Significance of Late Gadolinium Enhancement at Right Ventricular Attachment to Ventricular Septum in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with extensive late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is a novel marker for increased risk for sudden death (SD) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). Small focal areas of LGE confined to the region of right ventricular (RV) insertion to ventricular septum (VS) have emerged as a frequent and highly visible CMR imaging pattern of uncertain significance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of LGE confined to the RV insertion area in patients with HC. CMR was performed in 1,293 consecutive patients with HC from 7 HC centers, followed for 3.4 ± 1.7 years. Of 1,293 patients (47 ± 14 years), 134 (10%) had LGE present only in the anterior and/or inferior areas of the RV insertion to VS, occupying 3.7 ± 2.9% of left ventricular myocardium. Neither the presence nor extent of LGE in these isolated areas was a predictor of adverse HC-related risk, including SD (adjusted hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 1.50, p = 0.53; adjusted hazard ratio 1.16/10% increase in LGE, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 4.65, p = 0.83, respectively). Histopathology in 20 HC hearts show the insertion areas of RV attachment to be composed of a greatly expanded extracellular space characterized predominantly by interstitial-type fibrosis and interspersed disorganized myocyte patterns and architecture. In conclusion, LGE confined to the insertion areas of RV to VS was associated with low risk of adverse events (including SD). Gadolinium pooling in this region of the left ventricle does not reflect myocyte death and repair with replacement fibrosis or scarring.

Meta-analysis of randomized trials of postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Clinical benefit of postconditioning in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention is still controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of available randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to define the role of postconditioning in STEMI. Fourteen RCTs evaluating postconditioning in a total of 778 patients with STEMI were identified in PubMed, EMBase, and Cochrane databases from January 1998 to February 2014. Overall, postconditioning was found to be cardioprotective in term of infarct size reduction (weighted standardized mean differences -0.5837, 95% confidence interval -0.9609 to -0.2066, p <0.05), but significant heterogeneity across the trials was detected (I(2) = 84%). Univariate meta-regression analysis did not identify clinical or procedural variables associated with a more pronounced effect of postconditioning effects on infarct size with the exception of using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to evaluate infarct size (p <0.01). Restricting the analysis to 6 RCTs including a total of 448 patients and evaluating the postconditioning effect on infarct size by means of CMR led to the disappearance of benefit of postconditioning on infarct size. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis of RCTs suggested that postconditioning reduces infarct size, as expressed by weighted standardized mean differences. However, if the analysis was limited to trials with a more accurate quantification of infarct size reduction, namely by CMR, the benefit was lost. More data are required before adoption of postconditioning in clinical practice.