A comparison of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus reveals no clinical and epidemiological but molecular differences.

Most studies on Staphylococcus aureus have focused on the molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections. In contrast, little information is available regarding the molecular epidemiology of currently circulating methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates in hospital settings, an epoch when the epidemiology of S. aureus has undergone significant changes. We conducted a cross-sectional study to compare the clinical, epidemiological, and genetic characteristics of MSSA and MRSA isolates at 3 tertiary-care hospitals in Medellín, Colombia, from February 2008 to June 2010. The infections were classified according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions. Genotypic analysis included spa typing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and staphylococcal cassette chromosome (mec) (SCCmec) typing. A total of 810 patients was enrolled. One hundred infections (12.3%) were classified as community-associated (31 CA-MSSA, 69 CA-MRSA), 379 (46.8%) as healthcare-associated community-onset (136 HACO-MSSA, 243 HACO-MRSA), and 331 (40.9%) as healthcare-associated hospital-onset (104 HAHO-MSSA, 227 HAHO-MRSA). Genotype analyses showed a higher diversity and a more varied spa type repertoire in MSSA than in MRSA strains. Most of the clinical-epidemiological characteristics and risk factors evaluated did not allow for discriminating MRSA- from MSSA-infected patients. The lack of equivalence among the genetic backgrounds of the major MSSA and MRSA clones would suggest that the MRSA clones are imported instead of arising from successful MSSA clones. This study emphasizes the importance of local surveillance to create public awareness on the changing S. aureus epidemiology.

CC8 MRSA strains harboring SCCmec type IVc are predominant in Colombian hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports highlight the incursion of community-associated MRSA within healthcare settings. However, knowledge of this phenomenon remains limited in Latin America. The aim of this study was to evaluate the molecular epidemiology of MRSA in three tertiary-care hospitals in Medellín, Colombia. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from 2008-2010. MRSA infections were classified as either community-associated (CA-MRSA) or healthcare-associated (HA-MRSA), with HA-MRSA further classified as hospital-onset (HAHO-MRSA) or community-onset (HACO-MRSA) according to standard epidemiological definitions established by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Genotypic analysis included SCCmec typing, spa typing, PFGE and MLST. RESULTS: Out of 538 total MRSA isolates, 68 (12.6%) were defined as CA-MRSA, 243 (45.2%) as HACO-MRSA and 227 (42.2%) as HAHO-MRSA. The majority harbored SCCmec type IVc (306, 58.7%), followed by SCCmec type I (174, 33.4%). The prevalence of type IVc among CA-, HACO- and HAHO-MRSA isolates was 92.4%, 65.1% and 43.6%, respectively. From 2008 to 2010, the prevalence of type IVc-bearing strains increased significantly, from 50.0% to 68.2% (p = 0.004). Strains harboring SCCmec IVc were mainly associated with spa types t1610, t008 and t024 (MLST clonal complex 8), while PFGE confirmed that the t008 and t1610 strains were closely related to the USA300-0114 CA-MRSA clone. Notably, strains belonging to these three spa types exhibited high levels of tetracycline resistance (45.9%). CONCLUSION: CC8 MRSA strains harboring SCCmec type IVc are becoming predominant in Medellín hospitals, displacing previously reported CC5 HA-MRSA clones. Based on shared characteristics including SCCmec IVc, absence of the ACME element and tetracycline resistance, the USA300-related isolates in this study are most likely related to USA300-LV, the recently-described 'Latin American variant' of USA300.