The Impact of Hepatitis on Clinical Outcomes for Pediatric Patients with Aplastic Anemia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic role of hepatitis in pediatric patients with aplastic anemia and the incidence of hepatitis B among patients with hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia in an area with a previously high prevalence of hepatitis B after nationwide hepatitis B vaccination for 30 years. STUDY DESIGN: Pediatric patients (n = 78) with aplastic anemia were enrolled in this study, including 9 with hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia. We collected the clinical characteristics, etiologies of the aplastic anemia, hepatitis B virus serology and serum hepatitis B viral load, response to the treatments, and survival outcome from the participants. We applied univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to evaluate the correlations between clinical features and survival outcome. Survival analysis was done using Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Patients with hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia were related to significantly worse survival prognosis when compared with patients with non-hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia, and hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia was the only independent prognostic factor to predict a poor survival outcome in our patients with aplastic anemia by multivariable analysis. In none of the total 78 patients was aplastic anemia related to hepatitis B virus infection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia had a significantly worse prognosis when compared with patients whose aplastic anemia was not hepatitis-associated. This study demonstrates the potential benefit of hepatitis B vaccination in decreasing the incidence of hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia in children.

The Role of Stents as Bridge to Surgery for Acute Left-Sided Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The role of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery for acute left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer has remained controversial. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of this approach, we performed a meta-analysis at the gastrointestinal surgery center of Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (Eastern Hospital). METHODS: Two PubMed and science-direct electronic databases were searched up to December 30, 2017. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: We selected 8 RCTs articles, which included 497 cases. The directly stoma rates were significantly lower in the stent group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] = 0.30-0.70, p = 0.0003). The successful primary anastomosis rates were significantly higher in the stent group (OR = 2.29, 95% CIs = 1.52-3.45, p < 0.0001). The post-procedural complication rates were significantly lower in the stent group (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.18-0.82, p = 0.01). However, tumor recurrence rates were significantly higher in the stent group (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.09-2.93, p = 0.02). Conclusions This meta-analysis confirms that SEMS placement could reduce direct stoma rate and increases the successful primary anastomosis rate; however, it was associated with a seemingly higher incidence of tumor recurrence.