a risk factor for retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and generated conflicting data. To clarify this question we performed a large two-centre case-control study and a meta-analysis of published studies. Two hundred seven consecutive patients with RVO and a control group of 150 subjects were screened between 1996 and 2006. A systematic meta-analysis was done combining our study with further 17 published European case-control studies. APC resistance was detected in 16 out of 207 (7.7%) patients and eight out of 150 (5.3%) controls. The odds ratio (OR) estimated was 1.49 with a (non-significant) 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.62-3.57. The meta-analysis including 18 studies with a total of 1,748 patients and 2,716 controls showed a significantly higher prevalence of FVL in patients with RVO compared to healthy controls (combined OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.19-2.32). All single studies combined in the meta-analysis were too small to reliably detect the effect individually. This explains the seemingly contradictory data in the literature. In conclusion, the prevalence of APC resistance (and FVL) is increased in patients with RVO compared to controls, but the effect is only moderate. Therefore, there is no indication for general screening of factor V mutation in all patients with RVO. We recommend this test to be performed in patients older than 50 years with an additional history of thromboembolic event and in younger patients without general risk factors like hypertension.

Endothelial damage and activation of the hemostatic system during radiofrequency catheter isolation of pulmonary veins.

AIMS: To determine the systemic thrombogenic effect of radiofrequency catheter isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVI) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied endothelial damage marker (von Willebrand factor [vWf]), fibrinolysis markers (tissue plasminogen activator [t-PA], plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI-1]) and coagulation activation markers (D-dimer [DD]) in 30 patients (pts) undergoing PVI. Heparin was administered continuously after double transseptal puncture in all pts. Concentrations of vWf and t-PA were significantly increased after accomplishing PVI compared to the baseline values, and elevated levels persisted 24 hours later ( p < 0.01). PAI-1 levels decreased following PVI compared to the baseline levels ( p = 0.02). PAI-1 levels normalized 24 hours after the procedure. DD increased continuously during the procedure with the peak following PVI ( p < 0.01). Higher DD concentrations persisted 24 hours later ( p = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis, total procedure time correlated significantly with the peak vWf and DD concentrations, while total RF energy dose correlated only with peak vWf ( r = 0.82). Time to heparin administration correlated with DD levels prior to the first RF pulse ( r = 0.83, p < 0.01) as well as after PVI ( r = 0.75, p < 0.01). A group of patients heparinized within the first hour of the PVI procedure had normal preablation DD levels and significantly mitigated DD levels following PVI compared to the group of patients heparinized later ( p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary vein ablations cause an increased systemic procoagulant state as reflected by fibrin turnover, fibrinolysis activation and endothelial perturbation. The activation of the coagulation cascade could be decreased by early heparin administration.