Mexican American elders have similar severities of COPD despite less tobacco exposure than European American elders.

INTRODUCTION: Hispanics are the fastest growing ethnicity of the US population and the largest subset includes those of Mexican origin. Hispanics, including Mexican Americans (MAs), consistently report less tobacco exposure than European Americans (EAs), but limited data are available regarding differences in the clinical characteristics, severity of airflow obstruction, and functional status between MAs and EAs with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Participants in a community-based study of aging and frailty among MAs and EAs, San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging, underwent spirometry. Participants with spirometry values consistent with COPD by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria are described here. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent (248/721) of the participants who underwent spirometry had evidence of GOLD Stages 1-4 COPD. Significantly more MAs with COPD reported being never smokers compared to EAs with COPD. Among those with COPD who also smoked, MAs reported significantly less tobacco exposure than EAs (15.7 vs. 32.4 pack-years, respectively), but both groups had surprisingly similar severities of airflow obstruction. Additionally, MAs had worse functional status and perceived health than did EAs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significantly less exposure to tobacco smoke, MAs with COPD had a similar degree of obstruction to airflow compared with EAs with COPD. Healthcare providers should have a high index of suspicion for COPD in MAs who are exposed to even small amounts of cigarette smoke.

Determinants of osteoporosis prevention in low-income Mexican-American women.

BACKGROUND: Prevention is the most cost-effective means of managing osteoporosis. However, little is known about osteoporosis-related preventive practices in Mexican-American women. We examined factors that might influence women's decision to start preventive measures for osteoporosis. METHODS: Information was gathered through a cross-sectional survey of low-income Mexican-American women who were seen at two clinics in southern Texas. RESULTS: Of the 270 participants, 37% reported calcium supplementation, and 41% reported regular weight-bearing exercise to prevent osteoporosis. Fifty (41%) of the postmenopausal women were currently using hormone replacement therapy. Only 15% of the premenopausal and 13% of the postmenopausal women recalled that their health care provider had counseled them about prevention. Multivariate analysis showed that public education, bone densitometry evaluation, knowledge of osteoporosis, and counseling were determinants of prevention. CONCLUSION: Although osteoporosis is a preventable condition, our findings suggest that the majority of Mexican-American women do not receive adequate preventive measures or counseling about osteoporosis. Furthermore, we found that their health care provider's counseling about osteoporosis was a major determinant of osteoporosis prevention in these women.

Measuring subclinical disability in older mexican americans.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive list of adaptive strategies to prevent disability and use this information to devise a preliminary measure of subclinical disability (state of sustained independence in the presence of latent or manifest functional limitations) suitable for older Mexican Americans. METHOD: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 24 community-dwelling Mexican American elders (> or =65 years old) to elicit information about adaptations in performance of daily living tasks (eg, walking, dressing, and shopping) that may indicate presence of subclinical disability. This information was used to construct a quantitative self-report measure of subclinical disability administered to 207 older Mexican Americans. Item and factor analyses were performed to reduce the number of items and establish their underlying structure. Construct and discriminant validity of the reduced instrument was determined. RESULTS: A framework comprised of nine categories of daily living tasks, three functional levels, and five adaptation types was generated from the qualitative data. The initial 133-item measure (named the ADAPT) was reduced to a 44-item scale with three subscales (physical, household, and social). ADAPT scores correlated significantly in the expected direction with standard functional status measures, but the shared variance was modest, indicating that the ADAPT captured substantial, unique variance. Mean ADAPT scores differed significantly and were monotonically lower across subgroups classified as independent, subclinically disabled, and disabled, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ADAPT seems to have construct and discriminant validity as a measure of subclinical disability. Additional research is required to determine sensitivity to change and clinically significant cut points for varying risk of frank disability.