Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Pentobarbital Sedation for Transthoracic Echocardiography in Infants and Toddlers: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

BACKGROUND: Acquisition of transthoracic echocardiographic (TTEcho) images in children often requires sedation. The optimal sedative for TTEcho has not been determined. Children with congenital heart disease are repeatedly exposed to sedatives and anesthetics that may affect brain development. Dexmedetomidine, which in animals alters brain structure to a lesser degree, may offer advantages in this vulnerable population. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial enrolled 280 children 3-24 months of age undergoing outpatient TTEcho, comparing 2.5 µg·kg intranasal dexmedetomidine to 5 mg·kg oral pentobarbital. Rescue sedation, for both groups, was intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg·kg. The primary outcome was adequate sedation within 30 minutes without rescue sedation, assessed by blinded personnel. Secondary outcomes included number of sonographer pauses, image quality in relation to motion artifacts, and parental satisfaction. RESULTS: Success rates with a single dose were not different between sedation techniques; 85% in the pentobarbital group and 84% in the dexmedetomidine group (P = .8697). Median onset of adequate sedation was marginally faster with pentobarbital (16.5 [interquartile range, 13-21] vs 18 [16-23] minutes for dexmedetomidine [P = .0095]). Time from drug administration to discharge was not different (P = .8238) at 70.5 (64-83) minutes with pentobarbital and 70 (63-82) minutes with dexmedetomidine. Ninety-five percent of sedation failures with pentobarbital and 100% of dexmedetomidine failures had successful rescue sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal dexmedetomidine was comparable to oral pentobarbital sedation for TTEcho sedation in infants and did not increase the risk of clinically important adverse events. Intranasal dexmedetomidine appears to be an effective "rescue" sedative for both failed pentobarbital and dexmedetomidine sedation. Dexmedetomidine could be a safer option for repeated sedation in children, but further studies are needed to assess long-term consequence of repeated sedation in this high-risk population.

Do anesthetics harm the developing human brain? An integrative analysis of animal and human studies.

Anesthetics that permit surgical procedures and stressful interventions have been found to cause structural brain abnormalities and functional impairment in immature animals, generating extensive concerns among clinicians, parents, and government regulators regarding the safe use of these drugs in young children. Critically important questions remain, such as the exact age at which the developing brain is most vulnerable to the effects of anesthetic exposure, whether a particular age exists beyond which anesthetics are devoid of long-term effects on the brain, and whether any specific exposure duration exists that does not lead to deleterious effects. Accordingly, the present analysis attempts to put the growing body of animal studies, which we identified to include >440 laboratory studies to date, into a translational context, by integrating the preclinical data on brain structure and function with clinical results attained from human neurocognitive studies, which currently exceed 30 studies. Our analysis demonstrated no clear exposure duration threshold below which no structural injury or subsequent cognitive abnormalities occurred. Animal data did not clearly identify a specific age beyond which anesthetic exposure did not cause any structural or functional abnormalities. Several potential mitigating strategies were found, however, no general anesthetic was identified that consistently lacked neurodegenerative properties and could be recommended over other anesthetics. It therefore is imperative, to expand efforts to devise safer anesthetic techniques and mitigating strategies, even before long-term alterations in brain development are unequivocally confirmed to occur in millions of young children undergoing anesthesia every year.

Anesthesia and the pediatric cardiac catheterization suite: a review.

Advances in technology over the last couple of decades have caused a shift in pediatric cardiac catheterization from a primary focus on diagnostics to innovative therapeutic interventions. These improvements allow patients a wider range of nonsurgical options for treatment of congenital heart disease. However, these therapeutic modalities can entail higher risk in an already complex patient population, compounded by the added challenges inherent to the environment of the cardiac catheterization suite. Anesthesiologists caring for children with congenital heart disease must understand not only the pathophysiology of the disease but also the effects the anesthetics and interventions have on the patient in order to provide a safe perioperative course. It is the aim of this article to review the latest catheterization modalities offered to patients with congenital heart disease, describe the unique challenges presented in the cardiac catheterization suite, list the most common complications encountered during catheterization and finally, to review the literature regarding different anesthetic drugs used in the catheterization lab.

A combination of mild hypothermia and sevoflurane affords long-term protection in a modified neonatal mouse model of cerebral hypoxia-ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Infant brain injury from hypoxia-ischemia (HI) can lead to life-long impairment, but protective strategies are lacking. Short-term but not long-term protection has been demonstrated in the Rice-Vannucci neonatal brain ischemia model (RVM) by volatile anesthetic administration before HI, while exposure during HI has not been tested. In the current study, we evaluated a combination of sevoflurane and mild hypothermia as a protective approach during HI, both short- and long-term, by introducing intubation and mechanical ventilation to the RVM. METHODS: The right common carotid artery was ligated in 10-day-old mice during brief sevoflurane anesthesia, followed by a 2-hour recovery with the dam. Littermates were then randomized to either: HI spontaneously breathing 10% oxygen for 60 minutes (the classical RVM); HI-Protect mild hypothermia and orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation with 3.5% sevoflurane in 10% oxygen for 60 minutes; or Room Air spontaneously breathing room air for 60 minutes. In a nonsurviving cohort, cerebral oxygenation was monitored in the area at risk and the contralateral hemisphere during HI or HI-Protect using visible-light spectroscopy (Spectros Corp). Mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were measured. Arterial blood gases were obtained. Right/left brain hemispheric weight ratios and brain damage scores were determined 1 week after HI. In another group, learning and behavior were assessed in young adulthood (9 weeks) using spontaneous locomotion, Morris water maze, and apomorphine injection. RESULTS: During HI, ipsilateral and contralateral brain oxygenation, arterial blood pressures, blood gases, and glucose levels were similar in both ischemic groups, while heart rate was slower in the HI-Protect group. One week after ischemia, brain hemispheric weight ratios and injury scores in several brain regions were significantly worse after HI, compared with HI-Protect. Nine weeks after HI, Morris water maze hidden platform and reversal platform escape latencies, measures of spatial memory function, were superior after HI-Protect, compared with HI (P < 0.0001). HI-Protect animals demonstrated significantly less circling behavior after an apomorphine challenge (P < 0.0001), a measure of striatal integrity. CONCLUSIONS: To test the neuroprotective effects of volatile anesthetics during neonatal brain ischemia, we developed a modification of the RVM. By using mechanical ventilation and endotracheal intubation, sevoflurane administration during HI was survivable. The combination of sevoflurane administration and mild hypothermia during HI conferred not only short-term structural, but also long-term functional protection, compared with littermates treated according to the RVM. These findings warrant further studies to improve neurological outcome in critically ill infants.

Anesthetic neurotoxicity.

All routinely utilized sedatives and anesthetics have been found neurotoxic in a wide variety of animal species, including non-human primates. Neurotoxic effects observed in animals include histologic evidence for apoptotic neuronal cell death and subsequent learning and memory impairment. Several cohort studies in neonates with significant comorbidities requiring surgical procedures early in life have also demonstrated abnormal neurodevelopmental outcomes. This article provides an overview of the currently available data from both animal experiments and human clinical studies regarding the effects of sedatives and anesthetics on the developing brain.

Can we improve the outcomes of pediatric congenital heart disease survivors?

Appreciating the complexity and evolving pathophysiology after palliation of CHD is critical to improving the outcome. Despite a growing patient population because of greater survival over the years, detailed data on the long-term outcomes of these patients is surprisingly sparse. The establishment in 2001 of the Pediatric Heart Network by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute has provided a collaborative multicenter platform to conduct large trials in CHD and to characterize outcomes. This chapter has emphasized how CHD care spans the continuum from fetal life to adulthood. Current research efforts aspire to better characterize short-term and long-term outcomes, continue advancement of technologies to better diagnose and treat CHD, and to elucidate the role of genetics and biomarkers in predicting outcome. Focused studies on variations in perioperative practice and quality will help us provide better clinical outcomes for CHD survivors.

Successful resuscitation of bupivacaine-induced cardiotoxicity in a neonate.

We report a case of bupivacaine-induced cardiotoxicity in a neonate following caudal epidural block under general anesthesia for urologic surgery. Prompt recognition of the complication allowed early intervention with both standard resuscitative measures and administration of 20% Intralipid(®) , resulting in a good outcome.

Management of traumatic tracheobronchial separation in a teenager using a fabricated extra-long endotracheal tube.

Tracheobronchial separation (TBS) due to blunt chest trauma in children is extremely rare. We report the case of a 14-year-old boy who fell 20 feet and developed respiratory distress, bilateral pneumothoraces, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema. Computed tomography imaging at the initial institution failed to detect tracheobronchial disruption, and the patient was managed conservatively. The patient's worsening condition prompted bronchoscopic examination which revealed complete separation of the right main bronchus from the trachea. Single-lung ventilation was instituted using a fabricated extra-long nasotracheal tube due to the patient's large size and mandibular fracture, and the airway was primarily anastamosed with an open thoracotomy approach. The clinical features of tracheobronchial separation as well as anesthetic, clinical and surgical management of this rare but life-threatening injury are described.

Wet forced-air warming blankets are ineffective at maintaining normothermia.

BACKGROUND: Forced-air warming systems have proven effective in preventing perioperative hypothermia. To date, reported adverse events relate primarily to overheating and thermal injuries. This study uses a simple model to show that forced-air warming blankets become ineffective if they get wet. METHODS: Temperature sensor probes were inserted into three 1-liter fluid bags. Group C bags served as the control. Groups D (dry) and W (wet) bags were placed on Bair Hugger(R) Model 555 (Arizant Healthcare, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA) pediatric underbody blankets. The warming blanket for Group W bags was subsequently wet with irrigation fluid. Temperature was documented every 5 min. This model was repeated two times for a total of three cycles. Statistical analysis was performed using anova for repeated measures. RESULTS: Starting temperatures for each model were within a 0.3 degrees C range. Group C demonstrated a steady decline in temperature. Group D maintained and slightly increased in temperature during the observation period, while Group W exhibited a decrease in temperature at a rate similar to Group C. These results were significant at P < 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: A wet forced-air warming blanket is ineffective at maintaining normothermia. Once wet, the warming blanket resulted in cooling similar to the control group.