Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(4): 443-450, 2019 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30306400

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficiency and safety of raltitrexed- or floxuridine (FUDR)-based transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 81 patients with unresectable CRCLM who failed systemic chemotherapy and were treated with TACE in our department from Oct 2014 to Oct 2017. Of these, 61 patients received TACE using raltitrexed, oxaliplatin, and pirarubicin (raltitrexed group), and 20 received TACE using FUDR, oxaliplatin, and pirarubicin (FUDR group). The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS, from the first TACE), progression-free survival (PFS, from the first TACE), and adverse reactions were evaluated and compared between the two groups, and prognostic factors for OS were analyzed. RESULTS: The ORRs of the raltitrexed group and FUDR group were 67.2 and 45.0%, respectively (P = 0.076), and the DCRs were 86.9 and 80.0%, respectively (P = 0.452). The median OS (from first TACE) was 14.0 months in the raltitrexed group and 13.0 months in the FUDR group (P = 0.556). The median PFS (from first TACE) was 2.1 months in the raltitrexed group and 2.4 months in the FUDR group (P = 0.878). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the primary tumor site, Child-Pugh class, and combination with local ablation (RFA or CRA) were independent significant factors affecting survival. There were no significant differences in adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05), and no treatment-related death occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: TACE treatment based on raltitrexed or FUDR is an efficient and safe alternative choice for treating unresectable CRCLM.


Sujet(s)
Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/administration et posologie , Chimioembolisation thérapeutique , Tumeurs colorectales/anatomopathologie , Floxuridine/administration et posologie , Tumeurs du foie/secondaire , Tumeurs du foie/thérapie , Quinazolines/administration et posologie , Thiophènes/administration et posologie , Sujet âgé , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/effets indésirables , Femelle , Floxuridine/effets indésirables , Humains , Tumeurs du foie/anatomopathologie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Pronostic , Quinazolines/effets indésirables , Études rétrospectives , Analyse de survie , Thiophènes/effets indésirables , Résultat thérapeutique
2.
Genet Mol Res ; 15(3)2016 Sep 23.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27706768

RÉSUMÉ

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an alternative surgical approach to alleviate fecal incontinence and constipation. This study aimed to explore the effects and underlying mechanisms of SNS with acupuncture on gut transit time and colon c-kit protein expression in rats with slow transit constipation (STC). Fifty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups: blank control, SNS, Mosapride, sham SNS, and STC model control group. The STC model was established by subcutaneous injection of morphine. Each group was treated over a 15-day period. Gut transit time was measured 1 day before the treatment started and after 5, 10, and 15 days of treatment. After the 15-day treatment, animals were sacrificed and colonic tissues were collected for analysis of c-kit protein expression, using western blot analysis. We found significant differences in gut transit time in the SNS group compared with the Mosapride group after 5 (P = 0.001) and 10 (P = 0.004) days of treatment. After 15 days of treatment, there were no differences in gut transit time among the SNS, Mosapride, and blank control groups. However, significant differences were observed when comparing the SNS and Mosapride groups with the STC model and sham SNS groups. A decreased c-kit protein expression was observed in the STC model control, sham SNS, and Mosapride groups, compared with the SNS group (P = 0.001). Our data indicate that SNS can decrease gut transit time and increase the expression of c-kit protein in rats with STC to improve colon transit function.


Sujet(s)
Thérapie par acupuncture , Côlon/métabolisme , Côlon/physiopathologie , Constipation/métabolisme , Constipation/physiopathologie , Transit gastrointestinal/physiologie , Protéines proto-oncogènes c-kit/métabolisme , Sacrum/innervation , Animaux , Stimulation électrique , Femelle , Mâle , Rat Sprague-Dawley , Facteurs temps
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE