Clear aligner therapy practices among orthodontists practicing in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The acceptability and preference for clear aligner therapy (CAT) has been increasing among orthodontists, but there is still a lack of consensus regarding CAT best practices. Consequently, this study aimed to investigate CAT practices among orthodontists practicing in Canada. METHODS: The survey was conducted among orthodontists practicing in Canada using a modified previously published survey. Sixty orthodontists participated (6.1% response rate). It consisted of 11 sections with open and closed questions related to demographic information and particularities about using or not using CAT. The survey responses were exported from REDCap to a Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Wash) spreadsheet, then statistically analyzed using SPSS software (SPSS for Windows, version 21.0; IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). The comments were categorized under themes and subthemes. Data were organized in descriptive statistics, expressing frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: Almost 30% of the orthodontist's annual caseload was treated with CAT, most frequently prescribed to adult patients. Case complexity and patient cooperation were the factors that most influenced the decision to prescribe CAT. Almost half of orthodontists reported sometimes combining CAT with adjunctive fixed appliances. CONCLUSIONS: Most orthodontists prescribe CAT, and its use is based on the malocclusion's complexity. Orthodontists who do not prescribe CAT believe that fixed appliance therapy has superior treatment outcomes.

Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to survey retention protocols and retainer characteristics among orthodontists practicing in Canada. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to 576 orthodontists registered with the Canadian Association of Orthodontists. It included respondents' demographic details, preferred orthodontic retainers and prescribed wear protocol, adjunctive retention procedures, the timing of retention follow-ups, retainer choice in specific situations, and retainer characteristics. Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to test the associations between variables. RESULTS: An 18% response rate was recorded (n = 101). Vacuum-formed retainers were the most commonly used retainers in the maxilla (50.5%), whereas bonded retainers were preferred in the mandible (54.5%). An initial full-time removable retainer wear period was commonly prescribed (63.0%-67.0%). Retainer checks were carried out by 85.1%-89.1% of orthodontists for 1 or 2 years after the end of active orthodontic treatment. Only 44.6%-56.4% were comfortable with general dentists continuing retainer checks. Most (72.5%-84.1%) retainers were fabricated in the orthodontists' office laboratory. Indefinite retainer wear was commonly suggested and was significantly influenced by the number of years in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Most orthodontists' preferred retainer was the vacuum-formed retainers in the maxilla and the bonded retainers in the mandible. A variety of retention protocols and retainer characteristics was evident among orthodontists that reflect the considerable variation in malocclusion traits we face day-to-day. There seems to be a potential dichotomy between orthodontists being uncomfortable about allowing general dental practitioners to manage retention and orthodontists unwilling to provide retention care indefinitely.