Factors Associated With the Decision to Decline Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-stage, ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer and High-risk Scoring on Genomic Assays.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of refusal of chemotherapy ranges from 3% to 19%, but varies widely by patient profile and treatment setting. Using a large national registry, we explore factors significantly associated with the decision to decline chemotherapy in patients with early-stage, HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) despite high risk scoring on multigene sequencing analysis for OncotypeDX (ODX) or MammaPrint (MP), in which the survival benefit of chemotherapy is clear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HR+/HER2- BC and high risk scoring on ODX (score >26) or MP were selected from the National Cancer Database (2004-2017). Only those who refused to get chemotherapy despite their physician's recommendations were included. Univariate frequency and proportion statistics were used to describe the patient cohort. Bivariate Chi-square analysis evaluated the association between refusal of recommended chemotherapy and sociodemographic characteristics. Significant variables (P < .05) were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: N = 43,533 patients were included (88.7% ODX, 11.3% MP). A total of n = 4415 (10.1%) patients declined chemotherapy despite recommendation by the patient's primary oncologist. Age >70 (OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 2.96-4.04, P < .001), black race (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36, P = .01), non-private insurance, lobular carcinoma histology (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.35, P < .001), and tumor grade of I significantly predicted chemotherapy decline. CONCLUSION: Identifying and addressing many of the factors that contribute to under-treatment in minorities is to be key to reducing cancer disparity and improving equity in cancer care and outcome.

Metastasectomy versus radiation of secondary sites in stage IV breast cancer: Analysis from a national cancer registry.

PURPOSE: Locoregional therapy at primary or secondary sites in breast cancer may be associated with improved survival as compared to systemic therapy alone. We explored the sociodemographic and clinicopathologic factors associated with the use of radiation versus surgical resection of metastatic sites (metastasectomy) in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, followed by the associated overall survival. METHODS: We sampled the National Cancer Database for patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, (2010-2017) and described cohort's characteristics using univariate analyses. We identified 5 subgroups based on malignant site involvement: 1. Bone only, 2. Brain only, 3. Liver only, 4. Lung only, and 5. Metastasis involving >1 site. Kaplan-Meier modeling with log-rank testing and multivariate Cox Regression analysis were used to explore differences in overall survival between those that received radiation at secondary sites and those that underwent metastasectomy. RESULTS: N = 22,749patients were included in this analysis. Radiation (81.2%) was used more commonly than metastasectomy (28.8%). Metastasectomy was associated with better median overall survival across all 5 cohorts (p < .001), with the survival benefit being the most pronounced with lung only (OS: 56.9 months; HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p = .032), or liver only (OS: 41.6 months; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.7-1.1, p < .001) metastasis. CONCLUSION: Metastasectomy in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer may be associated with improved overall survival as compared to radiation of secondary lesions, particularly in those with only liver or lung involvement. Prospective randomized controlled trials investigating surgical resection of metastatic sites in patients with breast cancer are warranted.