Predictors of return to work in cancer survivors in the Royal Air Force.

PURPOSE: Return to work (RTW) is beneficial for cancer survivors, employers and society. However, little is known about predictors of RTW in the military environment. METHODS: A cohort of 194 Royal Air Force (RAF) personnel aged 18-58 who survived primary cancer treatment between 2001 and 2011 were followed up for 18 months. Information was obtained from occupational health and primary care records. Personal, occupational and clinical predictors of RTW were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The median sickness absence before RTW was 107 days. Six months after diagnosis 54 % of participants had RTW, and reached 80 % by 12 months. Time taken to RTW was predicted by age at diagnosis, rank, trade group, pre-diagnosis sickness absence, site of cancer, treatment modality, and prognosis. RTW at 18 months were predicted by higher rank (HR = 2.31; 95 % CI 1.46-3.65), and having melanoma (9.75; 4.97-19.13). Those receiving chemotherapy were significantly less likely to have RTW compared to other treatment modalities (0.18; 0.10-0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Rank, cancer diagnostic group, and treatment modality are the most important predictors of RTW in cancer survivors in the RAF. These predictors can be used to inform rehabilitation programmes and decisions on RTW.

United Kingdom military aeromedical evacuation in the post-9/11 era.

BACKGROUND: Recent UK military operations in support of the fight against terrorism have resulted in UK military casualties. Movement of these casualties through the military medical chain requires a highly sophisticated aeromedical evacuation capability with worldwide reach. Recognition of the determinants of evacuation allows development to ensure optimal future configurations of military aeromedical evacuation services. METHODS: The database recording aeromedical evacuations undertaken by the Royal Air Force was searched to provide demographic and clinical data for evacuations between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2010. Diagnoses leading to evacuation were categorized according to International Classification of Diseases codes. RESULTS: There were 21,477 medical evacuations undertaken. Analysis demonstrated 85.9% were for men and 86.5% were for military personnel, of whom 72.0% were in the army. The most common reasons for evacuation in military patients were musculoskeletal/connective tissue disorders (N = 9192; 50.0%), trauma (N = 1303; 7.1%), and mental health disorders (N = 1151; 6.3%). The most common reasons for evacuation in nonmilitary patients were musculoskeletal/connective tissue disorders (N = 734; 23.8%), genitourinary disorders (N = 325; 10.5%), and circulatory disorders (N = 255; 8.3%). Nontraumatic diagnoses were the determinants of evacuation in 92.9% of military and 95.1% of nonmilitary patients; 17.8% of trauma patients and 0.5% of nontrauma patients utilized high-dependency care. DISCUSSION: The UK aeromedical evacuation system must have the capacity to evacuate large numbers of patients with nontraumatic diagnoses, but also the flexibility to accommodate smaller, more variable numbers of higher dependency trauma patients. The military medical chain must continually review the differing requirements of civilian patients transferred within their aeromedical system.

A 5-year review of atrial fibrillation in military aircrew.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cause of disqualification from flying in both civilian and military aircrew. We reviewed 5 yr of atrial fibrillation management in the Royal Air Force (RAF) from both a clinical and occupational perspective. METHODS: Patients were identified from the RAF Medical Boards (RAFMB) electronic database using search terms "atrial," "fibrillation," and "arrhythmia." Management was compared to current RAF and national clinical guidelines and current civilian and military aviation medicine policy. RESULTS: Over the 5-yr period assessed, 23 aircrew were identified with AF. Paroxysmal AF (PAF) was the most common diagnosis. Five aircrew remained fit to fly with no limitations, 12 fit to fly with restrictions, and 6 were graded permanently unfit for flying, with one of these being medically discharged. DISCUSSION: The incidence and demographics of aircrew identified with AF in this paper is comparable to previous studies. All aircrew in our study were treated in accordance with current RAF/national guidelines. Emerging treatments such as radiofrequency ablation and the new anticoagulants remain to be assessed for suitability in a military context. CONCLUSION: Management of AF in RAF aircrew requires a holistic approach, with an awareness of the arrhythmogenic aviation environment in which RAF aircrew operate. Most RAF aircrew with AF will retain a restricted flying status, but this should be considered on a case-by-case basis.