Host single nucleotide polymorphisms and biomarkers of neuronal damage and inflammation in people living with HIV.

OBJECTIVES: Blood-brain barrier impairment is frequent in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWHIV), affecting the penetration of target cells and antiretrovirals into the central nervous system, through transporters (e.g. ABCB1), leading to neuroinflammation. This study aimed to identify variants of genes encoding transporters able to predict neuroinflammation biomarker levels. METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma samples were obtained from PLWHIV. The CSF biomarkers were quantified by commercial assays. Genetic variants were evaluated through real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: A total of 107 PLWHIV (163 samples) were included in the study: 79% were male, median age was 48.5 years, CD4% was 25%, and HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) was observed in 17.8%. The ABCB1 2677G>T genetic variant showed a different allelic distribution according to the clinical group (P = 0.026). In linear regression analyses, HIV-related central nervous system disorders, ABCG2 1194+928CC genotype, log viral load, CSF-to-serum albumin ratio, ß-1,42 levels, and CSF proteins were retained in the final model as factors independently associated with CSF neopterin levels; CSF proteins and integrase inhibitor use were associated with CSF tau level in the multivariate model. Phospho-tau regression analysis reported the ABCB1 2677GT/TT genotype and CSF proteins as predictors in the final model; sex, protease inhibitors, neopterin, and ABCB1 2677 GT/ TT genotype were predictors in the multivariate regression for ß-1,42. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, pharmacogenetic and clinical features were found to be predictors of neuro-inflammation biomarkers.

Antiretroviral Levels in the Cerebrospinal Fluid: The Effect of Inflammation and Genetic Variants.

Neurocognitive impairments are common in people living with HIV. Some conditions, such as chronic inflammation, astrocyte infection and an impaired blood-brain barrier (BBBi), along with host genetic variants in transporter genes, may affect antiretroviral (ARV) exposure in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The aim of this study was to evaluate ARV CSF penetration according to compartmental inflammation, BBB permeability and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in drug transporter encoding genes. CSF neopterin (ELISA), plasma and CSF ARV concentrations (HPLC) and host genetic variants in ABCC2, HNF4α, SLCO1A2 and SLC22A6 (real-time PCR) were measured. Bi- and multivariate analyses were performed for single ARV and classes. We included 259 participants providing 405 paired plasma and CSF samples. CSF/plasma ratios (CPR) showed an increase for NRTIs and nevirapine with low penetrations for the majority of ARVs. At bi-variate analysis, several associations, including the effect of BBBi (emtricitabine, raltegravir), age (zidovudine and darunavir), and high CSF neopterin (NRTIs and border-line for PIs) were suggested. An association was found between genetic variants and integrase strand transfer (ABCC2 and HNF4α), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (SLCO1A2), and protease inhibitors (SLC22A6). At multivariate analysis age, gender, BMI, and altered BBB were independent predictors of nucleoside reverse transcriptase CSF concentrations; age (for protease inhibitors) and body mass index and altered BBB (integrase strand transfer inhibitors) were also associated with ARV CSF exposure. We describe factors associated with CSF concentrations, showing that demographic, BBB integrity and, partially, genetic factors may be predictors of drug passage in the central nervous system.

Safety and efficacy of daclatasvir at doses other than 60 mg daily in HIV/HCV co-infected subjects: Data from the ICONA/HepaICONA foundation cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Daclatasvir (DCV) is a HCV NS5A inhibitor whose plasma exposure may be influenced by co-administration with inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 such as many antiretrovirals. AIMS: Describe the use of different DCV dosages; assess if dose prescription complies with Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPC); evaluate safety and efficacy of 60 versus 30/90 mg and adequate (i.e. concordant with SmPC) versus incorrect prescriptions. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients included in ICONA/HepaICONA starting a DCV-including treatment. Incidence rates of liver adverse events (LAE) were calculated; Poisson regression model was used to identify factors associated with LAE. RESULTS: 311 patients were included: 250 (80.4%) received DCV at a dosage of 60 mg, 52 (16.7%) 30 mg and 9 (2.9%) 90 mg. An inadequate dosage was used in 18 individuals (5.8%). No difference in SVR was observed (93.8% with 60 mg and 94.2% with 30/90 mg, p = 0.910; 93.5% with adequate and 100% with incorrect dosage, p = 0.277). There were 36 LAE with no differences in the two-paired groups. Decompensated liver disease was a risk factor for LAE (aRR = 2.37; p = 0.034), while HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml resulted protective (aRR = 0.22; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: DCV use resulted in high SVR rate regardless of dosage and correctness of prescription.

Early low-molecular-weight heparin administration is associated with shorter time to SARS-CoV-2 swab negativity.

BACKGROUND: Antiviral and immune-modulating properties of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) against Coronaviridae have been reported by in vitro studies, but no in vivo evidence is yet available. We sought to know whether the timing of prophylactic doses of LMWH during the course of COVID-19 may affect the time to SARS-CoV-2 nasal-oropharyngeal swab negativization. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric cross-sectional study on patients requiring sub-intensive ward admission due to first SARS-CoV-2 infection and undergoing early (EH; within 7 days from COVID-19 signs and symptoms onset) versus delayed prophylactic LMWH (DH; after 7 days). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was measured by reverse transcription real-time PCR according to scheduled time points: first swab after 2 weeks from COVID-19 onset, then at 1-week intervals until negativity. RESULTS: Time to SARS-CoV-2 swab negativity was shorter in EH (38 patients) compared with DH (55 patients): 22 versus 37 days (P=0.004). The number of confirmative negative swabs in EH was significantly higher compared with DH at week 2 (21.1% versus 3.6%; P=0.017) and 4 (60.0% versus 19.6%; P<0.001). At univariate, EH differed from DH for several disease severity and clinical management parameters. Nevertheless, after accounting for the differences, Cox regression showed early LMWH administration (hazard ratio [HR] 2.91 [1.51, 5.63]; P=0.002) and higher lymphocytes nadir (HR 1.04 [1.01, 1.08]; P=0.020) as predictors of shorter time to swab negativity. CONCLUSIONS: This potential antiviral and/or immune-modulating activity of LMWH needs further in vivo confirmations by randomized controlled trials.

Pharmacogenetic determinants of kidney-associated urinary and serum abnormalities in antiretroviral-treated HIV-positive patients.

Tenofovir disoproxyl fumarate (TDF) has been associated with renal tubular abnormalities, phosphaturia and proteinuria (retinol binding protein, RBP, loss): vitamin D (VD) and PTH affect these markers. Aim was to understand if some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were predictors of renal abnormalities in an Italian cohort of HIV-affected patients. DNA was analyzed through real-time PCR, urinary RBP corrected by creatinine (uRBP/Cr). The majority of patients received TDF. Abnormal uRBP/Cr was more frequent in TDF recipients: eGFR <90 mL/min and TDF were predictors in the whole cohort, whereas eGFR <90 mL/min, TDF concentrations and CYP24A1-3999TT in TDF-treated patients. Phosphate levels were higher low VD level patients: age <50 years, CYP27B1 + 2838CC genotype and non-European ancestry were predictors. PTH levels were border-line higher in TDF patients: non-European ancestry, females, TDF, VD levels < 30 ng/mL and SLC28A2-124CT/TT and ABCC2-24CC were predictors. For the first time, SNPs were associated with PTH, phosphate, calcium and tubular dysfunction in HIV-infected patients.

The outcome of HIV-positive late presenters according to detectable CMV DNA and anti-CMV treatment.

BACKGROUND: HIV late presenters are at high risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and end-organ disease. CMV viraemia has been associated with poor survival but the effect of anti-CMV treatment has not been studied in this setting. METHODS: HIV-positive patients were included in a retrospective study if presenting with <350 CD4+ T-cells/µl and starting an antiretroviral treatment within 3 months of the diagnosis. Primary end point was 5-year survival according to the presence of CMV viraemia, CMV end-organ disease and anti-CMV treatment. RESULTS: 302 patients were included. 157 patients (52%) presented CMV viraemia (CMV-V) and 44 (14.6%) CMV end-organ disease (CMV-EOD). 5-year mortality was higher in CMV-EOD and CMV-V patients than in CMV-negative patients (11.4 versus 9.6 versus 0%; P=0.002). In patients with CMV-V, 5-year mortality was numerically higher in untreated patients (12.9% versus 6.9%; P=0.257) without reaching statistical significance. At univariate analysis the diagnosis of serious opportunistic infections (cryptococcosis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, lymphoma; P=0.001) and the absence of a negative CMV DNA in the follow-up (P<0.001) were associated with poor outcome. At multivariate analysis HCV coinfection (P=0.016; aOR 6.98, 95% CI 1.50, 32.59), the absence of a negative CMV DNA in the follow-up (P<0.001; aOR 19.40, 95% CI 3.70, 101.64) and marginally the absence of anti-CMV treatment (P=0.052; aOR 4.944, 95% CI 0.99, 24.73) were independent predictors of poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CMV reactivation in HIV-positive patients with poor immunity is associated with worse prognosis: the pre-emptive use of anti-CMV therapy was associated with a better outcome in patients with CMV-V.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (200mg twice daily) plus raltegravir (400mg twice daily) dual regimen in the clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Unboosted atazanavir with raltegravir has been investigated at 300mg twice daily showing frequent hyperbilirubinemia and selection of resistance-associated mutations. OBJECTIVES: Atazanavir 200mg twice daily could increase tolerability and plasma exposure. STUDY DESIGN: Patients on atazanavir/raltegravir (200/400 twice daily), with self-reported adherence >95% and no concomitant interacting drugs were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: 102 patients [72.5% male, age 46.4 years (42-54), BMI 24kg/m2 (22-26)] were included. CD4+ T lymphocytes were 417 cell/µL (302-704) and 76 patients (74.5%) had HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml. After 123 weeks 18.6% patients showed virological failure and 3.9% discontinued for intolerance. Available genotypes showed selection of major integrase (7/10 patients) and protease resistance-associated mutations (5/13 patients). In patients switching with dyslipidemia (n=67) total, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides significantly decreased. Patients switching with eCRCL<60ml/min (n=27) had no significant changes while patients with eCRCL >60ml/min showed significant decrease (-9.8ml/min, p=0.003) at 96-weeks. Atazanavir and raltegravir trough concentrations were 321ng/mL (147-720) and 412ng/mL (225-695). Self-reported non-adherence (n=4) was significantly associated with virological failure (p=0.02); patients with virological success had borderline longer previous virological control (33 vs. 18 months, p=0.07). DISCUSSION: Switch to atazanavir/raltegravir was safe and well tolerated allowing optimal drugs' plasma exposure. However, a concerning rate (18.6%) failed with newly selected mutations and stopped ATV/RAL because of DDI and intolerance issues or were lost to follow-up. This regimen might be considered in selected patients, without history of protease inhibitors failure or HBV infection, showing optimal adherence and prolonged suppression.

Pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir and rilpivirine in combination with simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients with liver cirrhosis.

Objectives: To evaluate the plasma trough concentrations ( C trough ) of dolutegravir and rilpivirine used in combination with simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients with liver cirrhosis. Virological efficacy and safety of both ART and anti-HCV therapy were assessed. Patients and methods: A prospective observational study in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with liver cirrhosis on ART with dolutegravir plus rilpivirine and treated with simeprevir plus sofosbuvir (±ribavirin) was conducted. Dolutegravir, rilpivirine, GS-331007 (sofosbuvir metabolite) and simeprevir C trough were evaluated with a validated HPLC method at anti-HCV treatment baseline and weeks 2 and 4. Geometric means were calculated to summarize C trough values. Results: Twelve patients were evaluated: 75% were males and the median (IQR) age was 53 (53-55) years. All patients were Child-Pugh stage A, except one who was stage B. The geometric mean (95% CI) of C trough of rilpivirine and dolutegravir did not change between baseline and week 4 ( P = 0.654 and P = 0.268, respectively), with corresponding overall values of 135 (102-177) and 1357 (970-1897) ng/mL. The overall geometric mean (95% CI) of GS-331007 and simeprevir C trough was 370 (268-512) and 2537 (1569-4101) ng/mL, respectively, without significant variation between weeks 2 and 4 ( P = 0.643 and P = 0.179, respectively). All patients completed anti-HCV treatment, achieving sustained virological response. All but two patients maintained undetectable HIV-RNA up to post-treatment week 24. Conclusions: Dolutegravir and rilpivirine C trough appeared not to be affected by concomitant treatment with simeprevir plus sofosbuvir in these HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with liver cirrhosis, supporting the use of this antiretroviral regimen in this setting.

Efavirenz pharmacogenetics in a cohort of Italian patients.

The pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics of efavirenz (EFV) have been widely studied, although data in the Italian population are limited. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CYP2B6 gene have been associated with increased EFV plasma concentrations and central nervous system toxicity. The aim of this work was to evaluate EFV plasma exposure according to SNPs in genes involved in drug metabolism and elimination in a cohort of Italian HIV-1-positive patients treated with EFV. Plasma samples were used to measure EFV concentrations at 12h after intake (C12) by a validated HPLC/PDA system. Whole blood was used to identify SNPs in ABCB1, MRP2, CYP2B6, CYP2A6, UGT2B7, NR1I2 (PXR), NR1I3 (CAR) and HNF4α by real-time PCR. The association between SNPs and EFV plasma levels was evaluated through non-parametric tests. Among 201 patients, the median EFV C12 was 2618.5ng/mL. No significant associations were found for MRP2, CYP2A6, UGT2B7, PXR and CAR SNPs; conversely, an association of CYP2B6 516G>T, ABCB1 3435C>T and 2677G>T, and HNF4α 975C>G polymorphisms with EFV C12 was observed. In multivariate analysis, only CYP2B6 516 TT and ABCB1 3435 TT genotypes were independently associated with an EFV C12 of >4000ng/mL (toxicity cut-off). This study confirmed the role of CYP2B6 and ABCB1 polymorphisms, showed a relationship with HNF4α, and the lack of association of CYP2A6, UGT2B7, NR1I2 and NR1I3 SNPs on EFV plasma exposure. Data regarding some of the studied SNPs are the first obtained in an Italian cohort of HIV patients and lead to a global vision about EFV pharmacogenetics.

Tenofovir clearance is reduced in HIV-positive patients with subclinical tubular impairment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if tenofovir (TFV) clearance is associated with urinary retinal-binding protein (RBP) in HIV-positive patients with normal estimated filtration rate. DESIGN: A cross-sectional diagnostic study. METHODS: HIV-positive patients with estimated creatinine clearance above 60 ml/min, on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-containing combination since at least 6 months, taking TDF at night, and without significant comorbidities (diabetes, untreated hypertension, known renal malformations, recurrent nephrolithiasis) and nephrotoxic drugs were included. TFV plasma and urinary concentrations were measured 12 h after drug intake (C12). RBP was measured through enzyme immunoassay kit on spot urines and corrected per urinary creatinine (uRBP/uCr); normality ranges were below 130 µg/g (in patients aged <50 years) and below 172 µg/g (in patients aged ≥50 years). RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-nine patients were included (median age of 45.8 years, 71.6% male and 85.4% whites); patients were concomitantly treated with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (155, 53.6%), protease inhibitors (118, 40.8%), or integrase inhibitors (16, 5.5%)-containing regimens. Estimated creatinine clearance was 89.4 ml/min (78.6-105.9). Urinary RBP (uRBP) and uRBP/uCr were 204.6 ng/ml (92-380) and 169.7 µg/g (85.8-318.3), respectively; abnormally high uRBP/uCr was observed in 157 patients (54.3%). A multivariate binary logistic regression confirmed that both ethnicity (P = 0.004, ß 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.41-6.10) and TFV urinary C12 less than 21 mg/ml (P = 0.006, ß 2.04, 95% confidence interval 1.12-3.41) were significantly associated with abnormal uRBP/uCr. CONCLUSION: HIV-positive TDF-treated patients showed a high prevalence of proximal tubular impairment: ethnicity (whites) and low urinary TFV concentrations were significantly associated with elevated uRBP. SDC VIDEO:: http://links.lww.com/QAD/A852.

Raltegravir Plus Nevirapine as Maintenance Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Positive Patients: Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: Tolerability, long-term toxicities and selection of resistant variants limit the use and efficacy of antiretroviral drugs in HIV-positive patients. Novel combinations are needed for mantaining long-term control of HIV replication; nevertheless scarse data are available on protease inhibitor-free dual antiretroviral therapies. METHODS: A multi-centric retrospective study was conducted including HIV-1-positive patients on raltegravir/nevirapine dual regimens. Plasma concentrations were measured as therapeutic drug monitoring while a subset of patients underwent intensive 12-hour pharmacokinetic evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients switching from successful regimens (76.6% male, median age 52 years) was included; 10 patients on raltegravir plus nevirapine once-daily while 67 subjects on twice-daily schedule. After a median follow-up of 32 months 69 patients (89.6%) were still successfully on treatment. Three patients discontinued for side effects (skin rash or hepatoxicity). Virological failure was observed in five patients (6.5%, 3 on once-daily schedule): in 4 patients (80%) resistance-associated mutations were observed (4 reverse transcriptase, 2 integrase). Triglycerides decreased in patients switching with lipid abnormalities (n=52) and estimated creatinine clearance increased in those with less than 60 ml/min (n=13). Median trough raltegravir and nevirapine concentrations were 83 ng/ml (32-227) and 5460 ng/ml (4037-7221); intensive 12-hours pharmacokinetic parameters (n=7) were similar to published data. CONCLUSION: Dual therapy with raltegravir/nevirapine in selected patients was highly effective over a 32-month follow up: virological failure was infrequent (6.5%), most common with once-daily schedule (60%) and often associated with the selection of resistance-associated mutations (80%). Twice-daily raltegravir plus nevirapine deserves further clinical evaluation as an NRTI- and PI-sparing strategy in selected patients.

HIV-1 Very Low Level Viremia Is Associated with Virological Failure in Highly Active Antiretroviral Treatment-Treated Patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of HIV-1 very low-level viremia (<50 copies/ml) on the 2-year risk of virological failure. A retrospective analysis including HIV-positive patients presenting two consecutive HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml (outpatient clinic in Italy, first semester of 2010) was performed. HIV RNA was measured through real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay CAP/CTM HIV-1 version 2.0 (detection limit: 20 copies/ml) and stratified as undetectable RNA ("Target Not Detected", TND), <20 copies/ml, 20-50 copies/ml. After 96 weeks virological failure was defined as two consecutive viral loads above 50 copies/ml. Log-rank tests and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model were used for univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 1,055 patients (71.4% male, 87.4% white, aged 46.7 years) were included: nadir and current CD4 cell counts were 203 cells/mm(3) (106-292) and 554 cells/mm(3) (413-713.5). HIV RNA was undetectable in 781 patients (74%), <20 copies/ml in 190 patients (18%) and 20-50 copies/ml in 84 patients (8%). Virological failure was observed in 81 patients (7.7%); at multivariate analysis detectable RNA at baseline (p=0.017), HCV infection (p=0.020), more than three pills in the regimen (p=0.003), and duration of HIV RNA <50 copies/ml below 2 years (p<0.001) were independently associated with virological failure. In 14 patients newly selected resistance-associated mutations were observed. Undetectable HIV RNA by real-time PCR is significantly associated with a lower 2-year risk of virological failure along with Ab HCV negativity, longer viral control, and lower pill burden. Studies investigating the management of residual viremia under antiretroviral treatment are warranted.

Cerebrospinal fluid inhibitory quotients of antiretroviral drugs in HIV-infected patients are associated with compartmental viral control.

BACKGROUND: Despite the efficacy of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART), a large proportion of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients may develop moderate neurocognitive impairment. Antiretroviral drug passage into the central nervous system may be relevant for preventing and treating HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder; nevertheless, clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacodynamic targets are not known. METHODS: HAART-treated adults with wild-type HIV were prospectively enrolled. CSF concentrations (measured by mass spectrophotometric methods) and inhibitory quotients (CSF concentrations divided by in vitro 50% and 95% inhibitory concentrations) were compared among different drugs and related to CSF HIV RNA levels. CSF escape was defined as CSF HIV RNA >50 copies/mL despite contemporary plasma HIV RNA below that threshold. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients (91 male [71.7%], 93 white [73.2%], with a median age of 46 years [interquartile range, 40.5-54.5 years]) provided 174 paired CSF and plasma samples. Twice-daily darunavir, once-daily darunavir, and efavirenz had the highest CSF 95% inhibitory quotients (18.5, 8.2, and 6.4, respectively). Higher nadir CD4 cell count (P = .01) and plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL (P < .001) were independent predictors of controlled CSF HIV RNA. Optimal drug exposure (CSF detectable drugs and 95% inhibitory quotient >1) was protective for CSF escape (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebrospinal fluid 95% inhibitory quotients may be used to compare antiretroviral drug compartmental exposure; they deserve longitudinal studies to assess the adequacy of CSF drug concentrations in treated HIV-infected patients.

Determinants of darunavir cerebrospinal fluid concentrations: impact of once-daily dosing and pharmacogenetics.

OBJECTIVES: To compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) darunavir and ritonavir concentrations in patients receiving darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily or 600/100 mg twice daily. To determine the influence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes encoding for blood-brain barrier transporters (ABCB1 3435 C>T, ABCB1 1236 C>T, ABCB1 2677 G>T, SLCO1A2 38 A>G, SLCO1A2 516 A>C, ABCC2 -24 G>A) on darunavir and ritonavir penetration into CSF. DESIGN: Comparative pharmacokinetics study in patients. METHODS: Plasma and CSF darunavir and ritonavir concentrations (2-26 h after drug intake) were determined by a validated HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry method in adults on darunavir-based combination antiretroviral therapy undergoing a lumbar puncture. RESULTS: HIV-infected patients on once-daily darunavir/ritonavir had significantly lower CSF darunavir trough concentrations and CSF-to-plasma ratios than patients on darunavir/ritonavir twice-daily (10.7 versus 38.2 ng/ml and 0.32 versus 0.90%; P < 0.05). No significant effect of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes encoding for blood-brain barrier transporters was noted apart from slightly higher CSF darunavir penetration in patients carrying OATP1A2 uncommon variants. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to compare darunavir CSF concentrations in patients taking the once-daily or the twice-daily dosage: our data show that darunavir and ritonavir dosing significantly affects not only CSF concentrations but also the extent of drug penetration into the CSF. Furthermore a minority of patients in the once-daily arm presented very low CSF concentration of potential concern for HIV control in the central nervous system. The relative importance of pharmacogenetics in influencing CSF darunavir pharmacokinetics deserves further clinical investigation.

Multiple bone fractures in an 8-year-old child with cow's milk allergy and inappropriate calcium supplementation.

The case of an 8-year-old boy with severe bone mass reduction and 4 fractures as a result of an unsupervised diet established to treat cow's milk allergy is presented. Endocrine, genetic and orthopedic pathologies were excluded. While vitamin D intake had always been appropriate, his calcium intake had been inadequate for many years. This clinical report suggests that both vitamin D and calcium supplementation are necessary when a cow's milk protein-free diet is prescribed, even when a hypo- or non-allergenic formula is provided.