From barriers to opportunities from COVID-19 pandemic: Stakeholder perspectives on cervical cancer screening programs in LMICs of the Asia-Pacific region.

Cervical cancer is preventable, yet it remains the fourth most common cancer in women globally. The highest incidence and mortality occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where over 70% of women have never been screened, and 58% of the cases are in Asia. While the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions to cervical screening programs, particularly for LMICs, there were opportunities that emerged from the pandemic that were enablers of program recovery. Stakeholders played key roles in materialising strategy into implementation. Therefore, in this study, we examined the barriers and facilitators to implementing recovery strategies from the stakeholders' perspectives. We interviewed fifteen stakeholders from nine LMICs in the Asia-Pacific region directly involved in the implementation of the cervical screening program. A total of 23 barriers and 21 facilitators were identified, of which seven barriers and nine facilitators related directly to the pandemic. Pandemic-related barriers included movement restrictions, resource diversion, cancelled campaigns and training, deprioritisation of HPV prevention efforts, and a reduced health workforce. Stakeholders concurred that most barriers had predated the pandemic and remained as the pandemic eased. Conversely, the pandemic introduced facilitators such as means for targeted campaigns, improved understanding of viruses, accessible training with online platforms, better PCR testing capabilities, a shift in the government's position towards preventive health services, and openness to HPV testing and self-swabs. The emerging facilitators offered opportunities to address some of the persistent barriers, such as limited cervical cancer awareness and insufficient healthcare providers in screening programs. However, effective implementation of these emerging facilitators requires improved communication and collaboration between policymakers and implementers to accelerate the recovery of screening programs in LMICs. Further work is necessary to align emerging facilitators with the health system goals and resource settings of each country in turning these opportunities into actions.

Human papillomavirus prevalence among Australian men aged 18-35 years in 2015-2018 according to vaccination status and sexual preference.

BACKGROUND: Australia introduced a national HPV vaccination program for girls in 2007 and boys in 2013, achieving high coverage in both populations. We assessed HPV prevalence among men who have sex with women (MSW) and men who have sex with men (MSM) aged 18-35 years and examined program effects by vaccination status. METHODS: Men recruited between 2015-2018 self-collected a penile or intra-anal swab for HPV genotyping. HPV vaccination status was confirmed with the National Register. HPV prevalence was examined by age groups and vaccination status. RESULTS: Of 1,625 men included (median age 27 years; IQR [23-30]), 231 (14.2%) were vaccinated, and 1,370 (84.3%) were unvaccinated. Among 984 MSW, the prevalence of quadrivalent vaccine-targeted HPV types (6,11,16,18) was 10.6% (95%CI: 8.7-12.8) in unvaccinated and 10.7% (5.7-19.3%) in vaccinated men (p=0.96). Prevalence was lowest in the youngest age groups regardless of vaccination status. Among MSM, quadrivalent HPV type prevalence was 40.3% (36.0-44.8%) in unvaccinated and 29.9% (23.1-37.8%) in vaccinated men (p=0.02). In unvaccinated MSM, prevalence was high regardless of age, whereas among vaccinated MSM, prevalence was lowest in the youngest age-group (p=0.001). Among those with confirmed doses, quadrivalent HPV types were detected in 0% (0-7.7%; n=46) of men who had their first dose at 13-19 years and 37.2% (27.5-47.8%; n=94) of those who received their first dose at 20 years or older. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates the importance of universal adolescent HPV vaccination to ensure MSM receive the same benefits as MSW.

Predicting disease recurrence in patients with endometriosis: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Despite surgical and pharmacological interventions, endometriosis can recur. Reliable information regarding risk of recurrence following a first diagnosis is scant. The aim of this study was to examine clinical and survey data in the setting of disease recurrence to identify predictors of risk of endometriosis recurrence. METHODS: This observational study reviewed data from 794 patients having surgery for pelvic pain or endometriosis. Patients were stratified into two analytic groups based on self-reported or surgically confirmed recurrent endometriosis. Statistical analyses included univariate, followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors of recurrence, with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regularisation. Risk-calibrated Supersparse Linear Integer Models (RiskSLIM) and survival analyses (with Lasso) were undertaken to identify predictive features of recurrence. RESULTS: Several significant features were repeatedly identified in association with recurrence, including adhesions, high rASRM score, deep disease, bowel lesions, adenomyosis, emergency room attendance for pelvic pain, younger age at menarche, higher gravidity, high blood pressure and older age. In the surgically confirmed group, with a score of 5, the RiskSLIM method was able to predict the risk of recurrence (compared to a single diagnosis) at 95.3% and included adenomyosis and adhesions in the model. Survival analysis further highlighted bowel lesions, adhesions and adenomyosis. CONCLUSIONS: Following an initial diagnosis of endometriosis, clinical decision-making regarding disease management should take into consideration the presence of bowel lesions, adhesions and adenomyosis, which increase the risk of endometriosis recurrence.

Coverage of cervical cancer prevention interventions among people in Australia who inject drugs.

BACKGROUND: The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and regular (i.e., every five years) cervical screening are essential to prevent cervical cancer. Australia has high overall coverage of both interventions but little is known about coverage among people who inject drugs. and known barriers to preventive care among this population may extend to cervical cancer control measures. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2023 Illicit Drug Reporting System interviews, in which people who regularly inject drugs participated. The sample was restricted to people with a cervix, with participants aged 25-74 years eligible for the National Cervical Screening Program and participants born after 1980 eligible for HPV vaccination. Age-standardised prevalence ratios were used to compare coverage among this sample to the Australian general population; other results were summarised descriptively. FINDINGS: Among participants eligible for screening (n = 243), most (96.7 %) reported lifetime uptake, while 70.2 % had been screened during the past five years, which was similar to the general population (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.14, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.31). Among those never or overdue for screening (n = 57), one third (31.7 %) were aware that self-sampling is available and barriers to screening varied, with similar numbers reporting personal (e.g., 'I didn't know I needed to'), logistical (e.g., 'I don't have time'), and test-related reasons (e.g., 'the test is uncomfortable/painful'). Among participants eligible for HPV vaccination (n = 99), coverage was 27.2 %, 38 % lower than the general population (PR: 0.62, 95 % CI: 0.39-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical screening coverage among this sample of people who inject drugs was similar to the Australian population. Health promotion messaging that focuses on the availability of self-sampling and the importance of regular screening may improve coverage among those overdue for screening. HPV vaccination was lower than the general population, warranting targeted efforts to offer the vaccine to eligible people who inject drugs.

DNA methylation at individual CpG-sites of EPB41L3, HTERT and FAM19A4 are useful for detection of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or worse: Analysis of individual CpG-sites outperforms averaging.

Global methylation analysis of gene promoters is promising for detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) in high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women. However, diagnostic performance of methylation data at individual CpG-sites is limited. We explored methylation for predicting HSIL+ in self- and clinician-collected samples from Papua New Guinea. Methylation of EPB41L3 (1-6 CpG-sites), hTERT (1-10 CpG-sites) and FAM19A4 (1-5 CpG-sites) was assessed through pyrosequencing from 44 HPV+ samples (4 cancers, 19 HSIL, 4 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), 17 normal). New primers were designed for FAM19A4 directed to the first exon region not explored previously. In clinician-collected samples, methylation at CpG-sites 4 and 5 of EPB41L3 were the best HSIL predictors (AUC >0.83) and CpG-site 4 for cancer (0.925). Combination of EPB41L3 sites 2/4 plus FAM19A4 site 1 were the best HSIL+ markers [100% sensitivity, 63.2% specificity]. Methylation at CpG-site 5 of FAM19A4 was the best HSIL predictor (0.67) in self-collected samples, and CpG-sites 1 and 3 of FAM19A4 for cancer (0.77). Combined, FAM19A4 site 1 plus HPV 16/18 detection yielded sensitivity of 82.6% and specificity of 61.9%. In conclusion, methylation at individual CpG-sites of EPB41L3 and FAM19A4 outperformed global analysis and improved HSIL+ detection, warranting further investigation.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between Mycoplasma genitalium and Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).

BACKGROUND: Differences in opinion concerning the contribution of M. genitalium to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has resulted in inconsistencies across global testing and treatment guidelines. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between M. genitalium and PID and M. genitalium positivity within PID cases to provide a contemporary evidence base to inform clinical practice (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022382156). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Medline and Web of Science were searched to Dec 1, 2023 for studies that assessed women for PID using established clinical criteria and used nucleic acid amplification tests to detect M. genitalium. We calculated summary estimates of the 1) association of M. genitalium with PID (pooled odds ratio [OR]) and 2) proportion of PID cases with M. genitalium detected (pooled M. genitalium positivity in PID), using random-effects meta-analyses, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included: 10 estimated M. genitalium association with PID, and 19 estimated M. genitalium positivity in PID. M. genitalium infection was significantly associated with PID (pooled OR=1.67 [95%CI: 1.24-2.24]). The pooled positivity of M. genitalium in PID was 10.3% [95%CI: 5.63-15.99]. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses showed that M. genitalium positivity in PID was highest in the Americas, in studies conducted in both inpatient and outpatient clinic settings, and in populations at high risk of sexually transmitted infections. CONCLUSIONS: M. genitalium was associated with a 67% increase in odds of PID and was detected in about one in ten clinical diagnoses of PID. These data support testing women for M. genitalium at initial PID diagnosis.

Performance of CADM1, MAL and miR124-2 methylation as triage markers for early detection of cervical cancer in self-collected and clinician-collected samples: an exploratory observational study in Papua New Guinea.

OBJECTIVE: WHO recommends human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical screening, with triage of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) positive women. However, there are limitations to effective triage for low-resource, high-burden settings, such as Papua New Guinea. In this exploratory study, we assessed the performance of host methylation as triage tools for predicting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in self-collected and clinician-collected samples. DESIGN: Exploratory observational study. SETTING: Provincial hospital, same-day cervical screen-and-treat trial, Papua New Guinea. PARTICIPANTS: 44 hrHPV+women, with paired self/clinician-collected samples (4 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 19 HSIL, 4 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 17 normal). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Methylation levels of CADM1, MAL and miR124-2 analysed by methylation-specific PCRs against the clinical endpoint of HSIL or SCC (HSIL+) measured using liquid-based-cytology/p16-Ki67 stain. RESULTS: In clinician-collected samples, MAL and miR124-2 methylation levels were significantly higher with increasing grade of disease (p=0.0046 and p<0.0015, respectively). miR124-2 was the best predictor of HSIL (area under the curve, AUC 0.819) while MAL of SCC (AUC 0.856). In self-collected samples, MAL best predicted HSIL (AUC 0.595) while miR124-2 SCC (AUC 0.812). Combined miR124-2/MAL methylation yielded sensitivity and specificity for HSIL+ of 90.5% (95% CI 69.6% to 98.8%) and 70% (95% CI 45.7% to 88.1%), respectively, in clinician-collected samples, and 81.8% (95% CI 59.7% to 94.8%) and 47.6% (95% CI 25.7% to 70.2%), respectively, in self-collected samples. miR124-2/MAL plus HPV16/HPV18 improved sensitivity for HSIL+ (95.2%, 95% CI 76.2% to 99.9%) but decreased specificity (55.0%, 95% CI 31.5% to 76.9%). CONCLUSION: miR124-2/MAL methylation is a potential triage strategy for the detection of HSIL/SCC in low-income and middle-income country.

Seegene Anyplex II assays detect HPV consistently using DNA extracts from different extraction methods.

The efficiency of PCR-based diagnostic assays can be impacted by the quality of DNA template, and anal samples can be particularly problematic due to the presence of faecal contaminants. Here, we compared the Quick-DNA Viral Kit (Zymo, Zymo Research, CA) and MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume Kit (MP96, Roche) for use of the Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 assay (Anyplex28, Seegene) with anal samples. A total of 94 anal samples extracted using the MP96 and Zymo kits were tested via the Anyplex28, which detects high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV, Panel A) and low-risk (LR-HPV, Panel B) HPV types. Testing the HR-HPV types (Panel A), 86 (91.5%) MP96 and 84 (89.4%) Zymo samples were deemed assessable. Overall agreement between the two methods was 87/94 (92.6%, 95% CI: 85.3-97.0) with the Kappa value of 0.678 (0.5-0.9). Of the 87 assessable samples, 50 (57.5%) were concordant, 34 (39.1%) partially concordant, and 10 (11.5%)discordant. In conclusion, the Anyplex28 produces comparable HPV genotyping results when using DNA extracts from either of these two methods.

Evaluation of Seegene Anyplex II Performance for Detection of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Cervical Cancer Specimens.

CONTEXT.­: Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues may identify the cause of lesions and has value for the development of new diagnostic assays and epidemiologic studies. Seegene Anyplex II assays are widely used for HPV screening, but their performance using FFPE samples has not been fully explored. OBJECTIVE.­: To validate Anyplex II HPV HR Detection (Anyplex II, Seegene) using FFPE samples. DESIGN.­: We used 248 stored DNA extracts from cervical cancer FFPE samples collected during 2005-2015 that tested HPV positive using the RHA kit HPV SPF10-LiPA25, v1 (SPF10, Labo Biomedical Products) HPV genotyping assay, manufacturer-validated for FFPE samples. RESULTS.­: Of the selected 248 samples, 243 were used in our analysis. Consistent with SPF10 genotyping results, Anyplex II detected all 12 oncogenic types and had an overall HPV detection rate of 86.4% (210 of 243 samples). Anyplex II and SPF10 showed very high agreement for the detection of the 2 most important oncogenic genotypes: HPV 16 (219 of 226; 96.9%; 95% CI, 93.7-98.75) and HPV 18 (221 of 226; 97.8%; 95% CI, 94.9-99.3). CONCLUSIONS.­: Overall results showed that both platforms produced comparable HPV genotyping results, indicating the suitability of Anyplex II for FFPE samples. The Anyplex II assay has the added convenience of being an efficient, single-well semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. Further optimization of Anyplex II may enhance its performance using FFPE samples by improving the detection limit.

Development of a touchdown droplet digital PCR assay for the detection and quantitation of human papillomavirus 16 and 18 from self-collected anal samples.

IMPORTANCE: The quantity of the human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with disease outcome. We designed an accurate and precise digital PCR assay for quantitating HPV in anal samples, a sample type that is typically problematic due to the presence of PCR inhibitors.

The early impacts of primary HPV cervical screening implementation in Australia on the pathology sector: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The transition of Australia's National Cervical Screening Program from cytology to a molecular test for human papillomavirus (HPV) (locally referred to as the 'Renewal'), including a longer five-year interval and older age at commencement, significantly impacted all sectors of program delivery. The Renewal had major implications for the roles and requirements of pathology laboratories providing services for the Program. This study aimed to understand the early impacts of the Renewal and its implementation on the pathology sector. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with key stakeholders (N = 49) involved in the STakeholder Opinions of Renewal Implementation and Experiences Study (STORIES), 11-20 months after the program transition. A subset of interviews (N = 24) that discussed the pathology sector were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four overarching themes were identified: implementation enablers, challenges, missed opportunities, and possible improvements. Participants believed that the decision to transition to primary HPV screening was highly acceptable and evidence-based, but faced challenges due to impacts on laboratory infrastructure, resources, staffing, and finances. These challenges were compounded by unfamiliarity with new information technology (IT) systems and the new National Cancer Screening Register ('Register') not being fully functional by the date of the program transition. The limited availability of self-collection and lack of standardised fields in pathology forms were identified as missed opportunities to improve equity in the Program. To improve implementation processes, participants suggested increased pathology sector involvement in planning was needed, along with more timely and transparent communication from the Government, and clearer clinical management guidelines. CONCLUSION: The transition to primary HPV screening had a significant and multifaceted impact on the Australian pathology sector reflecting the magnitude and complexity of the Renewal. Strategies to support the pathology sector through effective change management, clear, timely, and transparent communication, as well as adequate funding sources will be critical for other countries planning to transition cervical screening programs.

The recovery strategies to support cervical cancer elimination in lower-and middle-income countries (LMICs) following COVID-19 disruptions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the existing challenges to achieving the WHO target of eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem by working towards the target of fewer than four cases per 100 000 women. We reviewed the literature to identify potential recovery strategies to support cervical cancer prevention programs in lower-and middle-income countries (LMICs) following COVID-19 disruptions and the extent to which strategies have been implemented. Utilising the WHO health systems framework, we mapped these recovery strategies against the six building blocks to examine their reach across the health system. Most recovery strategies were focused on service delivery, while leadership and governance played a pivotal role in the continuity of cervical cancer prevention programs during the pandemic. Leadership and governance were the drivers for outcomes in the building blocks of health information systems, financing and critical support in operationalising service delivery strategies. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic with strained health resources and economies, stakeholders would significantly influence the coverage and sustainability of cervical cancer prevention programs. The support from multisectoral stakeholders would accelerate the recovery of cervical cancer prevention programs. To achieve the WHO target by 2030, we call for future studies to understand the barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of stakeholders in order to support the decision-making processes and information required to implement recovery strategies in LMICs.

No woman left behind: achieving cervical cancer elimination among women living with HIV.

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in women of reproductive age globally. The burden of this disease is highest in low-income and middle-income countries, especially among women living with HIV. In 2018, WHO launched a global strategy to accelerate cervical cancer elimination through rapid scale-up of prophylactic vaccination, cervical screening, and treatment of precancers and cancers. This initiative was key in raising a call for action to address the stark global disparities in cervical cancer burden. However, achieving elimination of cervical cancer among women with HIV requires consideration of biological and social issues affecting this population. This Position Paper shows specific challenges and uncertainties on the way to cervical cancer elimination for women living with HIV and highlights the scarcity of evidence for the effect of interventions in this population. We argue that reaching equity of outcomes for women with HIV will require substantial advances in approaches to HPV vaccination and improved understanding of the long-term effectiveness of HPV vaccines in settings with high HIV burden cervical cancer, just as HIV, is affected by social and structural factors such as poverty, stigma, and gender discrimination, that place the elimination strategy at risk. Global efforts must, therefore, be galvanised to ensure women living with HIV have optimised interventions, given their substantial risk of this preventable malignancy.

Implementation of Australia's primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical screening program: The STakeholders Opinions of Renewal Implementation and Experiences Study.

In this study, we aimed to document stakeholders' experiences of implementing Australia's renewed National Cervical Screening Program. In December 2017, the program changed from 2nd yearly cytology for 20-69 year olds to 5 yearly human papillomavirus (HPV) screening for women 25-74 years. We undertook semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders including government, program administrators, register staff, clinicians and health care workers, non-government organisations, professional bodies, and pathology laboratories from across Australia between Nov 2018 - Aug 2019. Response rate to emailed invitations was 49/85 (58%). We used Proctor et al's (2011) implementation outcomes framework to guide our questions and thematic analysis. We found that stakeholders were evenly divided over whether implementation was successful. There was strong support for change, but concern over aspects of the implementation. There was some frustration related to the delayed start, timeliness of communication and education, shortcomings in change management, lack of inclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in planning and implementation, failure to make self-collection widely available, and delays in the National Cancer Screening Register. Barriers centred around a perceived failure to appreciate the enormity of the change and register build, and consequent failure to resource, project manage and communicate effectively. Facilitators included the good will and dedication of stakeholders, strong evidence base for change and the support of jurisdictions during the delay. We documented substantial implementation challenges, offering learnings for other countries transitioning to HPV screening. Sufficient planning, significant and transparent engagement and communication with stakeholders, and change management are critical.

Quantitation of Mycoplasma genitalium using droplet digital PCR.

Mycoplasma genitalium is a sexually transmitted infection with increasing concerns around antimicrobial resistance. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a rapid quantification method with high precision that may be useful for absolute quantitation of bacteria in samples. This study aimed to develop a ddPCR assay for the quantification of M. genitalium. ddPCR targeting the gene mgpB was established and analysed using the QX100 ddPCR system. The assay was evaluated against quantitated DNA standards, and then in comparison to an established quantitative PCR performed on the Lightcycler 480 II. DNA template of increasing complexity was used, including synthetic double stranded DNA, DNA extracts from laboratory-cultured M. genitalium strains (n = 17) and DNA from M. genitalium-positive clinical samples (n = 21). There was a strong correlation between ddPCR concentration estimates and measured DNA standards (r2 = 0.997), and between ddPCR and qPCR quantitation for different templates (r2 ranging from 0.953 to 0.997). ddPCR reliably detected template in a range from <10 copies per reaction to >104 copies per reaction and demonstrated linearity over dilution series. Concentration estimates by ddPCR were reproducibly less than those determine by qPCR. ddPCR demonstrated precise and reproducible quantitation of M. genitalium with a variety of templates.

gyrA Mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium and Their Contribution to Moxifloxacin Failure: Time for the Next Generation of Resistance-Guided Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Although single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Mycoplasma genitalium parC contribute to fluoroquinolone treatment failure, data are limited for the homologous gene, gyrA. This study investigated the prevalence of gyrA SNPs and their contribution to fluoroquinolone failure. METHODS: Samples from 411 patients (male and female) undergoing treatment for M. genitalium infection (Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, March 2019-February 2020) were analyzed by Sanger sequencing (gyrA and parC). For patients treated with moxifloxacin (n = 194), the association between SNPs and microbiologic treatment outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: The most common parC SNP was G248T/S83I (21.1% of samples), followed by D87N (2.3%). The most common gyrA SNP was G285A/M95I (7.1%). Dual parC/gyrA SNPs were found in 8.6% of cases. One third of infections harboring parC G248T/S83I SNP had a concurrent SNP in gyrA conferring M95I. SNPs in gyrA cooccurred with parC S83I variations. Treatment failure was higher in patients with parC S83I/gyrA dual SNPs when compared with infections with single S83I SNP alone from analysis of (1) 194 cases in this study (81.2% vs 45.8%, P = .047), and (2) pooled analysis of a larger population of 535 cases (80.6% vs 43.2%; P = .0027), indicating a strong additive effect. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with parC S83I SNP alone, M. genitalium infections with dual mutations affecting parC/gyrA had twice the likelihood of failing moxifloxacin. Although antimicrobial resistance varies by region globally, these data indicate that gyrA should be considered as a target for future resistance assays in Australasia. We propose a strategy for the next generation of resistance-guided therapy incorporating parC and gyrA testing.

Performance of Human Papillomavirus Attribution Algorithms to Predict Causative Genotypes in Anal High-Grade Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Gay and bisexual men (GBM) are at increased risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). Understanding the fractions of HSILs attributable to HPV genotypes is important to inform potential impacts of screening and vaccination strategies. However, multiple infections are common, making attribution of causative types difficult. Algorithms developed for predicting HSIL-causative genotype fractions have never been compared with a reference standard in GBM. METHOD: Samples were from the Study of the Prevention of Anal Cancer. Baseline HPV genotypes detected in anal swab samples (160 participants) were compared with HPV genotypes in anal HSILs (222 lesions) determined by laser capture microdissection (LCM). Five algorithms were compared: proportional, hierarchical, maximum, minimum, and maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS: All algorithms predicted HPV-16 as the most common HSIL-causative genotype, and proportions differed from LCM detection (37.8%) by algorithm (with differences of -6.1%, +20.9%, -20.4%, +2.9%, and +2.2% respectively). Fractions predicted using the proportional method showed a strong positive correlation with LCM, overall (R = 0.73 and P = .002), and by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status (HIV positive, R = 0.74 and P = .001; HIV-negative, R = 0.68 and P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Algorithms produced a range of inaccurate estimates of HSIL attribution, with the proportional algorithm performing best. The high occurrence of multiple HPV infections means that these algorithms may be of limited use in GBM.

Comparison of Seegene AnyPlexTM II STI-7e with standard-of-care diagnostic methods for the detection of Mycoplasma genitalium, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis.

The AnyPlexTM II STI-7e panel assay (Seegene) detects seven sexually transmitted organisms (Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, M. hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, U. parvum, and Trichomonas vaginalis). This study compared the performance of AnyPlexTM II STI-7e with standard-of-care diagnostic methods. Samples (cervical or vaginal swabs, or urine) from 1330 women were tested on standard-of-care assays; 83/1318 (6.3%) tested positive for M. genitalium (ResistancePlus® MG), 99/1317 (7.5%) positive for C. trachomatis and 11/1316 (0.8%) positive for N. gonorrhoeae (Hologic® Aptima Combo 2®), and 6/689 (0.9%) positive for T. vaginalis (wet mount microscopy). AnyPlexTM II STI-7e had good agreement for the detection of M. genitalium [Cohen's kappa of 0.80, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.74-0.87] and C. trachomatis (kappa of 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.92), with positive and negative % agreement >96% for both infections. There was lower agreement for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae (kappa of 0.37, 95%CI 0.19-0.55) and T. vaginalis (kappa of 0.521, 95%CI 0.25-0.80). In summary, the test performed well in this comparison for M. genitalium and C. trachomatis detection, but results were less conclusive for N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis due to low prevalence in the population.

Older women testing positive for HPV16/18 on cervical screening and risk of high-grade cervical abnormality.

In Australia's HPV-based cervical screening program, we previously showed that risk of histological high-grade abnormality at 1 year post screening decreased with age in women with oncogenic HPV. In this study, we followed 878 HPV16/18 positive women aged 55 years and over for up to 3 years post screening test, to determine the proportion with histological high-grade abnormality (HGA, incorporating high-grade squamous intraepithelial abnormality (HSIL), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma) and to correlate risk of HGA with liquid-based cytology result and with prior screening history. HGA was detected in 7.8% at 1 year and 10.0% at 3 years, with no significant difference (P = .136), despite the number of women with follow-up information significantly increasing from 82.9% to 91.0% (P < .0001). The proportion of HPV16/18 positive women with HGA at 3 years was highest in those with an HSIL cytology result (79.0%) and lowest in those with negative cytology (6.2%). Women with an adequate screening history had fewer HGA than such women with inadequate prior screening (6.6% vs 16.0%, P = .001) or with a history of an abnormality (6.6% vs 14.4%, P = .001). HPV16/18 infection in women over 55 years may have a different natural history from that in younger women, in whom HGA are more common after HPV16/18 detection. In HPV-based cervical screening programs, management algorithms for screen-detected abnormalities based on risk stratification should include factors such as age, screening history and index cytology result, so that women receive appropriate investigation and follow-up.

"So, if she wasn't aware of it, then how would everybody else out there be aware of it?"-Key Stakeholder Perspectives on the Initial Implementation of Self-Collection in Australia's Cervical Screening Program: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: In December 2017, the Australian National Cervical Screening Program transitioned from 2-yearly cytology-based to 5-yearly human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical screening, including a vaginal self-collection option. Until July 2022, this option was restricted to under- or never-screened people aged 30 years and older who refused a speculum exam. We investigated the perspectives and experiences of stakeholders involved in, or affected by, the initial implementation of the restricted self-collection pathway. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 49 stakeholders as part of the STakeholder Opinions of Renewal Implementation and Experiences Study. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were thematically analysed and coded to the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Outcomes. RESULTS: Stakeholders viewed the introduction of self-collection as an exciting opportunity to provide under-screened people with an alternative to a speculum examination. Adoption in clinical practice, however, was impacted by a lack of clear communication and promotion to providers, and the limited number of laboratories accredited to process self-collected samples. Primary care providers tasked with communicating and offering self-collection described confusion about the availability, participant eligibility, pathology processes, and clinical management processes for self-collection. Regulatory delay in developing an agreed protocol to approve laboratory processing of self-collected swabs, and consequently initially having one laboratory nationally accredited to process samples, led to missed opportunities and misinformation regarding the pathway's availability. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst the introduction of self-collection was welcomed, clear communication from Government regarding setbacks in implementation and how to overcome these in practice were needed. As Australia moves to a policy of providing everyone eligible for screening the choice of self-collection, wider promotion to providers and eligible people, clarity around pathology processes and the scaling up of test availability, as well as timely education and communication of clinical management practice guidelines, are needed to ensure smoother program delivery in the future. Other countries implementing self-collection policies can learn from the implementation challenges faced by Australia.