Ultrasound-guided perineural vs. peritendinous corticosteroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections are proven to be effective in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); however, the optimal injection site still remains unclear. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of perineural vs. peritendinous target sites for corticosteroid injection in CTS. DESIGN: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatients, tertiary care center. POPULATION: Forty-six patients were equally randomized into two intervention groups as group A (18 female and five male patients; mean age: 50.0±15.9 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±3.3 months) and group B (19 female, four male patients; mean age: 54.3±15.0 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±4.7 months). METHODS: Methylprednisolone acetate (40 mg) and 1 mL of 1% trimecaine hydrochloride was injected next to the median nerve (group A) or among flexor tendons away from the nerve (group B) under ultrasound (US) guidance. The visual analogue scale was used as the primary outcome measure, and the symptom severity scale and functional status scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire were used as the secondary subjective outcome measures. Two-point discrimination, grip strength, cross-sectional area, and distal motor latency were assessed as objective outcome measures. The data were collected at baseline and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Both groups showed improvement in subjective and objective measures at 2 weeks following the injection - also maintained up to 12 weeks during the follow-up (P<0.05). However, no difference was observed between the two groups (P<0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both intervention techniques seem to be effective and safe in the conservative treatment of CTS. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Based on this study results, it might be noteworthy that physicians can opt for perineural or peritendinous injections without compromising the treatment efficacy and safety. Herewith, US guidance is, for sure, necessary for performing safe and accurate injections.

Interrater variability for CT angiography evaluation between neurologists and neuroradiologist in acute stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of arterial occlusion has a considerable impact on the indication of mechanical thrombectomy, and CT angiography (CTA) is recommended in the management of acute stroke. The goal of the present study is to assess the interrater agreement in the diagnosis of occlusion of intracranial arteries on CTA between a neuroradiologist and neurologists. METHODS: CTA images of 75 acute stroke patients were evaluated for occlusion of intracranial arteries by an experienced interventional neuroradiologist, and stroke and general neurologists. RESULTS: 75 patients who were treated by intravenous thrombolysis were enrolled in the study. CTA images were available for all 75 patients (34 females; mean age ± SD, 72 ± 14 years; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 10; median 8-14; and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT mean 9.7). The agreement between the neuroradiologist and neurologists in evaluation of intracranial artery occlusion was as follows: occlusion of the middle cerebral artery segment M1: observer agreement 77%, kappa (κ) = 0.61 and middle cerebral artery M2: observer agreement 77%, κ 0.48; internal carotid artery: observer agreement 92%, κ 0.84; T occlusion: observer agreement 90.0%, κ 0.33; posterior cerebral artery segments P1 and P2: observer agreement 98%, κ 0.97; basilar artery: observer agreement 96%, κ 0.92; and vertebral artery segment V4: observer agreement 88%, κ 0.48. CONCLUSION: Interrater agreement of CTA evaluation of occlusion between the neurologists and the neuroradiologist was very strong. The ability of the trained neurologists to read an intracranial large vessel occlusion correctly may improve the door-to-needle times in acute stroke. Advances in knowledge: In this study, the neurologists were able to recognize occlusion of intracranial arteries. This could accelerate the management of acute stroke care.

Laboratory-Based Markers as Predictors of Brain Infarction During Carotid Stenting: a Prospective Study.

AIM: New ischemic lesions in the brain can be detected in approximately 50% of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). We wished to discover the laboratory-based predictors of new infarctions in the brain after CAS. METHODS: All consecutive patients with internal carotid artery stenosis of ≥70% with indication for CAS were enrolled in a prospective study for 16 months. All patients used dual antiplatelet therapy for ≥7 days before CAS. Neurologic examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain were undertaken before and at 24 h after CAS. Samples of venous blood were collected at ＜24 h before CAS for the evaluation of hematology, reticulocytes, coagulation markers (PT, APTT, Fbg, Clauss), vWF antigen, PAI-1 activity, PAI-1 polymorphism 4G/5G, and the multiplate (aspirin and clopidogrel) resistance test. Blood samples for the assessment of anti-Xa activity were collected during CAS. Differences in the values of laboratory markers between patients with and without new ischemic lesions of the brain on control MRI were evaluated. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 81 patients (53 males; mean age, 67.3±7.2 years). New ischemic infarctions in the brain on control MRI were found in 46 (56.8%) patients. Three of seven patients with resistance to aspirin or clopidogrel had a new ischemic infarction in the brain. No significant differences for particular markers were found between patients with and without an ischemic lesion in the brain. CONCLUSION: A high risk of a new ischemic infarction in the brain was detected in patients undergoing CAS, but a laboratory-based predictor of such an infarction could not be identified.

Sonolysis in Prevention of Brain Infarction During Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting (SONOBUSTER): a randomized, controlled trial.

AIMS: Previous case series have detected silent brain infarctions in as many as one-third of patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and in up to two-thirds of patients after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Sonolysis employs ultrasound to facilitate disruption of thrombi and has been shown to be safe and effective for improving long-term outcomes following acute stroke. Here, we examined whether intraoperative sonolysis alters the risk of new brain ischaemic lesions during CEA or CAS. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients with internal carotid stenosis ≥70% indicated for CEA/CAS were screened in this prospective study. Patients were allocated randomly to sonolysis and control groups. Neurological examination, cognitive function tests, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were conducted before intervention and at 24 and 30 days post-surgery. Of the 487 screened patients, 121 (87 males; mean age, 66.65 ± 7.17 years) were allocated to the sonolysis group and 121 (75; 66.02 ± 8.11 years) to the control group. New brain ischaemic lesions on post-procedure MRI were significantly less frequent in the sonolysis group than in the control group (31.4% of patients vs. 47.1%; P = 0.018). Sonolysis and CEA were identified as independent predictors of reduced brain ischaemic risk [sonolysis: odds ratio (OR) = 0.450 (0.215-0.942), P = 0.034 and CEA: OR = 0.208 (0.087-0.495), P < 0.001]. Stroke or transient ischaemic attack occurred in one sonolysis patient and three control patients (P = 0.372). No significant group differences were found in post-intervention cognitive test scores (P > 0.3). CONCLUSION: This study provides Class II evidence that sonolysis during CEA or CAS reduces the risk of new brain ischaemic lesions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01591005).

Comparison of brain vessel imaging from transtemporal and transcondylar approaches using contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded duplex sonography and Virtual Navigator.

AIMS: The transcondylar approach is a new and used for detection of chronic cerebro-spinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) and intracranial venous reflux in patients with multiple sclerosis. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of native and contrast enhanced (CE-) transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) to detect flow and reflux in deep cerebral veins and intracranial venous sinuses from transcondylar and transtemporal approaches. METHODS: Brain magnetic resonance imaging and TCCS from transtemporal and transcondylar approaches using the new technology - Fusion Imaging - in 8 volunteers and 5 patients with multiple sclerosis. RESULTS: Using TCCS and CE-TCCS, the arteries of the circle of Willis could be detected from the transtemporal approach in 13/13 subjects in both examinations, while detection of the venous system was possible in 7/13 and 9/13 subjects, respectively. However, the arteries of the circle of Willis and venous system were detected through the transcondylar approach in only 5/13 (P=0.041) and 1/13 (P=0.031) subjects using TCCS, and in 12/13 (P=0.921) and 7/13 (P=0.687) subjects using CE-TCCS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal that the TCCS transcondylar approach has serious limitations for the standard detection of intracranial venous reflux.

Outcome predictors in acute basilar artery occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: to identify predictors of good outcome in acute basilar artery occlusion (Bao). Background: acute ischemic stroke (aiS) caused by Bao is often associated with a severe and persistent neurological deficit and a high mortality rate. METHODS: the set consisted of 70 consecutive aiS patients (51 males; mean age 64.5 ± 14.5 years) with Bao. the role of the following factors was assessed: baseline characteristics, stroke risk factors, pre-event antithrombotic treatment, neurological deficit at time of treatment, estimated time to therapy procedure initiation, treatment method, recanalization rate, change in neurological deficit, post-treatment imaging findings. 30- and 90-day outcome was assessed using the modified rankin scale with a good outcome defined as a score of 0­ 3. RESULTS: the following statistically significant differences were found between patients with good versus poor outcomes: mean age (54.2 vs. 68.9 years; p=0.0001), presence of arterial hypertension (52.4% vs. 83.7%; p=0.015), diabetes mellitus (9.5% vs. 55.1%; p=0.0004) and severe stroke (14.3% vs. 65.3%; p=0.0002), neurological deficit at time of treatment (14.0 vs. 24.0 median of national institutes of health Stroke Scale [nihSS] points; p=0.001), successful recanalization (90.0% vs. 54.2%; p=0.005), change in neurological deficit (12.0 vs. 1.0 median difference of nihSS points; p=0.005). Stepwise binary logistic regression analysis identified age (or=0.932, 95% Ci=0.882­0.984; p=0.012), presence of diabetes mellitus (or=0.105, 95% Ci=0.018-0.618; p=0.013) and severe stroke (or=0.071, 95% Ci=0.013-0.383; p=0.002) as significant independent negative predictors of good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: in the present study, higher age, presence of diabetes mellitus and severe stroke were identified as significant independent negative predictors of good outcome.

Safety and efficacy of sonothrombolysis using bilateral TCD monitoring by diagnostic 2 MHz probes - a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Sonothrombolysis is a new treatment method for patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS). Various ultrasound frequencies and intensities are being tested these days. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the safety and efficacy of sonothrombolysis using 2 diagnostic probes and bilateral monitoring in patients with acute occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve consecutive IS patients (7 males; age 47 - 78, average 64.1 ± 9.4 years) with acute MCA occlusion and contraindication of thrombolysis were included in the study. 60-min bilateral 2-MHz pulsed-wave Doppler monitoring of the area of occlusion was performed in all patients (Group 1). The control group consisted of 37 IS patients (20 males; age 32 - 78, average 62.2 ± 12.1 years) treated with standard sonothrombolysis and selected from the Thrombotripsy Study database (Group 2). The differences in number of recanalized arteries after a 1 h treatment, independent patients (modified Rankin scale [mRS] value of 0 - 2) after 90 days and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (SICH) were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: Complete recanalization was found in 4 (30.0%) Group 1 and in 12 (32.4%) Group 2 patients. Seven (58.3%) Group 1 and 22 (59.5%) Group 2 patients were independent after 90 days. SICH was found in none of Group 1 patients and in 1 (2.7%) of the Group 2 patients (P>0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, sonothrombolysis using 2 probes and bilateral monitoring is safe but not more effective than standard sonothrombolysis in acute IS patients with MCA occlusion.

A controlled trial of revascularization in acute stroke.

PURPOSE: To compare safety and utility of intraarterial revascularization with use of stents to no revascularization in patients who either failed to respond to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or have contraindications to IVT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case-control study was approved by local ethics committees; all patients signed informed consent. One hundred thirty-one patients (74 men; mean age, 65.9 years ± 12.3; range, 25-86 years) with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion were enrolled; 75 underwent IVT. No further recanalization therapy was performed in 26 (35%) IVT-treated patients with MCA recanalization (group 1). Patients with IVT failure after 60 minutes were allocated to endovascular treatment (group 2A) or no further therapy (group 2B). Patients with contraindication to IVT were allocated to endovascular treatment within 8 hours since AIS onset (group 3A) or to no recanalization therapy (group 3B). Neurologic deficit at admission, MCA recanalization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), and 3-month clinical outcome were evaluated. Favorable clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin scale score 0-2 at 3 months after stroke onset. Two-sided Mann-Whitney U test, independent samples t test, Fisher exact test, multivariate logistic regression analysis of baseline variables, and complete MCA recanalization for the prediction of favorable clinical outcome were used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission was 13.5, 16.0, 15.5, 15.0, and 16.0 in groups 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B, respectively (P > .05); SICH occurred in one of 26 (3.8%), one of 23 (4.3%), one of 26 (3.8%), one of 31 (3.2%), and one of 25 (4.0%) patients, respectively (P > .05). MCA recanalization after endovascular treatment was achieved in 50 of 54 (92.6%) patients. Favorable outcome was significantly different between groups 2A and 2B (10 of 23 [43.5%] and four of 26 [15.4%], respectively; P = .03) and groups 3A and 3B (14 of 31 [45.2%] and two of 25 [8.0%], respectively; P = .004) and was dependent on MCA recanalization (odds ratio, 5.55; P = .006). CONCLUSION: In this controlled trial, intraarterial revascularization with stents was an effective and safe-effective treatment option in patients with acute MCA occlusion with contraindication to IVT or after IVT failure.

Changes in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity during sonolysis using a diagnostic transcranial probe with a 2-MHz Doppler frequency in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound has various biological effects in the human body. The effects of continuous monitoring with ultrasound (sonolysis) on vasodilatation of the radial artery were described recently. We wanted to ascertain whether similar changes in the blood flow velocity during sonolysis could also be detected in the middle cerebral artery. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers (6 male and 9 female; age range, 23-68 years; mean ± SD, 47.1 ± 15.1 years) were subjected to 1 hour of middle cerebral artery sonolysis using a diagnostic transcranial probe with a 2-MHz Doppler frequency and measurement of the blood flow velocity at 2-minute intervals. During a second session, a flow curve was recorded for 10 seconds at 2-minute intervals. The peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, mean flow velocity, pulsatility index, and resistive index were recorded during both measurements. RESULTS: Irregular changes in the measured blood flow parameters were recorded during both sessions. Changes in particular hemodynamic parameters during both measurements were similar. The changes in the peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, mean flow velocity, pulsatility index, and resistive index were not significantly different between the two measurements (P < .05 in all cases). CONCLUSIONS: As opposed to sonolysis of the radial artery, sonolysis of the middle cerebral artery using a diagnostic 2-MHz frequency in healthy volunteers did not lead to changes in the flow curve or peripheral vasodilatation.

Prior use of antiplatelet therapy can be associated with a higher chance for early recanalization of the occluded middle cerebral artery in acute stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: The early recanalization (ER) of an occluded cerebral artery is important for clinical improvement in acute ischemic stroke. The aim of the study was to assess the possible association between the prior use of antiplatelets (AP) and ER of occluded middle cerebral artery (MCA) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). METHODS: In 146 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with occluded MCA and treated with IVT, the ER and incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) were compared according to the presence or absence of prior AP use. ER was assessed by transcranial Doppler or digital subtraction angiography within 2 h after the end of IVT. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (28 males, mean age: 69.8 ± 9.8 years) used AP and 90 patients were AP naïve (51 males, mean age: 65.8 ± 12.5 years). Prior AP use was associated with a higher rate of early MCA recanalization (53.6 vs. 29.5% in AP naïve, p = 0.007) and was shown as a predictor of ER (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.14-4.65; p = 0.020) in unadjusted analysis. No difference was found in the occurrence of SICH. CONCLUSION: Prior use of AP was associated with a higher rate of ER of occluded MCA, but with no increase of SICH after IVT.

Detection of intracranial arterial stenosis using transcranial color-coded duplex sonography, computed tomographic angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare intracranial arterial stenosis in patients with stroke using 3 different methods: transcranial color-coded duplex sonography, computed tomographic (CT) angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in a common clinical practice. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients (47 male and 20 female; age range, 23-79 years; mean age ± SD, 62.0 ± 9.5 years) were enrolled in this study over 40 months. All patients underwent examinations of the intracranial arteries using transcranial color-coded sonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. Findings were divided into 4 groups: normal, mild stenosis (<50%), severe stenosis (50%-99%), and occlusion. RESULTS: Because of technical reasons or an insufficient bone window, 465 of 536 arterial segments in 67 patients were evaluated; 12 stenotic and 15 occluded segments were detected using digital subtraction angiography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of transcranial color-coded sonography and CT angiography in comparison with digital subtraction angiography as a reference standard were 88.9%, 94.8%, 51.1%, and 99.3% and 81.5%, 98.7%, 78.6%, and 98.6%, respectively. The agreement between transcranial color-coded sonography and CT angiography was 93.8% (κ = 0.559); between transcranial color-coded sonography and digital subtraction angiography, it was 93.9% (κ = 0.588); and between CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography, it was 96.6% (κ = 0.697). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate agreement was found between CT angiography, transcranial color-coded sonography, and digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of intracranial stenosis. Computed tomographic angiography and digital subtraction angiography are sufficient for assessment of the diagnosis.