Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 54
Filtrer
1.
Workplace Health Saf ; 70(4): 207-219, 2022 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34915786

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between noise exposure, selected health conditions, and well-being among nurses. METHODS: A secondary analysis was performed on data obtained from 3,818 U.S. nurses who responded to a survey regarding noise exposure, health conditions, stress, professional quality of life, and workplace support. FINDINGS: Those who reported high noise exposure reported more health conditions, higher stress and burnout scores, and lower supportive environments. High noise exposure was significantly associated with lower professional quality of life. CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Noise may impact the health and quality of professional life of nurses. Occupational health nurses should advocate for the regular monitoring of nurses' exposure to hazardous noise at work, compare it to OSHA permissible levels, and collaborate with the occupational health team to ensure safe noise levels are maintained. Occupational health nurses should advocate for expanded research on effects of noise on health.


Sujet(s)
Épuisement professionnel , Infirmières et infirmiers , Études transversales , Humains , Satisfaction professionnelle , Qualité de vie , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Lieu de travail
2.
Res Nurs Health ; 33(6): 528-38, 2010 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21053386

RÉSUMÉ

Farmers experience higher rates of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) than workers in most other industries. We developed a model of farmers' use of hearing protection, and tested it with a random sample (n = 532) of farmers from the upper Midwest. Barriers to using hearing protection (e.g., difficulty communicating; OR = .44, p < .003) were negatively related to use. Greater access/availability of hearing protectors (OR = 1.75, p < .010) and male gender (OR = .43, p < .019) were positively related to use. The model correctly predicted use of hearing protection for 74% of the cases. Overall, farmers demonstrated low hearing protector use, and results were similar to those from previous studies of non-farm workers. Findings from this study will be useful in designing interventions to increase farmers' hearing protector use and decrease their rates of NIHL.


Sujet(s)
Maladies des agriculteurs/prévention et contrôle , Attitude envers la santé , Dispositifs de protection des oreilles/statistiques et données numériques , Surdité due au bruit/prévention et contrôle , Autosoins , Adulte , Maladies des agriculteurs/épidémiologie , Analyse de variance , Études transversales , Dispositifs de protection des oreilles/effets indésirables , Dispositifs de protection des oreilles/ressources et distribution , Femelle , Comportement en matière de santé , Enquêtes sur les soins de santé , Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé , Surdité due au bruit/épidémiologie , Humains , Modèles linéaires , Modèles logistiques , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , États du Centre-Ouest des États-Unis/épidémiologie , Modèles psychologiques , Valeur prédictive des tests , Autosoins/instrumentation , Autosoins/psychologie , Autosoins/statistiques et données numériques , Auto-efficacité , Soutien social
3.
Comput Nurs ; 19(4): 152-60; quiz 161-3, 2001.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11477739

RÉSUMÉ

Tailoring of health-related messages is effective in motivating behavior change. However, planning, designing, and implementing a tailored health promotion program can be a challenge. This article describes the process of creating a tailored multimedia program for presentation via computer to promote factory workers' use of hearing-protection devices to prevent noise-induced hearing loss. The creation process was segmented into 5 phases: 1) determination of program content; 2) creation of overall program design, including live action and still video and addition of sound and graphics; 3) development and integration of tailoring pathways into the final intervention; 4) development of a database and participant handouts; and 5) pilot testing of the intervention program. The approach used in this research program can serve as a prototype for future development of computerized multimedia health promotion interventions and can assist others in the effective use of this medium.


Sujet(s)
Enseignement assisté par ordinateur/méthodes , Dispositifs de protection des oreilles , Éducation pour la santé/organisation et administration , Surdité due au bruit/prévention et contrôle , Multimédia , Maladies professionnelles/prévention et contrôle , Santé au travail , Algorithmes , Arbres de décision , Surdité due au bruit/étiologie , Humains , Évaluation des besoins , Maladies professionnelles/étiologie , Projets pilotes , Techniques de planification , Enregistrement sur bande vidéo
6.
AAOHN J ; 49(9): 422-8, 2001 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11760505

RÉSUMÉ

Information is limited about the effects of the availability of over the counter medicines (OTCs) at a worksite on workers' ability to remain at work and the effect on health care utilization. The purpose of this preliminary study was to assess workers' perceptions related to the benefits of having a nurse directed over the counter medication dispensing system (OTCMS) at an automotive manufacturing plant. Fifty-six percent of 257 randomly selected workers who participated in semistructured interviews indicated they used OTCs as the first intervention when at home, and 88% had obtained OTCs from the plant's medical department. The workers were overwhelmingly positive about having an OTCMS available at their worksite. Eighty-nine percent indicated that having OTCs available from the occupational health nurse made it possible for them to stay at work and complete their shift. Not only did the workers find the OTCMS to be an asset in their worksite, but they also highly recommended having an OTCMS available in work settings that do not presently have one in place.


Sujet(s)
Comportement du consommateur , Médicaments sans ordonnance , Soins infirmiers en santé du travail , Services de médecine du travail , Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Services de médecine du travail/statistiques et données numériques , Évaluation de programme
7.
J Nurs Meas ; 8(2): 105-16, 2000.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11227578

RÉSUMÉ

This study replicated the factor model for the Reduced Laffrey Health Conception Scale (RLHCS), which was originally developed by Laffrey (1986) and reduced by Lusk, Kerr, and Baer (1995). Two independent samples of construction workers (n = 697 and n = 510) were used. The samples were predominately Caucasian males (over 97%), with mean ages of 35 and 38 years, respectively. Principal components factor analysis with direct oblimin rotation and structural equation modeling were used to replicate factors and to test the equality of the three observed covariance matrices (factory workers and two groups of construction workers), respectively. Results replicated the two-factor structure (clinical health and overall wellness) found in the earlier study with factory workers (Lusk et al., 1995) and demonstrated factor invariance across different samples.


Sujet(s)
Attitude envers la santé , Recherche en soins infirmiers/méthodes , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Adulte , Analyse statistique factorielle , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , États du Centre-Ouest des États-Unis , Reproductibilité des résultats
9.
Am J Health Promot ; 13(4): 219-27, 1999.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10351852

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Consistent use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) decreases noise-induced hearing loss, however, many workers do not use them consistently. Past research has supported the need to use a conceptual framework to understand behaviors and guide intervention programs; however, few reports have specified a process to translate a conceptual model into an intervention. PURPOSE: The strongest predictors from the Health Promotion Model were used to design a training program to increase HPD use among construction workers. SUBJECTS/SETTING: Carpenters (n = 118), operating engineers (n = 109), and plumber/pipefitters (n = 129) in the Midwest were recruited to participate in the study. DESIGN: Written questionnaires including scales measuring the components of the Health Promotion Model were completed in classroom settings at worker trade group meetings. MEASURES: All items from scales predicting HPD use were reviewed to determine the basis for the content of a program to promote the use of HPDs. Three selection criteria were developed: (1) correlation with use of hearing protection (at least .20), (2) amenability to change, and (3) room for improvement (mean score not at ceiling). RESULTS: Linear regression and Pearson's correlation were used to assess the components of the model as predictors of HPD use. Five predictors had statistically significant regression coefficients: perceived noise exposure, self-efficacy, value of use, barriers to use, and modeling of use of hearing protection. Using items meeting the selection criteria, a 20-minute videotape with written handouts was developed as the core of an intervention. A clearly defined practice session was also incorporated in the training intervention. CONCLUSION: Determining salient factors for worker populations and specific protective equipment prior to designing an intervention is essential. These predictors provided the basis for a training program that addressed the specific needs of construction workers. Results of tests of the effectiveness of the program will be available in the near future.


Sujet(s)
Dispositifs de protection des oreilles , Comportement en matière de santé , Promotion de la santé , Modèles de soins infirmiers , Santé au travail , Adulte , Ingénierie , Femelle , Humains , Modèles linéaires , Mâle , États du Centre-Ouest des États-Unis , Génie sanitaire , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Lieu de travail
11.
AAOHN J ; 47(1): 22-30, 1999 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10205372

RÉSUMÉ

This report presents data exploring the relationship between perceived psychological stress and several variables implicated in the etiology of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders (UECTDs). The sample was 354 workers from three different manufacturing companies. The primary job exposure for the subjects was that they were engaged in jobs that involved repetitious movements of the upper extremities, primarily of the hands and arms. Data collection included a detailed health history, a comprehensive physical examination of the upper extremities, limited electrodiagnostic testing, Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale, Karasek's Job Content Questionnaire, demographic information, and a measurement of repetition. Descriptive analyses, analysis of variance, correlational analyses, and multiple linear regression were used to examine the data. Perceived stress, as measured in this study, was only weakly associated with repetition, job dissatisfaction, and subjective complaints related to UECTDs. In addition, factors generally accepted as related to UECTDs (e.g., repetition, female gender, hormonal influences, and existing medical conditions) were not robust predictors of perceived stress. The major limitation is related to the measurement of perceived psychological stress. Like most psychosocial phenomena, perceived stress is a complex construct, one that is difficult to measure and correlate with health outcomes. Further research is necessary to examine what role, if any, perceived stress may have in the etiology of UECTDs.


Sujet(s)
Lésions par microtraumatismes répétés/étiologie , Lésions par microtraumatismes répétés/psychologie , Maladies professionnelles/étiologie , Maladies professionnelles/psychologie , Stress psychologique/complications , Adulte , Lésions par microtraumatismes répétés/diagnostic , Lésions par microtraumatismes répétés/soins infirmiers , Femelle , Humains , Contrôle interne-externe , Satisfaction professionnelle , Modèles linéaires , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Maladies professionnelles/diagnostic , Maladies professionnelles/soins infirmiers , Soins infirmiers en santé du travail , Facteurs de risque
13.
Hum Factors ; 41(3): 487-94, 1999 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10665215

RÉSUMÉ

In this project we tested the effectiveness of a theory-based intervention (video, pamphlets, and guided practice session) to increase the use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) among Midwestern construction workers and a national group of plumber/pipefitter trainers. Posttest measures were collected 10-12 months following this intervention. Pender's Health Promotion Model (1987) provided the conceptual basis for development of the training program. A total of 837 high-noise-exposed workers were included in the analysis: 652 regional Midwestern construction workers and 185 national plumber/pipefitter trainers. Effectiveness of the intervention was determined through the sequence of analyses recommended by Braver and Braver (1988) for the Solomon Four-Group Design. Analysis of variance and covariance of postintervention use and intention to use HPDs and a meta-analytic test were done. These analyses indicated that the intervention significantly increased use of HPDs but had no effect on intention to use HPDs in the future. Pretesting had no effect on use. Actual or potential applications of this research include guidance in the development of successful theory-based interventions to increase use of HPDs.


Sujet(s)
Dispositifs de protection des oreilles/statistiques et données numériques , Promotion de la santé , Surdité due au bruit/prévention et contrôle , Bruit au travail , Maladies professionnelles/prévention et contrôle , Adulte , Interprétation statistique de données , Études de suivi , Humains , Mâle , Professions , Facteurs temps
15.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J ; 59(7): 466-70, 1998 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9697294

RÉSUMÉ

The purpose of this study was to describe construction workers' use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) and determine their perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss. Operating engineers, carpenters, and plumbers/pipe fitters in the Midwest (n = 400) completed a written questionnaire regarding their use of HPDs and their perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss. Subjects were recruited through their trade union groups. Mean reported use of HPDs and mean perceived noise exposure were compared across trade groups. Bivariate and multivariate analysis techniques were used to assess relationships between use of HPDs and trade category, education, age, years of employment, noise exposure, and hearing loss. Bivariate analyses identified significant differences in mean use of HPDs by age, years of employment, and trade group. Multivariate logistic regression assessing the independent effects of these variables found significant differences only by trade group. Results indicate a need for significant improvement in all three trade groups' use of HPDs, and suggest a need to consider use and exposure levels, demographics, and trade group membership in designing hearing conservation programs.


Sujet(s)
Surdité/prévention et contrôle , Dispositifs de protection des oreilles/statistiques et données numériques , Bruit au travail/effets indésirables , Exposition professionnelle/prévention et contrôle , Adulte , Surdité/épidémiologie , Surdité/étiologie , Femelle , Humains , Modèles logistiques , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , États du Centre-Ouest des États-Unis/épidémiologie , Analyse multifactorielle , Bruit au travail/statistiques et données numériques , Exposition professionnelle/statistiques et données numériques , Odds ratio
18.
AAOHN J ; 45(8): 397-408; quiz 409-10, 1997 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9341314

RÉSUMÉ

1. Over 30 million workers are exposed to hazardous noise on the worksite. Continual exposure to high noise levels damages and destroys hearing cells within the ear, making noise induced hearing loss an irreversible impairment. 2. Hearing conservation programs are required by law for workers in industrial settings where noise exposures equal or exceed 85 dB(A). Many workers, such as those in construction and agricultural industries, are not covered by these programs. 3. Reducing noise through engineering or administrative controls is the first line of defense. When this is not sufficient, two types of personal hearing protection devices are available: passive hearing protection devices such as ear muffs, canal caps, and ear plugs, which reduce noise mechanically; and active noise reduction devices, which electronically cancel sound waves at the ear. 4. The most effective hearing protection devices are those with which the worker is most comfortable will use 100% of the time. The occupational health nurse has a major role in promoting increased use of hearing protection devices through continued contact with workers, administrators, and safety personnel.


Sujet(s)
Surdité due au bruit/prévention et contrôle , Maladies professionnelles/prévention et contrôle , Dispositifs de protection des oreilles , Surdité due au bruit/diagnostic , Surdité due au bruit/physiopathologie , Humains , Maladies professionnelles/diagnostic , Maladies professionnelles/physiopathologie , Soins infirmiers en santé du travail , États-Unis , Occupational Safety and Health Administration (USA)
20.
Res Nurs Health ; 20(3): 183-94, 1997 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9179173

RÉSUMÉ

The health promotion model (HPM) was tested as a causal model of construction workers' use of hearing protection (N = 359). Theoretical and exploratory models fit well, with the theoretical model accounting for 36.3% of variance and the exploratory model accounting for 50.6% of variance in hearing protection use. Value of use (benefits of using hearing protection), barriers to use, and self-efficacy were significant predictors in both the theoretical and exploratory models, but perceived health status was a predictor only in the theoretical model. In the exploratory model, where modifying factors were allowed direct relationships with use of hearing protection, two modifying factors--noise exposure and interpersonal influences-modeling--were significant predictors. Results of this test of the HPM are consistent with the revised HPM (Pender, 1996). There were significant direct paths from modifying factors to behaviour. Use of hearing protection was best predicted by behavior-specific predictors, such as perceived barriers to use of hearing protection. Results support the use of the HPM to predict use of hearing protection.


Sujet(s)
Dispositifs de protection des oreilles , Promotion de la santé , Surdité due au bruit/prévention et contrôle , Modèles de soins infirmiers , Modèles psychologiques , Maladies professionnelles/prévention et contrôle , Adulte , Analyse de variance , Analyse statistique factorielle , Femelle , Comportement en matière de santé , Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé , Humains , Mâle , Valeur prédictive des tests , Reproductibilité des résultats , Enquêtes et questionnaires
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE