Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 74(1): 110-118, 2022 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439573

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to reach a consensus in the classification and standardized reporting for the different types of PCNLs. METHODS: The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology was used to reach a consensus. Thirty-two statements were formulated reviewing the literature on guidelines and consensus on PCNLs, and included procedure specific details, outcome measurements and a classification for PCNLs. Experts were invited to two rounds of input, the first enabled independent modifications of the proposed statements and provided the option to add statements. The second round facilitated scoring of all statements. Each statement was discussed in the third round to decide which statements to include. Any suggestion or disagreement was debated and discussed to reach a consensual agreement. RESULTS: Twenty-five recommendations were identified to provide standardized reporting of procedure and outcomes. Consensual scoring above 80% were strongly agreed upon by the panel. The top treatment related outcomes were size of sheath used (99.1%) and position for PCNL (93.5%). The highest ranked Outcome Measures included definition of postoperative hospital length of stay (94.4%) and estimated blood loss (93.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The consensus statements will be useful to clarify operative technique, in the design of clinical trials and standardized reporting, and presentation of results to compare outcomes of different types of PCNLs.


Sujet(s)
Néphrolithotomie percutanée , Urolithiase , Consensus , Humains , Néphrolithotomie percutanée/méthodes , , Résultat thérapeutique , Urolithiase/chirurgie
2.
J Urol ; 173(5): 1789-92, 2005 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15821588

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: We investigated whether the menstrual cycle affects urinary glycosaminoglycan (GAG) excretion in normal young women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples from 10 healthy women 19 to 21 years old were collected daily during the whole menstrual cycle. Concentration of total urinary GAG was assessed as mug hexuronic acid per mg creatinine. Proportions of sulfated GAG species were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: Mean excretion values +/- SD for period days 4 to 13 and 15 to 28 of the cycle were significantly different (0.445 +/- 0.041 vs 0.356 +/- 0.035 microg/mg, p <0.001). Correlation between values for the first and second halves of the cycle showed that this difference was consistent irrespective of individual variations in GAG excretion (r = 0.9757, p <0.001). Proportions of urinary sulfated GAG did not change during the cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Excretion of total urinary GAG during the normal menstrual cycle of young women has a biphasic pattern with significantly higher values occurring in the first half of the cycle. This variation implies modulation by estrogens and consequently it should be considered when comparing the GAG concentration in urine samples from women of childbearing age.


Sujet(s)
Glycosaminoglycanes/urine , Cycle menstruel , Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Valeurs de référence
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...