A real-world observation on thrombopoietic agents for patients with cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China: A multicenter, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Studies on various thrombopoietic agents for cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia (CTIT) in China are lacking. This study aimed to provide detailed clinical profiles to understand the outcomes and safety of different CTIT treatment regimens. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 1664 questionnaires were collected from 33 hospitals between March 1 and July 1, 2021. Patients aged >18 years were enrolled who were diagnosed with CTIT and treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11), recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO), or a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA). The outcomes, compliance, and safety of different treatments were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 1437 analyzable cases, most patients were treated with either rhTPO alone (49.3%) or rhIL-11 alone (27.0%). The most common combination regimen used was rhTPO and rhIL-11 (10.9%). Platelet transfusions were received by 117 cases (8.1%). In multivariate analysis, rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery, platelet transfusion, and hospitalization due to chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) than rhIL-11 alone. No significant difference was observed in the time taken to achieve a platelet count of >100 × 109/L and chemotherapy dose reduction due to CIT among the different thrombopoietic agents. The outcomes of thrombocytopenia in 170 patients who received targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy are also summarized. The results show that the proportion of platelet recovery was similar among the different thrombopoietic agents. No new safety signals related to thrombopoietic agents were observed in this study. A higher proportion of physicians preferred to continue treatment with TPO-RA alone than with rhTPO and rhIL-11. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides an overview of CTIT and the application of various thrombopoietic agents throughout China. Comparison of monotherapy with rhIL-11, rhTPO, and TPO-RA requires further randomized clinical trials. The appropriate application for thrombopoietic agents should depend on the pretreatment of platelets, treatment variables, and risk of bleeding. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: To provide an overview of the outcome of cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China, our cross-sectional study analyzed 1437 cases treated with different thrombopoietic agents. Most of the patients were treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11) and recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO). rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery and platelet transfusion compared with rhIL-11.

Baseline radiologic features as predictors of efficacy in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases receiving surufatinib.

Objective: Currently, pre-treatment prediction of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases (PNELM) receiving surufatinib treatment was unsatisfying. Our objective was to examine the association between radiological characteristics and efficacy/prognosis. Methods: We enrolled patients with liver metastases in the phase III, SANET-p trial (NCT02589821) and obtained contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images. Qualitative and quantitative parameters including hepatic tumor margins, lesion volumes, enhancement pattern, localization types, and enhancement ratios were evaluated. The progression-free survival (PFS) and hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using Cox's proportional hazard model. Efficacy was analyzed by logistic-regression models. Results: Among 152 patients who had baseline CECT assessments and were included in this analysis, the surufatinib group showed statistically superior efficacy in terms of median PFS compared to placebo across various qualitative and quantitative parameters. In the multivariable analysis of patients receiving surufatinib (N=100), those with higher arterial phase standardized enhancement ratio-peri-lesion (ASER-peri) exhibited longer PFS [HR=0.039; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.003-0.483; P=0.012]. Furthermore, patients with a high enhancement pattern experienced an improvement in the objective response ratio [31.3% vs. 14.7%, odds ratio (OR)=3.488; 95% CI: 1.024-11.875; P=0.046], and well-defined tumor margins were associated with a higher disease control rate (DCR) (89.3% vs. 68.2%, OR=4.535; 95% CI: 1.285-16.011; P=0.019) compared to poorly-defined margins. Conclusions: These pre-treatment radiological features, namely high ASER-peri, high enhancement pattern, and well-defined tumor margins, have the potential to serve as predictive markers of efficacy in patients with PNELM receiving surufatinib.

Pucotenlimab in patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high solid tumors: A multicenter phase 2 study.

We report a multicenter, phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy of pucotenlimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, and potential biomarkers for response. Overall, 100 patients with previously treated, advanced solid tumors centrally confirmed as dMMR or MSI-H received pucotenlimab at 200 mg every 3 weeks. The most common cancer type is colorectal cancer (n = 71). With a median follow-up of 22.5 months, the objective response rate is 49.0% (95% confidence interval 38.86%-59.20%) as assessed by the independent review committee, while the median progression-free survival and overall survival have not been reached. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 18 patients. For the biomarker analysis, responders are enriched in patients with mutations in the KMT2D gene. Pucotenlimab is an effective treatment option for previously treated advanced dMMR/MSI-H solid tumors, and the predictive value of KMT2D mutation warrants further research. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03704246.

Loss of chromosome 9p21 is associated with a poor prognosis in adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas.

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is a rare histological subtype of pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis and a high metastasis rate. However, little is known about its genomic landscape and prognostic biomarkers. A total of 48 ASCP specimens and 98 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumour specimens were sequenced to explore the genomic landscape and prognostic biomarkers. The homozygous deletion of the 9p21.3 region (including CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and MTAP) (9p21 loss) occurred in both ASCP and PDAC, and a higher frequency of 9p21 loss was observed in ASCP (12.5% vs 2.0%, P = 0.022). Notably, 9p21 loss was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) in ASCP patients (mDFS (Median DFS) = 4.17 vs 7.33 months, HR (Hazard Ratio) = 3.70, P = 0.009). The most common gene alterations in patients with ASCP were KRAS (96%), TP53 (81%), CDKN2A (42%), SMAD4 (21%), CDKN2B (13%), and FAT3 (13%). The mutation rates of ACVR2A (6.25% vs 0%), FANCA (6.25% vs 0%), RBM10 (6.25% vs 0%), and SPTA1 (8.33% vs 1.02%) were significantly higher in ASCP than in PDAC. In conclusion, we have comprehensively described the genomic landscape of the largest cohort of ASCP patients to date and highlight that 9p21 loss may be a promising prognostic biomarker for ASCP, which provides a molecular basis for prognosis prediction and new therapeutic strategies for ASCP.

A Randomized Phase III Study of Anlotinib Versus Bevacizumab in Combination With CAPEOX as First-Line Therapy for RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Clinical Trial Protocol.

Background: Chemotherapy combined with antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies is the most promising approach to prolong survival and improve the quality of life of patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Anlotinib is an oral antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGF receptors 1/2/3, fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-4, and platelet-derived growth factor receptors a/ß. Since anlotinib combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CAPEOX) as a first-line treatment was previously shown to be effective and safe for patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type (WT) mCRC, we designed this randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus CAPEOX versus bevacizumab plus CAPEOX in patients with RAS/BRAF WT mCRC. Methods/design: The primary inclusion criteria are Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, confirmed RAS/BRAF WT colorectal adenocarcinoma, and unresectable metastases assessed by a multidisciplinary team. The main exclusion criteria are as follows: high microsatellite instability or deficient mismatch repair status, resectable or potentially resectable metastases, and previous systemic therapy for mCRC. A total of 698 patients will be randomized into the anlotinib and bevacizumab groups in a 1:1 ratio. Patients will receive 4 to 8 cycles of induction therapy (CAPEOX plus anlotinib or bevacizumab), followed by maintenance treatment (capecitabine plus anlotinib or bevacizumab) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee is the primary endpoint, whereas investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, resection rate of liver metastases, quality of life, and safety are the secondary endpoints. Enrollment commenced in May 2021. Discussion: A prospective, randomized, phase III trial will provide a meaningful comparison of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus CAPEOX with standard treatment for patients with unresectable RAS/BRAF WT mCRC.

Claudin 18.2 is a potential therapeutic target for zolbetuximab in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently diagnosed and treated in advanced tumor stages with poor prognosis. More effective screening programs and novel therapeutic means are urgently needed. Recent studies have regarded tight junction protein claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) as a candidate target for cancer treatment, and zolbetuximab (formerly known as IMAB362) has been developed against CLDN18.2. However, there are few data reported thus far related to the clinicopathological characteristics of CLDN18.2 expression for PDAC. AIM: To investigate the expression of CLDN18.2 in PDAC patients and subsequently propose a new target for the treatment of PDAC. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas, Genotype-Tissue Expression, Gene Expression Omnibus, and European Genome-phenome Archive databases were first employed to analyze the CLDN18 gene expression in normal pancreatic tissue compared to that in pancreatic cancer tissue. Second, we analyzed the expression of CLDN18.2 in 93 primary PDACs, 86 para-cancer tissues, and 13 normal pancreatic tissues by immunohistochemistry. Immunostained tissues were assessed applying the histoscore. subsequently, they fell into two groups according to the expression state of CLDN18.2. Furthermore, the correlations between CLDN18.2 expression and diverse clinicopathological characteristics, including survival, were investigated. RESULTS: The gene expression of CLDN18 was statistically higher (P < 0.01) in pancreatic tumors than in normal tissues. However, there was no significant correlation between CLDN18 expression and survival in pancreatic cancer patients. CLDN18.2 was expressed in 88 (94.6%) of the reported PDACs. Among these tumors, 50 (56.8%) cases showed strong immunostaining. The para-cancer tissues were positive in 81 (94.2%) cases, among which 32 (39.5%) of cases were characterized for strong staining intensities. Normal pancreatic tissue was identified solely via weak immunostaining. Finally, CLDN18.2 expression significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, nerve invasion, stage, and survival of PDAC patients, while there was no correlation between CLDN18.2 expression and localization, tumor size, patient age and sex, nor any other clinicopathological characteristic. CONCLUSION: CLDN18.2 expression is frequently increased in PDAC patients. Thus, it may act as a potential therapeutic target for zolbetuximab in PDAC.

Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy regimens for first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Asia: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the optimal palliative first-line chemotherapy regimen for East Asian patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). AREAS COVERED: We conducted a systematic review using a literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library without date restrictions, and abstracts from major oncology congresses. Studies meeting the following criteria were included: East Asian patients ≥18 years old with metastatic/locally advanced unresectable ESCC; first-line chemotherapy; reporting of overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall response rate, and/or safety; randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and prospective or retrospective comparative studies. In total, 39 articles were identified for: platinum plus fluoropyrimidine (n = 9), platinum plus taxane (n = 16), platinum plus fluoropyrimidine plus taxane (n = 7), platinum plus fluoropyrimidine plus other (n = 3), irinotecan plus platinum (n = 2), taxane plus fluoropyrimidine (n = 1). EXPERT OPINION: The available data supports both taxane plus platinum regimens and fluoropyrimidine plus platinum regimens in the first-line treatment of East Asian patients with ESCC. Compared with data from doublet chemotherapy studies, triplet chemotherapy appeared to improve ORR, but did not seem to prolong OS, possibly due to an increased incidence of adverse events.

Necrolytic migratory erythema is an important visual cutaneous clue of glucagonoma.

Glucagonoma is an extremely rare neuroendocrine tumor that arises from pancreatic islet alpha cells. Although glucagonoma is usually accompanied by a variety of characteristic clinical symptoms, early diagnosis is still difficult due to the scarcity of the disease. In this study, we present the cumulative experiences, clinical characteristics and treatments of seven patients diagnosed with glucagonoma during the past 10 years at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. The seven patients in our cohort consisted of six females and one male with an average diagnosis age of 40.1 years (range 23-51). The average time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of glucagonoma was 14 months (range 2-36 months). All the patients visited dermatology first for necrolytic migratory erythema (NME) 7/7 (100%), and other presenting symptoms included diabetes mellitus (DM) 4/7 (57%), stomatitis 2/7 (28%), weight loss 4/7 (57%), anemia 4/7 (57%), diarrhea 1/7 (14%), and DVT1/7 (14%). Plasma glucagon levels were increased in all patients (range 216.92-3155 pg/mL) and declined after surgery. Imaging studies revealed that four of seven patients had liver metastasis. Six of seven patients received surgical resection, and all of them received somatostatin analog therapy. Symptoms improved significantly in 6 out of 7 patients. Three of seven patients died of this disease by the time of follow-up. Our data suggest that if persistent NME is associated with DM and high glucagon levels, timely abdominal imaging should be performed to confirm glucagonoma. Once diagnosed, surgery and somatostatin analogs are effective for symptom relief and tumor control.

Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced well-differentiated pancreatic and extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with surufatinib versus placebo: Results from two randomized, double-blind, phase III trials (SANET-p and SANET-ep).

AIM: To investigate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients who had neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) from SANET trials. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive surufatinib or placebo. HRQoL questionnaires, including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-G.I.NET21, were collected. The prespecified HRQoL outcome was the mean change of scores from baseline to the last available visit for each domain. Time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) was defined as the time from randomization to deterioration of ≥10 points from baseline in domain score, disease progression, or death. RESULTS: 370 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to surufatinib (n = 242) or placebo (n = 128). No significant difference in mean scores change from baseline to the last available visit was observed for QLQ-C30 and QLQ- G.I.NET21 domains, with the exception of diarrhea. The mean score of diarrhea increased 11.7 points from baseline in the surufatinib arm and decreased 1.2 points in the placebo arm, and the between-group difference was 12.9 points. Compared with placebo, surufatinib treated patients had a significantly longer TUDD for dyspnea (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.86; P = 0.0058) and a significantly shorter TUDD for diarrhea (HR 2.91; 95% CI, 1.66-5.10; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in TUDD for the remaining domains of QLQ-C30 and G.I.NET-21. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL was similar in patients treated with surufatinib and placebo except for diarrhea. The preservation of HRQoL supports surufatinib as a treatment option for NETs. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02589821, NCT02588170.

Prognostic Significance of PTTG1 and Its Methylation in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Pituitary tumor-transforming gene-1 (PTTG1), one type of DNA repair-related gene, has been reported to be dysregulated in several tumors and serve as a tumor promotor. Previously, the oncogenic roles of PTTG1 were also reported in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, the prognostic values of PTTG1 in LUAD and the possible mechanism of its dysregulation have not been clarified. We analyzed TCGA datasets and reported that PTTG1 expression showed a distinct increase within LUAD specimens in comparison with nontumor specimens. Further survival study revealed that patients containing a great PTTG1 level had noticeably less overall survival and progression-free survival as compared with patients containing a low PTTG1 level. Multivariate analyses confirmed that PTTG1 expression was a factor of prognosis that is independent in terms of LUAD patients. Besides, PTTG1 methylation had a negative regulation on PTTG1, so PTTG1 had a high expressing level in LUAD tissues. However, the relation between hypermethylation and overall survival was not demonstrated using TCGA datasets. In addition, we observed that LUAD specimens with advanced stages exhibited a higher level of PTTG1. Finally, the dysregulated genes related to PTTG1 expression were screened, and KEGG assays revealed that the above genes were involved in the p53 signaling pathway, indicating the possible regulatory function of PTTG1 in the p53 signaling pathway. Overall, our findings suggest that PTTG1 may serve as an efficient clinical biomarker and a therapeutic target for patients suffering from LUAD.

Potent antitumor activity of novel taxoids in anaplastic thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is the most aggressive form of thyroid cancers and it is rapidly fatal without any effective therapeutic regimens. There are some clinical trials showing that paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for ATC can achieve a relatively high response rate and low incidence of adverse reaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential therapeutic activity of novel taxoids in ATC cells. METHODS: We evaluated antitumor activity of five novel 3'-difluorovinyltaxoids (DFV-taxoids) in anaplastic thyroid cancer cells by a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments. Besides, we also explored the potential mechanism underlying the difference among the taxoids and paclitaxel by molecular docking and tubulin polymerization assays. RESULTS: Our data showed that these novel DFV-taxoids were more effective than paclitaxel in ATC cell lines and xenografts, as reflected by the inhibition of cell proliferation, colony formation and tumorigenic potential in nude mice, and the induction of G2/M phase arrest and cell apoptosis. Using tubulin polymerization assays and molecular docking analysis, we found that these DFV-taxoids promoted more rapid polymerization of ß-tubulin than paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that these novel taxoids exhibit stronger antitumor activity in ATC cells than paclitaxel, thereby providing a promising therapeutic strategy for the patients with ATC.

Inhibition of Ras protein activator like 2 produces antitumor effects in gastric cancer via the suppression of YAP1 activation.

Ras protein activator like 2 (RASAL2) has a cancer-related function, but plays inconsistent roles in different malignancies. This project was designed to determine the role of RASAL2 in carcinogenesis in gastric cancer. The Cancer Genome Atlas data revealed high levels of RASAL2 in gastric cancer tissue, which was confirmed in clinical specimens of gastric cancer via real-time quantitative PCR and western blotting assays. High RASAL2 was correlated with a reduced survival rate in gastric cancer patients. In gastric cancer cell lines, the silencing of RASAL2 restrained cellular proliferation, invasion and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, while enhancing chemosensitivity to cisplatin. Mechanistically, the silencing of RASAL2 was found to inhibit the activation of Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), a pro-oncogenic protein in gastric cancer, and decrease the expression of YAP1 target genes. The re-expression of constitutively active YAP1 substantially reversed RASAL2-silencing-produced antitumor effects. Moreover, treatment with YAP1 inhibitors could diminish RASAL2-overexpression-evoked oncogenic effects in gastric cancer cells. Additionally, gastric cancer cells with RASAL2 silencing exhibited a reduced ability to form xenograft tumors in nude mice. Collectively, our data demonstrate that the silencing of RASAL2 has noteworthy antitumor effects in gastric cancer cells via the suppression of YAP1 activation. This project underscores a vital role of the RASAL2/YAP1 axis in gastric progression and indicates that targeting this oncogenic axis may be applied as a potential therapeutic option for gastric cancer.

A Phase 2 Study of Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Two-Year Outcomes and Continued Treatment beyond First RECIST-Defined Progression.

INTRODUCTION: In a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, phase 2 study for pretreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), camrelizumab showed potent antitumor activity and acceptable safety profile. The aim of this report was to provide long-term data and evaluate potential benefit of treatment with camrelizumab beyond progression. METHODS: From November 15, 2016, to November 16, 2017, 217 patients received camrelizumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 or 3 weeks. Treatment beyond first Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-defined progression (TBP) with camrelizumab was allowed. RESULTS: At data cutoff of December 16, 2019 (>2 years after the last patient enrollment; median duration of follow-up, 13.2 months [IQR 5.7-25.8]), 14 (43.8%) of the 32 responses per blinded independent central review were ongoing. The median duration of response was not reached (range 2.5-30.5 + months). The ongoing response rates at 12, 18, and 24 months were 68.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.7-82.2), 59.8% (95% CI 38.8-75.6), and 53.1% (95% CI 31.0-71.0), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months (95% CI 11.5-16.3). The 18- and 24-month OS rates were 41.3% (95% CI 34.6-47.9) and 33.7% (95% CI 27.3-40.2), respectively. Of the 172 patients who experienced RECIST-defined progression per investigator, 102 received TBP, while 70 did not (non-TBP). The median OS was 16.9 months (95% CI 13.3-22.6) in the TBP group versus 9.4 months (95% CI 5.8-14.8) in the non-TBP group, and the 18- and 24-month OS rates were 47.5% (95% CI 37.3-56.9) versus 33.1% (95% CI 22.3-44.3) and 38.8% (95% CI 29.2-48.4) versus 23.2% (95% CI 13.8-34.1), respectively. No new safety signals of camrelizumab were observed. CONCLUSIONS: With prolonged follow-up, camrelizumab continues to demonstrate the durable response and long survival in pretreated advanced HCC patients with manageable toxicities, especially in those who continued the treatment beyond first RECIST-defined progression.

Efficacy and safety of a novel anti-HER2 therapeutic antibody RC48 in patients with HER2-overexpressing, locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a single-arm phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment options for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing gastric cancer at third-line have shown limited clinical benefit. Further, there is no specific treatment for HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ and fluorescence in-situ hybridization-negative patients. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of a novel anti-HER2 antibody RC48 for patients with HER2-overexpressing, advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. METHODS: Patients with HER2-overexpressing (IHC 2+ or 3+), locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer who were under at least second-line therapy were eligible and received RC48 2.5 mg/kg alone every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, time to progression, disease control rate, and safety. RESULTS: Of 179 patients screened, 125 were eligible and received RC48 treatment. The ORR was 24.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.5%-33.3%). The median PFS and OS were 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.7-4.9 months) and 7.9 months (95% CI: 6.7-9.9 months), respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events were decreased white blood cell count (53.6%), asthenia (53.6%), hair loss (53.6%), decreased neutrophil count (52.0%), anemia (49.6%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase level (43.2%). Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 45 (36.0%) patients, and RC48-related SAEs were mainly decreased neutrophil count (3.2%). Seven patients had adverse events that led to death were not RC48-related. CONCLUSIONS: RC48 showed promising activity with manageable safety, suggesting potential application in patients with HER2-overexpressing, advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer who have previously received at least two lines of chemotherapy.

Thrombospondin 4/integrin α2/HSF1 axis promotes proliferation and cancer stem-like traits of gallbladder cancer by enhancing reciprocal crosstalk between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor cells.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), the primary component of tumor stroma in tumor microenvironments, are well-known contributors to the malignant progression of gallbladder cancer (GBC). Thrombospondins (THBSs or TSPs) comprise a family of five adhesive glycoproteins that are overexpressed in many types of cancers. However, the expression and potential roles of TSPs in the crosstalk between CAFs and GBC cells has remained unclear. METHODS: Peritumoral fibroblasts (PTFs) and CAFs were extracted from GBC tissues. Thrombospondin expression in GBC was screened by RT-qPCR. MTT viability assay, colony formation, EdU incorporation assay, flow cytometry analysis, Transwell assay, tumorsphere formation and western blot assays were performed to investigate the effects of CAF-derived TSP-4 on GBC cell proliferation, EMT and cancer stem-like features. Subcutaneous tumor formation models were established by co-implanting CAFs and GBC cells or GBC cells overexpressing heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) to evaluate the roles of TSP-4 and HSF1 in vivo. To characterize the mechanism by which TSP-4 is involved in the crosstalk between CAFs and GBC cells, the levels of a variety of signaling molecules were detected by coimmunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence staining, and ELISA assays. RESULTS: In the present study, we showed that TSP-4, as the stromal glycoprotein, is highly expressed in CAFs from GBC and that CAF-derived TSP-4 induces the proliferation, EMT and cancer stem-like features of GBC cells. Mechanistically, CAF-secreted TSP-4 binds to the transmembrane receptor integrin α2 on GBC cells to induce the phosphorylation of HSF1 at S326 and maintain the malignant phenotypes of GBC cells. Moreover, the TSP-4/integrin α2 axis-induced phosphorylation of HSF1 at S326 is mediated by Akt activation (p-Akt at S473) in GBC cells. In addition, activated HSF1 signaling increased the expression and paracrine signaling of TGF-ß1 to induce the transdifferentiation of PTFs into CAFs, leading to their recruitment into GBC and increased TSP-4 expression in CAFs, thereby forming a positive feedback loop to drive the malignant progression of GBC. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that a complex TSP-4/integrin α2/HSF1/TGF-ß cascade mediates reciprocal interactions between GBC cells and CAFs, providing a promising therapeutic target for gallbladder cancer patients.

Camrelizumab in Combination with Apatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (RESCUE): A Nonrandomized, Open-label, Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab [an anti-programmed death (PD-1) mAb] plus apatinib (a VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This nonrandomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study enrolled patients with advanced HCC who were treatment-naïve or refractory/intolerant to first-line targeted therapy. Patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg (for bodyweight ≥50 kg) or 3 mg/kg (for bodyweight <50 kg) every 2 weeks plus oral apatinib 250 mg daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Seventy patients in the first-line setting and 120 patients in the second-line setting were enrolled. As of January 10, 2020, the ORR was 34.3% [24/70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 23.3-46.6] in the first-line and 22.5% (27/120; 95% CI, 15.4-31.0) in the second-line cohort per IRC. Median progression-free survival in both cohorts was 5.7 months (95% CI, 5.4-7.4) and 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.6), respectively. The 12-month survival rate was 74.7% (95% CI, 62.5-83.5) and 68.2% (95% CI, 59.0-75.7), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 147 (77.4%) of 190 patients, with the most common being hypertension (34.2%). Serious TRAEs occurred in 55 (28.9%) patients. Two (1.1%) treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Camrelizumab combined with apatinib showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in patients with advanced HCC in both the first-line and second-line setting. It might represent a novel treatment option for these patients.See related commentary by Pinato et al., p. 908.

Apatinib inhibits pancreatic cancer growth, migration and invasion through the PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2/MAPK pathways.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is generally characterized with high levels of malignancy and poor prognosis. In addition, there are currently no effective therapeutic agents against the disease. However, apatinib which is a small molecular agent targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), has been shown to generate favorable outcomes in gastric cancer. Therefore, the present study explored the effects of apatinib on pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The activity of the ASPC-1 or PANC-1 cells was examined through colony formation assays, wound healing experiments as well as the Transwell and Western blot (WB) analyses. Additionally, a xenograft model was established by subcutaneously injecting the ASPC-1 cells into nude mice. Microvessel density (MVD) and Ki-67 expression were examined through immunohistochemistry (IHC) and WB analyses. RESULTS: The findings showed that treatment with either 10 or 20 µM of apatinib led to a decrease in the proliferation, migration and invasion of ASPC-1 and PANC-1 cells. Additionally, apatinib significantly hindered xenograft growth. Moreover, there was a decrease in Ki-67 expression and MVD, 21 days after treatment with apatinib. The results also showed that apatinib had no effect on the levels of the VEGFR-2, ERK1/2 and AKT proteins although there was a significant decrease in the expression of phosphate VEGFR2 (p-VEGFR2), phosphate AKT (p-AKT) and phosphate ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2). CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib inhibits the proliferation and migration of pancreatic cancer cells, blocking growth and angiogenesis in transplanted tumors. In addition, the underlying mechanism may involve phosphorylation of the PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2/MAPKs signaling pathways.

Surufatinib in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (SANET-p): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Surufatinib showed superior efficacy in extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in the phase 3 SANET-ep study. In SANET-p, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. METHODS: SANET-p was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, done in 21 hospitals across China. Eligible patients were adults (aged 18 years or older) with progressive, advanced, well differentiated pancreatic NETs, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and progression on up to two kinds of previous systemic regimens for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive web response system to receive 300 mg of surufatinib or placebo, taken orally once per day in consecutive 4-week treatment cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, poor compliance, use of other antitumour medication, pregnancy, loss to follow-up, or if the investigator deemed discontinuation in the patient's best interest. Randomisation was done centrally using stratified block randomisation (block size three), stratified by pathological grade, previous systemic antitumour treatment, and ECOG performance status score. Patients, investigators, research staff, and the sponsor study team were masked to treatment allocation. Crossover to surufatinib was permitted for patients in the placebo group with disease progression. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included all patients in randomisation. A pre-planned interim analysis was done at 70% of the predicted progression-free survival events. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02589821. FINDINGS: Between Feb 18, 2016, and Nov 11, 2019, of 264 patients who were screened, 172 (65%) patients were randomly assigned to receive surufatinib (n=113) or placebo (n=59). The median follow-up was 19·3 months (95% CI 9·3-19·4) in the surufatinib group and 11·1 months (5·7-35·9) in the placebo group. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 10·9 months (7·5-13·8) for surufatinib versus 3·7 months (2·8-5·6) for placebo (hazard ratio 0·49, 95% CI 0·32-0·76; p=0·0011). The trial met the early stopping criteria at the interim analysis and was terminated on recommendation from the independent data monitoring committee. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (43 [38%] of 113 with surufatinib vs four [7%] of 59 with placebo), proteinuria (11 [10%] vs one [2%]), and hypertriglyceridaemia (eight [7%] vs none). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 25 (22%) patients in the surufatinib group and four (7%) patients in the placebo group. There were three on-treatment deaths in the surufatinib group, including two deaths due to adverse events (gastrointestinal haemorrhage [possibly treatment-related] and cerebral haemorrhage [unlikely to be treatment-related]), and one death attributed to disease progression. One on-treatment death in the placebo group was attributed to disease progression. INTERPRETATION: Surufatinib significantly improves progression-free survival and has an acceptable safety profile in patients with progressive, advanced pancreatic NETs, and could be a potential treatment option in this patient population. FUNDING: Hutchison MediPharma.

Surufatinib in advanced extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (SANET-ep): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of surufatinib (HMPL-012, sulfatinib) in patients with extrapancreatic NETs. METHODS: SANET-ep was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial undertaken at 24 hospitals across China. Patients (aged 18 years or older) with unresectable or metastatic, well differentiated, extrapancreatic NETs, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and progression on no more than two types of previous systemic regimens were enrolled. Patients were centrally randomly assigned (2:1) using stratified block randomisation (block size 3) via an interactive web response system to receive oral surufatinib at 300 mg per day or matching placebo. Randomisation was stratified by tumour origin, pathological grade, and previous treatment. Patients, investigators, research staff and the sponsor study team were masked to treatment allocation. Crossover to the surufatinib group was allowed for patients in the placebo group at disease progression. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. A preplanned interim analysis was done at 70% of predicted progression-free survival events. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02588170. Follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Dec 9, 2015, and March 31, 2019, 198 patients were randomly assigned to surufatinib (n=129) or placebo (n=69). Median follow-up was 13·8 months (95% CI 11·1-16·7) in the surufatinib group and 16·6 months (9·2-not calculable) in the placebo group. Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 9·2 months (95% CI 7·4-11·1) in the surufatinib group versus 3·8 months (3·7-5·7) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·33; 95% CI 0·22-0·50; p<0·0001). As the trial met the predefined criteria for early discontinuation of the study at the interim analysis, the study was terminated early, as recommended by the independent data monitoring committee. The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were hypertension (47 [36%] of 129 patients in the surufatinib group vs nine [13%] of 68 patients in the placebo group) and proteinuria (25 [19%] vs zero). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 32 (25%) of 129 patients in the surufatinib group and nine (13%) of 68 patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in three patients in the surufatinib group (disseminated intravascular coagulation and hepatic encephalopathy, liver injury, and death with unknown reason) and one patient in the placebo group (cachexia and respiratory failure). INTERPRETATION: Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients given surufatinib compared with patients given placebo, and surufatinib has a favourable benefit-to-risk profile in patients with progressive, advanced, well differentiated extrapancreatic NETs. Our results suggest that surufatinib might be a new treatment option for this population. FUNDING: Hutchison MediPharma.