Evaluation of Patient Characteristics Linked to Major Bleeding Events in Patients Prescribed Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy and lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage than warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Given the lack of data identifying risk factors in patients who bled while on a DOAC, we sought to investigate these characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective chart review was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board and assessed patients who experienced bleeding events while on DOAC therapy from 6/1/2015 to 7/1/2020. Patient characteristics were evaluated, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), renal function, concomitant therapies, and baseline comorbidities. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included for analysis, with a median age of 75.8 years. Most patients were female (51.7%) and 24 (27.6%) had a BMI >30. At time-of-event, 21 patients (24.1%) had acute kidney injury. Thirty-three patients (37.9%) were on concomitant antiplatelet therapy (APT), with 31 (35.6%) on single APT and 2 on dual APT. Pertinent comorbidities included hypertension (74.7%), ischemic cerebrovascular accident (28.7%), thyroid abnormality (23.0%), active cancer (14.9%), and anemia (13.8%). Eleven patients (12.6%) had a prior bleeding event. Most patients were on apixaban (69.0%) for the indication of stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation/flutter (72.4%). FDA-approved dosing was used in most patients (92.0%), and all deviations reflected underdosing. Most bleeding events were defined as major (95.4%), occurred at a critical organ site (72.4%), and developed spontaneously (58.6%). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide insight into characteristics of patients who experience bleeding events while on DOAC therapy. Understanding these potential risk factors may optimize the safe use of these agents.

Virtual Care Team Guided Management of Patients With Heart Failure During Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Scalable and safe approaches for heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization are needed. OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed the safety and effectiveness of a virtual care team guided strategy on GDMT optimization in hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: In a multicenter implementation trial, we allocated 252 hospital encounters in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% to a virtual care team guided strategy (107 encounters among 83 patients) or usual care (145 encounters among 115 patients) across 3 centers in an integrated health system. In the virtual care team group, clinicians received up to 1 daily GDMT optimization suggestion from a physician-pharmacist team. The primary effectiveness outcome was in-hospital change in GDMT optimization score (+2 initiations, +1 dose up-titrations, -1 dose down-titrations, -2 discontinuations summed across classes). In-hospital safety outcomes were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. RESULTS: Among 252 encounters, the mean age was 69 ± 14 years, 85 (34%) were women, 35 (14%) were Black, and 43 (17%) were Hispanic. The virtual care team strategy significantly improved GDMT optimization scores vs usual care (adjusted difference: +1.2; 95% CI: 0.7-1.8; P < 0.001). New initiations (44% vs 23%; absolute difference: +21%; P = 0.001) and net intensifications (44% vs 24%; absolute difference: +20%; P = 0.002) during hospitalization were higher in the virtual care team group, translating to a number needed to intervene of 5 encounters. Overall, 23 (21%) in the virtual care team group and 40 (28%) in usual care experienced 1 or more adverse events (P = 0.30). Acute kidney injury, bradycardia, hypotension, hyperkalemia, and hospital length of stay were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with HFrEF, a virtual care team guided strategy for GDMT optimization was safe and improved GDMT across multiple hospitals in an integrated health system. Virtual teams represent a centralized and scalable approach to optimize GDMT.

Cardiac Safety of Clonidine and Quetiapine in Post-Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Background: Clonidine and quetiapine are frequently used medications in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit (ICU). Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of clonidine compared to quetiapine on cardiac safety outcomes in adult cardiac surgery ICU patients. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective observational analysis at a tertiary care, academic medical center. Results: One hundred and sixty-one cardiac surgery patients who were administered clonidine or quetiapine during their ICU stay were included between June 2015 and May 2017. The major endpoint of this study was a cardiac safety composite of bradycardia, hypotension, and QTc prolongation. Minor endpoints included ICU and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. There were 115 patients included in the clonidine arm and 46 patients in the quetiapine arm. There was no difference between groups with regard to the major endpoint (30.43% vs 33.15%; P < .8). There was a shorter ICU and hospital length of stay in the clonidine arm compared to quetiapine P < .0001. All other endpoints were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Patients who received clonidine tended to have undergone less complex procedures, be younger, and have a lower APACHE II score than patients who received quetiapine. The incidence of composite cardiac safety outcomes was not different in clonidine compared to quetiapine in cardiac surgery ICU patients.

Comparison of trauma-dosed tranexamic acid versus aminocaproic acid in cardiac surgery in the setting of drug shortage.

BACKGROUND: Antifibrinolytic agents, tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), are often used during cardiac surgery to decrease the number of allogenic blood transfusions and to prevent perioperative bleeding. Weight-based TXA dosing regimens have been compared to fixed-dose regimens of EACA with variable outcomes in perioperative blood product transfusions and chest tube output. Serious adverse events, including seizures, have been reported with higher doses of TXA. Fixed-dose TXA regimens have been evaluated in trauma and orthopedic surgery but there is a paucity of evidence in the cardiac surgery population. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To compare the safety and efficacy of fixed-dose TXA versus EACA in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective chart review was conducted at a 793-bed tertiary care academic teaching hospital comparing cardiac surgery patients receiving either fixed-dose TXA 1000 mg followed by a 500-1000 mg infusion or EACA-7.5 g intravenous boluses followed by a 1-1.25 g/h infusion for the duration of the surgery. The major endpoint included chest tube output at 12 h, 24 h, and 7 days postoperatively. Minor endpoints included quantity and incidence of blood product transfusions and reported safety events. RESULTS: There were 1544 patients included. Chest tube output was similar between groups and the TXA group required more intraoperative blood product transfusions (22.7% vs. 18.2%, p = .03). There were no differences in the median quantity of total blood products administered postoperatively at 24 h or at 7 days. Reported safety events were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Both fixed-dose TXA and EACA may be considered safe and effective options for antifibrinolytic therapy in cardiac surgery patients.

Evaluation of Prescribing Practices and Outcomes Using Direct-acting Oral Anticoagulants After Cardiac Surgery.

PURPOSE: Cardiac surgery patients frequently require anticoagulation. Warfarin remains the preferred agent, and a few trials have reported negative outcomes with the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in these patients. Therefore, limited literature exists that supports the dosing, safety, and efficacy of DOACs within the cardiac surgery population. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. All data were extrapolated from electronic medical records of qualifying patients from August 2017 to August 2019. Adult patients were included if they received at least 1 of 4 DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran) after undergoing one of the following cardiac surgeries: coronary artery bypass graft, bioprosthetic valve replacement, aortic surgery, or valve repair. The composite safety end point included major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. The composite efficacy outcome of thromboembolic events included deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, and intracardiac thrombus. FINDINGS: A total of 305 patient charts were identified for analysis; 229 patients met the inclusion criteria. The composite safety outcome occurred in 12 patients (5.2%) within 90 days after cardiac surgery. One patient (0.4%) experienced a thromboembolic event within 90 days after cardiac surgery. The most commonly prescribed DOAC was apixaban (79.0%). US Food and Drug Administration-approved dosing was used in 91.3% of patients, and DOACs were primarily used for the indication of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (88.2%). IMPLICATIONS: These data provide insight into the prescribing practices, efficacy, and safety of DOACs in cardiac surgery patients.

Comparison of anticoagulated versus non-anticoagulated patients with intra-aortic balloon pumps.

BACKGROUND: There is limited guidance regarding the use of anticoagulation in patients on intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). The purpose of this study is to compare the safety outcomes in anticoagulated versus non-anticoagulated patients with an IABP. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the coronary care unit or cardiac surgery unit who received an IABP from May 2015 to July 2018. Patients who were anticoagulated with heparin while on an IABP were compared to those who were not anticoagulated. Major endpoints included a composite of thrombotic events and a composite of bleeding events. The major composite endpoint of thrombotic events included the incidence of ischemic stroke, any venous thromboembolism, device thrombosis, and limb ischemia. The major composite endpoint of bleeding events included major access site bleeding, minor access site bleeding, major non-access site bleeding, and minor non-access site bleeding. Minor endpoints included any major endpoint events occurring within 24 and 48 h of IABP insertion, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were evaluated for inclusion and 147 were included in the final analysis. There were 82 and 65 patients in the heparin and non-heparin groups, respectively. The composite endpoint of thrombotic events occurred in 7.3 and 7.7% in the heparin and non-heparin groups, respectively (p = 1). The composite bleeding endpoint occurred in 20.7 and 20.0% in the heparin and non-heparin groups, respectively (p = 0.91). There were no differences found in minor endpoints between groups. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences found in major endpoints of bleeding and thrombotic events in patients who received anticoagulation while on an IABP versus those who did not receive anticoagulation.

Virtual optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy in hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the IMPLEMENT-HF pilot study.

AIMS: Implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains incomplete. Non-cardiovascular hospitalization may present opportunities for GDMT optimization. We assessed the efficacy and durability of a virtual, multidisciplinary 'GDMT Team' on medical therapy prescription for HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤40%) were prospectively identified from 3 February to 1 March 2020 (usual care group) and 2 March to 28 August 2020 (intervention group). Patients with critical illness, de novo heart failure, and systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg in the preceeding 24 hs prior to enrollment were excluded. In the intervention group, a pharmacist-physician GDMT Team provided optimization suggestions to treating teams based on an evidence-based algorithm. The primary outcome was a GDMT optimization score, the sum of positive (+1 for new initiations or up-titrations) and negative therapeutic changes (-1 for discontinuations or down-titrations) at hospital discharge. Serious in-hospital safety events were assessed. Among 278 consecutive encounters with HFrEF, 118 met eligibility criteria; 29 (25%) received usual care and 89 (75%) received the GDMT Team intervention. Among usual care encounters, there were no changes in GDMT prescription during hospitalization. In the intervention group, ß-blocker (72% to 88%; P = 0.01), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (6% to 17%; P = 0.03), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (16% to 29%; P = 0.05), and triple therapy (9% to 26%; P < 0.01) prescriptions increased during hospitalization. After adjustment for clinically relevant covariates, the GDMT Team was associated with an increase in GDMT optimization score (+0.58; 95% confidence interval +0.09 to +1.07; P = 0.02). There were no serious in-hospital adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Non-cardiovascular hospitalizations are a potentially safe and effective setting for GDMT optimization. A virtual GDMT Team was associated with improved heart failure therapeutic optimization. This implementation strategy warrants testing in a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Assessment of Sotalol and Dofetilide Dosing at a Large Academic Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Patients initiated on sotalol and dofetilide require inpatient monitoring and dose adjustments due to risks of corrected QT (QTc) prolongation and Torsades de pointes (TdP). Patients may receive higher initial doses than recommended due to close monitoring by specialized practitioners. The objective of this study was to describe prescribing practices of sotalol and dofetilide and to compare safety outcomes between standard and nonstandard dosing strategies. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of adult inpatients who underwent sotalol or dofetilide initiation between June 1, 2015, and August 1, 2018. The end points of this study included the percentage of patients who received standard and nonstandard dosing, incidence of QTc prolongation (≥500 milliseconds or ≥15% from baseline), incidence of TdP, and dose reduction or medication discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients (195 sotalol and 184 dofetilide) were included in this analysis. There were 110 (56.4%) patients in the sotalol group and 111 (58.4%) patients in the dofetilide group that received nonstandard initial dosing. Nonstandard dosing was associated with a greater incidence of QTc prolongation compared to standard dosing (57.5% vs 43.0%, P = .005). Only one patient in the nonstandard dosing group experienced TdP. Patients initiated on nonstandard dosing required dose reduction or therapy discontinuation (37.6% vs 23.4%, P = .003) more frequently. CONCLUSION: Higher than recommended initial doses of sotalol or dofetilide were associated with higher incidence of QTc prolongation and more frequent therapy modification.

Comparison of Positive Inotropic Agents in the Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

Current guidelines recommend the consideration of positive inotropes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) who have low cardiac index and evidence of systemic hypoperfusion or congestion. However, there is no evidence detailing the first line agent for the management of ADHF. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of dobutamine to milrinone for the treatment of ADHF. This was a single-center, retrospective study at a tertiary academic medical center, approved by Partner's Health Care Institutional Review Board. Patients included in this study were those admitted with ADHF who received dobutamine or milrinone from June 2015 to July 2017. A total of 95 dobutamine and 40 milrinone patients were included in the analysis. Median hospital length of stay was 12 days in the dobutamine group versus 10 days in the milrinone group (P = 0.34). Rehospitalization within 30 days occurred in 29.5% of patients in the dobutamine group versus 17.5% of patients in the milrinone group (P = 0.15). Median intensive care unit length of stay was 4.5 days in the dobutamine group versus 10 days in the milrinone group (P < 0.01). All other minor end points including all-cause mortality, progression to renal failure within 72 hours, rehospitalization in 90 days, and urine output within 72 hours of therapy were not found to be statistically significant. In addition, a post hoc analysis compared major and minor outcomes between milrinone and dobutamine using linear and logistic regression with adjustment for baseline characteristics. There were not any statistically significant findings in the post hoc analysis. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between the 2 groups other than longer intensive care unit length of stay in the milrinone group.

Marijuana Use in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Marijuana use is increasing as more states are legalizing cannabis for both medicinal and recreational purposes. National survey data estimate that >2 million Americans with established cardiovascular diseases currently use or have used marijuana in its variety of forms, including inhalation and vaping. Cannabinoid receptors are distributed in multiple tissue beds and cells, including platelets, adipose tissue, and myocytes. Observational data suggest associations between marijuana and a broad range of adverse cardiovascular risks. Marijuana is becoming increasingly potent, and smoking marijuana carries many of the same cardiovascular health hazards as smoking tobacco. Synthetic cannabinoids have been linked to more sustained and deleterious pharmacodynamic effects. Marijuana is classified as a Schedule I substance, thus limiting its rigorous study for cardiovascular health effects. This review summarizes cardiovascular considerations related to marijuana use, pharmacological interactions, and future steps to provide clearer guidance regarding its cardiovascular safety. Screening for marijuana use is encouraged, especially in young patients presenting with cardiovascular disease.

Evaluation of the Effect of Apixaban on INR in the Inpatient Population.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), particularly direct factor Xa inhibitors, have been associated with prolongation of the prothrombin time and the international normalized ratio (INR). Although DOACs do not require monitoring, elevations in the INR have been reported in in vitro and observational studies. The literature surrounding the extent of elevation and the clinical significance is limited. The objective of this study was to quantify the degree of INR elevation in hospitalized patients receiving apixaban. This was a single-center, retrospective, observational analysis of adult patients who received at least 1 dose of apixaban during their hospital admission and had at least 1 INR sample collected prior to and following administration. The major end point of this study was to characterize the effect of apixaban on the INR by determining the percentage of patients with an INR higher than our laboratory defined normal (defined as INR > 1.1). Minor end point outcomes included the incidence of an INR increase >0.3 from baseline INR and additional patient-specific factors that may influence INR elevation. Seventy-nine patients were included in the analysis. On day 1 of therapy, the median (interquartile range, IQR) INR was 1.4 (1.3:1.6) with 84.5% of patients having an elevated INR. The median (IQR) INR increased to 1.5 (1.4:1.6) and 1.7 (1.5:1.9) on day 4 and day 7, respectively. Of patients whose INR increased by more than 0.3, the median (IQR) change in INR from baseline was 0.5 (0.4:0.6). Apixaban is associated with a notable increase in INR in hospitalized patients, although it is not clear the clinical impact of the increase. Although literature does not support monitoring INR as a marker of apixaban activity, it is important for clinicians to understand the association apixaban has on the INR to avoid inappropriate interpretation of routine coagulation assays.

The Role of Double and Triple Therapy with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Coronary Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease, and Stroke.

PURPOSE: Combining antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy is often necessary in clinical practice. However, there is limited literature on tolerability and efficacy for triple therapy with the newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The objective of this study is to characterize the discharge prescribing practice of double versus triple antithrombotic therapy with a DOAC at a large, tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study, patients were identified if they had received any combination of a DOAC, aspirin, and a P2Y12 inhibitor during an admission at our institution from June 1, 2015, to May 31, 2016. Patients were included in the analysis if they had any indication for anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies and were discharged from the hospital with prescriptions for a DOAC and single or dual antiplatelet agents (aspirin and/or P2Y12 inhibitor). Patients were excluded if they had an unclear indication for antiplatelet therapy. Patient characteristics and 6-month efficacy and tolerability outcomes were collected via review of the electronic medical record. FINDINGS: A total of 367 patients were included in this analysis. Most patients at our institution who required both antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents were discharged on a regimen of aspirin and a DOAC. Patients across all groups most commonly received antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome-related events, whereas they received anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Within 6 months of discharge, there were 16 bleeding-related readmissions in the DOAC-aspirin group, 1 in the DOAC-P2Y12 group, and 0 in the triple therapy group. IMPLICATIONS: This analysis found that varying combinations of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants are used, depending on clinical indications. Further studies are needed that focus on patients with indications for dual antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation to compare double and triple therapy strategies for efficacy and bleeding risk.

Evaluation of antiplatelet agents for secondary prevention of stroke using mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The current guidelines recommend various antiplatelet agents used alone or in combination for secondary prevention of noncardioembolic stroke. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis to determine which antiplatelet or combination of antiplatelet agents is most efficacious and tolerable in patients with prior stroke. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (1945 through March 2012), EMBASE (1974 through March 2012), and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry (1975 through April 2012) to identify randomized trials evaluating the role of various antiplatelet agents and combinations for the secondary prevention of stroke. Key articles were cross-referenced for additional studies. Data were screened and evaluated to generate direct and indirect comparisons for recurrent stroke and overall hemorrhagic events. Data were reported as rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 24 articles were included in the analysis. Eleven antiplatelet regimens were compared in >88,000 patients. The combination of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus dipyridamole (DP) was more protective against recurrent stroke than ASA alone (RR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.93), and no differences were found in all other direct and indirect comparisons with active treatment. ASA plus DP was associated with more overall hemorrhagic events than DP (RR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.17-2.81), cilostazol (RR = 2.12; 95% CI, 1.21-3.48), and triflusal (RR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.05-2.78) but fewer events than the combination of ASA plus clopidogrel (RR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.56). The combination of ASA plus clopidogrel was associated with an excess of overall hemorrhagic events compared with clopidogrel (RR = 2.81; 95% CI, 1.96-4.10), cilostazol (RR = 5.56; 95% CI, 3.03-9.66), DP (RR = 4.78; 95% CI, 2.80-8.21), sarpogrelate (RR = 3.59; 95% CI, 1.96-6.45), terutroban (RR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.21-3.61), ticlopidine (RR = 2.80; 95% CI, 1.69-5.00), and triflusal (RR = 4.36; 95% CI, 2.62-7.81). CONCLUSION: We found that ASA plus DP was more protective than ASA alone for preventing recurrent stroke; however, no difference was found between most direct and indirect comparisons of antiplatelet agents and combinations. More overall hemorrhagic events seemed to occur with the combination of ASA and clopidogrel than with other treatments. Selection of antiplatelet therapy for the secondary prevention of stroke must be individualized according to patient comorbidities, including risk of stroke recurrence and bleeding.