RÉSUMÉ
The incidence of duodenal tumors (DTs) is increasing. However, the mechanisms underlying its development remain unclear. Environmental factors, including the microbiome and bile acids (BAs), are believed to influence tumor development. Therefore, we conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study to investigate the potential differences between patients with DTs and healthy controls (HCs) based on these factors. In addition, the BAs in the duodenal fluid were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We recruited 41 patients and performed 16S rRNA-seq. There was no difference in the observed ASVs or PCoA plot of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity between the DTs and HCs. The lithocholic acid concentration was significantly lower in the DT group than in the control group. The ratio of CDCA to LCA was significantly higher in patients with DTs. No significant differences in microbiota were observed between DTs and HCs. In patients with DTs, the lithocholic acid concentration in duodenal was significantly lower than in HCs.
Sujet(s)
Acides et sels biliaires , Tumeurs du duodénum , Duodénum , Microbiome gastro-intestinal , ARN ribosomique 16S , Humains , Mâle , Acides et sels biliaires/métabolisme , Femelle , Études prospectives , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs du duodénum/microbiologie , Tumeurs du duodénum/métabolisme , Duodénum/métabolisme , Duodénum/microbiologie , Sujet âgé , ARN ribosomique 16S/génétique , Adulte , Acide lithocholique/métabolisme , Microbiote , Études cas-témoinsRÉSUMÉ
Water pressure method (WPM) is useful for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), characterized not only by underwater conditions but also by active water pressure via the waterjet function. However, the extension of the colorectum by injecting excess water and contaminating the operative field by stool and bleeding have been issues. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel perfusion system using a continuous liquid-suction catheter attachment (CLCA) in colorectal ESD with WPM. We retrospectively reviewed cases in which the perfusion system was used in colorectal ESD with WPM between August 2022 and September 2023. We evaluated clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, volume of injection by the waterjet function, volume of suction by the endoscope and CLCA, and concentration of floating matter in the operative field over time. Thirty-one cases were enrolled. The median lesion size was 30 (range, 15-100) mm. In all cases, en bloc resection was achieved without perforation. The median injection volume was 2312 (range, 1234-13,866) g. The median suction volumes by the endoscope and CLCA were 918 (range, 141-3162) and 1147 (range, 254-11,222) g, respectively. The median concentration of floating matter in the operative field (measured in 15 cases) was 15.3 (range, 7.3-112) mg/mL when the endoscope arrived at the lesion and 8.0 (range, 3.2-16) mg/mL after endoscopically washing at the beginning of the ESD. It ranged from 7.6 to 13.4 mg/dL every 20 min during ESD. This perfusion system could prevent the extension of the lumen and maintain a good field of view in colorectal ESD with WPM.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The relationship between primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and biliary bile acids (BAs) remains unclear. Although a few studies have compared PSC biliary BAs with other diseases, they did not exclude the influence of cholestasis, which affects the composition of BAs. We compared biliary BAs and microbiota among patients with PSC, controls without cholestasis, and controls with cholestasis, based on the hypothesis that alterations in BAs underlie the pathophysiology of PSC. METHODS: Bile samples were obtained using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography from patients with PSC (n = 14), non-hepato-pancreato-biliary patients without cholestasis (n = 15), and patients with cholestasis (n = 13). RESULTS: The BA profiles showed that patients with PSC and cholestasis controls had significantly lower secondary BAs than non-cholestasis controls, as expected, whereas the ratio of cholic acid/chenodeoxycholic acid in patients with PSC was significantly lower despite cholestasis, and the ratio of (cholic acid + deoxycholic acid)/(chenodeoxycholic acid + lithocholic acid) in patients with PSC was significantly lower than that in the controls with or without cholestasis. The BA ratio in the bile of patients with PSC showed a similar trend in the serum. Moreover, there were correlations between the alteration of BAs and clinical data that differed from those of the cholestasis controls. Biliary microbiota did not differ among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PSC showed characteristic biliary and serum BA compositions that were different from those in other groups. These findings suggest that the BA synthesis system in patients with PSC differs from that in controls and patients with other cholestatic diseases. Our approach to assessing BAs provides insights into the pathophysiology of PSC.
Sujet(s)
Acides et sels biliaires , Angiocholite sclérosante , Cholestase , Angiocholite sclérosante/sang , Angiocholite sclérosante/microbiologie , Humains , Mâle , Acides et sels biliaires/sang , Acides et sels biliaires/analyse , Acides et sels biliaires/métabolisme , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Cholestase/sang , Cholestase/microbiologie , Cholangiopancréatographie rétrograde endoscopique , Études cas-témoins , Sujet âgé , Conduits biliaires/microbiologie , Bile/métabolisme , Bile/microbiologie , Chénodiol/analyse , Acide cholique/analyse , Acide cholique/sangRÉSUMÉ
Background and study aims Superficial pharyngeal cancers can be cured with transoral surgery (TOS), which preserves organ function and quality of life. Pharyngeal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging to perform because of limited maneuverability and complex anatomical features. The water pressure method (WPM) is useful for natural traction techniques during ESD and is potentially useful for pharyngeal ESD. This study aimed to investigate the short-term outcomes of WPM-ESD for pharyngeal lesions. Patients and methods Therapeutic outcomes of patients who underwent WPM-ESD for pharyngeal lesions at Keio University between May 2019 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Twenty-one pharyngeal lesions treated with WPM-ESD were analyzed. Three lesions were located in the oropharynx and 18 in the hypopharynx. All ESD procedures were performed under general anesthesia. The endoscopic en bloc resection rate was 100%. The median procedure time was 15 minutes (range 4-45 minutes). All patients were successfully extubated on the day of ESD. No serious adverse events (AEs) related to WPM-ESDs were observed. None of the patients required nasogastric intubation, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or tracheotomy. The median fasting time and hospital stay were 2 days (range 2-5 days) and 6 days (range 6-10 days), respectively. All the histological results indicated squamous cell carcinoma. The complete histologic resection rate was 76.2%. Conclusions WPM-ESD achieved a high en bloc resection rate and short procedure time without serious AEs. Thus, it may be a useful treatment for pharyngeal lesions.
RÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) are novel endoscopic procedures for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADET). However, consensus on how to use both procedures appropriately has not been established. In this study, we evaluated treatment outcomes of both procedures, including resectability. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled study conducted between January 2020 and June 2022, patients with SNADET ≤12 mm were randomly allocated to UEMR and CSP groups. The primary end point was sufficient vertical R0 resection (SVR0), which was defined as R0 resection including a sufficient submucosal layer. We compared treatment outcomes including SVR0 rate between groups. RESULTS: The SVR0 rate was significantly higher in the UEMR group than in the CSP group (65.6% vs 41.5%, P = 0.01). By contrast, the R0 resection rate was not significantly different between study groups (70.3% vs 61.5%, P = 0.29). The submucosal layer thickness was significantly greater in the UEMR group than in the CSP group (median 546 [range, 309-833] µm vs 69 [0-295] µm, P < 0.01). CSP had a shorter total procedure time (median 12 [range, 8-16] min vs 1 [1-3] min, P < 0.01) and fewer total bleeding events (9.4% vs 1.5%, P = 0.06). DISCUSSION: UEMR has superior vertical resectability compared with CSP, but CSP has a shorter procedure time and fewer bleeding events. Although CSP is preferable for most small SNADET, UEMR should be selected for lesions that cannot be definitively diagnosed as mucosal low-grade neoplasias.