Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrer
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 21(9): e696-e706, 2020 09.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32639469

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that antibiotic use in PICUs is based on criteria not always supported by evidence. We aimed to describe determinants of empiric antibiotic use in PICUs in eight different countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: PICUs in Canada, the United States, France, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Thailand, and Brazil. SUBJECTS: Pediatric intensivists. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used literature review and focus groups to develop the survey and its clinical scenarios (pneumonia, septic shock, meningitis, and intra-abdominal infections) in which cultures were unreliable due to antibiotic pretreatment. Data analyses included descriptive statistics and linear regression with bootstrapped SEs. Overall response rate was 39% (482/1,251), with individual country response rates ranging from 25% to 76%. Respondents in all countries prolonged antibiotic duration based on patient characteristics, disease severity, pathogens, and radiologic findings (from a median increase of 1.8 d [95% CI, 0.5-4.0 d] to 9.5 d [95% CI, 8.5-10.5 d]). Younger age, severe disease, and ventilator-associated pneumonia prolonged antibiotic treatment duration despite a lack of evidence for such practices. No variables were reported to shorten treatment duration for all countries. Importantly, more than 39% of respondents would use greater than or equal to 7 days of antibiotics for patients with a positive viral polymerase chain reaction test in all scenarios, except in France for pneumonia (29%), septic shock (13%), and meningitis (6%). The use of elevated levels of inflammatory markers to prolong antibiotic treatment duration varied among different countries. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic-related decisions are complex and may be influenced by cultural and contextual factors. Evidence-based criteria are necessary to guide antibiotic duration and ensure the rational use of antibiotics in PICUs.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens , Maladie grave , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Brésil , Canada , Enfant , Maladie grave/thérapie , Études transversales , France , Humains , Italie , Japon , Enquêtes et questionnaires , États-Unis
2.
J Pediatr ; 162(6): 1107-11, 2013 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23312685

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To compare end-of-life decisions for neonatal and pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: This study involved a chart review of all pediatric deaths occurring over a 2-year period at a large maternal-child university hospital. Modes of death were compared. RESULTS: Of the 220 deaths analyzed, 145 occurred in intensive care units (ICUs), including 77 in the neonatal ICU (NICU) and 68 in the pediatric ICU (PICU). Only 6% of deaths were preceded by cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Dying while on the respirator was the most common mode of death in the PICU (51%) and the least common in the NICU (5%; P<.05). Unstable physiology at time of death was much more common in the PICU (82% vs 47%; P<.05). Withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions (LSI) in stable patients for quality of life reasons was the most common cause of death in the NICU (53% vs 16%; P<.05). Seventy-five children died outside of an ICU because LSI were withheld; neonates died mainly of extreme prematurity, and older children died mainly from terminal illness. CONCLUSION: The majority of pediatric deaths occur in ICUs. Modes of death in the NICU and the PICU are strikingly different. A greater proportion of deaths in the NICU occur in infants with stable physiology who might not have died had LSI not been withdrawn. Most deaths outside of ICUs are attributable to withholding of LSI. A significant proportion of neonates in whom LSI are withheld have a possibility of intact survival, unlike older patients.


Sujet(s)
Cause de décès , Mortalité hospitalière , Mortalité infantile , Unités de soins intensifs néonatals/éthique , Adolescent , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Prise de décision , Hôpitaux universitaires , Humains , Nourrisson , Nouveau-né , Études rétrospectives
5.
J Pediatr ; 147(6): 812-7, 2005 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16356437

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether noninvasive therapy using a helium-oxygen mixture reduces the use of positive-pressure ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure caused by severe bronchiolitis. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that recruited infants in 4 pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). A total of 39 nonintubated infants with severe bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were randomly assigned within 8 hours of PICU admission to receive a helium-oxygen mixture (helium group) or an air-oxygen mixture (control group) through an inflatable head hood. The primary study outcome was the requirement for positive pressure mechanical ventilation. Results were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: No differences were noted between the control and helium groups with respect to age (1.0 vs 1.1 months), prematurity, or family history of asthma or smoking. Positive pressure ventilation was judged necessary for 4 of the 21 (19.0%) infants in the control group and in 4 of the 18 (22.2%) in the helium group (relative risk = 1.17; 95% confidence interval = 0.34 to 4.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not detect any differences between the patients in the helium group and the control group with respect to the rate of positive-pressure ventilation.


Sujet(s)
Bronchiolite virale/thérapie , Hélium/usage thérapeutique , Oxygène/usage thérapeutique , Infections à virus respiratoire syncytial/thérapie , Thérapie respiratoire/méthodes , Canada , Méthode en double aveugle , Humains , Nourrisson , Nouveau-né , Ventilation à pression positive , Résultat thérapeutique
6.
J Pediatr ; 142(1): 62-6, 2003 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12520257

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of dimethylglycine (DMG) on oxygen consumption (VO(2)) in children with Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean cytochrome-c oxidase (SLSJ-COX) deficiency (OMIM 220111). STUDY DESIGN: In a crossover randomized double-blind clinical trial, 5 children with SLSJ-COX deficiency, who were stable and old enough to comply with VO(2) measurement, were treated with placebo or DMG for 3 days, and with the alternate treatment after a 2-week washout period. VO(2) was measured by indirect calorimetry before and after treatment. Dietary caloric intake was calculated for 3 days before each measurement. Mean caloric intakes per day were 1562 and 1342 kcal x m(-2) before and during placebo, 1,336 and 1,380 before and during DMG, respectively. RESULTS: DMG was well tolerated and, in all cases, resulted in markedly increased blood DMG levels (617 + 203 mmol x L(-1)), versus 0 to 2 mmol x L(-1) without treatment. Mean VO(2) was lower after administration of either DMG (-1 +/- 3 mL x min(-1) x m(-2)) or placebo (-6 +/- 4), but neither difference was statistically significant. There was no detectable effect of DMG treatment on blood levels of lactate, pyruvate, bicarbonate, or pH. VO(2) values of patients (range, 101-135 mL x min(-1) x m(-2)) were lower than published norms (150-160 mL x min(-1) x m(-2)). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that treatment with DMG does not substantially change VO(2) in children with SLSJ-COX deficiency.


Sujet(s)
Déficit en cytochrome-c oxydase/traitement médicamenteux , Déficit en cytochrome-c oxydase/métabolisme , Consommation d'oxygène/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Sarcosine/analogues et dérivés , Sarcosine/administration et posologie , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Études croisées , Méthode en double aveugle , Calendrier d'administration des médicaments , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Résultat thérapeutique
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE