Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrer
1.
J Exp Orthop ; 11(3): e12089, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38974052

RÉSUMÉ

Purpose: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) presents significant challenges, especially in elderly and comorbid patients, often necessitating revision surgeries. We report on a series of patients with confirmed PJI of the knee and concomitant soft-tissue/extensor apparatus defects, treated by using pedicled myocutaneous medial or lateral sural artery perforator (MSAP/LSAP) gastrocnemius flaps. Methods: Our retrospective study at the Center for Musculoskeletal Infections, included patients with knee PJI undergoing pedicled myocutaneous MSAP/LSAP gastrocnemius flap reconstruction for combined soft tissue and extensor apparatus defects. The tendinous back of the gastrocnemius muscle was used and, if required, the Achilles tendon for extensor apparatus reconstruction, with the skin island addressing the cutaneous defect. Perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes after 1 year were evaluated, including functional and clinical assessments with the American Knee Society Score (AKSS). Results: Eight patients (mean age 73 years; five female) were included, predominantly with Staphylococcus aureus infections. Six patients involved isolated MSAP flaps, two were extended with the Achilles tendon. The median time for wound healing was 9 days. Short-term follow-up showed successful reconstruction in seven patients, with minor wound dehiscence in one patient. One patient required flap revision for a perigenicular haemato-seroma and two patients were diagnosed with new haematogenous PJI infection. Significant improvement in AKSS scores after surgery was observed (functional AKSS: median 33-85; clinical AKSS: median 64-91, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Pedicled myocutaneous MSAP/LSAP gastrocnemius flaps offer a safe, reliable and versatile option for reconstructing combined soft tissue and extensor apparatus defects in PJI after TKA. This approach yields excellent functional outcomes with minimal peri- and postoperative complications, which is particularly beneficial in elderly and comorbid patients and feasible in settings without microsurgical availability. Level of evidence: Level IV.

2.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 73, 2024 Jul 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971822

RÉSUMÉ

The implementation of isolation precautions for patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pending test results is resource intensive. Due to the limited availability of single-bed rooms at our institution, we isolated patients with suspected COVID-19 together with patients without suspected COVID-19 on-site in multiple-bed rooms until SARS-CoV-2-test results were available. We evaluated the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to individuals sharing the room with patients isolated on-site. This observational study was performed at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, from 03/20 - 11/20. Secondary attack rates were compared between patients hospitalized in multiple-bed rooms and exposed to individuals subjected to on-site isolation precautions (on-site isolation group), and patients exposed to individuals initially not identified as having COVID-19, and not placed under isolation precautions until the diagnosis was suspected (control group). Transmission events were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Among 1,218 patients with suspected COVID-19, 67 (5.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 21 were isolated on-site potentially exposing 27 patients sharing the same room. Median contact time was 12 h (interquartile range 7-18 h). SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified in none of the patients in the on-site isolation group vs. 10/63 (15.9%) in the control group (p = 0.03). Isolation on-site of suspected COVID-19-patients in multiple-bed rooms avoided single-room occupancy and subsequent in-hospital relocation for many patients without confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection. The absence of secondary transmission among the exposed patients in the on-site isolation group allows for assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of this strategy given the limitation of a small sample size.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Isolement du patient , Chambre de patient , SARS-CoV-2 , Humains , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/diagnostic , Femelle , Mâle , Suisse/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , SARS-CoV-2/génétique , SARS-CoV-2/isolement et purification , Sujet âgé , Adulte , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Hôpitaux universitaires
3.
ACS Infect Dis ; 10(5): 1545-1551, 2024 05 10.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632685

RÉSUMÉ

Gram-positive bacteria, in particular Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), are the leading bacterial cause of death in high-income countries and can cause invasive infections at various body sites. These infections are associated with prolonged hospital stays, a large economic burden, considerable treatment failure, and high mortality rates. So far, there is only limited knowledge about the specific locations where S. aureus resides in the human body during various infections. Hence, the visualization of S. aureus holds significant importance in microbiological research. Herein, we report the development and validation of a far-red fluorescent probe to detect Gram-positive bacteria, with a focus on staphylococci, in human biopsies from deep-seated infections. This probe displays strong fluorescence and low background in human tissues, outperforming current tools for S. aureus detection. Several applications are demonstrated, including fixed- and live-cell imaging, flow cytometry, and super-resolution bacterial imaging.


Sujet(s)
Colorants fluorescents , Infections à staphylocoques , Staphylococcus aureus , Humains , Colorants fluorescents/composition chimique , Infections à staphylocoques/microbiologie , Infections à staphylocoques/diagnostic , Cytométrie en flux/méthodes , Bactéries à Gram positif
4.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 12(1): 38, 2023 04 21.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37085891

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: We sought to decipher transmission pathways in healthcare-associated infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) within our hospital by epidemiological work-up and complementary whole genome sequencing (WGS). We report the findings of the four largest epidemiologic clusters of SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurring during the second wave of the pandemic from 11/2020 to 12/2020. METHODS: At the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, systematic outbreak investigation is initiated at detection of any nosocomial case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, occurring more than five days after admission. Clusters of nosocomial infections, defined as the detection of at least two positive patients and/or healthcare workers (HCWs) within one week with an epidemiological link, were further investigated by WGS on respective strains. RESULTS: The four epidemiologic clusters included 40 patients and 60 HCWs. Sequencing data was available for 70% of all involved cases (28 patients and 42 HCWs), confirmed epidemiologically suspected in house transmission in 33 cases (47.1% of sequenced cases) and excluded transmission in the remaining 37 cases (52.9%). Among cases with identical strains, epidemiologic work-up suggested transmission mainly through a ward-based exposure (24/33, 72.7%), more commonly affecting HCWs (16/24, 66.7%) than patients (8/24, 33.3%), followed by transmission between patients (6/33, 18.2%), and among HCWs and patients (3/33, 9.1%, respectively two HCWs and one patient). CONCLUSIONS: Phylogenetic analyses revealed important insights into transmission pathways supporting less than 50% of epidemiologically suspected SARS-CoV-2 transmissions. The remainder of cases most likely reflect community-acquired infection randomly detected by outbreak investigation. Notably, most transmissions occurred between HCWs, possibly indicating lower perception of the risk of infection during contacts among HCWs.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Infection croisée , Humains , SARS-CoV-2/génétique , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Phylogenèse , Épidémies de maladies , Infection croisée/épidémiologie , Centres de soins tertiaires
5.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 12(1): 43, 2023 04 30.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37122021

RÉSUMÉ

We conducted a qualitative interview-based study to examine the perception of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers (HCWs) without patient contact in a tertiary academic care center. We compared these findings to those derived from interviews of HCWs with patient contact from the same institution using the same study design. The following main four themes were identified: (1) As for HCWs with patient contact, transparent communication strongly contributes to employees' sense of security. (2) Information on personal protective equipment (PPE) usage needs to be stratified according to different educational backgrounds and professions. (3) Consistency of IPC measures was positively perceived yet a desire for constant reminders to counteract the fatigue effect played a more significant role for HCWs without patient contact. (4) As compared to HCWs with patient contact, HCWs without patient contact preferred uniform digital training resources rather than more face-to-face training. This study shows that the needs of HCWs with and without patient contact differ and need to be considered in pandemic management.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humains , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Pandémies/prévention et contrôle , Transmission de maladie infectieuse du patient au professionnel de santé/prévention et contrôle , Personnel de santé , Perception
6.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 29(4): 498-505, 2023 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36283610

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the adherence and impact of quality-of-care indicators (QCIs) in the management of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection in a prospective and multicentre cohort. METHODS: Analysis of the prospective, multicentre international S. Aureus Collaboration cohort of S. Aureus bloodstream infection cases observed between January 2013 and April 2015. Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of adherence to QCIs on 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1784 cases were included. Overall, 90-day mortality was 29.9% and mean follow-up period was 118 days. Adherence was 67% (n = 1180/1762) for follow-up blood cultures, 31% (n = 416/1342) for early focus control, 77.6% (n = 546/704) for performance of echocardiography, 75.5% (n = 1348/1784) for adequacy of targeted antimicrobial therapy, 88.6% (n = 851/960) for adequacy of treatment duration in non-complicated bloodstream infections and 61.2% (n = 366/598) in complicated bloodstream infections. Full bundle adherence was 18.4% (n = 328/1784). After controlling for immortal time bias and potential confounders, focus control (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.99; p 0.038) and adequate targeted antimicrobial therapy (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91; p 0.004) were associated with low 90-day mortality. DISCUSSION: Adherence to QCIs in S. Aureus bloodstream infection did not reach expected rates. Apart from the benefits of application as a bundle, focus control and adequate targeted therapy were independently associated with low mortality.


Sujet(s)
Bactériémie , Sepsie , Infections à staphylocoques , Humains , Staphylococcus aureus , Études prospectives , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Bactériémie/diagnostic , Bactériémie/traitement médicamenteux , Bactériémie/microbiologie , Infections à staphylocoques/diagnostic , Infections à staphylocoques/traitement médicamenteux , Infections à staphylocoques/microbiologie , Sepsie/traitement médicamenteux , Pronostic
7.
Bone Joint J ; 104-B(6): 696-702, 2022 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35638215

RÉSUMÉ

AIMS: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and fracture-related infections (FRIs) are associated with a significant risk of adverse events. However, there is a paucity of data on cardiac complications following revision surgery for PJI and FRI and how they impact overall mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the risk of perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) and mortality in this patient cohort. METHODS: We prospectively included consecutive patients at high cardiovascular risk (defined as age ≥ 45 years with pre-existing coronary, peripheral, or cerebrovascular artery disease, or any patient aged ≥ 65 years, plus a postoperative hospital stay of > 24 hours) undergoing septic or aseptic major orthopaedic surgery between July 2014 and October 2016. All patients received a systematic screening to reliably detect PMI, using serial measurements of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. All-cause mortality was assessed at one year. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to compare incidence of PMI and mortality between patients undergoing septic revision surgery for PJI or FRI, and patients receiving aseptic major bone and joint surgery. RESULTS: In total, 911 consecutive patients were included. The overall perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) rate was 15.4% (n = 140). Septic revision surgery for PJI was associated with a significantly higher PMI rate (43.8% (14/32) vs 14.5% (57/393); p = 0.001) and one-year mortality rate (18.6% (6/32) vs 7.4% (29/393); p = 0.038) compared to aseptic revision or primary arthroplasty. The association with PMI persisted in multivariable analysis with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 4.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1 to 10.7; p < 0.001), but was not statistically significant for one-year mortality (aOR 1.9 (95% CI 0.7 to 5.4; p = 0.240). PMI rate (15.2% (5/33) vs 14.1% (64/453)) and one-year mortality (15.2% (5/33) vs 9.1% (41/453)) after FRI revision surgery were comparable to aseptic long-bone fracture surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing revision surgery for PJI were at a risk of PMI and death compared to those undergoing aseptic arthroplasty surgery. Screening for PMI and treatment in specialized multidisciplinary units should be considered in major bone and joint infections. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):696-702.


Sujet(s)
Arthrite infectieuse , Cardiopathies , Orthopédie , Arthrite infectieuse/chirurgie , Cardiopathies/complications , Humains , Odds ratio , Réintervention/effets indésirables
8.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 11(1): 30, 2022 02 08.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35135617

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Protecting healthcare workers (HCWs) from exposure to SARS-CoV-2 during patient care is central to managing the current pandemic. Higher levels of trust in personal protective equipment (PPE) and infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies have been previously related to lower levels of emotional exhaustion, yet little is known on how to achieve such a perception of safety. We thus sought to identify institutional actions, strategies and policies related to HCWs' safety perception during the early phase of the pandemic at a tertiary care center in Switzerland by interviewing HCWs from different clinics, professions, and positions. METHODS: For this qualitative study, 36 face-to-face semi-structured interviews were performed. Interviews were based on a guide that addressed the perception of institutional strategies and policies during the first phase of the pandemic in March 2020. The participants included doctors (n = 19) and nurses (n = 17) in senior and non-senior positions from eight clinics in the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, all involved in patient care. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and organized using MAXQDA (VERBI Software GmbH, Berlin). FINDINGS: Five recurring themes were identified to affect HCWs' perception of their safety during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: (1) transparency and clarity of information, (2) communication on the availability of PPE (with the provision of information alone increasing the feeling of safety even if supplies of PPE were reported as low), (3) uniformity and consistency of guidelines, (4) digital resources to support face-to-face teaching (although personal information transfer is still being considered superior in terms of strengthening safety perception) and (5) support and appreciation for the work performed. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies institutional policies and actions influencing HCWs' safety perception during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the most important of which is the factor of transparent communication. This knowledge reveals potential areas of action critical to improving preparedness and management in hospitals faced with an infectious disease threat.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Personnel de santé , Pandémies , Équipement de protection individuelle , Centres de soins tertiaires , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Humains , Prévention des infections/statistiques et données numériques , Transmission de maladie infectieuse du patient au professionnel de santé/prévention et contrôle , Soins aux patients , Équipement de protection individuelle/normes , Recherche qualitative , SARS-CoV-2 , Suisse/épidémiologie
9.
Injury ; 52(11): 3489-3497, 2021 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34304885

RÉSUMÉ

Introduction Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a severe post-traumatic complication which is occasionally accompanied by a deficient or even avital soft-tissue envelope. In these cases, a thoroughly planned orthoplastic approach is imperative as a vital and intact soft-tissue envelope is mandatory to achieve fracture union and infection eradication. The aim of this study was, to analyse if soft-tissue reconstruction (STR) without complications is associated with a better long-term outcome compared to FRI patients with STR complications. In particular, it was investigated if primary flap failure represented a risk factor for compromised fracture union and recurrence of infection. Patients and Methods Patients with a lower leg FRI requiring STR (local, pedicled and free flaps) who were treated from 2010-18 at the University Hospital Basel were included in this retrospective analysis. The main outcome measure was the success rate of STR, further outcome measures were fracture nonunion and recurrence of infection. Results Overall, 145 patients with lower leg FRI were identified, of whom 58 (40%) received STR (muscle flaps: n = 38, fascio-cutaneous flaps: n=19; composite osteo-cutaneous flap: n = 1). In total seven patients required secondary STR due to primary flap failure. All failures and flap-related complications occurred within the first three weeks after surgery. Secondary STR was successful in all cases. A high Charlson Comorbidity Index Score was a significant risk factor for flap failure (p = 0.011). Out of the 43 patients who completed the 9-month follow-up, 11 patients presented with fracture nonunion and 12 patients with a recurrent infection. Polymicrobial infection was a significant risk factor for fracture nonunion (p = 0.002). Primary flap failure was neither a risk factor for compromised fracture consolidation (p = 0.590) nor for recurrence of infection (p = 0.508). Conclusion: A considerable number of patients with lower-leg FRI required STR. This patient subgroup is complex and rich in complications and the long-term composite outcome demonstrated a high rate of compromised fracture consolidation and recurrent infections. It appears that secondary STR should be performed, as primary flap failure was neither a risk factor for compromised fracture consolidation nor for recurrence of infection. We propose to monitor these patients closely for three weeks after STR.


Sujet(s)
Lambeaux tissulaires libres , , Traumatismes des tissus mous , Analyse statistique factorielle , Humains , Jambe , Récidive tumorale locale , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Traumatismes des tissus mous/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutique
10.
Bone Joint J ; 103-B(2): 213-221, 2021 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517743

RÉSUMÉ

AIMS: The principle strategies of fracture-related infection (FRI) treatment are debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant retention (DAIR) or debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant removal/exchange. Increasing the period between fracture fixation and FRI revision surgery is believed to be associated with higher failure rates after DAIR. However, a clear time-related cut-off has never been scientifically defined. This systematic review analyzed the influence of the interval between fracture fixation and FRI revision surgery on success rates after DAIR. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in PubMed (including MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection, investigating the outcome after DAIR procedures of long bone FRIs in clinical studies published until January 2020. RESULTS: Six studies, comprising 276 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Data from this review showed that with a short duration of infection (up to three weeks) and under strict preconditions, retention of the implant is associated with high success rates of 86% to 100%. In delayed infections with a fracture fixation-FRI revision surgery interval of three to ten weeks, absence of recurrent infection was reported in 82% to 89%. Data on late FRIs, with a fracture fixation-FRI revision surgery interval of more than ten weeks, are scarce and a success rate of 67% was reported. CONCLUSION: Acute/early FRI, with a short duration of infection, can successfully be treated with DAIR up to ten weeks after osteosynthesis. The limited available data suggest that chronic/late onset FRI treated with DAIR may be associated with a higher rate of recurrence. Successful outcome is dependent on managing all aspects of the infection. Thus, time from fracture fixation is not the only factor that should be considered in treatment planning of FRI. Due to the heterogeneity of the available data, these conclusions have to be interpreted with caution. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):213-221.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Débridement , Ablation de dispositif , Ostéosynthèse interne , Appareils de fixation orthopédique/effets indésirables , Infections dues aux prothèses/thérapie , Association thérapeutique , Ostéosynthèse interne/instrumentation , Ostéosynthèse interne/méthodes , Humains , Réintervention , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutique
11.
Pflege ; 33(4): 247-255, 2020 08.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32811329

RÉSUMÉ

Between dream and distress - Setting up and running a cohort ward for COVID-19 Patients at an acute hospital - A case study Abstract. Background: In the context of the pandemic, hospitals must be able to care for COVID-19 patients within a very short timeframe. OBJECTIVE: Description of the setting up of a cohort ward for patients with COVID-19 on a surgical ward including the development of the nursing team. METHODS: The intrinsic retrospective case study describes the situation, identifies special phenomena in a reflective manner and links them to existing knowledge. Data were anecdotal, routine data were collected in the context of nursing practice development. RESULTS: Setting up the cohort ward in a Swiss hospital consisted of structural and technical planning, infection control measures, the establishment of interprofessional structures, and internal communication. During the four-week operation, 71 patients were treated. The use of practice development methodology initiated a cultural change. The reflection describes a field of tension between "dream and distress": As a dream, the lived experience of optimal care, with well-functioning processes, sufficient material, sufficient personnel and a very good interprofessional cooperation was evaluated. Distress in the form of high infection rates as well as psychological and physical stress did not occur. After the cohort ward was closed, there was a risk working back in normal operations based on existing economical and organizational conditions, with the knowledge that a different cooperation and organization is possible. CONCLUSIONS: Positive experiences from the "crisis mode" should be used to further develop essential operations during normal times.


Sujet(s)
Infections à coronavirus/soins infirmiers , Unités hospitalières/organisation et administration , Personnel infirmier hospitalier/psychologie , Pandémies , Pneumopathie virale/soins infirmiers , COVID-19 , Infections à coronavirus/épidémiologie , Humains , Pneumopathie virale/épidémiologie , Détresse psychologique , Études rétrospectives , Suisse/épidémiologie
12.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 20(12): 1409-1417, 2020 12.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32763194

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus persistent bacteraemia is only vaguely defined and the effect of different durations of bacteraemia on mortality is not well established. Our primary aim was to analyse mortality according to duration of bacteraemia and to derive a clinically relevant definition for persistent bacteraemia. METHODS: We did a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study at 17 European centres (nine in the UK, six in Spain, and two in Germany), with recruitment between Jan 1, 2013, and April 30, 2015. Adult patients who were consecutively hospitalised with monomicrobial S aureus bacteraemia were included. Patients were excluded if no follow-up blood culture was taken, if the first follow-up blood-culture was after 7 days, or if active antibiotic therapy was started more than 3 days after first blood culture. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Univariable and time-dependent multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to assess predictors of mortality. Duration of bacteraemia was defined as bacteraemic days under active antibiotic therapy counting the first day as day 1. FINDINGS: Of 1588 individuals assessed for eligibility, 987 were included (median age 65 years [IQR 51-75]; 625 [63%] male). Death within 90 days occurred in 273 (28%) patients. Patients with more than 1 day of bacteraemia (315 [32%]) had higher Charlson comorbidity index and sequential organ failure assessment scores and a longer interval from first symptom to first blood culture. Crude 90-day mortality increased from 22% (148 of 672) with 1 day of bacteraemia, to 39% (85 of 218) with 2-4 days, 43% (30 of 69) with 5-7 days, and 36% (10 of 28) with more than 7 days of bacteraemia. Metastatic infections developed in 39 (6%) of 672 patients with 1 day of bacteraemia versus 40 (13%) of 315 patients if bacteraemia lasted for at least 2 days. The second day of bacteraemia had the highest HR and earliest cutoff significantly associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1·93, 95% CI 1·51-2·46; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: We suggest redefining the cutoff duration for persistent bacteraemia as 2 days or more despite active antibiotic therapy. Our results favour follow-up blood cultures after 24 h for early identification of all patients with increased risk of death and metastatic infection. FUNDING: None.


Sujet(s)
Bactériémie/microbiologie , Infections à staphylocoques/sang , Infections à staphylocoques/diagnostic , Staphylococcus aureus , Sujet âgé , Études de cohortes , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études prospectives
13.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 150: w20271, 2020 05 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32365217

RÉSUMÉ

The reproductive number in Switzerland was between 1.5 and 2 during the first third of March, and has consistently decreased to around 1. After the announcement of the latest strict measure on 20 March 2020, namely that gatherings of more than five people in public spaces are prohibited, the reproductive number dropped significantly below 1; the authors of this study estimate the reproductive number to be between 0.6 and 0.8 in the first third of April.


Sujet(s)
Taux de reproduction de base , Infections à coronavirus/épidémiologie , Épidémies , Pneumopathie virale/épidémiologie , COVID-19 , Humains , Pandémies , Suisse/épidémiologie
15.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 75(5): 1071-1086, 2020 05 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32016348

RÉSUMÉ

Staphylococcus aureus is a major human pathogen causing a vast array of infections with significant mortality. Its versatile physiology enables it to adapt to various environments. Specific physiological changes are thought to underlie the frequent failure of antimicrobial therapy despite susceptibility in standard microbiological assays. Bacteria capable of surviving high antibiotic concentrations despite having a genetically susceptible background are described as 'antibiotic tolerant'. In this review, we put current knowledge on environmental triggers and molecular mechanisms of increased antibiotic survival of S. aureus into its clinical context. We discuss animal and clinical evidence of its significance and outline strategies to overcome infections with antibiotic-tolerant S. aureus.


Sujet(s)
Infections à staphylocoques , Staphylococcus aureus , Animaux , Antibactériens/pharmacologie , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Tolérance aux médicaments , Humains , Infections à staphylocoques/traitement médicamenteux
16.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(1): 8-17, 2020 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31855973

RÉSUMÉ

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a severe complication after bone injury and can pose a serious diagnostic challenge. Overall, there is a limited amount of scientific evidence regarding diagnostic criteria for FRI. For this reason, the AO Foundation and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society proposed a consensus definition for FRI to standardize the diagnostic criteria and improve the quality of patient care and applicability of future studies regarding this condition. The aim of this article was to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for the diagnosis of FRI. For this purpose, the FRI consensus definition will be discussed together with a proposal for an update based on the available evidence relating to the diagnostic value of clinical parameters, serum inflammatory markers, imaging modalities, tissue and sonication fluid sampling, molecular biology techniques, and histopathological examination. Second, recommendations on microbiology specimen sampling and laboratory operating procedures relevant to FRI will be provided. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Diagnostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Sujet(s)
Fractures osseuses , Infection de plaie opératoire , Marqueurs biologiques , Consensus , Fractures osseuses/complications , Fractures osseuses/diagnostic , Humains , Manipulation d'échantillons
17.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(1): 30-41, 2020 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567902

RÉSUMÉ

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a major complication in musculoskeletal trauma and one of the leading causes of morbidity. Standardization of general treatment strategies for FRI has been poor. One of the reasons is the heterogeneity in this patient population, including various anatomical locations, multiple fracture patterns, different degrees of soft-tissue injury, and different patient conditions. This variability makes treatment complex and hard to standardize. As these infections are biofilm-related, surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment, and this entails multiple key aspects (eg, fracture fixation, tissue sampling, debridement, and soft-tissue management). Another important aspect, which is sometimes less familiar to the orthopaedic trauma surgeon, is systemic antimicrobial therapy. The aim of this article is to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for systemic antimicrobial therapy with respect to FRI, based on the most recent literature combined with expert opinion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Sujet(s)
Anti-infectieux , Fractures osseuses , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Consensus , Fractures osseuses/complications , Fractures osseuses/traitement médicamenteux , Humains , Infection de plaie opératoire/traitement médicamenteux
18.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 200, 2019 Feb 28.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30819115

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Infestations with scabies mites are a global burden affecting individuals of all ages, classes and ethnicities. As poor sanitation and overcrowding favor the transmission of this highly contagious disease, epidemic outbreaks are frequently observed among displaced persons and asylum seekers. Due to the growing influx of refugees during the last years, public health authorities in host countries are frequently confronted with the challenge to treat individuals with diagnosed or suspected scabies promptly and effectively to avoid further spreading of the infestation. This study aimed to establish a straightforward and efficient algorithm for rapid screening and treatment of large numbers of patients with confirmed or suspected scabies infestations. METHODS: Forty-eight individuals (58% males, mean age 22.4 yrs.) from Syria with suspected scabies infestation were allocated to 3 colour-coded groups: (1) no signs or symptoms of infestation, (2) itch only, and (3) itch and typical skin lesions. Patients were treated with a single (group 1) or two doses of oral ivermectin at an interval of 7 days (group 2), or with a combination of 2 doses of ivermectin plus 2 applications of permethrin ointment at an interval of 7 days (group 3). Follow-ups were performed 4 weeks after initial treatments. RESULTS: All individuals with signs and/or symptoms of infestation had improved skin lesion; in 10/11 (90.9%) lesion had completely resolved. All individuals with initial itch only (n = 32) reported improvement of its intensity or complete resolution. None of the patients of group 1 developed itch or skin lesions. The algorithm was reapplied in 4 individuals (8.3%) after 4 weeks and the outbreak was completely controlled after 8 weeks. Colour-coding ensured fast flow of information between health-care providers at the interfaces of the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm proved to be both highly efficient for treatment of large numbers of patients with suspected or diagnosed scabies infestation as well as for prevention of spreading of the disease. Hence, this algorithm is well suited for the management of scabies mass outbreaks.


Sujet(s)
Algorithmes , Gale/diagnostic , Gale/traitement médicamenteux , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Animaux , Antiparasitaires/administration et posologie , Antiparasitaires/usage thérapeutique , Épidémies de maladies , Femelle , Personnel de santé , Humains , Nourrisson , Ivermectine/administration et posologie , Ivermectine/usage thérapeutique , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Perméthrine/administration et posologie , Perméthrine/usage thérapeutique , Réfugiés , Gale/épidémiologie , Suisse/épidémiologie , Syrie
20.
J Orthop Res ; 37(2): 271-287, 2019 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30667561

RÉSUMÉ

Orthopedic device-related infection (ODRI), including both fracture-related infection (FRI) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), remain among the most challenging complications in orthopedic and musculoskeletal trauma surgery. ODRI has been convincingly shown to delay healing, worsen functional outcome and incur significant socio-economic costs. To address this clinical problem, ever more sophisticated technologies targeting the prevention and/or treatment of ODRI are being developed and tested in vitro and in vivo. Among the most commonly described innovations are antimicrobial-coated orthopedic devices, antimicrobial-loaded bone cements and void fillers, and dual osteo-inductive/antimicrobial biomaterials. Unfortunately, translation of these technologies to the clinic has been limited, at least partially due to the challenging and still evolving regulatory environment for antimicrobial drug-device combination products, and a lack of clarity in the burden of proof required in preclinical studies. Preclinical in vivo testing (i.e. animal studies) represents a critical phase of the multidisciplinary effort to design, produce and reliably test both safety and efficacy of any new antimicrobial device. Nonetheless, current in vivo testing protocols, procedures, models, and assessments are highly disparate, irregularly conducted and reported, and without standardization and validation. The purpose of the present opinion piece is to discuss best practices in preclinical in vivo testing of antimicrobial interventions targeting ODRI. By sharing these experience-driven views, we aim to aid others in conducting such studies both for fundamental biomedical research, but also for regulatory and clinical evaluation. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:271-287, 2019.


Sujet(s)
Expérimentation animale/normes , Ostéosynthèse interne/effets indésirables , Fixateurs internes/effets indésirables , Infections dues aux prothèses , Animaux , Anti-infectieux/administration et posologie , Modèles animaux , Infections dues aux prothèses/microbiologie , Plan de recherche
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE