Prenatal diagnosis of SLC25A24 Fontaine progeroid syndrome: description of the fetal phenotype, genotype and detection of parental mosaicism.

BACKGROUND: Fontaine progeroid syndrome (FPS, OMIM 612289) is a recently identified genetic disorder stemming from pathogenic variants in the SLC25A24 gene, encoding a mitochondrial carrier protein. It encompasses Gorlin-Chaudry-Moss syndrome and Fontaine-Farriaux syndrome, primarily manifesting as craniosynostosis with brachycephaly, distinctive dysmorphic facial features, hypertrichosis, severe prenatal and postnatal growth restriction, limb shortening, and early aging with characteristic skin changes, phalangeal anomalies, and genital malformations. CASES: All known occurrences of FPS have been postnatally observed until now. Here, we present the first two prenatal cases identified during the second trimester of pregnancy. While affirming the presence of most postnatal abnormalities in prenatal cases, we note the absence of a progeroid appearance in young fetuses. Notably, our reports introduce new phenotypic features like encephalocele and nephromegaly, which were previously unseen postnatally. Moreover, paternal SLC25A24 mosaicism was detected in one case. CONCLUSIONS: We present the initial two fetal instances of FPS, complemented by thorough phenotypic and genetic assessments. Our findings expand the phenotypical spectrum of FPS, unveiling new fetal phenotypic characteristics. Furthermore, one case underscores a potential novel inheritance pattern in this disorder. Lastly, our observations emphasize the efficacy of exome/genome sequencing in both prenatal and postmortem diagnosis of rare polymalformative syndromes with a normal karyotype and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).

Performance of cell-free DNA testing for common fetal trisomies in triplet pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: In singleton pregnancies, the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis as a screening test for common fetal trisomies has spread worldwide though we still lack sufficient data for its use in triplet pregnancies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of cfDNA testing in detecting fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies as a first-tier test. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort study including data from pregnant women with a triplet pregnancy who underwent cfDNA testing between May 1, 2017, and January 15, 2020. cfDNA was obtained by massive parallel sequencing (VeriSeq NIPT solution; Illumina®). The objectives of the study were to assess the diagnostic performance of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 (T21) (primary outcome), trisomy 18 (T18) and 13 (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: During the study period, cfDNA testing was performed in 255 women with triplet pregnancy, of which 165 (64.7%) had a neonatal outcome available. Three tests were positive for T21, one of which was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype, and the other was confirmed at birth. The third case did not undergo an invasive procedure and was not confirmed at birth (false positive). In one case, cfDNA testing was positive for T18 and was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype. There were no cases of trisomy 13 in the cohort. The no-call rate was 2.4% at first sampling. Fifty-eight (22.7%) women had embryo reduction, which in 40 (69%) of whom was performed after the cfDNA test result. CONCLUSION: cfDNA testing could be offered as primary screening for main fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies after provision of appropriate patient information.

Monochorionic twins with discordant trisomy 21, another case to remind this uncommon condition and how to deal with.

Monozygotic twins discordant for trisomy 21 are rare. We present the twelfth reported case of this uncommon condition undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis. Dealing with discordant fetal anomalies in monochorionic pregnancy can be challenging for physicians and patients; pros and cons of different invasive procedure options must be discussed with the couple, contending with certain specific peculiarities of this type of pregnancy. Although chorionic villi sampling can be performed earlier, higher risk of misdiagnosis of discordant aneuploidy is reported. Indeed, when heterokaryotic twins are suspected, a two-sampling amniocentesis is recommended, to ensure independent sampling of each fetus and to rule out confined placental mosaicism as well. The couple should be informed of the possible management and the risks for the non-affected twin whether selective reduction is required, and likewise if the pregnancy continues without selective termination.

Noninvasive Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 21 in Patients with a Vanishing Twin.

A vanishing twin (VT) occurs in up to 30% of early diagnosed twin pregnancies and is associated with an increased risk of fetal aneuploidy. Here, we describe our experience in a large VT population of 847 patients that underwent noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common fetal trisomies over a three-year period. All patients underwent an ultrasound examination prior to NIPT. Two comparison populations were included, namely, the singleton (n = 105,560) and the viable multiple gestation pregnancy samples (n = 9691) collected over the same period. All NIPT samples in the VT population received a result, of which 14 were high-risk for trisomy 21 (1.6%), nine for trisomy 18 (1.1%), and six for trisomy 13 (0.7%). Diagnostic testing confirmed the presence of trisomy 21 in 6/12 samples, giving a positive predictive value of 50%. One trisomy 18 case and no trisomy 13 cases were confirmed. The time between fetal demise and NIPT sampling did not appear to affect the number of true- or false-positive cases. In conclusion, NIPT is an effective screening method for trisomy 21 in the surviving fetus(es) in VT pregnancies. For trisomies 18 and 13, a positive NIPT should be interpreted carefully and ultrasound monitoring is preferrable over invasive diagnostic testing.

Case Report: How whole-genome sequencing-based cell-free DNA prenatal testing can help identify a marker mhromosome.

A supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) is a structurally abnormal chromosome that cannot be characterized by conventional banding cytogenetics. Marker chromosomes are present in 0.075% of prenatal cases. They are associated with variable phenotypes, ranging from normal to severely abnormal, and the prognosis is largely dependent on the results of further cytogenomic analysis. Here, we report the identification and characterization of a marker chromosome following prenatal screening in a 39-year-old pregnant patient. The patient had a normal first trimester ultrasound but was high-risk for fetal chromosome anomalies based on the results of maternal serum parameters. Chorionic villus sampling was performed, and analysis of chorionic villi revealed the presence of two identical marker chromosomes. In the interest of a rapid identification of the markers, we performed noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) together with chorionic villus sampling. A pericentromeric 29 Mb duplication of chromosome 20: dup (20) (p13q11.21) was identified and thereafter confirmed by targeted metaphasic FISH. Whole-genome sequencing-based NIPT was instrumental in rapid characterization of the SMCs and allowed us to obviate the need for multiple expensive and time-consuming FISH analyses.

Strategy for Use of Genome-Wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Rare Autosomal Aneuploidies and Unbalanced Structural Chromosomal Anomalies.

Atypical fetal chromosomal anomalies are more frequent than previously recognized and can affect fetal development. We propose a screening strategy for a genome-wide non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) to detect these atypical chromosomal anomalies (ACAs). Two sample cohorts were tested. Assay performances were determined using Cohort A, which consisted of 192 biobanked plasma samples-42 with ACAs, and 150 without. The rate of additional invasive diagnostic procedures was determined using Cohort B, which consisted of 3097 pregnant women referred for routine NIPT. Of the 192 samples in Cohort A, there were four initial test failures and six discordant calls; overall sensitivity was 88.1% (37/42; CI 75.00-94.81) and specificity was 99.3% (145/146; CI 96.22-99.88). In Cohort B, there were 90 first-pass failures (2.9%). The rate of positive results indicating an anomaly was 1.2% (36/3007) and 0.57% (17/3007) when limited to significant unbalanced chromosomal anomalies and trisomies 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 22. These results show that genome-wide NIPT can screen for ACAs with an acceptable sensitivity and a small increase in invasive testing, particularly for women with increased risk following maternal serum screening and by limiting screening to structural anomalies and the most clinically meaningful trisomies.

Cell-Free DNA Analysis in Maternal Blood: Differences in Estimates between Laboratories with Different Methodologies Using a Propensity Score Approach.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the failure rate and performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing, mainly in terms of detection rates for trisomy 21, performed by 2 laboratories using different analytical methods. METHODS: cfDNA testing was performed on 2,870 pregnancies with the HarmonyTM Prenatal Test using the targeted digital analysis of selected regions (DANSR) method, and on 2,635 pregnancies with the "Cerba test" using the genome-wide massively parallel sequencing (GW-MPS) method, with available outcomes. Propensity score analysis was used to match patients between the 2 groups. A comparison of the detection rates for trisomy 21 between the 2 laboratories was made. RESULTS: In all, 2,811 patients in the Harmony group and 2,530 patients in the Cerba group had no trisomy 21, 18, or 13. Postmatched comparisons of the patient characteristics indicated a higher no-result rate in the Harmony group (1.30%) than in the Cerba group (0.75%; p = 0.039). All 41 cases of trisomy 21 in the Harmony group and 93 cases in the Cerba group were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods of cfDNA testing showed low no-result rates and a comparable performance in detecting trisomy 21; yet GW-MPS had a slightly lower no-result rate than the DANSR method.

Autoimmune disorders but not heparin are associated with cell-free fetal DNA test failure.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested a possible association between heparin treatment at the time of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing and a non-reportable result. However, these studies lack of proper methodology and had a low level of proof to firmly incriminate heparin. Our objective was to investigate further the relationship between heparin treatment and cfDNA test results. METHODS: Two complementary approaches were used for the demonstration. First, we conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients with a singleton pregnancy, screened for aneuploidies by using cfDNA, but with a non-reportable cfDNA result. We included patients between 2013 and 2016 including the patients from the DEPOSA study as controls. CfDNA testing was performed by massive parallel sequencing by using a whole-genome approach. A multiple logistic regression was used to account for the influence of the variables included. Second, we performed in vitro experiments on mimic samples containing increased concentrations of heparin. RESULTS: Of 9867 singleton pregnancies tested during the inclusion period, 58 (0.59%) had a non-reportable result and were compared to 295 control patients. Fifteen (25.9%) and 20 (6.8%) patients were treated with heparin in the group with a non-reportable cfDNA result and with a successful assay, respectively. In multivariable analysis, an increased calculated risk at the first-trimester combined screening (OR 28.8 CI 9.76-85.15, p < 0.001), maternal weight (OR 1.03, CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.01), and the presence of an autoimmune disease (OR 10.38, CI 1.62-66.53, p = 0.01) were the only characteristics associated with a non-reportable result. In vitro experiments showed that heparin had no impact on fetal fraction measurement or the final result, no matter what the dose tested. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment by heparin had no impact on cfDNA screening test for aneuploidies, while the presence of an autoimmune disorder is an independent predictor of a non-reportable result.

Cell-free fetal DNA versus maternal serum screening for trisomy 21 in pregnant women with and without assisted reproduction technology: a prospective interventional study.

PURPOSE: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a primary screening test has been available for years but few studies have addressed this option in a prospective manner. The question is of interest after reports that maternal serum screening (MSS) is less accurate for pregnancies resulting from assisted reproduction technologies (ART) than for spontaneous pregnancies (SP). METHODS: A prospective interventional study was designed to address the performances of cfDNA compared with MSS in pregnancies with or without ART. Each patient was offered both MSS and cfDNA testing. The primary analysis cohort ultimately included 794 patients with a spontaneous pregnancy (SP) (n = 472) or pregnancy obtained after ART (n = 322). RESULTS: Overall, the false-positive rate and positive predictive value were 6.6% and 8.8% for MSS but 0% and 100% for cfDNA. MSS false-positive rate and positive predictive values were clearly poorer in the ART group (11.7% and 2.6%) than in the SP group (3.2% and 21.1%). The global rates of invasive procedures were 1.9% (15/794) with cfDNA but 8.4% (65/794) if MSS alone was proposed. CONCLUSION: cfDNA achieved better performance than MSS in both spontaneous and ART pregnancies, thus decreasing the number of invasive procedures. Our findings suggest that cfDNA should be considered for primary screening, especially in pregnancies obtained after ART.

Constitutional chromoanasynthesis: description of a rare chromosomal event in a patient.

Structural alterations in chromosomes are a frequent cause of cancers and congenital diseases. Recently, the phenomenon of chromosome crisis, consisting of a set of tens to hundreds of clustered genomic rearrangements, localized in one or a few chromosomes, was described in cancer cells under the term chromothripsis. Better knowledge and recognition of this catastrophic chromosome event has brought to light two distinct entities, chromothripsis and chromoanasynthesis. The complexity of these rearrangements and the original descriptions in tumor cells initially led to the thought that it was an acquired anomaly. In fact, a few patients have been reported with constitutional chromothripsis or chromoanasynthesis. Using microarray we identified a very complex chromosomal rearrangement in a patient who had a cytogenetically visible rearrangement of chromosome 18. The rearrangement contained more than 15 breakpoints localized on a single chromosome. Our patient displayed intellectual disability, behavioral troubles and craniofacial dysmorphism. Interestingly, the succession of duplications and triplications identified in our patient was not clustered on a single chromosomal region but spread over the entire chromosome 18. In the light of this new spectrum of chromosomal rearrangements, this report outlines the main features of these catastrophic events and discusses the underlying mechanism of the complex chromosomal rearrangement identified in our patient, which is strongly evocative of a chromoanasynthesis.

De novo complex intra chromosomal rearrangement after ICSI: characterisation by BACs micro array-CGH.

BACKGROUND: In routine Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) men with severe oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be informed about the risk of de novo congenital or chromosomal abnormalities in ICSI program. Also the benefits of preimplantation or prenatal genetic diagnosis practice need to be explained to the couple. METHODS: From a routine ICSI attempt, using ejaculated sperm from male with severe oligozoospermia and having normal karyotype, a 30 years old pregnant woman was referred to prenatal diagnosis in the 17th week for bichorionic biamniotic twin gestation. Amniocentesis was performed because of the detection of an increased foetal nuchal translucency for one of the fetus by the sonographic examination during the 12th week of gestation (WG). Chromosome and DNA studies of the fetus were realized on cultured amniocytes RESULTS: Conventional, molecular cytogenetic and microarray CGH experiments allowed us to conclude that the fetus had a de novo pericentromeric inversion associated with a duplication of the 9p22.1-p24 chromosomal region, 46,XY,invdup(9)(p22.1p24) [arrCGH 9p22.1p24 (RP11-130C19 --> RP11-87O1)x3]. As containing the critical 9p22 region, our case is in coincidence with the general phenotype features of the partial trisomy 9p syndrome with major growth retardation, microcephaly and microretrognathia. CONCLUSION: This de novo complex chromosome rearrangement illustrates the possible risk of chromosome or gene defects in ICSI program and the contribution of array-CGH for mapping rapidly de novo chromosomal imbalance.

Fetal RHD genotyping in maternal serum during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Fetal RHD genotype determination is useful in the management of sensitized RhD-negative pregnant women. It can be ascertained early during pregnancy by chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis. However, these procedures are invasive, resulting both in an increased risk of fetal loss and in an increased severity of immunization due to fetomaternal haemorrhage. A reliable determination of RHD genotype by fetal DNA analysis in maternal serum during the first trimester of pregnancy is reported in this study. One hundred and six sera from RhD-negative pregnant women were obtained during the first trimester of pregnancy. These sera were tested for the presence of RHD gene using a new real-time polymerase chain reaction assay and the results compared with those obtained later in pregnancy on amniotic fluid cells and by RHD serology of the new-born. All sera from women carrying a RhD-positive fetus (n = 62) gave positive results for RHD gene detection and sera from women carrying a RhD-negative fetus (n = 40) were negative. The high level of accuracy of fetal RHD genotyping obtained in this study could enable this technique to be offered on a routine basis for the management of RhD-negative patients during the first trimester of pregnancy.